Pro-life Texas pol accused of affair with stripper and paying for abortions — as she shares torrid Chuck E. Cheese claim
The woman, Alex Grace, who came forward in a video posted on the Current Revolt Substack. She alleged that Republican state Rep. Giovanni Capriglione paid for 'meetups' with her along with 'several abortions for his own personal gain' starting when she was just 18.
'I know that Giovannie Capriglione has been having affairs since 2005 because it's me. I'm her. I'm not proud of it, in fact I'm ashamed of it. Hopefully, you can keep in mind that we all have a past and I wish I could say for him that that was the worst of it, but it's not,' Grace alleged in a TikTok.
Advertisement
She alleged that the relationship turned sour after he began playing out his 'foul' fantasies — while he worked to 'erode away at women's rights.'
In one instance, he made her pick up cash near a dumpster behind a Chuck-E-Cheese, she says.
3 Texas Rep. Giovanni Capriglione has touted himself as a pro-lifer.
Aaron E. Martinez/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement
Capriglione, 52, dropped his reelection bid for his seat in the suburbs north of Fort Wort just three days before Grace's video surfaced — then came clean about the affair.
However, the pol — who hails from tony Southlake — denied paying for any abortions and vowed to pursue 'legal remedies' over her claims.
'Years ago, I selfishly had an affair. I'm not proud of this. Thank God my wife and family forgave me, and we moved past it and have the strong marriage we do today,' he said in a statement.
3 Alex Grace made the serious accusations in a video published just three days after he dropped his reelection bid.
TikTok / @alaskaunicornco
Advertisement
'I have never, nor would I ever, pay for an abortion,' he added.
On his campaign website, Giovanni touts himself as 'a pro-life leader with a 100% pro-life voting record,' who 'voted to defund Planned Parenthood and authored and passed numerous pro-life bills, including the Pro-Life Abortion Trigger Ban bill.'
The 'trigger ban' made performing abortions punishable by up to life in prison.
Advertisement
3 Capriglione poses with his wife in a candy store.
Facebook / Giovanni Capriglione
Grace said she was working as an 18-year-old exotic dancer when she first met Capriglione, who came into her club in 2004 and appeared to be 'a very straight-laced businessman,' according to the Texas Tribune.
Their relationship blossomed as Capriglione returned every few weeks, she said.
'We became close friends,' she said. 'He was magnetizing. He was outwardly genuine and kind. … He was the one who reminded me to keep my head up. He was the one that encouraged me. He pushed me to succeed more in life.'
They would first meet up at his office, before moving to hotels and later his home while his family was away, Grace alleged.
She claimed that Capriglione's wife even 'encouraged' the tryst.
'Stop feeling bad for his wife, she encouraged it. Quit assuming that every pregnancy that was terminated were mine, quit assuming I was the only one,' she said.
She said that she eventually had to break off their relationship, claiming, 'It was when his fantasies were so foul and seeing the political moves that he was making were continuing to erode away at women's rights… that was the catalyst for me taking the step back.'
Advertisement
Capriglione gave Grace 'gifts' and cash over the course of their relationship, she said.
Grace described one instance when Capriglione allegedly arranged to meet up at an address that turned out to be a Chuck E. Cheese, according to the Texas Tribune.
'He told me to go to the back of the building and next to the dumpster there would be a rubber mat. Look under it,' she recalls him telling her. 'And under this rubber mat was an envelope with money.'
Grace said the relationship started to fizzle out in 2012, when he was elected to the state legislature, according to the Texas news outlet.
Advertisement
Sometime between 2019 and 2020 the two had a phone call, where Grace shared her outrage with the lawmaker's views, she said.
She claimed that Capriglione hung up and the two never spoke again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Authoritarian threats to campus speech come from both abroad and at home
In 2015, a visiting scholar at Harvard Law School named Teng Biao scheduled a public event with another Chinese dissident that coincided with the visit by Harvard's president, Drew Gilpin Faust, to China. The law school's vice dean for international legal studies convinced Teng to cancel the panel to avoid 'embarrassing' the school and undermining its programs in China. In 2018, the debating union at Georgetown University's Qatar campus planned to discuss whether 'major religions should portray God as a woman.' Accused of 'insulting God,' the university canceled the event because it 'failed to follow the appropriate approval processes and created a risk to safety and security.' Administrators noted that the school encouraged 'civil dialogue that respects the laws of Qatar,' presumably including prohibitions of blasphemy. On March 25, masked federal agents surrounded and handcuffed Rumeysa Öztürk, a doctoral student at Tufts University and a Fulbright scholar from Turkey, on a street near her home outside Boston. They forced her into an unmarked car and shipped her to a detention center in Louisiana. Her apparent offense was co-authoring a pro-Palestinian opinion piece in a student newspaper. The federal judge who ordered her release declared that Öztürk's detention risked chilling 'the speech of the millions and millions of individuals in this country who are not citizens.' These three incidents reflect a disturbing trend in which university administrators seek to accommodate authoritarian regimes eager to silence critics, and the Trump administration works to suppress campus protests and criticism of its policies. In her new book 'Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech,' Sara McLaughlin, a senior scholar at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, paints a portrait of 'censors without borders' policing speech, while complicit universities, eager to profit from global partnerships and tuition-paying international students, turn a blind eye or, worse, self-censor to avoid alienating China and other authoritarian states. McLaughlin does a commendable job of calling attention to threats to freedom of expression across the globe, though, in our view, suppression of speech by foreign governments on U.S. campuses is not as pervasive a practice as she makes it appear. At least not yet. In 2023, students at George Washington University posted artwork mocking China's fitness to host the Olympics. When two Chinese student groups complained that the artwork 'insulted China,' the university president, Mark Wrighton, declared the postings unacceptable and agreed to investigate those responsible. After a public outcry, Wrighton apologized, terminated the investigation and declared his support for 'freedom of speech — even when it offends people.' McLaughlin finds it 'troubling that Wrighton's first instinct … was to promise censorship.' But she offers no evidence to support her assertion that the instinct to censor was 'shared by many university leaders.' Nor does she demonstrate that 'sensitivity exploitation' — using the desire to create a welcoming environment for all students to suppress criticism of a foreign government — is having a widespread impact on free speech. In a recent Gallup poll, 74 percent of college students said their institution was doing an excellent or good job of protecting unfettered expression, while only 5 percent believe it is doing a poor job. Of much greater concern is the ability of China and other authoritarian states to restrict the speech of their nationals abroad by threatening their families or, when they return home, their livelihoods or freedom. Universities 'want to reap the financial and reputational rewards' of bringing international students to their campuses, McLaughlin contends, but have failed to 'accept the [accompanying] responsibilities to free speech and academic freedom.' McLaughlin suggests as well that U.S. institutions that have relationships with authoritarian foreign partners often feel pressure to self-censor because 'that is how many university administrations operate: not as values-driven institutions, but as global corporations that must protect the bottom line.' Having 'reached the point where brand supersedes all else, and protecting image matters more than protecting values,' they continue operating campuses in countries 'conducting human rights violations their community members are not freely allowed to teach or discuss.' These broad-brush attacks are, alas, not accompanied by practical proposals for what universities can and should do. How might leaders of campuses in the U.S. 'stand by' international students when their families at home are threatened? How can they protect scholars who lose access to research materials or are denied visas for criticizing authoritarian regimes? Should they insist that the host countries of campuses they operate abroad respect American academic norms in their entirety if the cost is sharply limiting opportunities for their faculty and students, including individuals from the countries in which they operate? Or should they warn students and faculty of the likely constraints on expression and do what they can to minimize them, recognizing that their campuses will not be able to operate as freely abroad as they would at home? McLaughlin acknowledges that the extent of self-censorship by students, teachers and administrators 'is difficult to measure.' And that universities should not 'simply cut off engagement with unfree countries.' Instead, campuses established in authoritarian countries should 'carefully and thoughtfully tailor engagement to limit opportunities for rights violations and interference,' advise students and faculty of the challenges they face, make clear they oppose 'transnational repression' and educate students about how to protect themselves. Good advice, as far as it goes, though that is how most universities already operate. Sadly, the greatest threats to free speech and academic freedom on American university campuses may now be home-grown. Shortly after taking office, President Trump promised to deport 'all the resident aliens' who participated in pro-Palestinian protests. Secretary of State Marco Rubio boasted in March of revoking at least 300 visas of students and others whose activities 'are counter … to our foreign policy.' Last month, the State Department directed consular officials to screen the 'entire online presence' of foreign students seeking to study in the U.S. for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Red states, eager to amplify Trump administration policies, have adopted a host of educational gag orders restricting discussion of race, gender, sexual orientation and other 'divisive concepts.' Ohio, for example, limits discussion of ' controversial beliefs or policies,' including 'climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, immigration policy, marriage, or abortion.' And last month, a federal judge temporarily enjoined a Mississippi anti-DEI statute for 'possible widespread suppression of speech.' As McLaughlin recognizes, the 'fight against authoritarian influence' is 'a problem that cannot be 'solved,' only mitigated.' Given the Trump administration's approach to higher education, mitigation efforts should probably begin on American soil and with our own government.
American Military News
8 minutes ago
- American Military News
Video: Top Democrat senator falls during Senate floor vote
A new video shows a top Democrat senator falling on the Senate floor during a vote on Wednesday. The Democrat senator was quickly helped back to her feet by Republican senators in the chamber. In a Thursday video shared by The Blaze on X, formerly Twitter, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) can be seen falling to the ground of the Senate floor during a voting session. In the video, Warren appears to be trying to sit or lean on a desk before suddenly falling backwards, knocking over the desk, and falling on the ground. After Warren fell to the ground, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) quickly rushed over to help her. In the video, Cruz can be seen offering Warren a hand as she rose back up to her feet. The video also shows Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) walking over to the Democrat senator to potentially provide assistance. 🚨Elizabeth Warren just FELL on the Senate floor — TheBlaze (@theblaze) July 31, 2025 The Daily Caller reported that the Democrat senator did not appear to have suffered any harm from her fall on the Senate floor on Wednesday. The outlet noted that Warren's fall took place as the Senate was voting on a pair of resolutions that would have blocked U.S. military sales to Israel. READ MORE: Videos: Trump adviser collapses suddenly on stage According to The Hill, Wednesday's vote on the sale of U.S. weapons to Israel saw a record number of Democrat senators vote in favor of blocking weapon sales to Israel. The outlet noted that while the pair of resolutions brought by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) received record support from Democrats, the resolutions were opposed by every Republican senator as well as 20 Democrat senators. The Hill reported that the Senate voted 70-27 against a resolution Sanders brought to block $675 million in U.S. weapons sales to Israel, while the Senate voted 73-24 against a resolution that would have blocked the sale of tens of thousands of automatic rifles.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Doggett calls Texas redistricting map part of Trump plan to ‘win next year's election this year'
Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, criticized a new GOP-backed congressional map that targets Democratic districts in major Texas cities, saying it's part of Donald Trump's effort to secure more Republican seats ahead of the midterms.
