Brawl Erupts In Armenian Parliament As Government Cracks Down On Opponents
"I will voluntarily go to the Investigative Committee," he said.
This comes as Sargsyan faces prosecution for calling for ousting President Nikol Pashinyan as political tensions flared in the South Caucasus country.
Kristine Vardanyan, another opposition MP, claimed Sargsyan was attacked from behind by Vahe Galumyan, a lawmaker from the ruling Civil Contract party, while other lawmakers from the ruling party began to shout from their seats, after which they got up and attacked Sargsyan with their fists and also used slang expressions.
This's a video of a #fight btw pro-govt & opposition MPs in the #Armenia |n parliament. A MP from the ruling team, which zealously advocates reconciliation with #Turkey, suddenly called his opponent the Turk's son. They should decide whether this's a swear word or a compliment. pic.twitter.com/j5HOAM0DdX
— Karina Karapetyan (@KarinaKarapety8) July 8, 2025
The confrontation unfolded during a tense debate over stripping Sargsyan of parliamentary immunity. Armenian authorities have accused him of involvement in planning an armed coup, an allegation he firmly denies.
In his speech, Sargsyan said Armenia had become "a bastion of dictatorship" where "everything is decided in advance, written down, approved."
The incident underscores growing political tensions in Yerevan. Pashinyan's government has been cracking down on political opponents he has said are trying to engineer a coup. In a social media post Monday, Pashinyan said he would liberate the Armenian Apostolic Church from its "anti-Christian, adulterous, anti-national, anti-state" leadership.
Later in the session, the National Assembly voted to revoke parliamentary immunity for two key opposition figures: Seyran Ohanyan, leader of the "Armenia" faction and a former defence minister, and faction secretary Artsvik Minasyan. The vote also cleared the way for criminal proceedings against both.
A decision on whether to strip Sargsyan of immunity and authorise his detention was still pending as the special session continued. In contrast, no such detention motions were introduced for either Ohanyan or Minasyan.
As the National Assembly deputy speaker Ruben Rubinyan could not control the session, he declared a recess.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
10 hours ago
- India Today
Why Trump, Putin, and Xi All Want the Zangezur Corridor Now
In a mountainous corner of southern Armenia lies a stretch of land barely visible on most maps. Just 43 kilometres long, the proposed Zangezur Corridor could reshape the geopolitics of the South Caucasus—and beyond. Azerbaijan hails it as a vital link. Armenia sees it as a national threat. Turkey views it as the spine of a new Turkic superhighway, while Iran calls it a dagger at its northern The corridor would connect Azerbaijan to its exclave, Nakhchivan, and from there to Turkey—bypassing Armenia proper. It's an idea rooted in Soviet-era railways, but revived after Azerbaijan's military victory in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. The Russia-brokered ceasefire included vague language about reopening transport links. Baku interpreted this as a green light for term 'Zangezur Corridor' was first publicly invoked by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in 2021. Soon after, he warned that if Armenia refused, Azerbaijan would open the corridor 'by force.'Tensions rejects what it calls the 'corridor logic'—the notion that a foreign-controlled land route could be carved through its territory. Yerevan insists any trade route must fall fully under Armenian jurisdiction, with its customs, laws, and security in role is deeply entwined. Moscow helped broker the ceasefire and proposed that its FSB border service secure the corridor. This would deepen Russia's logistical footprint in the Caucasus—ensuring relevance even while distracted in Ukraine and reeling from meanwhile, has drawn a red line. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has stated that no corridor crossing Armenia should fall under foreign control, warning that such a project would sever Tehran's access to Yerevan and empower pan-Turkic influence along Iran's sensitive northwest already feels excluded from China's Belt and Road Initiative. Zangezur could be the final blow to its regional connectivity however, sees opportunity. The corridor would slot neatly into its evolving Middle Corridor—linking China to Europe through Central Asia, the Caspian, and the Caucasus. It's a faster, cheaper alternative to the northern route via Russia or the southern one through Iran. Geopolitically, it's less risky—and far more while regional players jostle, the United States is now re-entering the frame—with a striking new proposition under former President Donald Trump's foreign policy advisors are reportedly floating a bold plan: hand operational control of the corridor to a U.S.-based commercial logistics company. In this vision, American enterprise would act as a stabilising force—mirroring similar initiatives in Ukraine involving rare earth supply proposal serves several strategic goals:Cut Russian FSB oversight from the region,Sideline Iran from east-west logistics,Provide Armenia with security assurances,advertisementAnd entrench U.S. corporate influence in Eurasian essence, the Trump camp wants economic control to yield geopolitical leverage. But Armenian officials remain sceptical. For them, it's a sovereignty 2024, Yerevan tabled a 'Crossroads of Peace' plan—offering trade transit under full Armenian control. It includes customs checks, security guarantees, and open access, but firmly rejects the notion of warn that accepting 'foreign-managed' corridors—even symbolically—could set dangerous precedents, threatening national sovereignty and regional however, is watching with glee. Ankara sees Zangezur as the linchpin of a greater Turkic world—stretching from Istanbul to the Chinese Russia bogged down in Ukraine and Iran facing isolation, Turkey believes the time is ripe to assert leadership in the Caucasus. The corridor, from Ankara's perspective, is about more than trade. It's about identity, culture, and geopolitical talks continue. Armenia and Azerbaijan met in Kazan in late 2024 to discuss new terms. But so far, there is no final remains adamant. Iran remains opposed. Russia remains embedded. And Trump—though not in office—remains corridor is not merely theoretical. Skirmishes near Syunik, surveillance in Armenian villages, and increased military deployments all signal that the situation remains volatile. Human rights groups warn of displacement risks for local residents. Environmentalists highlight the ecological fragility of the Zangezur Mountains—home to endangered species and vital water these concerns, the corridor's economic promise is significant. If managed neutrally, institutions like the IMF and World Bank estimate it could raise regional GDP by up to 5% and slash freight times by nearly a third. For landlocked Armenia, it could be a rare chance to pivot from isolation to Washington, policy analysts see the Zangezur Corridor as a potential wedge—one that could weaken China's Belt and Road monopoly, dilute Russian control, and offer U.S. allies like Georgia a new economic Moscow sees it differently. Kremlin strategists fear that a U.S.-anchored corridor could bring NATO-aligned logistics infrastructure perilously close to Russia's southern Tehran, hawks warn that the corridor, if U.S.-backed, could serve as a containment tool—tightening a noose around Iran's vulnerable northwest, where millions of ethnic Azerbaijanis in Ankara, it's the foundation of a grand project: Pan-Turkic this is about far more than roads or railways. Zangezur has become a 21st-century crucible for power dusty Soviet maps to headlines in Washington, Zangezur now symbolises the struggle for control over the South Caucasus—and the shape of post-post-Cold War next chapter may be written by diplomats, business executives—or whoever controls Zangezur may well control the crossroads of Eurasia itself.- Ends
Indian Express
5 days ago
- Indian Express
Azerbaijan leader says he wants Russia to admit it accidentally shot down passenger plane killing 38
Ilham Aliyev, the president of Azerbaijan, on Saturday said he wanted Russia to publicly acknowledge that it had accidentally shot down an Azerbaijani passenger plane in December last year, killing 38 people on board, and to punish those responsible. President Vladimir Putin apologised at the time to Aliyev for what the Kremlin called a 'tragic incident' over Russia in which an Azerbaijan Airlines plane crashed after Russian air defences opened fire against Ukrainian drones. But he stopped short of saying Russia had shot down the aircraft. Aliyev, speaking at a news conference in the city of Khankendi during an event called The Global Media Forum, made clear that he wanted much more from Moscow whom he accused of inaction following the downing of the airliner. 'We know exactly what happened — and we can prove it. Moreover, we are confident that Russian officials also know what happened,' Aliyev said. 'The real question is: why didn't they do what any responsible neighbour should do?' He said Azerbaijan expected the incident to be formally acknowledged, for those responsible to be held accountable, for compensation to be paid to victims' families and those injured, and for Moscow to reimburse the cost of the destroyed aircraft. 'These are standard expectations within the framework of international law and good-neighbourly relations,' he said. Flight J2-8243, en route from Baku to the Chechen capital Grozny, crash-landed near Aktau in Kazakhstan after diverting from southern Russia, where Ukrainian drones were reported to be attacking several cities. Thirty-eight people were killed and 29 survived. Ties between Moscow and Baku have seriously deteriorated in recent months after Russian police detained a group of ethnic Azerbaijanis living in Russia and accused them of various historic crimes. Speaking at the same event, Aliyev said he wanted a transit corridor to be opened between Azerbaijan and its exclave of Nakhchivan that would run via Armenia. Aliyev said: 'We are talking about unimpeded state access from Azerbaijan to Azerbaijan. And we understand this literally — we are talking about a connection between parts of one country.' He said that, if and when it is set up, that Azerbaijani train passengers should not be exposed to physical danger from Armenian civilians whom he accused of throwing stones at such trains in the Soviet era and called for 'reliable and verifiable' security guarantees. 'This is an absolutely legal and fair demand,' Aliyev said. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on July 16 that the US had offered to manage the potential transport corridor. The potential corridor, which Baku is keen to secure, would run roughly 32 km (20 miles) through Armenia's southern Syunik province, linking the majority of Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan, an Azerbaijani exclave that borders Baku's ally Turkey. The transit link is one of several stumbling blocks to a peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia, neighbours in the South Caucasus region who have fought a series of wars since the late 1980s and remain arch rivals. The countries said in March they had finalised a draft peace deal, but the timeline for signing it remains uncertain.
NDTV
5 days ago
- NDTV
South Korea's Yoon Indicted On Additional Criminal Charges Over Martial Law
South Korea's ousted conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol was indicted Saturday on additional criminal charges related to his ill-fated imposition of martial law, about three months after he was formally thrown out of office. Yoon's additional indictments mean he will remain in jail for up to six months as he faces a trial at the Seoul Central District Court on his Dec. 3 martial law declaration that plunged South Korea into huge political turmoil. Yoon was sent back to prison last week after the Seoul court approved his arrest warrant requested by a team of investigators headed by independent counsel Cho Eun-suk. Cho's team indicted Yoon on abuse of power that obstructed the rights of some of his Cabinet members. The charge was imposed because Yoon summoned only select Cabinet members to approve his emergency martial law when South Korean law requires approval of all Cabinet members for such a measure, Park Ji-young, a senior investigator at Cho's team, told a briefing. Park said Yoon was also charged with fabricating an official document in an attempt to satisfy a formal requirement for a martial law declaration before he eventually destroyed it. State prosecutors have already indicted Yoon on other criminal charges including masterminding a rebellion, a grave charge whose conviction carries only two sentences - capital punishment or life imprisonment. After declaring martial law, Yoon sent troops and police officers to the opposition-controlled National Assembly, but enough lawmakers managed to enter an assembly chamber and voted down his decree, forcing his Cabinet to lift it. Yoon was later impeached by the assembly, with some of his ruling party lawmakers also voting to suspend his presidential powers. Yoon has argued his decree was a desperate attempt to draw public support of his fight against the "wickedness" of the main liberal opposition Democratic Party, which had obstructed his agenda, impeached top officials and slashed the government's budget bill. He earlier called the National Assembly "a den of criminals" and "anti-state forces." In January, Yoon was arrested by state prosecutors. But in March, he was released from prison after a judge at the Seoul district court canceled his arrest to allow him to stand trial without being held in custody. In April, the Constitutional Court formally dismissed Yoon as president, prompting a snap election to choose his successor. After winning that election, new President Lee Jae Myung, a former Democratic Party leader, approved legislation to launch independent investigations to uncover fuller details of Yoon's martial law stunt and delve into other criminal allegations involving his wife and administration. Lee named Cho an independent counsel to lead an investigation on Yoon's martial law decree. In May, state prosecutors indicted Yoon on charges of abusing power and forcing soldiers and police officers to try to seal the assembly and election offices, acts that are not part of their duties.
