Claim of assault in Torquay historic area planning row
Police said inquiries were ongoing after they were called to Meadfoot Sea Road in Torquay on 22 April following reports of a man being assaulted.Mr Redman said he raised his concerns about work going on because he believes the site is important to the culture and heritage of Torquay.The walled garden has been described by English Heritage as "an unusual survivor".Mr Redman said: "I crossed the road towards a group of people - one of those people came forwards in an aggressive manner, grabbed my mobile telephone, hit across my face, getting me into a headlock and was forcing me to the ground."Plans for nine apartments and two houses on the site were first submitted in July 2021 and refused in March 2022 and plans for seven apartments and two homes were refused in August 2023.
Planning permission was given in March 2024 for some demolition work, but when work began there were claims developers had carried out work outside of the agreed permissions.Torbay Council said there would be "no further work apart from minor repairs to protect the neighbouring building while we further investigate what has taken place".The council said it would now work to "consider the next steps under planning and environmental law, including the possibility of enforcement action to control activity at the site".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Sheffield behaviour order breached 990 times but no fines issued
A ban on city centre street drinking, begging and other anti-social behaviour in Sheffield was breached nearly 1,000 times in three Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) imposed in April means people caught committing offences within a designated area, such as urinating publicly, using drugs or loitering, could be fined up to £ City Council said early results on the order showed that supporting individuals' welfare had been the priority, as no fines had been issued despite 990 breaches by 219 Renshaw, CEO of the Archer Project homeless charity, said it was important that people who were homeless and affected by the order were offered meaningful support. "People within street homeless communities often have a set of multiple barriers to address," he said."Maintaining long-term support is important if we are going to see people's lives change."The council said that in 350 cases, the individual was offered advice or directed to support and welfare services. Drugs or alcohol were confiscated 99 than 30 individuals were referred to the "ASB harm reduction enforcement pathway meeting", where multiple agencies meet monthly to focus on people with complex needs who are repeatedly breaching the order. Mr Renshaw added: "I've spoken to people who felt they have been approached when they have been sat on the grass drinking and other people haven't."But the larger picture was that anti-social behaviour in the city centre was problematic, and the PSPO is helping to address that."Sixty-two of the 219 people who breached the order received notices of intended action, which the council said "emphasised a preventative approach", and showed officers had "prioritised offering support" rather than issuing Crossthorn, chair of communities at the council, said: "Hopefully in time we will see these behaviours reduced and people feeling safer."The PSPO is there to keep people safe. It will only be enforced if behaviour is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to others."It is great to see that officers are using their powers to offer support and intervention to those who need it."A report to Sheffield City Council in 2024 suggested the PSPO was needed due to "continuous and unreasonable" anti-social behaviour in parts of the city over two thirds of people surveyed and 67 out of 77 organisations supported it being introduced. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Mushroom lunch murderer Erin Patterson prevented from selling house by court order
The property at the centre of a deadly mushroom lunch has been restrained by the court after Erin Patterson was found guilty of triple murder. Victorian supreme court Justice Michelle Quigley granted the confiscation application over Patterson's Leongatha property on 23 July after a closed court hearing. A suppression over the restraining order was lifted at 5pm on Wednesday. Patterson was on 7 July found guilty of murdering her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. She was also found guilty of the attempted murder of Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson. The jury found she deliberately served the four people beef wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms at her Leongatha home on 29 July 29 2023. Patterson, 50, pleaded not guilty, claiming during her 11-week trial in Morwell that she did not intentionally poison her lunch guests. But 12 jurors returned the four guilty verdicts on 7 July after seven days of deliberations. On 16 July, the Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions made an application in the supreme court for the Leongatha property to be restrained under the confiscation act. The order was granted after a closed court hearing before Justice Quigley on 23 July. A spokesperson from the Office of Public Prosecutions confirmed the confiscation application was to prevent the property being sold or otherwise dealt with. 'This is to ensure that if any family members of Ms Patterson's victims apply for compensation or restitution, the property is available to satisfy any orders that are made by the court,' the OPP statement said. Patterson's lawyers have been approached for comment, while her ex-husband Simon declined a request. Patterson, who is facing the possibility of life behind bars, will return to court for a pre-sentence hearing later in 2025. After her sentence is handed down, she will have 28 days to file an appeal.
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Victorian Liberal deputy Sam Groth and wife threaten defamation and privacy action over News Corp stories
Victorian Liberal party deputy leader and former Australian tennis star, Sam Groth, has threatened legal action over News Corp stories which claimed Liberal colleagues of Groth's were querying how he began his relationship with his wife, Brittany, with his lawyers claiming the articles are worse than 'gutter journalism'. The legal letter from law firm Giles George alleges two articles in the Herald Sun and social media posts published this week constitute a serious invasion of Brittany Groth's privacy under new tort laws, which came into force last month. 'The article did not amount to 'news' and did not even have the 'character of news' – it was not 'journalistic material',' the letter from defamation lawyer Patrick George claimed. 'It was, at best, malicious gossip which was not even investigated ... It would be too kind to describe the article as 'gutter journalism' because it did not amount to 'journalism' at all.' The articles are likely to cause serious harm to the MP's reputation,, the letter said. According to the letter the articles were also published by the Courier Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the Mercury and promoted on News Corp's social media accounts, and were open for comments by members of the public. The Groths are demanding all the articles and posts be removed permanently by 5pm on Wednesday and the paper publish an apology, with the legal letter saying in part: 'On 29 July 2025, the Herald Sun published disgraceful gossip about Sam and Brittany Groth. The allegations that were published were defamatory, false and extremely improper – they should not have been published'. The letter also claims that the Groths intend to 'pursue legal action against your sources' and demands as 'a matter of urgency that the names of those sources be provided, along with the retention of 'all communications' with them. Sam Groth, said the publication was 'a shock and a disgrace'. 'It amounted to serious tortious conduct in relation to which we will pursue legal action if it cannot be resolved,' he said. 'It is shocking that a media company would behave this way in 2025 – taking away a woman's privacy and agency and causing her extreme distress as a mother. 'This is not just about us. It's about drawing a line in the sand and ensuring that publishers are not allowed to get away with defamation and the reckless harm it causes.' The article claimed unnamed 'Liberal colleagues' had raised concerns with Groth over when the couple's relationship began, as they feared the issue could be weaponised by their political opponents. The letter states 'we are instructed that no colleague, Liberal or otherwise, raised the matter with our client prior to your [reporter's] questions being sent … this was not an issue in the party room, or more broadly'. Asked about the report on Tuesday, the premier, Jacinta Allan, refused to comment, stating 'families shouldn't be dragged into politics'. The Victorian Liberal leader, Brad Battin, said 'any attempt to besmirch the relationship of Sam, Britt and their children is a disgrace'. Groth was elevated to deputy Liberal leader in December after a successful spill by Battin against then-leader, John Pesutto, who had lost a defamation case brought on by fellow Liberal MP, Moira Deeming. The editor of the Herald Sun, Sam Weir, declined to comment when approached by Guardian Australia but was quoted in the Herald Sun: 'We stand by our reporting on a matter of public interest, covering important issues which could have a major impact on Victorian politics in the lead-up to an election.'
