TSSAA Legislative Council denies one-time transfer proposal in Tennessee with 12-0 vote
A motion to deny was approved by a 12-0 vote in response to a proposal made by Baylor School in Chattanooga.
The TSSAA has been under pressure from Tennessee lawmakers to change its long-standing transfer rule, which required athletes who leave one school for another in a different zone to be ineligible for one calendar year from their last varsity game unless they have a bona fide change of address. The proposal would have allowed no more than one transfer without residency requirements.
Rep. Scott Cepicky, R-Culleoka, proposed House Bill No. 0025 in December, which would change TSSAA transfer rules to allow athletes one free transfer without eligibility restrictions. The bill's language was more direct than previous legislation aimed at the TSSAA's transfer regulations, and it has Senate sponsorship.
Also, Tennessee Republican lawmakers last week gave final approval to a $447 million statewide publicly funded school voucher program, which will offer 20,000 scholarships of about $7,300 to Tennessee students. The school-choice philosophy behind vouchers and the TSSAA's previous transfer rules were not aligned. The association's restrictions might have deterred athletes from accepting a voucher if they could not gain immediate eligibility at another school.
More: NFHS announces high school football rule changes, including electronic communication
More: What are the Nashville area's best TSSAA basketball gymnasiums? We narrowed it to 15
Tennessee's current voucher program encompasses 2,095 students from three counties who can receive taxpayer funding to attend private schools. Those transfer requests are processed under the current TSSAA rules.
According to a TSSAA poll, a little more than half its member schools said they didn't want to amend transfer rules. Baylor, whose rule proposal for a one-time transfer was tabled by the Council in December, stated in its proposal that the change became necessary as a result of the TSSAA Legislative Council amending its amateur rule to allow NIL payments in 2023.
'That acknowledged the commercial interests of high school athletes,' Baylor stated as its rationale in the proposal. 'Continuing to enforce the existing transfer rules that restrict the value of a high school athlete is and will continue to be under antitrust scrutiny as the TSSAA is the lone body in which a high school athlete can compete in the state of Tennessee. The threat of possible litigation from affected families towards the TSSAA, and/or its member schools warrants significant change to the current transfer rules.'
The Legislative Council also unanimously denied a proposal from St. Andrew's - Sewanee that would have loosened transfer rules. It proposed that students transferring for academic reasons can retain varsity eligibility if their previous school could confirm the move was academic and unrelated to sports. Principals at schools on both sides of the transfer would have had to agree to that.
The Council also denied a proposal, 11-1, from McCallie that would have lessened the competitive advantage boarding schools have over others. McCallie proposed to put a limit on the number of boarding school students who can compete on athletic teams. The proposal also stipulated that students transferring from inside Tennessee to a boarding school after ninth grade would be ineligible for a year. Transfers from beyond Tennessee would be immediately eligible unless they're seniors.
Reach sports writer Tyler Palmateer at tpalmateer@tennessean.com and on the X platform, formerly Twitter, @tpalmateer83.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TSSAA one-time transfer proposal in Tennessee denied in 12-0 vote
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall
LINCOLN, Nebraska —Nebraska was anything but nice. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Nebraska) faced about 750 voters during a contentious town hall here on Monday night. The two-term Republican lawmaker was there to explain his vote for President Donald Trump's signature achievement: the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that extended the 2017 tax cuts and plowed billions into immigration enforcement while slashing health care and food programs for the poor.


Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Advertisement A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Advertisement Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamor for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.