Sidmouth coastal defence work pushed back to 2027
The start date for a £21m coastal defence scheme has been pushed back to 2027 due to "various delays", a council has said.East Devon District Council said the project would help protect Sidmouth town and seafront from flooding and erosion for the next 100 years.The project was originally due to begin this year but the council said "a number of factors" had caused delays, including discussions around planning and "various delays due to contractor and staff resources". Councillor Geoff Jung, portfolio holder for coast, country and environment, said: "The team is confident that good planning and teamwork will ensure the project succeeds in protecting Sidmouth's coast."
He said they "recognise how important this coastal defence scheme is for the people of Sidmouth"."We're fully committed to moving ahead positively, and we're grateful for the continued support from our community, local councils, and partners," he added.The project, which includes the area between Jacob's Ladder and East Beach, was originally due to begin this year.In August 2024 the council announced delays, saying the project was due to begin in around two years' time.A tendering process is set to begin later in the summer, with the company chosen to carry out the work set to be appointed by the end of the year.Once the chosen contractor has been appointed, the project will move onto the design stage, with local residents and stakeholder groups consulted.East Devon Distict Council is working alongside Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Councils to form the South West Flood and Coastal (SWFC) team.A project board made up of representatives from the council, the Environment Agency and other key partners is also overseeing the delivery of the project and its funding.The council said the preferred option for the scheme, chosen following community consultation, is a hybrid one involving breakwaters and increasing the level of shingle on the beach, known as recharging.A "super groyne", which is a barrier going from the beach to the sea, is to be built on East beach or a possible offshore breakwater could be built, which would be designed specifically to retain shingle.
The new shared SWFC service would provide sufficient officer and specialist support to this important scheme moving forward, they added.They said plans for a splash wall, which is a secondary coastal defensive wall, was to be re-evaluated and re-considered, following further careful studies."This option will save money in the long run while protecting homes and businesses in the area from floods, risks of rising sea levels, impacts of climate change and erosion for years to come," they said.The project has been funded by the Environment Agency, local councils and community groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Young country diary: An explosion of emerald butterflies
It was late morning, and my family and I were walking along the coast of south Devon. The sun blazed in the clear sky, and a green carpet of grass was interspersed with violets, bluebells and sea campions. Seals basked in the morning sunshine below us and the occasional bloody-nosed beetle lumbered across the path. It wasn't long before we got our first glimpse of a green hairstreak butterfly. It had emerald wings and black and white antennae. It was so delicate, it looked as if it was made of porcelain. My mum said it was a rare sight, as she had only ever seen three before in her life and although they're widespread across Britain, they're hard to spot. Unfortunately, their population is declining, partly due to habitat loss. But further on, we saw another, its wings glinting in the sunlight and the flower it was perched on nodding gently in the breeze. We continued to see the green wonders darting about, occasionally settling on a clump of prickly gorse. By the end of the walk, my legs were burning from the steep ascent, and we had encountered perhaps about 50 of them. My mum said we probably wouldn't see anything like it again. They must have just hatched, because there were so many, and there was a lot of gorse around, which is one of their caterpillar food-plants. I wonder if, when we go back next year, we'll find some more of those magical creatures. Read today's other YCD, by Issy, 11: 'Looking into the big eyes of a brown hare' To submit an article for consideration in Young Country Diary, please fill out the form here (or, if that does not work, as has been the case recently, try the form here). The deadline for submissions is Monday 30 June
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Young country diary: Staring into the big eyes of a brown hare
Each time I see a brown hare, I'm usually in a car and worried it'll get knocked down, but recently I almost stood on one. I was walking through the grass in my wellies one morning when I saw a pair of big, brown eyes peering up at me. The body didn't move, and I've since found out that hares freeze when they sense danger. Its ears were long, velvety, folded straight down behind its head, reaching its bony shoulders. I couldn't see its legs but I knew they were strong and long … Suddenly it bolted, showing me just how fast its legs could go. I tried to chase it but couldn't keep up, not in wellies. They can reach up to 45 miles per hour. The long grass parted ahead of me as her body rocked like my old hobby horse, zig-zagging through the meadow. I wish I could have touched him or her. I bet its fur would be warm and silky against my hand. It ended up on the hill, its rounded back black against the sun and those ears, alert now, pointing like fingers to the sky. I think she was a doe (a female) as they are bigger than the bucks (the males) and sometimes punch them when they're angry, especially in breeding season from spring until summer. Yes, I think she's definitely a female and my new best 11 Read today's other YCD, by Joscelyn, 10: 'An explosion of emerald butterflies' To submit an article for consideration in Young Country Diary, please fill out the form here (or, if that does not work, as has been the case recently, try the form here). The deadline for submissions is Monday 30 June
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Network Rail ‘wrongly' felled 300 trees
'Cowboy' Network Rail workers unnecessarily felled more than 300 healthy trees in a valley in Derbyshire, an analysis of its own figures suggests. Dozens of contractors are accused of spoiling the area around the village of Higham, near the Peak District, by chopping down oak and ash trees during bird nesting season. According to a vegetation management plan outlined to residents, the government-controlled company – which is responsible for maintaining lines across Britain – was seeking to 'remove or reduce trees and vegetation that could disrupt railway operations '. It laid out plans to 'clear all vegetation within 6.5 metres of the tracks', removing 648 trees between the settlements of South Wingfield and Clay Cross. The company said it would 'prune or remove' any trees further away that 'posed a risk'. However, analysis by The Telegraph of the company's data found that 433 of the trees felled – more than two-thirds of the total – were more than 6.5 metres away from the line. Around 22 per cent of those trees would likely have needed felling under national guidelines for dealing with ash dieback disease, suggesting the remaining 336 were cut down unnecessarily. It comes after distraught residents accused Network Rail of a 'scorched earth operation' which had left the countryside stripped bare. People living nearby said they had woken to find stacked piles of trunks and branches – containing nests to which birds still returned – following overnight weekend works. Cllr Heather Liggett said it had devastated a unique area of greenery which had been untouched ever since the railway line was built in 1840. 'There seems to be one law for them and another for the rest of us,' she said. She pointed out how a local golf club was refused permission to trim back an overgrown footpath because it was bird nesting season, leaving members of the public at risk from golf balls. Branding the Network Rail workers 'cowboys', Cllr Liggett added: 'Where is the law when it comes to these people? The community has been treated diabolically. 'To go felling trees at midnight; you are not going to know what [birds are] nesting. It's deplorable.' Sarah McRow obtained the Network Rail data through a freedom of information (FOI) request and suspects it ploughed ahead with clearing the vegetation to ready the line for electrification. The 56-year-old, who co-owns a nearby alpaca farm, said: 'It's completely brazen. They are absolutely doing this to bypass all the stringent ecological rules if they went down the electrification line. 'They've just gone hell for leather to take as much down as they possibly can... everyone has kicked up a fuss. You can't stick a tree back up once it's been felled. It's just outrageous what they are doing.' A report from the Tree Council, a charity, found oak trees had been felled 'which could have been retained' in what it described as a 'slash and burn' approach. In Network Rail's FOI response, an unnamed senior engineer said: 'Through climate change, our weather is becoming more extreme every year and this risk is growing. 'Whilst the vegetation has grown in this location for some time, the year-on-year increased risk this creates means we must action. 'We acknowledge that it's not ideal to start this work in bird nesting season. However, if we were to wait, we'd have to carry more of the risks through another autumn and winter storm season, which isn't tolerable.' Network Rail did not explain why hundreds of trees more than 6.5 metres away had been chopped down. A spokesman said: 'We have received the Tree Council's report about our work in this area. 'We take their recommendations seriously. We will review their report thoroughly and develop a detailed response in due course.'
