
Crossbenchers call for federal intervention after ‘deeply shocking' revelations about prison deaths
A Guardian Australia investigation on Tuesday revealed that inaction to remove known hanging points from 19 prisons across the country had caused a shocking death toll, more than 30 years after state governments promised to make prisons safe in the wake of the Aboriginal deaths in custody royal commission.
In one case, 10 inmates hanged themselves from the same type of ligature point at Brisbane's Arthur Gorrie prison over almost 20 years, despite early warnings that it be immediately addressed.
Guardian Australia has spent five months investigating the deadly toll of Australia's inaction to remove hanging points from its jails, a key recommendation of the 1991 royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody.
The main finding – that 57 inmates died using known ligature points that had not been removed – was made possible by an exhaustive examination of coronial records relating to 248 hanging deaths spanning more than 20 years.
Reporters combed through large volumes of coronial records looking for instances where a hanging point had been used repeatedly in the same jail.
They counted any death that occurred after prison authorities were made aware of that particular hanging point. Warnings were made via a prior suicide or suicide attempt, advice from their own staff or recommendations from coroners and other independent bodies.
Guardian Australia also logged how many of the 57 inmates were deemed at risk of self-harm or had attempted suicide before they were sent into cells with known hanging points.
In adherence with best practice in reporting on this topic, Guardian Australia has avoided detailed descriptions of suicide. In some instances, so that the full ramifications of coronial recommendations can be understood, we have made the decision to identify types and locations of ligature points. We have done this only in instances where we feel the public interest in this information being available to readers is high.
In another, four inmates were able to hang themselves from the same hanging point at the Adelaide Remand Centre after the state government was explicitly warned to either remove it or minimise its risk. In many cases, prisoners who were known suicide risks – like Gavin Ellis, a beloved son whose mother still mourns his loss – were sent into cells with hanging points that had been used in prior deaths.
The revelations prompted immediate calls from crossbenchers for the Albanese government to show national leadership on the issue and pressure state governments to engage in reform of their justice and prison systems.
The independent senator David Pocock said the cases were 'deeply shocking' and highlight 'a widespread failure in our prison system'.
'I would support more federally coordinated action to better address these persistent failures, whether through a Senate inquiry or action by national cabinet,' he said.
The Greens justice spokesperson, David Shoebridge, said the 57 deaths showed Australia's prison system was 'fundamentally broken and killing people, even though governments have been on notice for decades'.
He said it was time for the federal government to intervene.
'Thirty-four years after the Royal Commission, First Nations people are still dying from government inaction and broken promises,' he said.
'It's impossible to imagine something more awful than families losing their loved ones because a hanging point, that the authorities knew had killed before, still hadn't been removed.'
The deaths disproportionately affected Indigenous Australians, who remain vastly overrepresented in the system. Seven Indigenous Australians hanged themselves in 2023-24, a number not recorded since 2000-01.
The independent senator Lidia Thorpe said Guardian Australia's findings revealed 'shocking negligence'. She said the federal government could not keep 'pretending this is just a state issue'.
'That's not only misleading – it's a shameful abdication of responsibility,' Thorpe said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The Prime Minister needs to show leadership. These are preventable deaths. This is life or death. And it's long past time for action.'
Thorpe called for the coronial system to be overhauled, and 'real accountability mechanisms' to be put in place. She also wants to see someone tasked with the responsibility of overseeing and driving the implementation of the royal commission recommendations.
'Thirty years after the Royal Commission, people are still dying in exactly the same way. Governments are sitting on their hands while our people die in these brutal facilities,' Thorpe said.
'Implementing the Royal Commission recommendations won't just help First Nations people – it will save lives across the entire prison system.'
The independent MP and former barrister Zali Steggall said the deaths represented a 'systemic human rights failure' that 'demands immediate action'.
'I call on the government for firm national leadership,' she said. 'There urgently needs to be commitment and a timeline for the implementation for reform and previous recommendation.
'It's been more than 30 years since the Royal Commission of Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and countless more inquiries, and little has changed. It's clear that a step change on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander policy is needed by the government who have done very little to push progress since the referendum.'
In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Steven May's three-game ban for brutal collision set to divide the AFL world
Debate is set to rage after Melbourne defender Steven May was handed a three-match ban for his devastating collision with an opponent that has divided the football world. May was found guilty of rough conduct at the AFL tribunal on Wednesday night for the collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. A biomechanics expert calculated May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that the premiership defender would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. 'The time available to him to perceive and react to a complex scenario is not sufficient for him to adapt and avoid contact,' AIS biomechanist Daniel Cottam said in his findings, not all of which could be submitted as evidence for the tribunal hearing. May argued he had little time to react, saying he was so sure he was going to get to the ball first that he was left shocked when Evans beat him to it during Saturday's game at the MCG. But AFL Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said May had ample time while running towards the ball to realise there was a big chance he wouldn't arrive there first and to come up with a contingency plan. 'The most he could have hoped was that he would arrive at about the same time as Evans,' Gleeson said. 'It was far more likely that he would reach the ball after Evans. 'As he gathered the ball, Evans had time to position his body just slightly so as to turn slightly away from May. This gives some indication that May had sufficient time to make some attempt to move his body in a way that minimised or avoided the impact limits. 'May made no attempt to change his path, his body position or his velocity at any time leading up to or in the contest.' Before the hearing, Carlton captain Patrick Cripps questioned how May could have approached things differently. 'I felt like both of them were trying to contest the ball,' Cripps told the On the Inside podcast. 'You never want to see a player get injured but I don't understand what we want players to do. 'If that's a grand final and [May] hesitates and Franky gets the ball, what do you do?' Sign up to From the Pocket: AFL Weekly Jonathan Horn brings expert analysis on the week's biggest AFL stories after newsletter promotion The decision to suspend May has set a strong precedent when it comes to players arriving at a loose ball within a split second of each other. He will miss games against St Kilda, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs. Meanwhile, Sydney defender Riak Andrew was handed a five-match suspension after being found guilty of using a homophobic slur while representing the Swans' reserves team. First-year player Andrew, the younger brother of Gold Coast star Mac Andrew, used the slur during the Swans' VFL clash with North Melbourne on Saturday. The AFL integrity unit investigated the matter after a North Melbourne player informed an umpire about it during the match. The investigation found that Andrew used a highly offensive homophobic slur towards a North Melbourne opponent. 'In the course of the investigation, Andrew made full admissions and was remorseful and apologetic,' the AFL said in a statement.


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese government plotted to maintain native forest logging in NSW if court battle was lost, documents show
The Albanese government was so worried a court case could halt native forest logging in northern New South Wales that it drew up plans to essentially sidestep federal environment laws in the event of a loss, documents released under freedom of information laws (FoI) reveal. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, played a key role as the commonwealth and NSW governments worked to ensure some logging could continue in the face of any 'adverse decision' and to manage a potentially volatile situation between loggers and environmentalists. In the end, the planning wasn't needed, because the government won the case. Justice Melissa Perry ruled in the federal court in 2024 that the north-east regional forest agreement (RFA) was legitimate, despite the fact it was amended in 2018 without fresh scientific studies regarding the impact on threatened species. The initial 20-year RFA between the commonwealth and the state of NSW commenced in 2000. Shortly before it was due to expire, it was varied and extended for at least a further 20 years. The North East Forest Alliance conservation group challenged the 2018 north-east RFA on the grounds it was not a 'regional forest agreement' within the meaning of the RFA Act and therefore neither the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act nor the RFA Act applied 'to exempt forestry operations … from the approval processes'. The alliance argued the new agreement didn't properly assess 'environmental values' including old growth, wilderness, endangered species and world heritage values, along with 'principles of ecologically sustainable management'. If the federal and state governments had lost the court case, there could have been an immediate halt to logging in northern NSW forests and lengthy processes to assess areas one by one under the commonwealth's environment laws. The Albanese government was concerned such a decision could lead to environmentalists demanding an end to logging. The prime minister wrote to his environment and agriculture ministers in 2023 seeking updates on how to deal with any forestry shutdown, the FoI documents show. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Forestry Corp of NSW and other private forest owners would have been forced to put in approximately 1,700 applications to show their activities were consistent with federal environment laws. That process would have taken months. In July 2023, the then environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, and then agriculture minister, Murray Watt, wrote to Albanese stating: 'Thank you for your correspondence dated 23 May 2023, regarding forest management and seeking advice on strategy and preparedness to manage the impacts on communities if the federal court finds … that the north-east regional forest agreement as varied in 2018 is not a regional forest agreement for the purposes of the … Act.' The ministers, in their letter, said: 'While we await judgment, our departments have been working closely with the NSW government to consider implications for forestry operations in north-east NSW and options for government to prepare for and manage potential impacts of an adverse decision.' A separate ministerial briefing note to Plibersek in November 2023 states: 'This area is highly biologically diverse, supporting approximately 300 threatened species and approximately 22 endangered or critically endangered ecological communities listed as matters of national environmental significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Listed threatened species in the region include species that attract public attention and focus such as the Greater Glider, Swift Parrot and Koala.' The federal department of environment warned that the number of assessments needed if they lost the court case would be 'extremely high' and officers would need to be transferred from other sections to handle the workload. There would also be political and economic fallout for the government, the department warned in the briefing. 'Given the time required to complete environmental approval processes, we expect there will be sustained pressure over many months after the judgment to provide support to both the larger public and smaller private operators.' The environment law requirements would be seen as a barrier to the resumption of logging operations and could lead to calls for an industry transition package, the department said. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion One memo noted that the Victorian government had paid out $875m in industry support to close down its native timber industry. Bureaucrats also advised that 60% of NSW's high-grade sawlogs were coming from north-east forests and that this could leave NSW with a timber shortage. Another memo, also dated November 2023, explored several alternatives to keep the industry operating and effectively sidestep federal environment laws. The details were heavily redacted but included giving the state power to authorise logging under a special bilateral agreement between the federal government and NSW. A national interest exemption under the federal environment laws was also considered. This would have involved Forestry Corp applying to the federal environment minister and was seen as a possible short-term solution. Fast-track assessments were considered for Forestry Corp. This would still have taken six to nine months and there were concerns Forestry Corp lacked the scientific information about threatened species needed to quickly apply. There was also a suggestion Forestry Corp could 'self-assess' to determine any impacts of national environmental significance. The department was warned, however, that it could expect to receive complaints from environmentalists that Forestry Corp's activities were already breaching federal law. The Australian Conservation Foundation said the FoI documents showed that if the carve-out for native forest logging from federal environmental laws was to end, the environment department was prepared. 'For the sake of Australia's much-loved wildlife, we need to move to a post-RFA world,' the foundation's national biodiversity policy officer, Brendan Sydes, said. 'The environment minister, Murray Watt, should bring native forest logging under the national nature law as part of the reforms of the EPBC Act he's promised to introduce into parliament early next year. 'Failing to close the native forest logging loophole will mean threatened species like koalas and greater gliders continue to get pushed closer to extinction.'


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fraudster given a second chance with prison charity is jailed ... after she stole £300,000 from its coffers and boasted it was 'easy money'
A convicted fraudster who boasted that she made 'easy money' stealing from Lord Timpson's prison reform charity has been jailed. Samantha O'Sullivan was sentenced to more than three years for stealing over £307,000 from the Prison Reform Trust (PRT) after the charity, which prides itself in offering second chances, knowingly employed the convicted fraudster as head of finance and human resources. The organisation, which was then run by Lord Timpson before he became prisons minister, failed to notice missing money within weeks of promoting O'Sullivan, who duped bosses into signing off 171 fraudulent invoices and expenses so she could jet around the globe on holiday. Kingston Crown Court heard yesterday that the single mother lived an 'opulent lifestyle' for seven years, splashing out on five-star holidays to destinations including Cape Verde, Dubai, Lisbon, Barcelona and Split with the stolen cash. She plundered charity donations to pay for hotel stays, beauty salon treatments, designer clothes and rental properties. Meanwhile, the 57-year-old was celebrated by the charity as the very model of a reformed prisoner after claiming she had turned her life around. O'Sullivan had previously been jailed for theft in December 2013 after she preyed on the destitute during her role as deputy official receiver of Croydon, responsible for managing bankruptcy assets in the region. The then-civil servant stole £85,000 from those facing bankruptcy who had to sell their homes to pay back their debt, not knowing she was secretly pocketing their cheques under the counter to pay for lavish holidays. After her release from a year-long sentence, O'Sullivan got a job at the PRT in 2016 which had been prepared to overlook her conviction when it was portrayed as a one-off mistake in an otherwise unblemished 20-year financial career. Prosecutor Edward Franklin said O'Sullivan effectively almost doubled her salary by getting a total of 171 fraudulent invoices and fake expense claims paid into her bank accounts, which were signed off by unsuspecting bosses at a rate of one every other week. O'Sullivan duped Lord Timpson and trustees, including former Justice Secretary David Gauke and ex-Prisons and Probation Ombudsman Nigel Newcomen who were responsible for 'taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud', according to charity records. When she was eventually caught in an internal audit last year, O'Sullivan claimed it was 'easy money', according to a pre-sentence report. But yesterday she denied this, claiming she had only admitted the fraud was not sophisticated. Apologising for her 'horrible secret', she said: 'I'm ashamed and remorseful for what I have done.' O'Sullivan told the court she had been open about her past when she was employed, but found her role in the spotlight 'difficult'. She said: 'They gave me a chance and I did not set out to betray that trust that was given to me. 'I found the work was difficult, some people resented me, I was often under the spotlight as a reformed prisoner. 'I made terrible decision after terrible decision by somehow thinking I could make up for past mistakes by making new ones.' O'Sullivan claimed some of the cash was blown on her children's student rent, but when asked where the money had gone, she answered: 'I do not know.' Jailing her for three years and eight months, Judge Simon Heptonstall said O'Sullivan had a significant detrimental effect on the charity, with the missing money adding up to more than the organisation received in gifts and donations last year. 'These were treats for yourself and others, you took money away from a deserving charity,' he told O'Sullivan. 'It became a habit. You recognised it was something that was easy to do.' Pia Sinha, chief executive of the PRT, said: 'Miss O'Sullivan's actions represent an egregious breach of trust, which has been reflected in the sentence handed down today. 'Over the course of eight years, Miss O'Sullivan deliberately set out to defraud the charity of its funds, stealing money that was intended to support the 88,000 people in prison we serve. 'PRT has also reflected on the lessons it needs to learn from this sad episode. We continue to believe in giving people second chances, but this must always be done responsibly and with appropriate safeguards in place.'