
Starmer's disability benefit U-turn not enough, says rebel Labour whip
Sir Keir Starmer 's £3bn U-turn on his planned welfare cuts does not go far enough, a leading rebel who quit her frontbench job over the changes has warned.
The prime minister is still facing the prospect of around 50 Labour MPs voting against his welfare reforms, with former government whip Vicky Foxcroft among those calling for fresh concessions.
Ms Foxcroft dramatically quit this month in protest at the plans, saying she could not back cuts that will harm disabled people.
And, in an interview with The Guardian after Sir Keir's U-turn, she said it was 'good to hear that people won't be losing their benefits who are currently on them' but said there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement'.
She has not decided whether to back the government's plans on Tuesday, and around 50 Labour MPs are still expected to vote against the welfare shakeup even after the U-turn.
Labour whips have reportedly urged potential rebels to await the details of a review into personal independence payments (Pip), led by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, before rebelling against the government.
But one Labour MP said on Monday he will still oppose the measures even after Sir Keir's concessions.
Eltham and Chislehurst MP Clive Efford told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There are still £3.5 billion-worth of savings that are required in these measures and we don't yet know the poverty impact that they will have.'
Mr Efford said the rebellion was initially calling for more time to understand the impact of the changes, and warned against 'taking what I think is a leap in the dark'.
'There are choices that the Government can make here; there are other places it can go to identify the resources,' he added.
Meanwhile minister Jacqui Smith would not say what the consequences would be for those who do rebel on Tuesday. Baroness Smith said it is 'not constructive' to discuss potential punishments but that the government will 'keep talking, keep explaining the moves that the Government has already made to recognise some of the concerns'.
She told Times Radio: 'The way in which legislation goes through Parliament is it's always the case that you discuss the principles at second reading and I hope that all MPs will recognise the need for reform, and that's what this Bill is about.'
Rachael Maskell, one of the leading Labour rebels, told The Times: 'The whips have been effective at saying to colleagues they need to wait and see what the Timms review is going to achieve.
'I think personally it makes the bill even more difficult [to support], because it is a blank cheque now. I just think there are too many unanswered questions.'
As work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall prepares to outline the government's concessions in parliament on Monday, Sir Keir was said to be preparing further last-minute concessions to rebels.
Health secretary Wes Streeting on Sunday hinted further changes to the bill could be made. 'There is a review on Pip and we've got to listen,' he told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
He said the government is in a better position than last week, where defeat over the welfare changes looked all but certain, but would not say he is confident the bill will pass.
Ms Kendall on Sunday night said the government is reforming the welfare system so that it 'provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can'.
'Too often, disabled people feel trapped—worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on,' she said.
She added: 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it.'
As well as publishing the terms of reference for the Timms review on Monday, the government will also publish legislation offering benefit claimants a 'right to try' work. In a bid to encourage claimants into work, it will allow them to try jobs without the fear of losing their payments if it does not work out.
It comes after The Independent reported warnings that thousands of disabled women could find themselves trapped with abusers as a result of the government's upcoming welfare cuts.
Domestic violence charity Refuge and the Women's Budget Group (WBG) have issued a stark warning over the reforms, saying that in the long term, the cuts to vital funding for daily living costs for disabled people – which will impact all new claimants – will make it difficult for those at risk to flee abusive relationships.
Even with the concessions, the welfare cuts will be 'devastating for disabled women', WBG said, noting that disabled women are twice as likely to be victims of domestic abuse.
For many, PIP is the only income they receive, WBG warned, so not having access to this source of individual support elevates the risk of coercive control and makes it harder to escape abusive situations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
MPs demand ban on fundraisers' ‘misleading' tips
MPs are calling for a fresh crackdown on 'concealed tips' on charity fundraising platforms. Fundraising websites have been accused of steering donors into giving 'voluntary tips' of as much as 19pc – fees which are not shared with charities. One of those fundraisers, JustGiving, made £24m profit in 2023, up from an approximately £3.8m-a-year profit before it introduced the tip model, according to its company accounts. The platform said it has raised more than £7bn for charities and good causes since it was founded in 2000. Labour MP Jo Platt, member of the culture, media and sport committee, said: 'Fundraising platforms play an important role in facilitating giving. But concealed tipping options and hidden charges are unnecessarily diverting money away from charities and misleading donors.' She joins several other MPs including Anneliese Dodds, Alex Sobel and Saqib Bhatti who have lodged Parliamentary Questions this year asking when the Government will address the issue. When donors use JustGiving, the online platform suggests a tip set to 19pc. The sliding scale, which allows the tip to be adjusted, cannot be set to zero. Instead, donors have to choose to input a custom amount, and set that to £0, to avoid making a 'voluntary tip'. It is possible to claim back the tip. The JustGiving website states that donors can contact its customer service team via email or an online form in order to ask for a refund. A survey of over 2,0000 people published this week by Strand Partners shows over three quarters of voters want the Government to address the issue. Two thirds said they wanted it to be easier to remove tip options when donating online. JustGiving deducts 1.9pc of donations, alongside a 30p payment processing fee. Charities using the platform can pay a monthly fee of either £15 or £39 plus VAT for an improved service, and the platform claims 5pc of Gift Aid refunds. After an automatic 5 per cent platform fee taken from donations was scrapped in 2019, the company's profits increased from around £3.8m a year to £19m. The company behind the platform, posted profits of £24m in 2022 and 2023. Other fundraising platforms make it easier not to add a tip to a donation. GoFundMe lets donors slide the scale to £0, rather than requiring a custom amount to be entered. A GoFundMe spokesman said: 'GoFundMe is the only major platform which processes Gift Aid for free and allows donors to move the voluntary contribution slider to zero per cent with one click. 'We encourage all other platforms to follow our lead and ensure donors can give safely without any nasty surprises.' A fundraising code of practice will be introduced from November 1 this year, overseen by the Fundraising Regulator, and will require platforms to be transparent about fees and 'tips', and to offer straightforward ways to remove the extra payments. A spokesman for JustGiving said: 'Following consultation with some of the UK's leading charities, in 2019 we moved to a voluntary contribution model, so that as much money as possible could go directly to charities and good causes. This is now standard practice across the industry. 'Today, anyone using our platform has the option to leave a tip on top of their donation to support the running of JustGiving, and this is not compulsory. 'When people do choose to add a tip, this goes towards investing in and maintaining the technology that helps our site continue to securely raise funds on a global scale 24/7.'


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judges rule against Palestinian human rights group's claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel
A Palestinian human rights group lost its legal challenge on Monday to the British government's decision to supply Israel with parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment. Al-Haq alleged that the U.K. broke domestic and international law and was complicit in atrocities against Palestinians by allowing essential components for the warplanes to be supplied to Israel. The government said the ruling showed it had rigorous export rules and it would continue to review its licensing agreements, a spokesperson said. The government last year suspended about 30 of 350 existing export licenses for equipment deemed to be for use in the conflict in Gaza because of a 'clear risk' the items could be used to violate international humanitarian law. Equipment included parts for helicopters and drones. But an exemption was made for some licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets, which are indirectly supplied to Israel through the global spare parts supply chain and have been linked to bombing the Gaza Strip. While Al-Haq argued the U.K. shouldn't continue to export parts through what they called a 'deliberate loophole' given the government's own assessment of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law, the government said the parts were distributed to a collaboration involving the U.S. and six other partners to produce the jets. Components manufactured in the U.K. are sent to assembly lines in the U.S., Italy and Japan that supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts, the court said. Two High Court judges ruled that the issue was one of national security because the parts were considered vital to the defense collaboration and the U.K.'s security and international peace. They said it wasn't up to the courts to tell the government to withdraw from the group because of the possibility the parts would be supplied to Israel and used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn wrote in a 72-page judgment. Al-Haq and the groups that supported it, including U.K.-based Global Legal Action Network, Amnesty International and Oxfam, described the ruling as a disappointing setback, but said they had already made significant gains in getting the government to suspend some arms exports to Israel and they vowed to continue pressing their case. 'Despite the outcome of today, this case has centered the voice of the Palestinian people and has rallied significant public support, and it is just the start," said Shawan Jabarin, general director of Al-Haq. 'We continue on all fronts in our work to defend our collective human values and work towards achieving justice for the Palestinians.' Compared with major arms suppliers such as the U.S. and Germany, British firms sell a relatively small amount of weapons and components to Israel. The Campaign Against Arms Trade nonprofit group estimates that the U.K. supplies about 15% of the components in the F-35 stealth combat aircraft, including its laser targeting system.


The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
Gloating migrants take selfies on packed dinghy headed for UK – as Labour slammed over ‘merry-go-round' deal with France
GLOATING migrants have been spotted snapping cheery selfies as they attempt to cross the Channel in a bid to enter the UK. The boat was seen setting out from Gravelines, France, today, June 30. 5 5 Pictures show one boat, laden to the brim with migrants, setting off from a beach in France as one of them snaps selfies. Images show the migrants decked out in bright orange lifejackets and holding floatation devices. One of the men on the dinghy, sitting near the front, can be seen snapping a selfie in celebration. He holds both hands in the air in joy as he and his mates set out across the Channel. Others on the boat can also be seen pumping their arms in the air as the dinghy sets off for Britain's shores. Some further back in the boat look to be waving for the celebratory snaps. PM Sir Keir Starmer has come under increasing pressure to turn the tide on a record year of small boats after promising to 'smash the gangs' in the election. It comes after Labour was slammed for signing up to a "migrant merry-go-round" with France. Ministers are expected to reach a 'one in, one-out' returns deal with the French in a bid to deter small boats. Undercover delivery driver investigation The deal was branded a "gimmick" by Tory Shadow Home Secretary Chris Phillip. Starmer has previously admitted that the small boats crisis was "deteriorating." Record numbers of migrants have crossed the channel under Labour's government. Many are now finding easy work and free accommodation once reaching the UK, incentivising others to follow. 5 5 5 A Sun investigation revealed how Channel migrants were picking up jobs as food delivery couriers earning up to £250 a week after arriving in the UK. The investigation showed how migrants across the country could work illegally from asylum hotels as fast-food delivery drivers within hours of arriving in Britain. Bosses of Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat were hauled in by the Home Office to discuss the issue. He purchased the login to the delivery app's service from a seller called Danyel. Small boat migrants get illegal £1k-a-week delivery rider jobs within HOURS of landing in UK By Thomas Godfrey CHANNEL migrants are working as fast-food delivery riders within hours of arriving in the UK while being housed and fed at taxpayer expense. They rake in nearly £1,000 a week operating from asylum accommodation, used as hubs for black-market work on apps like Deliveroo and Just Eat. Migrants in hotels are banned from working in any circumstances if they have been in Britain for less than 12 months. Even those here longer are not allowed to legally work as delivery drivers. But at hotels around the country, including in London, Bournemouth and Manchester — each one housing hundreds of asylum seekers — we snapped migrants in branded jackets for Deliveroo, JustEat and Uber Eats. Some rode £1,000 e-bikes while others used public-hire bicycles. Last night Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick said: 'This crucial Sun investigation reveals yet another appalling abuse of our immigration system. 'These delivery companies know exactly what they're doing. It's a disgrace and they need to be made to feel consequences.'