logo
Counter extremism leader warns of Gaza radicalisation

Counter extremism leader warns of Gaza radicalisation

The National18-02-2025
Live updates: Follow the latest on Israel-Gaza The West's response to the war in Gaza has caused a degree of anger that will inevitably lead to a rise in radicalisation among young Muslims, the UK's leading counter-extremism expert has warned. Dame Sara Khan told The National she had never known such hostility from Muslims, outraged that the western democracies they have embraced appear to have taken the rule of law 'with a pinch of salt' when it comes to the more than 48,000 Palestinians killed in the conflict. Israel's actions in Gaza, which countries such as the US, UK and Germany have failed to suppress, are 'going to have a consequence', she said. She said middle-class Muslims, such as her banker and lawyer friends, were incensed at 'how cheap Palestinian life seems to be' in the eyes of the West. 'In the case of Palestinian lives, these laws and rules don't seem to matter,' the UK's former commissioner for countering extremism said. This was deeply worrying for the majority of Britain's four million Muslims, she said. 'It's something new, I've really never seen that level of anger.' She said it was breeding "disillusionment' in western democracy and predicted it would cause 'a whole load of societal problems that are going to come down the pipeline very soon'. She is concerned for the younger generation who have seen the grim images from Gaza. 'This is a reality we will have to deal with in the next couple of years.' The UK is not prepared for that reality, she argued. Ms Khan was appointed the UK's first counter-extremism commissioner in 2018, carrying out a series of reports assessing the threat of extremism, and strategies and legislation to combat it. In 2021 she became the Independent Adviser for Social Cohesion and Resilience, publishing the Khan Review on how to build resilience against extremism. She held the posts until December last year. "The government doesn't even have a counter-extremism strategy and hasn't had one for four years,' she said. 'My last review also showed the lack of any strategic approach to protect and promote social cohesion.' That lack of vision alarms her due to the rise in extreme ideas and policies that have become so commonplace that they are now almost acceptable, she said. 'Some things that were first confined to the fringes are now much more mainstream. That accelerating and evolving extremism landscape is something the UK government, and I suspect a lot of other governments, are not really addressing because there's so much focus on terrorism.' Ms Khan, a senior adviser for Crest Advisory, a crime and justice specialist firm, accuses authorities of not paying enough attention to extremist organisations who fall just below the threshold to be proscribed as a terrorist organisation yet promote the same ideology. 'They're in effect allowed to operate with impunity, even though they are radicalising people,' she warned. "I did a review of the law four years ago with Sir Mark Rowley [now Metropolitan Police Commissioner], where we evidenced gaps in legislation which allowed extremists to operate freely. The government has still not closed this loophole." Among her concerns were Islamist extremist groups promoting 'the war on Islam conspiracy theory'. This flourished during the coronavirus pandemic, which she said 'without a doubt unleashed a whole wave of support for conspiracy theories'. The growing acceptance of such theories and disinformation was leading to an 'accelerated societal threat landscape' where trust and confidence in the police, media, government and the law was ebbing away. When that happens, 'people will then start looking towards authoritarian or alternative voices', she said, which has arguably already occurred in several European countries with the rise of the far right. Many of those right-wing parties – in Germany, Austria, Hungary and the Netherlands – are built on anti-immigrant messages predominantly and unashamedly against Muslims. The misinformation and distrust also contributed to the anti-immigration riots in Britain last summer, largely sparked on social media, particularly by far-right influencers. "Within hours these individuals spread the false claim that the Southport murderer was an illegal immigrant and Muslim, neither of which was true. Yet disturbingly, people were prepared to believe this – why? This demonstrates how, for some, the perception of Muslims is inherently negative." Even worse, she points out, is how recent YouGov polling shows that incorrect information has flourished. In August 2024, 11 per cent believed the killer of three girls in Southport was a Muslim despite it emerging he was from a Christian background. In January that figure rose to 24 per cent, demonstrating the dangerous nature of disinformation and conspiracy theories. "Truth becomes meaningless," she said. In her recent paper, labelled The New Extremism Landscape, the counter-extremism expert highlighted the growing numbers of believers of more outrageous ideas. For example, while 4 per cent of those who consumed news through traditional media believed in the Great Replacement Theory, which incorrectly states there is a plot for Muslims to replace Europeans through mass migration, that rose to 55 per cent for those who obtained their news from Telegram. As a mother of two teenage girls and a toddler, like many modern parents Ms Khan worries about the deeply corrosive element of social media. The problem, which she accuses the British government and other western states of not taking it seriously enough, is the damaging effect of malign online information, she said. 'Social media has been pivotal in spreading these conspiracy theories, and the speed and the scale in being able to reach people in a way that is just so toxic is unprecedented,' she said. 'It contributes to the erosion and undermining of democratic rights and that erosion of social cohesion certainly contributes to hate crime, and this erosion of social cohesion is exploited by extremists of all persuasions.' Ms Khan, who was made Dame of the British Empire (DBE) in 2022 for services to counter-extremism, argued that disinformation contributes to 'polarising societies and feeding division' and has in part led to the UK's 'chronic democratic decline'. While Ms Khan, who co-wrote The Battle for British Islam: Reclaiming Muslim Identity from Extremism, accepted there was legitimate debate to be had on immigration, she warned it was 'imperative on our politicians to talk about in a way that isn't using inflammatory, divisive language'. She lamented, too, that for a subsection of the British population, 'no matter how much' Muslims contribute to public life 'some will always view Muslims through a suspicious lens'. She said 'you can either flee and live in fear, or you can stand up and fight', which is a sentiment she urges her children to follow. 'Stand up, push back and fight for your equal rights as a British citizen of this country and our democracy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli settlers accused of killing 117 sheep in West Bank attack
Israeli settlers accused of killing 117 sheep in West Bank attack

Gulf Today

time32 minutes ago

  • Gulf Today

Israeli settlers accused of killing 117 sheep in West Bank attack

Palestinian Bedouins accused Israeli settlers on Friday of killing 117 sheep in an overnight attack and stealing hundreds of others in an apparent effort to chase farmers off their land in the occupied West Bank. The incident comes amid what the United Nations described this week as intensifying attacks by Jewish settlers and security forces against Palestinians in the West Bank and record mass displacements. The Israeli army did not respond to a request for comment about the mass slaughter of the animals belonging to the Arab Al Kaabaneh Bedouin community, in the Jordan Valley. Veterinarians were called in to treat a handful of sheep which had survived the knife and gun attack, some of the animals shaking uncontrollably and in apparent shock. A Palestinian checks wounded sheep after settlers attack a Bedouin community in the Jordan valley, in West Bank. Reuters Salem Salman Mujahed, a resident of Arab Al Kaabaneh, said multiple groups of settlers working in coordination had orchestrated the assault, and accused the army of standing by. "(Settlers) came near the houses. I asked them what are you doing here then we started fighting with each other," he said. "The army detained me, and they handcuffed me." He said other groups of settlers then attacked the sheep, which are vital to his community's survival. Reuters was unable to independently verify who was responsible for the attack. A Palestinian Bedouin walks in a community as an Israeli settlement stands in the back ground in the Jordan valley, West Bank. Reuters Palestinian Minister Moayad Shaaban condemned the incident, calling it part of a broader strategy to displace Palestinians from the region. "These sheep and animals were slaughtered and shot at," he told Reuters. "They are using these tools to terrify these people to leave these areas, which have been inhabited for dozens of years." MOVING AWAY The attack prompted at least one family to begin relocating. Bedouin Tareq Kaabaneh said he could no longer withstand what he called settler intimidation. "They were armed, they steal donkeys and sheep. In the night they come here and start shooting toward us," Kaabaneh said. "I am moving now from here, I want to protect my kids and my sheep, my livelihood ... yesterday I was safe, but I don't know what will happen to me tomorrow," he added. The United Nations reported this week that mass displacements in the West Bank had reached levels unprecedented since Israel first took military control of the territory nearly six decades ago. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva also said there had been 757 settler attacks on Palestinians or their properties since January - a 13% increase from the same period last year. At least 964 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces and settlers in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee demanded this week a full investigation into the killing of a Palestinian American who was beaten to death by settlers in the West Bank on July 11, describing it as a "criminal and terrorist act." The United Nations' highest court said last year that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories, including the West Bank, was illegal and should end as soon as possible. Reuters

Israeli settlers slaughter dozens of sheep in attack on Palestinian Bedouins
Israeli settlers slaughter dozens of sheep in attack on Palestinian Bedouins

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israeli settlers slaughter dozens of sheep in attack on Palestinian Bedouins

At dawn on Friday, groups of Israeli settlers slaughtered dozens of sheep and beat and stole several others in al-Miteh in the Jordan Valley, in the occupied West Bank. The attack forced two Palestinian families to evacuate their homes and relocate to al-Auja, near the city of Jericho. This incident is part of a growing pattern of settler violence targeting Bedouin communities, aimed at driving them from lands coveted by Israeli settlers. The settlers frequently attack livestock as a way to destroy the livelihood of Palestinian families and facilitate the seizure of their lands. Mahmoud Kaabneh, one of the residents forced to flee, told Middle East Eye that on Thursday evening, settlers attacked the home of his brother Salem and attempted to steal donkeys. When the family intervened to stop them, more settlers arrived and began assaulting the homes of Salem and his cousin Suleiman, along with their families. The settlers then opened the sheep pen and stole around 350 sheep. Residents quickly gathered to try to recover the livestock. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Israeli army was present with the settlers and did nothing," Kaabneh said. "But when the residents tried to rescue the livestock, the soldiers attacked the Palestinians instead and chased us down. They arrested 20 men and beat them severely for four hours." 'We were left with nothing' In the early morning hours, residents continued searching for their sheep and discovered that settlers had slaughtered dozens of them. "More than 100 sheep were killed - some slaughtered with knives, others beaten to death, and many left with deep wounds. Some of them were stolen," Kaabneh said. He added that a man from the area was hit on the head with an iron pipe while trying to fend off the settlers. When an ambulance arrived, Israeli soldiers detained him for hours at the Hamra checkpoint near Tubas, preventing him from being transported to hospital. Palestinians left 'without shelter and water' as settlers empty West Bank village Read More » Kaabneh and his brothers, who live nearby, were forced to leave their homes and leave the area after the attack - the fifth time they've been displaced due to settler violence. "We've been displaced since 13 October 2023,' he said. "Each time we're attacked, our children and women are beaten, our sheep stolen. Once, they took everything we owned - our homes, belongings - and we were left with nothing but the clothes on our backs." According to local residents, settler attacks are a near-daily occurrence in the area, but this latest assault was among the most violent, spreading fear among Bedouin families. Aref Daraghmeh, a local anti-settlement activist, said at least 30 Bedouin families have been forced to leave the Jordan Valley due to increased settler violence since the start of the war on Gaza, including 20 families in the past three months alone. Recently, settlers have begun a tactic known locally as flag-based settlement, in which they plant an Israeli flag near the tents of Palestinian residents. If the flag is disturbed or even blown over by the wind, settlers use it as a pretext to attack Palestinians. This tactic has terrified residents, Daraghmeh told MEE, adding that settlers have also been using tractors to ram into homes and animal shelters. "There is no one to protect the Palestinians here," Daraghmeh said. "The Israeli army is supporting the settlers in their attempt to completely evacuate the Jordan Valley of its residents."

'We have enough wars': Israeli experts doubt their country's strategy after bombing of Syria
'We have enough wars': Israeli experts doubt their country's strategy after bombing of Syria

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

'We have enough wars': Israeli experts doubt their country's strategy after bombing of Syria

Israeli experts, including a former government official, have questioned the rationale of the country's latest military intervention in Syria, warning it achieved little, risks a wider sectarian war and damages hopes of stability in Damascus. Israel's air strikes this week on Sweida in southern Syria, and the Defence Ministry building in central Damascus, followed days of violence between Druze, Bedouin tribes and pro-government forces that formed the latest challenge for President Ahmad Al Shara's government. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government justified its strikes on grounds that combine national security with protection of the Druze, a religious minority deeply embedded in both Syria and Israel, as well as Jordan and Lebanon. But the escalation to military action was unnecessary, some Israelis believe. 'Israel could have sent appeasing messages to Ahmad Al Shara, drafting a list of mutually agreed upon understandings and even delineating red lines, rather than bomb for no apparent reason and attaining nothing,' Alon Pinkas, a chief of staff to multiple former Israeli foreign ministers, told The National. The violence in Sweida began with skirmishes including an ambush by Bedouin gunmen on a truck and kidnappings by Druze militiamen. Syrian government forces intervened in an offensive in which more than 200 Druze, including civilians, have been killed. Scores of Bedouins and government security forces have also been killed, and civil society organisations have accused all sides of atrocities, including killings, torture, and degrading treatment. On Thursday, the UK-based Syrian Observatory of Human Rights monitoring group claimed a total of 594 people had been killed in the violence since Sunday. According to Israeli military officials, their country's strikes were designed to send messages to Mr Al Shara's government that Israel will act to defend a community that is kin to its own citizens. The Druze, whose faith emerged from a branch of Islam in the 11th century, number around 150,000 people in Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Many serve in the Israeli military, as well as in the cabinet and parliament. There are around 800,000 Druze registered as living in Syria, mostly in the southern Sweida governorate, bordering Jordan. 'The Druze leaders approached the leaders in Israel to support the Druze in Syria and take a position to save them from this tragedy and this situation that they are in,' Col Hamada Ganem, a Druze and a former commander of the Israeli military's Gaza Strip Northern Brigade, told The National. 'The goal here was to protect the Syrian Druze. There was no Israeli goal against the Syrian state.' Mr Netanyahu's government gave the green light for military intervention after pressure from Israel's Druze population to act, and the desire to portray a show of force, observers said. 'In Israel, there are always domestic considerations, political considerations,' Professor Eyal Zisser, Vice Rector of Tel Aviv University and an expert on Syria, told The National. 'The Druze community in Israel is putting pressure, on the one hand, and also, whenever you can show that you are strong, why not?' If Al Shara is a statesman, he must defend his people, especially the minorities - they are an indispensable part of Syria Col Hamada Ganem, Druze former Israeli military commander Doubts over Al Shara In interviews, Israeli officials and academics painted a picture of a deep uncertainty in the country over the willingness and ability of Mr Al Shara's government in Damascus to prevent violence or to enact the vision he claims to seek of an inclusive and stable Syria. Colonel Ganem accused Mr Al Shara of both unwillingness and inability to protect Syria's minorities. 'If he is a statesman, he must defend his people, especially the minorities – they are an indispensable part of Syria,' he said. In a speech on Thursday, Mr Al Shara said the Druze were 'a fundamental part of the fabric' of Syria, and rejected any attempt for them to be 'dragged' into the hands of what he called 'an external party'. Syria's government is, 'keen on holding accountable those who transgressed and abused our Druze people', he added. Within Israel, some support and see the logic behind military intervention in Syria. Since the fall of the Bashar Al Assad regime last December, Israel has encroached on territory in a UN-controlled buffer in the Golan Heights, a rocky plateau recognised by most of the international community as Syrian territory. It has carried out air strikes against what it says were remnants of the former regime's military infrastructure. The presence of radical Islamist fighters in Syria's new armed forces rings alarm bells for many Israelis. They include foreign militants, including ethnic Turkic Uighurs from the Turkistan Islamic Party, which aims to form an Islamic state in Central Asia. Israel wants demilitarisation of southern Syria to prevent groups it sees as a national security threat replacing the Iran-aligned militias who once held positions there. The Tehran-backed groups fled with the fall of the Assad regime. Search for stability Others, while wary of the Syrian government's lack of monopoly on force, raise concerns about the long-term impact of Israeli military intervention. 'Let's focus on the interests of everyone to have stability,' Prof Zisser said. 'That's the basic thing, and such actions are against the idea of having stability.' Israel's operations this week have sparked Syrian and international condemnation, and are widely seen as further destabilising an already fragile situation. The strikes killed and injured several civilians, said Federico Jachetti, the Norwegian Refugee Council's Syria country office director. 'The international community must make it clear that such actions are unacceptable, represent a violation of international law, and directly contribute to Syria's instability,' he said. Many Israelis caution against dragging the country into another war in Syria, or of exacerbating tensions within and between sects, when violations have been committed on all sides. I don't think we need to be on the side of anyone committing violations. I think we need to do everything we can to stop this. Dr Nir Boms, Israeli expert on Syria Hikmat Al Hijri, the main figure in a triumvirate that constitutes the Druze spiritual leadership, earlier this week called for 'international protection' from 'all countries'. Other Druze leaders have cautioned against such moves, fearing that it may undermine integration. 'There absolutely was a massacre, but it was not just a Druze massacre,' Dr Nir Boms, director of the Syria Forum at Tel Aviv University's Moshe Dayan Centre, told The National, of this week's violence. 'I don't think we need to be on the side of anyone committing violations. I think we need to do everything we can to stop this.' While maintaining that Israel's intervention saved Druze lives in Syria, he cautioned against more warfare. 'I think Israel saved Druze lives with what it did,' Mr Boms added. 'But I don't want to put Israel in the middle of a Syrian sectarian war. For heaven's sake, we have enough wars of our own.' Netanyahu's politics Some go further, believing that Israel's intentions in Syria are less related to security and more to Mr Netanyahu's desire to stay in power. 'Netanyahu is infatuated with his 'wartime prime ministership' and believes that perpetuating the war − Gaza, Houthis, Iran and now Syria − shields him politically,' Mr Pinkas said. 'He deludes himself that he is actually remodelling the Middle East landscape solely through the use of military power.' Rather than manoeuvring among sects in Syria, Israel needs to support Mr Al Shara's stated aims to build an inclusive state that works for all its citizens, Mr Boms added. 'Israel actually has a vast interest in Ahmad Al Shara succeeding,' he said. 'A Syria that will be able to make peace from the inside will make peace from the outside.' Israel and the US have said they want Syria to join the Abraham Accords, a set of agreements that established diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab-majority countries. But such a move may face significant popular opposition, given the Israeli attacks on Syria in the past seven months. US pressure on Israel is the most likely deterrent to stop further military action in Syria, as President Donald Trump has lifted sanctions and appears charmed by Mr Al Shara, Prof Zisser said. 'Netanyahu does whatever Trump tells him to do,' he said. 'So, if this is an American dictate, it will happen.' Mr Netanyahu on Thursday framed the Israeli strikes as the catalyst for a ceasefire in Sweida. The cessation in hostilities came after US pressure for the fighting to end. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington had communicated with 'all parties' involved in the clashes in Syria and 'agreed on specific steps' to halt the violence. 'This will require all parties to deliver on the commitments they have made and this is what we fully expect them to do,' he wrote on X. For now, the future relationship between Israel and Syria remains unclear. One option is the return to a 1974 agreement between the two nations that saw the creation of a UN-patrolled buffer zone between armistice lines on the Golan Heights. But a complication is Israel's occupation of territory within that separation zone since the Assad regime fell. 'This government will not do it,' Mr Pinkas said. 'But before anything can be considered it remains to be seen how Al Shara consolidates power and extends sovereignty. Only then will Israel conceivably return to the 1974 armistice lines.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store