Delhi High Court dismisses Jacqueline Fernandez plea in money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar
Jacqueline Fernandez
,
Delhi High Court
on Thursday dismissed her plea to end criminal proceedings in a Rs 200-crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar, currently imprisoned for fraud.
Justice Anish Dayal dismissed the plea that also sought to quash the chargesheet by the
Enforcement Directorate
and proceedings pending before the special court under the stringent Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against her and others.
A copy of the detailed judgment is awaited.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Fernandez had challenged ED's case against her over allegations she received lavish gifts from Chandrasekhar and was part of alleged money laundering.
She appeared before ED for questioning in the investigation launched after Delhi Police booked Chandrasekhar for extortion and cheating Aditi Singh, wife of former Ranbaxy promoter Shivinder Singh, of Rs 200 crore. While police investigated Chandrasekhar's activities of alleged extortion and fraud from inside jail, ED named Fernandez as an accused in the money laundering probe.
In her defence, the actor contended that if as per ED's claims, money was distributed among other individuals too, then everyone involved, be it a grocery vendor, court officials or lawyers, could be deemed guilty of money laundering.
She questioned the premise that any financial transaction involving a criminal automatically constitutes money laundering, suggesting such an interpretation would create undue fear.
The actor said that she was an innocent victim of Chandrasekhar's "maliciously targeted attack". "There is absolutely no indication she had any involvement whatsoever in aiding him to launder his purportedly ill-gotten wealth.
Hence, she cannot be prosecuted for the offences under sections 3 and 4 of PMLA," her plea said.
However, ED opposed any relief, submitting Fernandez continued to enjoy Chandrasekhar's gifts despite being aware of his criminal antecedents. The agency also pointed out a special court took cognisance of the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) and prima facie found a case. The cognisance order was not challenged, ED said, adding there are other ongoing investigations against Chandrasekhar across the country.
Chandrasekhar and his wife Leena Paulose, facing proceedings in a money laundering case of ED, were arrested by Delhi Police, which invoked MCOCA. The duo allegedly used hawala routes and created shell companies along with other accused persons to park the money earned as proceeds of the crime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Rs 7.5 crore Ferrari ride comes to grinding halt in Bengaluru over tax evasion
Sometimes a fast ride leads straight to a parking spot you didn't ask for. A luxury Ferrari worth Rs 7.5 crore was seized by Bengaluru Road Transport Office (RTO) personnel after its owner was driving the supercar in the city, while having it registered in owner paid only Rs 20 lakh in road tax for the high-end sports car in the registered state, while in Karnataka the applicable tax would come to Rs 1.4 crore – a difference that caught the attention of officials intercepted the Ferrari near Lalbagh on Thursday morning. In an unusual move, after preliminary action, they transported the vehicle to the owner's residence and parked it in front of the property under official watch. Authorities gave the owner until Thursday evening to produce proper documents and clear the outstanding taxes. Failure to comply means the vehicle will be formally seized and legal action will follow under the Motor Vehicles owner is said to have paid Rs 1,41,59,041 and got the vehicle road tax system is among the highest in India. The state calculates road tax based on seating capacity, engine cubic capacity, fuel type, cost, weight, usage purpose, and vehicle age. A four-wheeler can face tax rates anywhere between 13 and 93 percent based on cost and age, though electric vehicles get a break at just 4 is reportedly one of the largest single-vehicle tax recoveries in recent memory in the state. The transport department has made it clear they're not slowing down their crackdown on luxury vehicles operating without valid tax Ferrari owner joins a growing club of luxury car enthusiasts who learnt their lesson against tax evasion the hard way. Back in February, the transport department seized 30 luxury cars, including Ferraris, Porsches, BMWs, Audis, Aston Martins and Range Rovers for tax evasion, with over 40 RTO officers involved in the operation.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
ED raids 8 places in J'khand in money laundering case against Yogendra Sao
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted search and survey operations on Friday at eight locations in Jharkhand in connection with a money laundering investigation against former state minister Yogendra Sao, his family members, and associates. The raids have been underway since early morning in Jharkhand's Hazaribagh and Ranchi, based on an ongoing investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), official sources told ANI. The raid pertains to the "generation of substantial proceeds of crime through activities such as extortion, illegal sand mining, and land grabbing." Similar raids ED had conducted on March 12 last year at 20 locations in Ranchi and Hazaribagh related to Sao, Amba Prasad, MLA and their other family members and associates under the provisions of the PMLA in connection with a case related to criminal activities such as extortion, collection of levy, illegal sand mining and land grabbing. During the course of the search operation on March 12, 2024, an unexplained cash amount of approximately. Rs 35 lakhs, digital devices, fake stamps from circle offices and banks, and various incriminating documents, including handwritten receipts and diaries, were recovered and seized. Evidence related to illegal sand mining in the state of Jharkhand was also seized during the searches. "The proceeds of crime generated from such criminal activities have been identified to be acquired in cash and subsequently utilised for further business activities and for the purchase of several immovable properties," ED then said in a statement.
News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Lawyer Suspended For Two Years Over Fake Rs 80,000 Court Fee Charged From Client
Last Updated: The three-member disciplinary committee also directed the advocate to pay Rs 25,000 as costs to the complainant within a month of receiving the order. In a disciplinary action against professional misconduct, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) has suspended advocate Ranjeeta Vengurlekar from practising law for two years after finding her guilty of duping a client by charging a fictitious court fee of Rs 80,000. The three-member disciplinary committee — comprising Chairman Dr Uday Warunjikar and members Sangram Desai and Aniruddha Garge — also directed the advocate to pay Rs 25,000 as costs to the complainant within a month of receiving the order. The complaint was filed by Abhijeet Jagannath Zadokar, who alleged that Vengurlekar had taken Rs 80,000 from him under the pretext of paying court fees, but handed over a fraudulent receipt. He claimed that over time, he paid a total of Rs 1.5 lakh for legal services, and ultimately suffered financial losses to the tune of Rs 21 lakh due to the mishandling of his legal matter. The advocate denied all allegations, claiming that the money was partly her professional fee, and that the complainant had merely sought legal consultation from her office in Badlapur. She also denied any responsibility for the alleged financial losses suffered by the complainant. However, during the inquiry, the complainant stepped into the witness box and submitted detailed evidence, including WhatsApp exchanges and a Section 65B certificate authenticating the electronic records. The committee found that despite being served through post and even personally via messenger, neither Vengurlekar nor her lawyer appeared for the hearings after filing a brief written reply. The committee noted that the evidence submitted by the complainant had remained unchallenged throughout the proceedings, as the respondent failed to cross-examine or counter the claims. 'Bare perusal of the record goes to show that the complainant has proved his case about misconduct," the committee observed, holding that the receipt allegedly provided by the advocate for the Rs. 80,000 court fee was prima facie bogus. It added that although criminal action may also lie in such matters, the Bar Council's scope was limited to examining misconduct under Section 35 of the Advocates Act. The disciplinary body emphasized that while it was not passing any order on other prayers made by the complainant, it found sufficient grounds to impose a professional penalty. We are of the view that it would be appropriate to pass an order of suspension for period of two years, the order concluded. First Published:
