Queensland lion attack: What we know so far
'The lady involved in the incident is still in a stable condition in hospital and is surrounded by members of our extended family,' the zoo posted late Monday afternoon.
'She has lost her arm. She is not an employee, a keeper or a zoo visitor. She is a much-loved member of the zoo owners' family.
'It has still not been possible to interview her to establish what led to this tragic incident.'
The woman was not in the enclosure with the lioness, the zoo said.
A Metro South Health Services spokeswoman said the woman remained in a stable condition on Monday.
The investigation
After closing on Sunday and Monday, the spokesperson said in a statement it would reopen from Tuesday.
Police and Workplace Health and Safety personnel arrived at the zoo on Sunday to begin investigations.
'The zoo is working with them to establish how this incident occurred, but the full details will not be known until our family member can be interviewed,' the Darling Downs Zoo spokesperson said.
Workplace Health and Safety Queensland said investigations were continuing on Monday, but could not provide more detail.
The zoo said it would not euthanise or otherwise punish the animal involved.
What is the Darling Downs Zoo
The Darling Downs Zoo is a two-hour drive from Brisbane, sitting 100 kilometres to the south-west. It is owned and managed by Stephanie and Steve Robinson, who purchased the 49-hectare property in 2001.
Locals from nearby communities in Allora and Clifton – which boast populations of about 1500 each – said the zoo was particularly popular with people from Toowoomba, the nearest major town that sits about 40 kilometres directly north of the zoo.
It has partnered with a number of local business and schools, who declined to comment.
The Robinsons moved their animal collection to the property in 2022 and began building the zoo. They opened the zoo in 2005, but ran successful breeding programs for years beforehand.
In recognition of its breeding programs working with vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered native species, which have been returned to the wild in partnership with release programs across the country, the Australian government listed the zoo as charity in June this year.
The zoo's big cats
The zoo houses several (asked for exact amount) big cats, including white and tawny African lions, tigers and leopards, and several species of small cats, such as cheetahs, caracals, and servals.
The cats are bred at the zoo, but its website says the animals in its breeding programs are not on display for visitors.
It began its lion breeding program in 1997, and its social media pages say managing director Steve Robinson has almost five decades of experience specifically dealing with African lions.
Some of the oldest lions at the zoo are almost 15 years old, which is approaching the natural lifespan of an African lion, but the oldest lion bred at the zoo is 24 years old, and now resides at the Mansfield Zoo, in north-eastern Victoria.
The zoo currently boasts a handful of cubs, including a set of female cubs born in mid-May and a male cub, Caesar, born in August last year.
Up-close encounters
The zoo offers several 'strictly monitored' close encounter experiences with the lions, tigers and leopards for $150 per person, which are used to help fund conservation programs.
Encounters are limited to four people per encounter, with two encounter offered per day. The zoo's website offers guests 'the thrill of a lifetime' with the opportunity to feed one of the zoo's big cats through the fence with tongs.
Guests are offered '15 minutes of big cat time', alongside educational talks and photo opportunities with all three big cat species.
Cubs are brought into the public-facing part of the zoo for tours at 10am each day.
A statement from the zoo on Sunday said the lion involved in the attack was not currently 'cubbing' – raising young – which can make big cats more aggressive.
How many big cats are in captivity in Queensland
We asked the Department of Primary Industries this very question.
Six hours later, the department provided a list of about 150 people and organisations with a current 'exhibited animal authority' that allows them to keep animals. There was no information regarding the actual animals.
If DPI knows, they aren't sharing.
Animal attacks at Queensland zoos
Last September, a 47-year-old Gold Coast tiger handler was mauled while she was walking the animal at Dreamworld, suffering serious lacerations and puncture wounds.
Also at Dreamworld, in 2011, a Bengal named Kato bit two Dreamworld tiger handlers – one in May and one in September.
Kato was transferred to Symbio Wildlife Park in NSW the following year, where he died in 2018 aged 16.
There were also a string of tiger-related injuries at Australia Zoo, on the Sunshine Coast, last decade.
In November 2013, 120-kilogram Sumatran tiger Ranu bit 33-year-old handler Dave Style on the neck and shoulder in front of horrified onlookers during a public show at the popular attraction, made famous by the late Steve Irwin.
The following July, another tiger, Juma, bit Australia Zoo handler Mark Turner on the calf during a routine walk.
And in 2016, Che Woolcott received deep scratches to his arm and head after Ranu swatted at him with his paw.
Monday's attack at Dreamworld came two days after a female pedestrian was taken to hospital with a potentially life-threatening injury after she was struck by a vehicle on the road approaching the theme park.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts
Qantas customers affected by the data hack could ultimately be entitled to compensation if the airline were found to have breached passenger privacy, experts say. A week after Qantas disclosed the loss of data of up to six million customers, consumer law experts say the airline could ultimately face penalties, if a series of conditions are met. Qantas detected unusual activity on a 'third-party platform' used by the airline's contact centre in Manila early last week, prompting an investigation, which determined customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and birthdates, as well as frequent flyer numbers had been accessed, through a third-party vendor to Qantas. The airline disclosed the breach, which has been suspected to be the work of a criminal cybergang called Scattered Spider. On Monday, Qantas said 'a potential cybercriminal has made contact' with the airline, saying it was 'working to validate' the communication. Cybersecurity officials fear the data could ultimately be used as ransom. Loading The uncertainty over the status of customer data highlights the volume of data held by Qantas. Maurice Blackburn class action lawyer Lizzie O'Shea, who specialises in privacy issues, said: 'Qantas is a holder of a very significant amount of consumer information, involving huge amounts of data that are used for all sorts of purposes, including profiling consumer behaviour.' Australian privacy law requires an entity to take reasonable steps to protect customers' information from misuse and unauthorised access.

Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts
Qantas customers affected by the data hack could ultimately be entitled to compensation if the airline were found to have breached passenger privacy, experts say. A week after Qantas disclosed the loss of data of up to six million customers, consumer law experts say the airline could ultimately face penalties, if a series of conditions are met. Qantas detected unusual activity on a 'third-party platform' used by the airline's contact centre in Manila early last week, prompting an investigation, which determined customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and birthdates, as well as frequent flyer numbers had been accessed, through a third-party vendor to Qantas. The airline disclosed the breach, which has been suspected to be the work of a criminal cybergang called Scattered Spider. On Monday, Qantas said 'a potential cybercriminal has made contact' with the airline, saying it was 'working to validate' the communication. Cybersecurity officials fear the data could ultimately be used as ransom. Loading The uncertainty over the status of customer data highlights the volume of data held by Qantas. Maurice Blackburn class action lawyer Lizzie O'Shea, who specialises in privacy issues, said: 'Qantas is a holder of a very significant amount of consumer information, involving huge amounts of data that are used for all sorts of purposes, including profiling consumer behaviour.' Australian privacy law requires an entity to take reasonable steps to protect customers' information from misuse and unauthorised access.


Perth Now
11 hours ago
- Perth Now
Radio presenter sues network over 2012 prank call gone wrong
An Australian radio host at the centre of a tragic prank call is suing Southern Cross Austereo over his treatment in the aftermath of the incident. Michael Christian was presenting radio show 2Day FM with Mel Greig in December 2012 when they made an on-air phone call to King Edward VII Hospital in London. At the time of the call, the then-Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton was in hospital being treated for hyperemesis gravidarum — — - severe morning sickness. Christian, who had only worked at 2Day FM for two days, alleges the radio show's production team had ordered him and Greig to impersonate King Charles and Queen Elizabeth II to get information about the Duchess' condition. Nurse Jacintha Saldanha answered the radio's call and, after falling for the hoax, transferred the radio hosts through to the Duchess' nurse. Saldanha was found dead five days later after taking her own life, leaving a note blaming the radio stunt and the hospital's handling of the situation for her death. Her tragic death led to widespread backlash against the radio hosts and broadcaster. Thirteen years after the incident, Christian has filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming the broadcaster failed to provide support when the prank spiralled into a global scandal. Nurse Jacintha Saldanha answered the radio station's prank call. Credit: Supplied According to court documents, Christian had been assured that Southern Cross Austereo would 'step in' if on-air content had crossed the line. His lawyers allege the company allowed him and co-host Greig to be 'left exposed to relentless public vitriol, harassment, and abuse, including death threats'. 'The radio presenters were left by SCA as the convenient fall guys and scapegoats for SCA management decisions and non-compliance'. The radio hosts behind the call, Mike Christian and Mel Greig, faced major backlash after Saldanha's death. Credit: Supplied Christian has also said that the prank breached the Australian Communication and Media Authority code of practice. Court documents say the delay in legal action being pursued was due to the broadcaster promising Christian that they would restore his reputation and rebuild his career. Christian's lawyers state the firm failed in this promise by not providing meaningful health support, not starting a public relations campaign to rebuild his brand, and failed to offer any opportunities or pay rises to reward his loyalty to the company. The legal action follows Christian being made redundant by SCA in February, which he alleges was not genuine as 'SCA still requires (his) former role to be performed'. Mike Christian filed the suit against SCA after his redundancy in February. Credit: Instagram / Michael Christian Michael Christian is seeking penalties, compensation for economic loss, and damages. Southern Cross Austereo has yet to respond to the lawsuit, which is awaiting a federal court date, but provided a short statement to media outlets regarding the case. 'As the matter is currently before the courts, and out of respect for the legal process and the privacy of those involved, it would be inappropriate for us to comment at this time,' a spokesperson for SCA said.