Italy's working age population set to shrink by one fifth, statistics agency says
Italy is battling with a falling birth rate and a shrinking population. Last year new births dropped to a record low of around 370,000, and the population fell by 37,000 to 58.93 million, continuing a decade-long trend.
In its latest demographic forecast, Istat predicted that the number of people in the 15-64 age group would fall from 37.4 million in 2024 to 29.7 million in 2050, with their share of the total resident population falling to 54.3% from 63.5%.
In the same period, the percentage of residents over the age of 65 is projected to rise to 34.6% of the total, from 24.3% currently, and the share of children up to the age of 14 to fall to 11.2% from 12.2%.
Italy's long-declining birth rate is considered a national emergency. But despite Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and her predecessors' pledges to tackle the issues, no one has so far been able to halt the drop.
Istat estimated on Monday that Italy's resident population would fall to 54.7 million by 2050, although it added that its forecast had a large margin of variability and uncertainty linked to migration trends.
In a report last year, Scope Ratings said Italy's demographics were the worst in Europe in terms of economic growth potential between 2023 and 2040, with a rapidly ageing population posing a threat to strained public finances.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Labour Has 'Disappointed' People While In Government, Reeves Admits
Save Rachel Reeves admits Labour has "disappointed" people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's going on with the Unilever share price?
The Unilever (LSE: ULVR) share price has barely budged after today's first-half results, with the stock market reacting with a familiar lack of excitement to another mixed update from the FTSE 100 giant. That feels par for the course. Unilever shares are down 5.8% over the last 12 months and 4.2% over five years. Not exactly thrilling for a business of this size and reputation. Personally, I'm relieved. I gave up on Unilever back in March and dropped the stock from my Self-Invested Personal Pension. Today's numbers haven't made me regret the move. Growth steady Unilever's headline numbers weren't awful. Underlying sales growth hit 3.4%, with a reasonable balance between price increases (1.9%) and volume gains (1.5%). That group isn't just passing costs onto shoppers but shifting more product too. Its personal care division led the way with 4.8% growth, while ice cream sales rose 5.9% ahead of November's planned demerger. Emerging market growth is expected to pick up speed in the second half, particularly in Asia. Developed markets performed better, with underlying sales up 4.3%. Gross margins climbed to a chunky 45.7%, helping fund increased brand and marketing investment. CEO Fernando Fernandez sounded bullish, with a focus on core brands and premium segments. But not everything was upbeat. Turnover fell 3.2% to €30.1bn year on year, hit by adverse currency moves and business disposals. Underlying operating profits slipped 4.8% to €5.8bn, with margins down 30 basis points to 19.3% Free cash flow halved to €1.1bn, hit by working capital demands and separation costs from the ice cream spin-off. Those aren't disasters, but they're not a reason for me to feel like I've missed out either. FTSE 100 farewell When I sold Unilever in March, I noted the shares had climbed just 10% over five years. That's a poor showing from a £109bn global consumer goods colossus. The company had seemed sprawling and unfocused, and even its plan to concentrate on 30 'Power Brands' hadn't fully convinced me. The shares have slipped since, yet the price-to-earnings ratio remains above the FTSE 100 average at 22.5. That's not unusual for the stock, and confirms its strong reputation among investors, but I'm not convinced it's justified by the growth outlook. The trailing dividend yield is 3.32%, which is fine but not standout. Analysts are more upbeat than I am. The 19 setting forecasts have produced a median share price growth forecast of 12.7% over the next year, lifting the stock from today's 4,467p to 5,038p. Forecasts aren't guarantees, of course. Better value elsewhere? Of 22 analysts, 14 rate it a Buy, five call it a Hold, and only three a Sell. I'm happy to be in the minority on this one. I have no regrets over selling Unilever, and no plans to buy. I don't think the growth outlook is strong enough or the dividend quite juicy enough to tempt me back in, given what's on offer elsewhere in the FTSE 100. That said, investors looking for a portfolio cornerstone or a little diversification might consider buying Unilever. It's a stable business, with a solid footprint in essential goods and long-term brand equity. But for my stocks and shares ISA, I'm currently chasing higher dividends or faster growth. And a bit more excitement. The post What's going on with the Unilever share price? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Unilever. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dmitry Medvedev: Russia's hawkish ex-president
Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, whose comments prompted US President Donald Trump to move two nuclear submarines, was once seen as a liberal reformer but has become one of the Kremlin's most prominent anti-Western hawks. The 59-year-old, who served as head of state between 2008 and 2012, sought "friendly" ties with Europe and the United States during his single term but faded into obscurity after handing the post back to President Vladimir Putin. Demoted to prime minister in 2012 and then made deputy head of Russia's security council in 2020 -- a largely advisory role -- Medvedev began espousing hardline views on social media shortly after Moscow launched its Ukraine offensive. In public statements since the conflict began he has described Westerners as "bastards and degenerates", declared that "Ukraine is, of course, Russia" and raised the possibility of using nuclear weapons against Russia's enemies. In June, after the US launched air strikes on nuclear facilities in Moscow-allied Iran, Medvedev suggested that "a number of countries" were willing to provide Tehran with nuclear warheads, prompting an angry Trump to accuse him of "casually" threatening a nuclear strike. On Thursday, Medvedev alluded to Moscow's semi-automatic "Dead Hand" nuclear arms control system in a Telegram post criticising Trump. Medvedev's critics have derided his posts as an attempt to retain political relevance in Russia's crowded elite circles, but Trump has taken the threats seriously. "Based on the highly provocative statements," Trump said Friday, "I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." - Tandem rule - Medvedev's often incendiary posts contrast sharply with his public image in office, when he declared Russia did not want confrontation with "any country" as part of his foreign policy doctrine. In 2010, he signed a nuclear arms reduction treaty with US President Barack Obama, while in 2011 he brought Russia into the World Trade Organisation after 18 years of negotiations. On his watch, Moscow also abstained in a key UN Security Council vote on Libya in 2011 that paved the way for a NATO-led military intervention, a decision Putin has relentlessly criticised since. But it was always clear who was the senior partner in a pairing dubbed Batman and Robin by a secret US cable. Medvedev's first act after winning a 2008 presidential election on the back of Putin's support was to appoint the Russian strongman as prime minister, giving Putin broad decision-making power. While some in the West greeted Medvedev's arrival, others saw him as simply a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. In 2008 Russia sent troops into Georgia, fracturing relations with the West, a decision that Medvedev insisted he made but that a top general claimed was planned by Putin before Medvedev was even inaugurated. His trademark modernisation programme was marked by bold statements but was also mercilessly mocked by commentators for being short on actions as Putin held real power. - Putin's protege - Medvedev, born in Putin's home town of Leningrad, owes his entire political career to the former KGB agent. Putin took his protege to Moscow after being appointed prime minister in 1999 and Medvedev rapidly rose to become chairman of gas giant Gazprom. He also served as chief of staff at the Kremlin and as first deputy prime minister. After taking office, he said Russia's economy had reached a "dead end" and required urgent reform. But cynics pointed out that such words counted for little when Russia was still dominated by Putin, and Medvedev himself played down the idea there was any radical difference in their visions. After championing anti-corruption measures while in office, Medvedev was himself accused of graft in 2017, when late opposition leader Alexei Navalny alleged he had built a luxury property empire using embezzled funds. Navalny was labelled an "extremist" by Russian authorities in 2021. While liberals and the West hoped Medvedev would reverse the increase in state control and erosion of civil liberties during Putin's previous rule, he showed little desire for a radical break with Putin's legacy. "Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin really is modern Russia's most popular, experienced and successful politician," Medvedev said during an attempt to explain why he was standing down in favour of Putin in 2012. bur/tw
