
What have Zambia's new cyber laws achieved so far? – DW – 07/07/2025
It has been almost three months since Zambia's president, Hakainde Hichilema, signed the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Acts of 2025 into law.
His supporters hailed the laws, calling them progressive, and said they would help fight digital crimes and improve national security.
But rights groups maintain the laws, especially the Cyber Crimes Act, are undemocratic, and stifle freedom of expression and speech.
The laws allow for the interception and surveillance of all electronic communications, including calls, emails, messages and streamed content. The Zambia Cyber Security Agency has been moved from an independent state agency and brought under the Office of the President.
Violating the laws also carries significant consequences: the legislation allows for the extradition of Zambians abroad, and stiff penalties, from fines to prison sentences — potentially two to 25 years — depending on the specific offense committed.
Mulambo Haimbe, Zambia's Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, said the legislation is meant to protect citizens online and not stifle fundamental freedoms.
"This conception that the cyber laws are perhaps meant to intrude, to go into your personal details in a willy-nilly fashion is not correct," he told journalists at a press briefing in Lusaka.
"It needs to be put in its proper context, contrary to the assertions that the government's intention is to intercept any of your communication and break into your gadget," he added.
Oliver Shalala Sepiso, a media consultant for the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND), also defended Zambia's new cyber laws — saying they are not about the surveillance of citizens but merely for digital or data protection.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
Given that the laws are meant to protect Zambians from digital crimes and identity theft while improving national security, their enactment on April 8 received surprisingly little fanfare. There was so little media coverage that most Zambians only learned about the new rules through an alert issued by the United States embassy in Lusaka, warning Zambians abroad about the intrusive nature of the legislation.
"Cyber legislation is needed to combat cybercrimes that are very rampant, like identity theft, and online fraud," Richard Mulonga, CEO of Bloggers of Zambia, told DW.
"There are some provisions that have the potential to restrict free expression, for example, assembly and association, and just broader digital rights."
Lungisani Zulu, President of the Law Association of Zambia, said his association will challenge the new law in court.
"Numerous provisions of the Act, which is now law, infringe upon the rights and freedoms of citizens, hinder a free press, and have the potential to undermine the cherished democracy in our country," Zulu said.
The new laws replace the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act of 2021, which was passed by former president, Edgar Lungu. Under these laws, Zambia police arrested Mbewe Sibajene in April 2024 for circulating satirical memes and videos mocking government officials and institutions. Police said the memes were abusive, defamatory, and aimed at inciting public disorder towards state institutions.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
Among the contentious provisions are laws that criminalize so-called false information, vague definitions of indecent content, and a lack of protection for journalists reporting on sensitive national issues.
The Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), a regional media watchdog in eight African countries, says the new law has already impacted journalists negatively.
"Journalists a living in fear because whenever they are doing their stories, they need to now do self-censorship because they don't know what is going to come out from what they are doing," Kennedy Mbulo, vice chairperson of MISA Zambia, told DW, "it has also impacted investigative journalism. You cannot record an individual because one day that could be used as evidence."
Tech savvy young Zambians are divided over the new cyber laws.
Kellys Mushota, a frequent social media user and youth member Zambia's Congress of Trade Unions, has noticed some changes online.
"The enactment of this law has seen some reduction in the number of harassment or even the way of harassment social media users engage in. However, there has also been a reduction of the will by people to speak freely on matters such as governance and politics," he told DW.
Kitwe-based 22-year-old researcher Joshua Seke says young people online are worried about their private conversations being intercepted by authorities.
"If you look at what young people are saying online, does it mean that now I can't laugh with my girl online? Is the government actually going to read everything that we do?" he asked.
Others, like 31-year-old Lusaka resident Mary Ndau, told DW that the laws would discourage online abuse.
"People will be doing the right thing online, they will not express bad behaviors or bully others online because they will be subjected to the law," she said.
As opposition leader, President Hichilema repeatedly criticized cyber laws, describing them as tools of government surveillance. Yet he has enacted arguably even stricter cybersecurity laws.
Kampala-based Edrine Wanyama of CIPESA (Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa), says cyber security legislation is not unique to Zambia, with neighbors South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Malawi also enacting cybersecurity laws.
"Countries tend to pick practices from one country, and apply in theirs," the lawyer told DW. "The whole virus keeps biting the rest of the continent, and these laws have been found to be effective for governments in checking on freedoms of expression, access to information, assembly and association in the online spaces."
The West Africa Media Foundation has also reported a rise in restrictive cyber laws infringing on freedom of expression and privacy in countries like Nigeria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Benin and Niger.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Turkey: Government silences last critical media outlets – DW – 07/09/2025
Over 95% of Turkish media are already considered pro-government. Now the regulatory authority has imposed a ten-day broadcasting ban on the two largest channels critical of the government. Turkey's freedom of expression and press freedom has been making headlines in Germany for years. The non-governmental organization Reporters Without Borders has ranked Turkey 159 out of 180 countries in its global press freedom index 2025. At the moment, officially "only" four people are in prison for their journalistic activities. While this marks a significant drop from a few years ago, the government is constantly finding new ways to suppress independent journalism. For example, passports of media professionals released from prison have been withheld so they are not able to leave the country. Foreign journalists are also unable to work freely in Turkey, as the arrest of Swedish journalist Kaj Joakim Medin shows. According to estimates by Reporters Without Borders and the International Press Institute (IPI), more than 95% of Turkish media are considered to be close to the government. This means that they are either directly or indirectly run by businesspeople loyal to the government. Observers report systematic interference in journalistic work. "The situation of media freedom in Turkey has been tense for 20 years," states Berk Esen, a political scientist at Sabanci University in Istanbul. The government's interventions have gradually worsened the situation. "The remaining mainstream broadcasters have been brought into line methodically over the past few years. What has remained is a handful of stations close to the opposition," says Esen. Now the political pressure has taken on a new form: Turkey's two largest TV stations critical of the government, Sözcü TV and Halk TV, will not be allowed to broadcast any programs for 10 days. The broadcasting ban came into force on Tuesday in accordance with a decision by the Radio and Television Supreme Council, or short, RTÜK. The decision was justified with the accusation of "incitement of the people". The ban of Halk TV is due to statements made by a studio guest on June 26. The guest had said: "Turkey is not becoming more religious, but more sectarian." In the case of Sözcü TV, RTÜK judged the live broadcast of the protests following the arrest of Istanbulmayor and presidential candidate Ekrem Imamoglu as "incitement to hatred and hostility," according to observers. Imamoglu has been in custody since March and is considered the most important opposition politician and a promising rival to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. "The government intended to quickly weaken the opposition by arresting Imamoglu. That didn't work, Imamoglu has even become more popular with the government's opponents. That is why the government is changing its strategy and increasing the pressure on other areas," analyzes Esen. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On Monday, one day before the ten-day broadcasting ban came into force, a court upheld the appeal by Halk TV's lawyers and suspended the enforcement for the time being. Nevertheless, the broadcasting bans are seen as a new escalation in the handling of press freedom. For the first time, two opposition broadcasters were silenced on the same day and for the same period of time. "With these punishments, RTÜK is trying to prevent the media from reporting on public affairs and suppress critical voices," the Turkish Journalists' Association, or TGC, stated. Also the deputy leader of the largest opposition party, Gökce Gökcen, expressed her outrage: "The broadcasting bans affect the very stations that have shown how unfounded the accusations against our local political representatives are. This is no coincidence. The fact that the [oppositional] Republican People's Party, or CHP, has become the strongest party in Turkey is being punished, and the press is being punished for reporting on it. In the end, the people themselves are being silenced." The CEO of Halk TV, Cafer Mahiroglu, warned that this step could be followed by the complete withdrawal of the broadcasting the European Parliament's rapporteur on Turkey, Nacho Sanchez Amor, wrote on X "I doubt even George Orwell could think of something like RTÜK! (...) Freedom of media speech are becoming a distant memory in Turkey. There is now a generation that never knew it and it's so sad." The consequences of those bans are also serious in economic terms. Without advertising revenue, opposition broadcasters are basically unable to survive. "Media that report critically on the government are put under pressure with broadcasting bans and fines and weakened economically," the Turkish Journalists' Association said. According to the Media and Legal Studies Association (MLSA), RTÜK imposed fines totaling 124 million Turkish lira (around €4m at the exchange rate at the time) between 1 January 2023 and 30 June 2024 and ordered broadcasts to be interrupted in 1357 cases. In the first half of 2023 alone, five opposition broadcasters were fined around 20 million Turkish lira (around €1.5 m at the time), while pro-government media remained virtually untouched. The TV bans hit Turkey at a politically tense time: the peace process with the PKK is causing controversy. Furthermore, numerous high-ranking oppositional CHP politicians are in custody. The former mayor of Izmir, Tunc Soyer, has been under arrest since the weekend. Turkey's third-largest city is considered a CHP stronghold and was previously one of the last major cities in which an opposition party had a majority. "The government currently wants to control rather than eliminate. Of course, this could change in the future," analyst Esen told DW, adding that despite the extremely tense situation, press freedom could continue to worsen. "We haven't hit rock bottom yet," he fears. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Taiwan launches record military drills amid China threats – DW – 07/09/2025
The 10-day drills aim to test Taiwan's response to a potential Chinese invasion, with the military, firefighters, police, and civil society all set to take part. Taiwanstarted its annual Han Kuang military exercise on Wednesday, aiming to test its defense capabilities against a possible attack from the Chinese mainland, with the maneuvers expected to last for 10 days. This is twice as long as the Han Kuang lasted in 2024 — making this year's drills largest and longest in Taiwan's history. China sees democratic Taiwan as a breakaway province and has not ruled out force to bring the island under its control, if necessary. Taiwan also plays a key role in Beijing's rivalry with the US, as Washington supports the self-ruled island's defense, including with weapons sales. Earlier this year, Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te defined China as a "foreign hostile force." Taiwan's Defense Ministry said that the latest drills started with exercises aimed at countering the activities of Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia vessels. The Chinese ships have been harassing Taiwanese vessels near offshore island groups close to China's coast. There is speculation that China might use such harassment as cover for an invasion of the island. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The drills also include supermarkets in Taiwan's cities. Supermarket staff will be tasked with guiding people to seek shelter when they hear air-raid sirens. The employees will also practice emergency response, including reassuring customers, delivering intelligence to authorities, as well as bandaging wounds in case of an attack. For the first time ever, officials also used mobile apps to stage urban resilience drills and test air raid evacuation procedures. A spokesman for China's Ministry of National Defense said "an attempt to seek independence by force can only result in a dead end." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Nigerians face new US visitor visa restrictions – DW – 07/09/2025
The US State Department has said it is going to issue single-entry three-month visas for Nigerians in non-immigrant and non-diplomatic categories, rolling back five-year multiple-entry visas. The US State Department has announced new visa rules for Nigerians wishing to travel to the US in the non-immigrant and non-diplomat categories. The US embassy in Nigeria posted to its website on July 8 that the US would issue single-entry visas with a three-month validity period. That rolls back the previous five-year multiple-entry visas that Nigerians enjoyed when it came to traveling to the US. US President Donald Trump has signed a directive banning the citizens of 12 countries, seven in Africa, from entering the US. A State Department memo from June indicated the US was considering a travel ban on 36 other countries, including Nigeria. That proposed, expanded, ban has not yet been officially announced. "We wish to underscore that as is standard globally, visa reciprocity is a continuous process and is subject to review and change at any time, such as increasing or decreasing permitted entries and duration of validity," the statement said. A Nigerian foreign ministry official told local media that Nigeria had no similar policy toward US citizens, according to Reuters news agency. Nigeria received nearly one-fifth of the non-immigrant visas issued by the US government in 2024 in Africa, according to the State Department. Meanwhile, President Trump is also hosting the leaders of five African nations — Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania and Senegal — to discuss commercial opportunities. Trump will host the leaders for a White House lunch, with closed-door meetings to follow through Friday. The Nigerian foreign minister last month warned that travel bans and tariffs could get in the way of potential trade deal with West Africa, particularly in the sectors of rare earth mineral and energy. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video