Jokowi suspects political motive behind diploma scandal, calls to impeach son Gibran
'My political instinct tells me these are attempts to damage or downgrade my political reputation,' the former president said on Monday (July 14), as quoted in a report on the Kompas TV website.
However, he said he was not bothered by the scandals: 'To me, it's nothing out of the ordinary.'
After stepping down at the end of his second and final term in October 2024, several public figures alleged that Jokowi's senior high school certificate and other academic diplomas were fake.
His accusers included Roy Suryo, a telematics expert and former youth and sports minister, and Rismon Sianipar, a digital forensics expert and lecturer at Mataram University, as well as individuals affiliated with a group called the Ulema and Activist Defenders Team (TPUA).
The fake diploma scandal resurfaced earlier this year while the former president was reportedly recovering from an illness at his home in Surakarta, Central Java, when a lawsuit was filed with the Surakarta District Court to challenge the documents' authenticity.
In response, Jokowi reported the plaintiffs to the Jakarta Police with reference to the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, in particular a provision on the distribution of electronic content that incites hate or hostility, or contains false information.
On Friday, the police announced a plan to open an investigation into four of the six defamation reports filed by Jokowi.
'It was concluded [that] we found indications of a criminal offence,' Jakarta Police spokesperson Sr Comr Ade Ary Syam Indradi said on July 11, as quoted by state news agency Antara.
Ade added that investigators might need to question Jokowi as the primary complainant, as well as other witnesses as the case developed.
The announcement prompted a response from Roy, who questioned the validity of the evidence used to open a formal police investigation, pointing out that copies of the diplomas under question would be inadmissible.
'Everyone knows that under the law, a photocopy [of a document] is not considered evidence,' he said on Monday, as quoted by Kompas TV.
'If it's only a copy, it is highly irregular for the investigation to proceed.'
The recent development marks an about-turn from a decision made earlier in May, when the National Police's Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim) dismissed the case after investigators deemed that Jokowi's diplomas were authentic.
The TPUA challenged that decision, however, and requested the police to review the case again.
The police granted the request and held a special case review last week, to which all plaintiffs were summoned to clarify the claims in their lawsuit.
Along with Roy and Rismon, the TPUA presented its analysis on a photograph of Jokowi's undergraduate diploma from Gadjah Mada University's Forestry Department at the centre of their legal challenge.
Although the plaintiffs have expressed confidence that the case would ultimately be brought to court despite denials from Jokowi's legal team, the Bareskrim has not released the outcome of its case review.
The Bareskrim review will not affect the Jakarta Police's investigation into the defamation complaint filed by Jokowi.
Around the same time, retired military officers grouped in the Indonesian Military Retirees Forum (FPPTNI) called on the legislature to impeach Gibran over a judicial ethics scandal linked to his vice presidential candidacy in the 2024 election.
In a letter submitted to the House of Representatives last month, the group asked lawmakers to begin the process of bringing charges against the Vice President, though the petition for impeachment has not been brought to a House plenary session as required under law.
Maj Gen (ret) Soenarko of the FPPTNI has dismissed Jokowi's claim that the group's petition to impeach his son was politically motivated.
'Our agenda is to safeguard Indonesia from irresponsible actors and nepotism,' he said on Tuesday, as quoted by Tempo.co. - The Jakarta Post/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Zelensky defends contested anti-corruption law changes
President Volodymyr Zelensky said defending Ukraine requires a strong enough law enforcement system. (EPA Images pic) KYIV : Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today defended legislative changes removing the independence of two key anti-corruption bodies, sparking the first major protests in Ukraine since the start of Russia's invasion. 'We all share a common enemy: the Russian occupiers,' Zelensky said after meeting with top law enforcement and anti-corruption officials. 'And defending the Ukrainian state requires a strong enough law enforcement system – one that ensures a real sense of justice,' he added. 'We all hear what society is saying,' he said, promising to 'resolve existing issues'. The bill would place the national anti-corruption bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor-general, who is appointed by the president. After meeting with Zelensky, NABU and SAPO repeated their criticism of the changes and said 'unambiguous legislative steps are required to reinstate the guarantees revoked by parliament'. Zelensky signed off on the widely criticised law yesterday, the same day it was passed by parliament. The law sparked the first major protest in Kyiv since Russian troops invaded in 2022, with over 1,000 people taking part. Large gatherings are banned under Ukraine's martial law. 'Serious step back' While the government says the law will make the anti-corruption agencies function better, its critics say it consolidates power in Zelensky's hands. They also argue it will allow government meddling in high-profile graft cases. The Anti-Corruption Action Center, an NGO, said the law would render the agencies meaningless as Zelensky's prosecutor-general would 'stop investigations into all of the president's friends'. The European Union called the decision a 'serious step back'. NABU began work in 2015, as Kyiv sought to bring the country closer to Europe after a 2014 pro-European revolution. Since its inception, the agency has uncovered widespread graft, including among figures in Zelensky's administration. On Monday, law enforcement conducted large-scale raids at NABU, detaining one employee on suspicion of spying for Russia. Transparency International's Ukraine office called the raids an 'attempt by the authorities to undermine the independence of Ukraine's post-revolution of dignity anti-corruption institutions'. Transparency International ranked Ukraine 105th out of 180 countries in its 'corruption perceptions index' in 2024, up from 144 in 2013. Supporters of the law warn that a political crisis over the legislation could work in Russia's favour by undermining unity in the country. Commenting on the protests at a briefing, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov today said there was 'a lot of corruption' in the country and the issue was 'a sensitive topic' for Ukraine.
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
File police, MACC reports over alleged threats, Kula tells Sabah graft whistleblower
KUALA LUMPUR: File a report with the police and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), government tells Sabah graft whistleblower. Deputy Minister at the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran said that the Madani government will not compromise with any intimidation. 'This matter has been raised by several MPs. This is a very serious allegation and completely unacceptable,' he said when winding up the debates on the Whistleblower Act (Amendment) in the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday (July 22). He added that any whistleblower who comes forward with information about any misconduct must not be silenced or threatened by any party. "Especially not by the authorities themselves. I would like to advise the individual named Albert Tei to immediately file a report with the police and the MACC complaints committee under Section 15 of the MACC Act 2009, naming the MACC officer involved in the allegation. 'I guarantee that the Madani government will not compromise with any intimidation if the allegation is true,' he said. Previously, Tei — who exposed a graft allegation in Sabah — allegedly was told by an MACC officer not to appear in public to avoid any problems.
The Star
18-07-2025
- The Star
Indonesia court jails former trade minister for four-and-a-half years in sugar graft case
Former trade minister Thomas Lembong was found guilty of improperly granting sugar import permits. -- PHOTO: REUTERS JAKARTA (Reuters): An Indonesian court on Friday sentenced a former trade minister to 4.5 years in jail for improperly granting sugar import permits that authorities said had caused nearly 600 billion rupiah (US$36.84 million) in state losses. Thomas Trikasih Lembong served as trade minister in 2015 and 2016 under President Joko "Jokowi" Widodo. Once seen as Jokowi's close aide, Lembong turned into one of the government's staunchest critics after leaving office. Judges at the corruption court in the capital Jakarta, said Lembong, as minister, was guilty of improperly granting import permits for sugar to private companies when the Southeast Asian country had a surplus of sugar. Indonesia's sugar output in 2015 was 2.49 million metric tons, while consumption was 2.12 million. In last year's presidential election, Lembong was the campaign manager for candidate Anies Baswedan. The election was won in a landslide by Prabowo Subianto, whom Jokowi backed. Lembong, who was arrested days after Prabowo's inauguration last year, had claimed in court that his prosecution was due to his involvement in the opposition camp, local media reported. Prosecutors had denied that his arrest was politically motivated. "The defendant was proven legally and convincingly to be guilty of having committed a corruption act," Judge Purwanto S. Abdullah said, to jeers from the crowd. Before handing down the sentence, the judges had argued that the import permits did not go through the proper procedures of consulting with other state bodies and that he had prioritised "capitalistic" interests over social justice. However, the judges said he did not enrich himself, leading to a shorter sentence than the seven years prosecutors had demanded. Prosecutors said Lembong had enriched the private companies. Holding up his handcuffed hands, Lembong told reporters after the sentencing that he would consider whether or not to appeal, saying judges had ignored his defence team. His lawyer Ari Yusuf Amir did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on Friday. ($1 = 16,285.0000 rupiah) (Reporting by Ananda Teresia and Stanley Widianto; Editing by Sharon Singleton) - Reuters
