logo
How to Watch One of the Most Dazzling Meteor Showers of the Year

How to Watch One of the Most Dazzling Meteor Showers of the Year

Gizmodo18 hours ago
Skywatchers are in for a treat: The Perseid meteor shower—one of the brightest and most active of the year—is about to hit its peak, according to the American Meteor Society.
The Perseids are an annual meteor shower that started in July, but astronomers expect the light show to be at its best between the evening hours of August 12 through to August 13. Famous for its typically high volume of swift, bright meteors, these burning space rocks leave long streaks of colorful light across the night sky in their wake, according to NASA. The Perseids' ability to produce fireballs is due to large chunks of material falling from the comet Swift-Tuttle as it makes its way around the Sun—every year Earth passes through the trail of debris and dust the comet leaves behind, and the interaction between that debris and our atmosphere is what causes the Perseids.
Under ideal conditions, the Perseid shower can produce 50 to 100 shooting stars per hour, the agency says. This year may be a little different, however, as a near-full Moon during those peak hours could make it especially difficult to see the Perseids in their full glory.
'​​In 2025, the waning gibbous moon will severely compromise this shower at the time of maximum activity,' the AMS states. 'Such conditions will reduce activity by at least 75 percent as only the brighter meteors will be visible.'
The August full Moon—also known as the Sturgeon Moon—rises on Saturday, August 9. That means that while it won't be completely full when the Perseids peak, it will still be bright enough to blot out some of the falling meteors. But there are things you can do to improve your chances of seeing some.
The number one rule of skywatching is to create the darkest conditions possible. You can't change the brightness of a near-full Moon, but you can take advantage of the shadows it casts, according to EarthSky. Instead of standing out in the open, choose a spot in the shadow of a tree or building—just make sure it doesn't obstruct your view. This will block out the moonlight and make it easier to spot shooting stars. It's also important to select a viewing location far from sources of light pollution. The more rural your spot, the more meteors you'll see. Looking at a smartphone, laptop, or tablet can affect your vision, too, so put them away and enjoy the view.
Even under a bright Moon, the best time of night to see shooting stars is between midnight and pre-dawn. This is when the sky is darkest and the Perseid shower is most active. During these hours, Earth is positioned so that you are on its leading side, according to The Planetary Society. This allows you to watch meteors as they come straight at the planet.
The Perseid shower is especially visible in the northern hemisphere because its radiant—the point in the sky from which its meteors appear to originate—is somewhat north on the sky's dome, The Planetary Society says. While the shooting stars are actually falling from the comet Swift-Tuttle, they look to our eyes like they come from the constellation Perseus, hence the name. You don't have to stare directly at the radiant to see them, however. In fact, the ideal place to look is 45 degrees away from this point.
The shower will remain active through the end of August, but is most dazzling in mid-August.
And if you don't manage to catch the Perseids, don't fret. Another meteor shower is just around the corner: The Geminids, which also occur annually, will take place under moonless conditions in December, according to NASA.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mission Success for Rocket Lab's Latest Constellation Deployment Launch for iQPS
Mission Success for Rocket Lab's Latest Constellation Deployment Launch for iQPS

Business Wire

time2 hours ago

  • Business Wire

Mission Success for Rocket Lab's Latest Constellation Deployment Launch for iQPS

MAHIA, New Zealand--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rocket Lab Corporation (Nasdaq: RKLB) ('Rocket Lab' or 'the Company'), a global leader in launch services and space systems, today successfully launched its 69 th Electron mission and deployed the latest satellite to orbit for Institute for Q-shu Pioneers of Space, Inc. (iQPS) - Rocket Lab's fifth dedicated mission in a multi-launch contract to build their constellation in low Earth orbit. 'The Harvest Goddess Thrives' mission lifted off from Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand at 04:10 UTC on August 5 th. Electron deployed a single synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging satellite named QPS-SAR-12 (nicknamed KUSHINADA-I for the Japanese goddess of harvest and agriculture) to a 575km circular Earth orbit. It was Rocket Lab's fourth launch this year for iQPS and fifth mission overall, making Electron the most prolific launcher of their constellation to date. Four more dedicated iQPS missions are scheduled to launch on Electron through the remainder of this year and in 2026. Rocket Lab Founder and CEO, Sir Peter Beck, says: 'Every Electron launch is a demonstration of payload deployment precision for our customers – an especially critical element when scaling satellite constellations. Today's fifth and flawless deployment for iQPS once again underscores Electron's reliability and continues to prove that consistent tailored access to space is a reality on Electron for our customers.' iQPS CEO, Dr. Shunsuke Onishi, says: 'Building a satellite constellation requires both timely development and manufacturing, as well as highly precise launch execution. We are deeply grateful to both our team and the Rocket Lab team for their continued dedication in making this possible. As the number of satellites increases, so too does the frequency and value of the data we are able to provide. We will continue to accelerate our efforts to ensure that our satellite data can be leveraged in even more fields and applications.' 'The Harvest Goddess Thrives' marks Rocket Lab's 11th Electron mission of 2025 and its 69 th launch overall. Details of the next Electron launch will be shared in the coming days. Launch images: About Rocket Lab Founded in 2006, Rocket Lab is an end-to-end space company with an established track record of mission success. We deliver reliable launch services, satellite manufacture, spacecraft components, and on-orbit management solutions that make it faster, easier, and more affordable to access space. Headquartered in Long Beach, California, Rocket Lab designs and manufactures the Electron small orbital launch vehicle, a family of spacecraft platforms, and the Company is developing the large Neutron launch vehicle for constellation deployment. Since its first orbital launch in January 2018, Rocket Lab's Electron launch vehicle has become the second most frequently launched U.S. rocket annually and has delivered over 200 satellites to orbit for private and public sector organizations, enabling operations in national security, scientific research, space debris mitigation, Earth observation, climate monitoring, and communications. Rocket Lab's spacecraft platforms have been selected to support NASA missions to the Moon and Mars, as well as the first private commercial mission to Venus. Rocket Lab has three launch pads at two launch sites, including two launch pads at a private orbital launch site located in New Zealand and a third launch pad in Virginia. Forward Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 'Securities Act') and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 'Exchange Act'). All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding our launch and space systems operations, launch schedule and window, safe and repeatable access to space, Neutron development, operational expansion and business strategy are forward-looking statements. The words 'believe,' 'may,' 'will,' 'estimate,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'anticipate,' 'intend,' 'expect,' 'strategy,' 'future,' 'could,' 'would,' 'project,' 'plan,' 'target,' and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the factors, risks and uncertainties included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC'), accessible on the SEC's website at and the Investor Relations section of our website at which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this press release. Any such forward-looking statements represent management's estimates as of the date of this press release. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change.

Purespring Therapeutics receives UK CTA approval for Phase I/II clinical trial of PS-002 in patients with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN)
Purespring Therapeutics receives UK CTA approval for Phase I/II clinical trial of PS-002 in patients with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN)

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Purespring Therapeutics receives UK CTA approval for Phase I/II clinical trial of PS-002 in patients with primary IgA nephropathy (IgAN)

First patient in Phase I/II clinical trial expected to be enrolled in Q4 2025 UK Clinical Trial Application (CTA) approval shortly follows U.S. IND clearance and granting of European Medicine Agency (EMA) orphan drug designation, enabling readiness for initiation across sites in both the U.S. and Europe PS-002, Purespring's lead precision nephrology programme, targets the complement pathway known to be a driver of IgA nephropathy and is supported by a wealth of preclinical data London – 5 August 2025 - Purespring Therapeutics, a precision nephrology company focused on transforming the treatment of kidney diseases, today announces that its UK Clinical Trial Application (CTA) for a planned Phase I/II study of PS-002, Purespring's lead programme, in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has been approved by the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) and Research Ethics Committee (REC). 'The CTA approval for our Phase I/II clinical trial of PS-002 represents another key milestone as we complete our transition to a clinical-stage precision nephrology company,' said Haseeb Ahmad, Purespring's Chief Executive Officer. 'Building on the recent FDA IND clearance and EMA orphan drug designation, this further validates the potential of our podocyte-targeting approach to go beyond symptom management and directly target kidney disease at its source. Looking ahead, we are committed to working closely with regulators and sites across the U.S. and Europe with the view to expand the therapeutic options available for people living with IgAN.' PS-002 was developed to target the underlying cause of many kidney diseases by modulating complement activation in the kidney via precision targeting of podocytes. The programme is initially focused on the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), a rare and chronic autoimmune kidney disease that primarily affects young adults. In IgAN, aberrant immunoglobin A (IgA) protein becomes trapped in the kidney's filters, known as the glomeruli, causing complement activation, inflammation, damage and scarring. A significant proportion of affected patients will go on to develop kidney failure despite currently available therapies. The Phase I/II clinical trial, which is expected to enroll its first patient in Q4 2025, will evaluate local administration of PS-002 to treat IgAN. In the Phase 1 part of the Phase I/II study, the main read-outs will be safety parameters, which, together with efficacy biomarkers, will be leveraged to select a dose for the Phase 2 part of the study. This second phase will be used to further define the safety profile and provide early markers of efficacy. Enabled by this latest regulatory approval and the recent U.S. IND clearance, as announced in July 2025, the Phase I/II study will recruit patients across the U.S. and Europe. For further information, contact: Purespring: Peter Mulcahycontact@ (0)20 3855 6324LinkedIn ICR Healthcare Amber Fennell, Sarah Elton-Farrpurespring@ Notes to Editors About Purespring Purespring is developing therapies to halt or prevent kidney disease, one of humankind's most poorly treated disease areas. Founded on the work of Professor Moin Saleem, Professor of Paediatric Renal Medicine at the University of Bristol, Purespring is the first company to successfully treat kidney disease by targeting the podocyte, a specialised cell that is implicated in the majority of renal disease. Purespring's platform approach enables streamlined gene therapy development for both acquired and genetic renal diseases, offering the potential to halt, reverse and even cure both rare and common kidney diseases. The Company currently has a pipeline of programmes in development including the lead asset for treatment of IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) and other complement mediated kidney disease. The Company also has programmes for disease caused by mutations in the gene NPHS2, as well as other monogenic glomerular kidney diseases. Based in London, the Purespring team combines world-leading expertise in podocyte biology and kidney disease with a wealth of experience in gene therapies, anchored in a culture of diversity, creativity and delivery. Purespring is backed by leading biotech investors, including Syncona Limited, Sofinnova Partners, Gilde Healthcare, Forbion, and the British Business Bank and has raised £115m ($149m) to date. For more information please visit: and follow us on in to access your portfolio

Does Chemoradiation Up Second Cancer Risk in Rectal Cancer?
Does Chemoradiation Up Second Cancer Risk in Rectal Cancer?

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

Does Chemoradiation Up Second Cancer Risk in Rectal Cancer?

TOPLINE: Among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not significantly increase second pelvic malignancies compared to chemotherapy alone, but it did raise the risk for nonpelvic cancers. METHODOLOGY: The risk for second cancers after pelvic radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is unclear, with recent studies yielding conflicting results. To better understand the risk for second malignancies, researchers evaluated 2624 patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who received chemotherapy alone (n = 460) or radiation therapy concurrent with chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy; n = 2164) between January 1995 and October 2019. Researchers analyzed the cumulative incidence of second malignancies, defined as a new cancer diagnosed more than 2 years after the initial rectal cancer diagnosis. Patients received adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX (60%), 5-fluorouracil (32%), and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (4%), with median radiation prescription doses of 5040 centigrays for conventional treatments and 5000 centigrays for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The median follow-up was 6.5 years in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy cohort and 5.6 years in the chemotherapy-alone cohort. TAKEAWAY: Rates of second pelvic malignancies at 10 years were higher with chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy, but the differences were not significant: The 10-year cumulative incidence was 5.8% with chemoradiotherapy vs 4.2% with chemotherapy (P = .30). Overall, the most common second pelvic malignancies were prostate adenocarcinoma (31%), bladder cancer (31%), and uterine cancer (28%). The 10-year incidence of second nonpelvic malignancies was significantly higher with chemoradiotherapy: 11% vs 4.4% with chemotherapy alone (P = .017). Overall, the most common second nonpelvic malignancies were lung cancer (24%), breast cancer (15%), and hematologic malignancies (13%). Compared with conventional radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy were associated with a reduced risk for second pelvic malignancies (P = .014). Several factors appeared to impact the risk for second malignancies following treatment. Adults aged 50 and older had higher risks for second pelvic (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; P = .005) and nonpelvic (HR, 2.48; P < .001) malignancies. Diabetes was linked to an increased risk for second nonpelvic malignancies (HR, 1.51; P = .028), whereas tobacco abstinence was associated with a decreased risk (HR, 0.63; P = .013). IN PRACTICE: O verall, patients who received chemoradiotherapy had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of developing second cancers outside the pelvis but not within the pelvis, the authors concluded. However, 'the concern for radiation-induced second malignancies should not preclude from using [chemoradiotherapy]' in this patient population. Instead, 'these data serve as a foundation for future prospective studies evaluating ways to further reduce the risk of second malignancies in high-risk patients undergoing [chemoradiotherapy] for rectal cancer.' SOURCE: The study, led by Kathryn R. Tringale, MD, and Kush H. Patel of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, was published online in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. LIMITATIONS: Potential surveillance bias existed because patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy had more intensive follow-up than those who received chemotherapy alone. Median follow-up was short, and the retrospective design precluded comparing doses in organs at risk that developed second cancers with those that did not. DISCLOSURES: The study was partly funded by a National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant. Some authors reported receiving research funding and having other ties with various sources. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store