Teradyne (TER) Tapped by Amazon as Warehouse Robot Supplier
A technician in a factory setting next to an industrial automation machine.
Vulcan is designed to handle tasks such as picking and stowing, integrating advanced touch sensitivity to perform delicate, repetitive movements with higher precision. Though Amazon has not officially confirmed its supplier, the robotic arms match Universal Robots' design, and are reportedly outfitted with grippers from Robotiq, another firm known for seamless compatibility with Teradyne's automation products.
Hunterbrook estimates the Vulcan project could be worth as much as $400 million for Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ:TER), as Amazon continues to invest in automating logistics for the 14 billion items it handles annually.This development highlights Teradyne's growing presence in warehouse and supply chain automation, adding another major client to its industrial roster. Shares of Teradyne moved higher following the report's release.
Teradyne advances industrial automation through collaborative robots and machine testing systems used in manufacturing, logistics, and high-volume warehouse operations.
While we acknowledge the potential of TER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: 10 Best Non-Mega Cap NASDAQ Stocks to Buy Right Now and 13 Cheap Stocks Under $50 to Buy Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what Warren Buffett says will be the ultimate growth industry!
Artificial intelligence (AI) has a lot of investors excited right now, yet billionaire investor Warren Buffett isn't one of them. Despite owning shares in companies such as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon, none of these investments were made solely based on their AI potential. In fact, Buffett seems to be quite cautious of the technology. Instead, he's warned investors that AI will give rise to an enormous amount of fraud, making scamming the biggest 'growth industry of all time'. Sticking to his principles Despite his hesitant stance, Buffett isn't blind to the benefits of this emerging technology. In the right hands, AI can be a remarkable tool with countless applications in finance, cybersecurity, automation, and work productivity among others. However, with so many businesses claiming to be the next big thing, Buffett and his team are remaining disciplined. They're focusing on the industries they understand the most, zooming in on the businesses with the widest competitive moats. That means rather than chasing speculative AI stocks, he's looking at the established players across the sectors that can leverage AI to improve their existing operations, using the proceeds to run phenomenal capital-return programmes. And right now, Apple seems to fit that bill. Exploring Apple's potential While Buffett's investment vehicle Berkshire Hathaway has trimmed its position in Apple throughout last year, it remains one of its largest holdings, representing 24% of the portfolio. As one of the largest consumer technology companies in the world, Apple produces an enormous amount of free cash flow driven by a loyal customer ecosystem. Since 2013, the company's been busy consistently buying back its own shares, with around $775bn spent over the last 12 years. To put this into perspective, that's enough money to buy the entirety of Visa with another $100bn to spare. And with management approving yet another $100bn in buybacks during 2025, the rewards for shareholders look set to continue, especially if the firm can deliver on its AI ambitions. So far, Apple has lagged when it comes to AI implementation. The rollout of Apple Intelligence has actually been quite slow and riddled with delays, which have seemingly continued into 2025. And the ongoing trade disruptions from newly-announced US tariffs aren't exactly helping matters, which have led to around a quarter of Apple's market-cap being lost in 2025. However, that might soon change. The company has a record number of revamped product launches in the second half of 2025. That includes four new iPhone models, and updates for its AirPods, Apple Watches, iPads, and MacBooks. And with plans to hire another 20,000 people over the next four years to expand its R&D capabilities, the firm might soon be catching up on the AI front, generating even more cash flow over the long run. Perhaps that's why Buffett continues to hold a significant chunk of shares. And it's why I think investors may want to take a closer look at this business. The post Here's what Warren Buffett says will be the ultimate growth industry! appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Zaven Boyrazian has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Apple. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Energy Stock: Diamondback Energy vs. Chevron
Key Points Chevron's integrated business and its rock-solid balance sheet help secure its dividend. Diamondback Energy is a well-run oil and gas company that offers good upside due to the potential for higher oil prices. Ultimately, the decision comes down to each individual's risk profile, but one stock stands out as a clear winner for passive income-seeking investors. 10 stocks we like better than Diamondback Energy › Comparing a pure-play exploration and production in the Permian Basin, Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ: FANG), with an integrated energy major, Chevron (NYSE: CVX), sheds light on many of the questions that oil and gas-focused investors face in the coming years. Let's take a look at which company might suit which type of investor better. The role of oil prices There's no getting around this question when investing in energy stocks, but the answers to it may not be immediately apparent. It's important to note that both these companies are very well run and pride themselves on a relatively low operating "break-even" oil price. This price represents the lowest price of oil needed to cover the cost of the company's operating expenses, existing wells (maintenance capital spending), and base dividend. Chevron's break-even price for oil is in the $30 per barrel range accoring to a Wood Mackenzie survey. Diamondback's management estimates its equivalent break-even price is $37 per barrel. That would appear to give Chevron the upper hand. However, consider that Chevron is an integrated major with substantial downstream and chemicals operations, which tend to perform well with a lower oil price; these factors are included in the break-even calculation. On the other hand, Diamondback is purely an exploration and production company. Moreover, Diamondback utilizes hedging to mitigate downside exposure to oil prices. Its hedges currently apply down to a price of oil of about $55 per barrel, meaning it has upside exposure to a price of oil above $55 per barrel. As such, you can think of Chevron's dividend (currently yielding 4.8%) as safe down to $30 per barrel, and Diamondback's base dividend (currently yielding 2.9%) as safe down to $37 per barrel. Consequently, if you are the type of investor primarily looking for yield and wanting to sleep safely at night, Chevron is the better investment for you. Don't forget the upside The flip side of the argument is that Diamondback has more exposure to a higher oil price, which is what one might expect, given that it's an exploration and production company. To provide some context for how this works, here's a look at Diamondback's management's estimated adjusted 2025 free cash flow (FCF) across a range of oil prices. For reference, Diamondback aims to return 50% of FCF to shareholders in the form of dividends (base and variable) and share buybacks. It has $1.845 billion remaining as part of a $6 billion share buyback authorization program. As of its first quarter, Diamondback made $829 million in share buybacks, equivalent to about $2.80 per share. Therefore, if management decided not to make any more buybacks and pay the remaining 50% in full-year FCF in dividends (base of $4, plus a variable dividend), then it could offer $5.20 in dividends, yielding 3.8%, assuming a price of oil of $60 a barrel. That theoretical figure rises $8.70 in dividends, yielding 6.4%, assuming a price of $80 a barrel. See what I mean by Diamondback having more upside exposure to the price of oil? Price of Oil per Barrel Free Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Per Share Free Cash Flow Yield (based on the current market price of Diamondback Energy of $136.5 a share) $50 per barrel $4.15 billion $14 10.3% $60 per barrel $4.85 billion $16 11.7% $70 per barrel $5.85 billion $20 14.7% $80 per barrel $6.85 billion $23 16.8% Data source: Diamondback Energy presentations. Table by author. In case you are wondering, based on these assumptions, the price of oil would have to be approximately $67 per barrel to get Diamondback's dividend yield to be equivalent to Chevron's current yield -- curiously enough, that's roughly the current price of oil now. Diamondback or Chevron? Ultimately, dividend-focused investors and those concerned about being overly exposed to oil prices will favor Chevron. In addition, Chevron's diversified operations (its production in the Permian is comparable to Diamondback's, but it has substantial other global assets, plus midstream and downstream operations) give it a place to focus its investment, even in the event of a sustained fall in oil prices. In contrast, other than reducing capital investment in response to lower prices (something Diamondback has already done this year), it's hard to think of what significant move a company like Diamondback can make. That said, many investors buy oil stocks precisely because they want exposure to the upside of oil, and Diamondback is a high-quality operator that has taken measures to limit its downside exposure. As such, nothing is stopping you from buying both stocks, as they are both attractive for passive income-seeking investors. Should you buy stock in Diamondback Energy right now? Before you buy stock in Diamondback Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Diamondback Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Energy Stock: Diamondback Energy vs. Chevron was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool legend questions Bayern move for Diaz
Liverpool Stand Firm as Bayern's Diaz Pursuit Sparks Criticism Bayern's gamble on Diaz triggers sharp response In a summer market already tilting toward the chaotic, Bayern Munich's £58.6 million bid for Liverpool's Luis Diaz has landed like a thunderclap. The Bundesliga champions — eager to replenish their attacking ranks — thought they had found a solution in the Colombian winger. But Liverpool's answer was firm: not for sale. Diaz, now 28 and entering his prime years, has reportedly voiced some uncertainty about his long-term future at Anfield. 'We're talking,' he admitted during Colombia's recent international break, acknowledging discussions with other clubs and describing his future as being 'in the club's hands.' Yet for all the speculation, the Reds remain unmoved. Arne Slot views him as essential to his plans and Liverpool, Premier League champions once more, are not in the business of selling starters — certainly not without an offer that would shift the tectonic plates. Hamann questions Bayern's logic in Diaz pursuit The bid has not only failed but provoked a strong backlash — from an unlikely source. Didi Hamann, a former midfielder for both Liverpool and Bayern Munich, did not pull any punches in his assessment of his old German club's strategy. Photo: IMAGO 'To now bring in Luis Diaz, a 28-year-old South American who played 50 games per season for four or five years and has those long flights home, which are also a problem,' Hamann said bluntly on Sky Germany. 'To pay 70 or 80 million for that, while the sale value is zero because he would be 32 at the end of his contract. I wonder what they even have the campus (academy) for?' His remarks reflect more than just financial prudence. There is a growing sentiment within German football that Bayern's dependency on high-profile imports may be stunting the development of their homegrown talents. No new contract on the table — yet no panic Although Diaz has not received a new contract offer from Liverpool — and his £140,000-a-week salary remains untouched since his 2022 move from Porto — the club appears relaxed. Diaz is contracted until 2027, and insiders have consistently rubbished claims of discontent over wages. The winger's performances have been more than respectable: 148 appearances, 41 goals, 16 assists, and four domestic trophies. His output, though not electric, is steady. His value to the system — his relentless pressing, his capacity to disrupt opposition shapes — is less tangible but no less real. Slot's project leaves no room for uncertainty Slot has been clear: Diaz is part of his vision. And unless Bayern (or Barcelona, who've also sniffed around) return with an astronomical bid, Diaz will still be in red come September. Whether he wants to be is a more delicate matter. But if Liverpool can once again offer trophies and Champions League lights, then even amid European temptation, the Colombian's best footballing future may still lie on Merseyside.
