logo
If you thought Labour's first year in power was bad, here's how things could get EVEN WORSE in next 12 months

If you thought Labour's first year in power was bad, here's how things could get EVEN WORSE in next 12 months

The Suna day ago
WELL, it wouldn't be a proper party without some tears, a massive hit to Sterling and some fake smiles and waves the morning after.
If this Labour Government's birthday week was an episode of Yes Minister or The Thick Of It, viewers would have said the script writers had gone too far and the chaos was too much for the realms of believability.
2
If you were not pinching yourself last week watching power drain away from a PM with a majority the size of the moon, or the weeping ­Chancellor becoming a ­walking ­metaphor for Labour's woes, then you really will believe anything.
Which made me wonder . . . what could this lot possibly do for an encore?
If you thought Season One of the Farce Show was bad, let's have a look in the crystal ball at year two . . .
SUMMER
LAST year Rachel Reeves insisted 'public services need to live within their means' and promised there would not be a repeat of November 2024's ­blistering £40billion tax raid, saying clearly: 'I'm not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes.'
So when she failed to repeat that promise in the wake of Downing Street's humiliating benefits capitulation last week, she teed up a long, cruel ­summer of speculation.
Taxes are clearly going up to fill yet another giant black hole in the Treasury sums, but which ones?
Petrol is currently pretty cheap, so expect the usual ­suspects to start banging the drum for a hike in fuel duty.
Logic would dictate that ­having peed off pensioners, farmers and employers already, only the most politically scarecrow-brained would declare war on drivers in such a spectacular fashion.
But after a year of failing spectacularly to read the room, who knows with this muppet show?
There's talk — floated in ­ Labour circles — of a wealth tax on assets over £10million, as if enough wealth creators haven't already scarpered high- tax Britain.
Moment Starmer TRIPS as he leaves Downing Street amid welfare fiasco
And how many more memos will we get from helpful ­Deputy PM Angela Rayner on how to soak the rich more?
As she is finally given a long-coveted desk in Downing Street, I see plenty of empire building to come from our Ange.
Add into the mix not one but two visits from Donald Trump to the UK and there are bear traps aplenty ahead for No10.
With the Don in Scotland next month to visit his golf clubs, will football nut Starmer be able to avoid the offer made over lunch in the White House to play 18 holes?
And what could go wrong in September's State visit, with lefty Palestine protesters and eco-loons already busy plotting an upset.
I suspect Starmer will also be hoping the President won't forget his name as he did with the Japanese PM this week . . . referring to him succinctly as 'Mr Japan'.
AUTUMN
PARTY conference season just one and a half years into office with a majority that big — and an Opposition so divided — should be a walk in the park for ­Labour.
But with Starmer bleeding out voters to the right, as well as the hard-left with the resurgent Jeremy Corbyn movement, expect the membership and MPs to make their voices heard.
It's a far cry from last year's hitch-free gathering of the party faithful that was so stage-managed it would have made Stalin blush.
I'm not sure yet another speech about being the son of a toolmaker is going to cut it, but why break a habit of a lifetime?
Yet conference season will be a sideshow to two potentially catastrophic events this side of Christmas.
Starmer delayed a reshuffle
It's pretty clear that Starmer delayed a reshuffle before the summer break as he works out whether he can keep his Chancellor.
It will be weighing heavily on his mind that no PM in modern times who has seen the second most powerful ­person in the government forced out has gone on to win the subsequent election.
But Reeves is running out of road when it comes to her ­fiscal rules not to increase ­borrowing for day-to-day spending, and not target the big three personal taxes.
Another raid on Capital Gains seems inevitable but that's unlikely to be anywhere near enough to fill what experts say is shaping up to be at least another £20billion black hole.
But it doesn't take a fortune teller to know that Reeves' credibility will be precisely zero if she rips up the rules, which seem to be the only thing stopping a full-scale UK debt crisis.
The markets have just seen a Labour government incapable of getting even a £5billion cut through Parliament.
UK debt crisis
Meanwhile, borrowing costs remain historically high.
While Reeves is in a tricky spot, the Budget rests heavily with the PM too — he has ­outsourced his entire economic thinking to his next door neighbour.
Yet he could not tell MPs last week if Reeves was safe in her job as she sobbed beside him.
I would say it is 50/50 the Chancellor survives the year, which would make the ­reshuffle a maximum moment of danger for Starmer.
While it's clear there are plenty of duds in the Cabinet who should be moved on, just ask Boris Johnson what ­happens when an already weakened PM tries to wield the axe, only to find it then plunged into his own back . . .
2026
HAPPY new year? I doubt it — especially if Reform ­continues its long march up the polling numbers ahead of crunch Scottish, Welsh and another round of brutal local elections in May.
With bookies looking at Nigel ­Farage's insurgents possibly seizing control of executive power in Cardiff Bay and even forming the Opposition in Holyrood, it could be a bloody night for the Government.
While the Tories are eyeing May next year to solve their own leadership woes, if Labour has as rough a time of it as current polls suggest they might, we could well see Starmer on the ropes.
Scores of Labour MPs have wafer-thin majorities and have already made clear that they are willing to flex their ­muscles.
Is there a world in which Sir Keir Starmer doesn't make it to his second anniversary in No10?
Even his closest allies and supporters say there cannot be many more spells like last week without it being terminal.
And who might be waiting in the wings ready to seize the crown?
As I said, keep an eye on Angela Rayner. . . and be ­careful what you wish for.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

King to warn of 'complex threats' facing UK and France - as Macron begins his first state visit
King to warn of 'complex threats' facing UK and France - as Macron begins his first state visit

Sky News

time17 minutes ago

  • Sky News

King to warn of 'complex threats' facing UK and France - as Macron begins his first state visit

The King will refer to the "complex threats" facing the UK and France - stressing "these challenges know no borders" - as he delivers a speech to welcome President Emmanuel Macron to his first state visit. It's understood that the monarch will be referring to issues around defence, artificial intelligence and the climate crisis when he speaks during tonight's glittering state banquet in Windsor. But with political discussions in the run up to this dominated by the issue of immigration and small boats crossing from France, the King's use of the word "borders" will be seen by some as particularly interesting. King Charles will say: "Our two countries face a multitude of complex threats, emanating from multiple directions. As friends and as allies, we face them together. "These challenges know no borders: no fortress can protect us against them this time." Emphasising how the UK and France can lead the way in confronting them, he will add: "Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world." King Charles and the Queen are set to welcome the French leader and his wife Brigitte to Windsor Castle. It is the first state visit to take place in Windsor in more than 10 years, and marks the first state visit to the UK by an EU leader since Brexit. Today, Mr Macron will address parliamentarians in the Palace of Westminster's Royal Gallery - and on Thursday, join a UK-France summit with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Defence, growth, security, migration and French tactics on tackling small boats will be discussed, with the two leaders expected to dial in to speak to other allied looking to support any future peace deal in Ukraine. Yesterday, Downing Street said that the UK's relationship with France was "key" to dealing with boat crossings, following reports French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the coast. Lord Ricketts, who was the Uk's ambassador to France until 2016, told Sky News that it is not the King's role to get bogged down in issues like the migration crisis. "The King won't get involved in the controversial political discussions, no, I think he's been brought up from birth to avoid that," he said. "I'm sure he has personal views and he will talk about the broader relationship but I think his job is to set the scene, to remind everyone that Britain and France are old nations, they have an enormous amount to share, the history is there and depth of personal relationships and that is the backdrop for Keir Starmer to get into the questions where maybe there are still differences." With the closeness between the two men, and the huge interest in the royals generally in France, journalist Maud Garmy from Pont de Vue magazine told us this trip will certainly attract more attention than your average political visit. "I have to admit, for French media, one of the main things about this visit is going to be the images from Windsor - because of the glamour, because of the pomp, because of the pageantry," she said. "There will be more images on French television about President Macron meeting the King in Windsor rather than him being in London for speeches with the prime minister because those images are much more glamorous, there will be a strong friendship shown, and for the media that's just pure gold." It will be the welcome from their royal hosts that will make the visit particularly special for the president and his wife Brigitte. The Prince and Princess of Wales will travel to RAF Northolt to meet the Macrons before travelling with them to Windsor, where the King and Queen will be waiting to accompany them on a carriage procession to Windsor Castle. The King and Queen paid a state visit to France in September 2023 and enjoy a warm rapport with the Macrons, who will stay in the castle during their trip.

Times letters: Junking juries and the pursuit of swift justice
Times letters: Junking juries and the pursuit of swift justice

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Times letters: Junking juries and the pursuit of swift justice

Write to letters@ Sir, I agree with Frances Gibb ('Don't assume that junking juries will speed up justice', comment, Jul 7) and unless strong and immediate opposition is mounted to resist any further attempts to dilute trial by jury, in my opinion it can only be a matter of time before it is abolished altogether. Chronic under-funding is not solved by creating a parallel system with inadequate resources, human and financial, as well as fewer safeguards against miscarriages of justice. Trial by jury is slower and more expensive than trial by judge and magistrates, but we should cherish and protect a system that puts the right to a fair trial by an impartial tribunal — the jury — before anything else. Ronald Thwaites KC Esher, Surrey Sir, I prosecuted many fraud cases during my career at the Bar ('Fraud suspects 'will lose their right to jury trial' ', news, Jul 5). The essential question in all of these cases was the same: namely, was the defendant behaving honestly or not. That is classically a question for a jury to use their varied worldly knowledge and experience to determine and my experience was that they did so very well. Of course, they were always directed that they must be sure of guilt to convict and must acquit in cases of reasonable doubt, which sometimes produced acquittals in cases where a single judge (or I) would probably have convicted. Cost and delay are, no doubt, concerns, but I would be very reluctant to make fundamental changes to a system which has served the interests of justice so well for so many years. Lawrence Griffiths Prosecuting counsel to HM Inland Revenue, 1969-93; standing counsel to HM Customs and Excise, 1989-93 Sir, The indication that specialist judges might in future preside over fraud trials represents common sense, not simply a means of reducing the huge backlog of cases. Some years ago I followed closely a particular trial at Southwark crown court. The first day was mostly taken up with the selection of a jury for a trial expected to last for at least two months. The judge heard pleas from potential jurors who had holidays booked and various medical appointments to attend, but the day was crowned by one candidate who stood up and said she simply could not concentrate for that amount of time. She was excused. When the trial began, there were long explanations about how a profit and loss account is compiled, accrual accounting and revenue recognition in a technology business. It became obvious to those of us in the visitors' gallery that three or four of the jurors had little idea of what was going on. Sure enough, many weeks later the jury failed to reach a verdict and the trial collapsed. Several years later I met someone at the Financial Conduct Authority, who explained that this had been one of the simpler cases and it could not contemplate taking many of the more complex ones to court. John White Petworth, W Sussex Sir, I have had more than 50 years' practice in the criminal courts (both prosecuting and defending, and also as a judge). I think it is quite wrong for any one person to be able to decide on guilt or innocence followed by a potentially long sentence of imprisonment and criminal bankruptcy. Most English judges are fair, but some are notorious for their prejudice in favour of the prosecution. The jury system is essential to protect the public against oppressive judges, police officers or even governments. As that great judge Lord Devlin wrote: It is the lamp that shows that freedom lives. Robert Rhodes KC London WC2 Sir, I am sure that Lord Evans of Weardale is doing his very best within the confines of whatever guidelines and time he has been given to find a new Archbishop of Canterbury (news, Jul 5, and letter, Jul 7), but the committee he chairs seems to have arrived at a situation where they have decided not to decide what to decide until they have decided what to do. I had a discussion a month ago with a senior churchman and suggested that six months is a long time to leave the Church of England leaderless and rudderless, and we should copy the example of the Catholic Church, who found their new Pope in less than three weeks. The CofE should set up a conclave of bishops. The conduct of it should be the same, with the bishops out of contact with the outside world until they reach a decision. It was suggested that I should write to the King, as head of the Church, to make that proposal. I have not yet done that but I am sure that he reads The Times. Alastair Stewart Nunnington, N Yorks Sir, Why does the letter from former ambassadors ('Recognise Palestine', Jul 7) fail to mention Hamas, the October 7 attacks that started this latest conflict or the hostages that were kidnapped and are still being held, but instead heaps all the blame on Israel, when the biggest barrier to peace in the Middle East has always been the threats its enemies pose to Israel's security? I too want to see a Palestinian state and have campaigned for that for decades, but the 'unconditional' recognition the letter calls for would mean doing so before any negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on security, borders, Jerusalem or the status of settlements and would, of course, leave Hamas in place, something to which Israel can obviously not agree. Lord Austin of Dudley House of Lords Sir, It is telling that the letter signed by some two dozen former ambassadors does not include one who formerly served as an ambassador to Israel. They would understand the impractical and unhelpful nature of this suggestion and presumably refused to sign. Lord Leigh of Hurley House of Lords Sir, It is clear that, with the burgeoning numbers, there needs to be a redefinition of children's learning difficulties and disabilities ('PM facing fresh revolt over special needs help', news, Jul 7). We first need to recognise that most conditions are on a continuum; yet there is an increasing tendency to attribute a fixed label to those conditions, whatever the degree, and often after constant pressure from importunate parents. Moderate needs can and should be addressed within mainstream schools, with more specialist teachers and earlier intervention, as Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, states. Those on the severe end of the spectrum only should require a special school. The current route to this is through an EHCP (education, health and care plan). This is a lengthy and costly process for local authorities who, understandably, wish to avoid parents taking them to tribunals. Phillipson is looking into ways of reforming the unwieldy system of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) support. We must hope that she will not be impeded by the Labour backbench brigade. Susan Bickley Ret'd teacher; Huntingdon, Cambs Sir, Before the EHCP was introduced in 2014, the school where I taught had a thriving special needs department with teaching assistants who could work with teachers on lesson material and assist a wide number of students with various needs. The department was decimated by the change in funding, leaving certain students with full-time help but all others with none. The year I retired, in 2019, the school even lost its nurture teacher due to a lack of funding. Meanwhile, the school was paying for a 'super head' and accountants at vast expense due to the switch to becoming an academy trust. Much needs reform, not only special needs help, but parents are not going to want to lose the support for their child. The government is in an impossible position until everyone accepts the reality of what we all face and that no system is ever perfect. Amanda Walker Ret'd teacher; Walkington, East Riding Sir, Your correspondents (letters, Jul 7) focused on the impact of AI on older children and young adults. As a preparatory school headmaster (now retired 12 years), I was often asked what was my school's academic focus in the primary years. I used to say with conviction that a core aim was to equip our pupils with the academic skills that would sustain them for life if they did not have access to computers and calculators 'if the lights went out': the four rules of number; times tables; percentages; a love of reading; accurate spelling; and cursive handwriting — the last enabling them to write from the heart a love letter or a letter of condolence. Nicholas Allen Chairman, Independent Association of Preparatory Schools, 2012-13; Ipswich Sir, Specialists value hospital resources (letter, Jul 7), but in the first instance the public crave prompt access to a medical opinion, with onward referral only if necessary. A 'neighbourhood health service' and enhanced technology (the NHS app and AI especially) could facilitate this and also free up hospitals to concentrate on delivering high-class tertiary care. Many community hospitals have closed and 'Darzi centres', modelled on Continental polyclinics, were never fully implemented. Let's give Wes Streeting the chance to restore quick, effective local primary healthcare. Tim Williams Ret'd consultant surgeon; Waldron, E Sussex Sir, Matthew Parris (comment, Jul 7) refers to economics as a dismal science. Dismal, yes. Science, no. The Rev Dr JE Roulston Bonnyrigg, Midlothian Sir, Further to your leading article on village cricket (Jul 7), judges have considered similar issues in the past and agreed with your views. Perhaps one of the most memorable is Lord Denning's dissent in Miller v Jackson (1977) where he found that it was not a nuisance that cricket balls were occasionally hit on to the property neighbouring the Lintz cricket club in Co Durham. He may have got some things (dreadfully) wrong in the past, but he got this right, saying 'in summertime, village cricket is the delight of everyone' and arguing that the cricketers of Lintz should continue to play. Quite apart from all the personal benefits of playing the sport, cricket is quintessentially British; it should be allowed to thrive. Anthony Philips London, W11 Sir, Those complaining about the possibility of cricket balls hitting them or their property might consider the example of Sir William Worsley, who captained Yorkshire County Cricket Club in the 1920s. He gave a monetary reward to any batsman who broke his library window in Hovingham Hall, thus encouraging local talent. Complainants might also consider who was there first. Ann Gray Beverley, East Riding Sir, As a parent whose eldest son went to Eton and youngest to Michaelhouse in KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, I've attended my fair share of matches at both schools over the years ('Rugby parents told off for touchline opulence', world, Jul 7). While at Eton, the June 4 celebrations steadily evolved into picnics with unbelievable extravagance, more worthy of being at a grand opera, whereas picnics at Michaelhouse remained reassuringly rustic: a sausage out of a farmer's 4×4 possibly still sizzling from the veld. How things are changing! Louisa Woods Greens Norton, Northants Sir, My parents always claimed to have had three weddings ('To have and to hold two weddings', Jul 7). Living in Chile in the 1930s, the first was the civil wedding, the legal element; next came a church one, a few days before they sailed for Liverpool. While at sea, the captain performed their third. In the 1980s they celebrated their 50th anniversary — but only the once. Alison Rollin Ruislip, Middx Write to letters@

First tranche of final report from Horizon scandal inquiry to be published
First tranche of final report from Horizon scandal inquiry to be published

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

First tranche of final report from Horizon scandal inquiry to be published

The first tranche of the long-awaited final report from an inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal is set to be published. More than 900 subpostmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 in what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history. Many were wrongly convicted of crimes such as theft and false accounting after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Subpostmasters' lives were destroyed – with some bankrupted by legal action and sent to prison. On Tuesday, the first volume of the Horizon IT inquiry's final report will be published – covering the devastating impact on the lives of the scandal's victims and the compensation process. The issue of financial redress has frequently been flagged as an issue by subpostmasters – with many still awaiting full compensation. The various compensation schemes have been criticised by victims as unfair and difficult to navigate – processes which lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates has previously described as 'quasi-kangaroo courts'. Retired judge Sir Wyn Williams, the chairman of the probe, will make a public statement following the report's publication. The inquiry was established in 2020, with a number of witnesses giving evidence on the use of Fujitsu's Horizon system, Post Office governance and the legal action taken against subpostmasters. In a previous statement addressing the compensation schemes, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store