Scottish government apologises for 'cultural genocide' of gypsy travellers
John Swinney said the "unfair and unjust" policies, enforced by councils and the UK government between 1940 and 1980, had been "unacceptable".
The "experiment" attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of gypsy travellers by rehousing them in low-quality Nissen-type huts, repurposed military buildings and other disused properties at sites across Scotland.
When families became too big for the cramped accommodation, their children would sometimes be taken away, either into temporary care or permanently – with some adopted in the UK or overseas.
Mr Swinney's apology came following the publication of a new independent report published by the Scottish government, which stated: "The context within which the TE [tinker experiment] occurred is best understood as cultural genocide".
The report, based on research from the University of St Andrews, found that the types of accommodation gypsy travellers were relocated to were "known by government agents to be substandard". It said the properties were "frequently without" electricity and running water.
Researchers said the "experiment" was part of a "recurring societal and institutional dehumanisation of gypsy travellers in Scotland", fuelled by the stereotype of them as practising "a backwards or undeveloped way of life".
The report highlighted the role of the UK national government "and specifically the Scottish Office as a primary actor in the construction and enforcement of such policies".
But it said local councils, churches and charities were also involved in "constructing the environment" that allowed it to happen.
Following its publication, the Church of Scotland also issued "a heartfelt and genuine apology for these historic wrongs".
In a statement to Holyrood, Mr Swinney told MSPs: "It is clear to the government that stark prejudice and lack of cultural awareness led to a series of unfair and unjust policies.
"These policies resulted in children being removed from families, and families were forced to live in substandard accommodation and degrading conditions.
"The trauma that this has caused to individuals, families and groups, including those who regard themselves as 'victims of tinker experiments', is significant and lasting".
With some members of the community watching on from Holyrood's public gallery, Mr Swinney added: "As First Minister of Scotland, I want to say this directly to gypsy traveller communities: the 'tinker experiments' should not have happened.
"These policies were wrong. And we recognise how much it is still hurting so many.
"And more than anything else, I want to say this – on behalf of Scotland, we are sorry."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jon Burrows: UUP's newest MLA carries on tradition of men in uniform
Jon Burrows is the newest Stormont MLA for the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), but he is not the only former police officer the party has tried to attract News NI understands the party approached Jim Gamble, the former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command Centre in the United Kingdom, to be its North Down candidate in the Westminster election in July immediately turned down the Gamble declined to comment when approached by the BBC. Instead, the party went for the former Army officer Colonel Tim Collins, who failed to win the notoriously told the BBC at the election count that the people of North Down "don't want someone who doesn't live in Northern Ireland"."They're interested in local politics," he added."They're not interested in cutting VAT, they're not interested in international affairs. "They're interested in potholes and hedges."He had already complained during the campaign that he could insure his Rolls Royce in England, where he lived, for what it costs to insure a Ford Fiesta in north the recruitment of Jon Burrows to replace Colin Crawford, who lasted less than a year in the North Antrim Stormont seat, carries on a tradition within the UUP of seeking to attract oven-ready high(ish) profile representatives who are no strangers to of the past four leaders of the UUP have been:Steve Aiken, a former Royal Navy submarine commanderDoug Beattie, a former Royal Irish Regiment officer well known for his service in Iraq and AfghanistanMike Nesbitt, a former TV news presenterIn addition, one of its nine current assembly members, Andy Allen, was seriously injured while serving in the Army in leader Robbie Butler is a former firefighter. The policy of bringing in high profile people from other walks of life is not entirely unique to the example, Sinn Féin now has an MP, Pat Cullen, better known for her role as boss of a UK-wide nursing trade the UUP unarguably is way out in front for bringing in candidates already well known in other fields. So why?"There is something that attracts seniority to the UUP," says former party staffer Michael Shilliday. "In the old days that was just "big house unionism". "Maybe it's still that."But really it is what the 'decent people' shtick from 2005 was all about."That's why these people see themselves reflected in the UUP."That is a reference to a disastrous 2005 general election campaign slogan: "Decent People Vote Ulster Unionist". I remember being in the BBC office in Stormont one morning when the party press officer walked in introducing a man he said was a former Royal Navy submarine what seemed like no time at all, Steve Aiken, to use the hackneyed line, went from the command of one sinking ship to he stepped down, he was replaced by Doug Beattie who promised a "union of people", before things the latest changes is Mike Nesbitt, another man who had no grounding in elected politics when he swapped his news anchor role at UTV for an even hotter seat at quitting the leadership the first time, following a disappointing assembly election, he is because there was no other obvious candidate and partly because he represented the best chance of salvation for a party which is rapidly using up its quota of last to former UUP director of communications Alex Kane "it's a hangover from the 1920s when the Ulster Unionists saw themselves as the party of service". "They still do," he adds."Service to the people, service to the country and for them that is represented by a uniform."In a way, Mike Nesbitt is the same. "He was seen in people's living rooms on television each night and that is a form of service too. "The problem is times have changed."But it also reflects a lack of candidates from those already within the ranks who have the track record necessary to win elections and that, long-term, is a problem for the once mighty party of unionism.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Why left needs more than just a good offer
It wasn't just about voting Yes or No. It was about asking new questions: about power, about institutions, about care and community, about who decides and who benefits. This was politicisation in action, a moment where people started to see their own lives not only as private struggles but as part of a wider system that could be challenged, shaped, changed. And it was inspiring, truly gorgeous to see. Moments like that don't happen often, but they matter. Because without politicisation, even the best ideas struggle to land. No-one builds a new world on an old common sense. READ MORE: Funding golf tournament was not attempt to butter up Donald Trump, says John Swinney Too often, we focus on the visible tips of the iceberg: candidates, slogans, manifestos. But without attending to the deeper cultural and ideological groundwork that allows those things to resonate. The question, although it is central obviously, isn't just what is on offer. It's whether people have the tools, the context, the disposition to receive it, and to act on it. A strong political project can't just drop from the sky and expect to gain traction. It has to meet people where they are … and recognise where they are not. A growing part of the electorate is disengaged, distrustful, unsure. They don't identify with political structures. They don't feel addressed. For many, the spaces that used to support political meaning-making – unions, political parties mainly – have been hollowed out. What's been lost isn't just organisational capacity, but ideological anchoring. It's important to say: this is not an argument against political parties. Parties remain essential vehicles for change, especially in representative democracies. But parties can't do it all. We're expecting too much from them if we think they can. They depend on a political culture that is already in motion. If they treat politicisation as a given, they will just be screaming into the void. We're often told that a good offer – the right policies, the right leader, the right tone – should be enough. But that only works if people are already prepared to hear it. If they're not, no amount of rhetorical polish will compensate. Because people may be angry, but that doesn't mean they're politicised. And the two are not the same. Politicisation is not a mood. It's a shift in worldview. It's the slow, uneven process by which people come to see injustice as structural, not accidental, and to believe that collective action might actually make a difference. That process doesn't happen by magic. It happens through experience, connection, and struggle. This is not a new insight, but it's one we often skip over. In his article entitled What Politicising Means, French political scientist Éric Darras lays out a framework for understanding politicisation as a process, not a status. According to Darras, to politicise means four things: Generalising a personal or local grievance into a shared problem — seeing it not as your private misfortune but as a structural issue that concerns others; Defatalising what was once thought natural or inevitable – recognising that things could be otherwise; Identifying a source of power or oppression – not necessarily to cast blame, but to map the forces shaping your life; And finally, gaining a sense of political capacity – the feeling that collective action might actually shift something. This is cultural work. It doesn't begin on the debate stage or end at the ballot box. And it can begin anywhere. For some, it might happen in a picket line. For others, in a housing campaign, a community kitchen, a tenants' meeting, a sports club, even at home. Darras describes three broad modes of politicisation. First, the classic route: engagement with formal democratic institutions (voting, party membership, following political news). Second, the insider-adjacent path: experts, lobbyists, professionals who interact with power without necessarily being elected. And third, the most diffuse and often the most creative: grassroots politicisation through protest, mutual aid, community work, digital activism, often outside or alongside institutional channels. That last one is where counter-hegemony lives. It's where new ways of seeing and naming the world begin to take root. But it requires care. Without time and space to reflect, relate and organise, political imagination withers, even in the face of crisis. The idea that a party or a candidate will do the heavy lifting of politicising the public is, at best, wishful thinking. At worst, it misunderstands what politics requires. Parties are crucial. Institutions matter. But they're not magical. They are only as strong as the political infrastructure around them: the networks of people and practices that keep political imagination alive between elections. That kind of collective engagement doesn't guarantee victory, but without it, victory becomes almost impossible. The energy of 2014 didn't come from a party apparatus alone. It came from the activation of thousands of people who, for the first time, felt that politics included them. This doesn't mean everyone has to do everything. But it does mean that we should stop treating politicisation as someone else's job, or as a given. If we want a serious, durable, democratic left, we need to treat politicisation as strategic work. That means: Supporting political education — not as formal instruction or jargon-heavy analysis, but through clear, concrete efforts to help people understand what's broken and why it doesn't have to be this way. Building or sustaining spaces where people can connect their stories to bigger structures: community organising, mutual aid groups, local campaigns, alternative media. (Image: Colin Mearns) Valuing relationships. Most people don't go to their first protest or meeting because they read a pamphlet. They go because someone they trust said, 'Come with me.' Acknowledging that politicisation takes time. It's not a single moment of awakening. It's a process, a practice. And here's something political parties and elected politicians can do, right now. If you care about change, name what's going wrong. Explain it. Say it plainly. Take every opportunity to answer the questions people keep asking, the ones that echo again and again in frustration, in fear, in anger. Where is our money going? Why does everything feel like an inexorable slide downward? Why do we work harder, pay more, and still fall behind? That is political education, too. If you're trusted with a platform, use it not just to persuade, but to illuminate. Because when people begin to see the system clearly, they begin to move. There's a danger that this line of argument sounds soft, like something for people with lots of time on their hands. But politicisation is not a luxury: it's the basic condition for democratic politics to function. We're living through a period of intense pressure – economically, socially, ecologically. People are navigating burnout, precarity, loneliness. In that context, the ability to think politically, to make meaning, to connect, to act, is fragile. If we want to do serious politics, we have to take that seriously. We need parties. We need unions. We need radical proposals. But none of it works if we don't rebuild the muscle of politicisation, in all its messy, ordinary, everyday forms.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The lawless London tourist hotspot in the shadow of Parliament: How Westminster Bridge has become a magnet for violent street scammers, illegal traders and pickpocket gangs
Sickening footage of scammers spitting at a man when he filmed them fleecing tourists on Westminster Bridge is the latest proof of the crime-wave gripping one of London's most iconic landmarks. Swindlers tricking visitors into betting on impossible-to-win 'cup and ball' games have become a common sight on the bridge, which sits in the shadow of the Houses of Parliament. Keen to expose the predators, a social media user filmed them - only to be shoved, abused and spat on. Westminster Bridge has become notorious as a hotbed for lawbreakers of all forms, from pickpockets, bag thieves and unlicensed pedicab riders to illegal traders hawking hot nuts, ice cream and hotdogs. Susan Hall, leader of the Conservatives in the London Assembly, told MailOnline: 'This is happening right under the nose of New Scotland Yard - which overlooks the bridge. You must ask yourself why the hell this is allowed to carry on.' One recent victim of the bridge's growing lawlessness was volunteer policeman Ned Donavan - a grandson of Roald Dahl - who was punched, kicked and choked by a mob when he tried to stop one of their accomplices pickpocketing a female tourist. Britain's 'revolving door' borders are one factor hindering police, with Romanian career criminal Ionut Stoica arrested on the bridge last year for illegal gambling and deported from the UK - only to be caught at almost the same spot just weeks later. The scammers themselves are highly organised, with spotters recruited to look out for police and council inspectors. This prompted a pair of enterprising officers to snare two of them by dressing up as Batman and Robin. The TikTok video, entitled 'five minutes of unedited scammers', was shared online earlier this month. Cup and ball games involve betting on where a ball is concealed under one of three cups. Tourists are lured in by accomplices who loudly celebrate to make it seem like they have just won money. But in reality, the game is impossible to win. The scam is a Europe-wide problem, with groups of criminals travelling between different cities to carry out the con. Members of the public who confront the gangs are often met with violence, as shown by the experience of TikToker @londonscammers. As he films several groups of scammers, the criminals - some of whom are dressed in designer gear - shout abuse and demand he delete the footage, before spitting at him when he bravely refuses. Susan Hall, who previously stood as Tory candidate for London Mayor, worries about the damage such scenes cause to the capital's reputation. 'The people who are getting scammed are tourists, so that doesn't send a good signal about London,' she said. 'I was recently driving a black cab along the bridge and watching it going on. These people are putting two fingers up to the police and saying ''we can do what we want'', which it seems they can.' Spotters employed by the scammers wait by the side of the bridge and send a text if they see inspectors approaching. To get around this problem, two Met Police officers recently went undercover dressed as Batman and Robin before grabbing two men they caught scamming tourists. Following the operation, Costica Barbu was remanded by police and fined £925. Eugen Stoica fled the country and was convicted at Croydon Magistrates Court in his absence. Ms Hall described the operation as 'fantastic' but questioned why they could not happen more regularly. London has a well documented problem with street thefts, with numerous incidents reported on Westminster Bridge. Ned Donovan, who volunteers as a special constable, intervened to try and stop a pick pocketer last August, only to be attacked by other members of his gang. 'Walking across Westminster Bridge, I saw a man in the act of pickpocketing a female tourist,' he previously said. 'I grabbed him and stopped him before he could disappear. 'Unfortunately, several of his accomplices appeared and began to punch me, kick me and choke me to get me to release their friend, which I wasn't going to let happen.' The Met Police appealed for witnesses at the time. Illegal street traders are another major issue on Westminster Bridge, alongside ice cream vans who block traffic to serve customers - despite the road being a red route. Westminster Council recently handed out £20,000 in fines to illegal traders and pedicabs following a much needed crackdown. The street traders had been selling peanuts, balloons and hot dogs on the bridge without having a licence or paying any tax on their earnings. One of the vendors was convicted for the second time in two months for previously selling hotdogs. Nine pedicabs operators - several of them repeat offenders - were handed fines totalling £9,075 following concerns rogue operators are ripping off tourists and operating unsafe vehicles. Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Children and Public Protection Cllr Aicha Less said: 'This is Westminster, not the Wild West. These fines send a clear message: if you break the rules in our city you will end up out of pocket and out of excuses.' 'Whilst we work with TfL to finalise a structured the licencing scheme is being finalised, our City Inspectors continue to prosecute pedicab drivers and partner with our neighbours in Lambeth and in the Metropolitan Police to ensure unsuspecting tourists are not ripped off.' Westminster Council recently fined illegal traders flogging goods such as peanuts, balloons and hot dogs A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: 'Our officers conduct regular patrols on Westminster Bridge as part of our work to tackle criminal behaviour and protect Londoners and tourists. 'This is seeing results, with two repeat offenders convicted in April for illegal gambling. 'We are going further this summer, with an enhanced police and local authority presence in London's town centres and high streets to tackle anti-social behaviour, theft and street crime.'
