logo
Federal funds for Brisbane Olympics stalled after arena shift

Federal funds for Brisbane Olympics stalled after arena shift

The federal government is yet to recommit to its $3.44 billion contribution to Brisbane 2032 Olympic infrastructure after its preferred project, an inner-city arena, was removed from the Games plan two months ago.
The Albanese government had agreed to fund the Brisbane Arena, which would host Olympic and Paralympic swimming events, leaving the main Olympic stadium to be delivered by the state.
But when Queensland's new Crisafulli LNP government adopted its Brisbane 2032 delivery plan in March, the arena – which the previous Labor government planned to build at Roma Street – was left for the private sector to deliver at Woolloongabba.
Swimming would be held at a new National Aquatic Centre to be built next to the Centenary Pool at Victoria Park, where the main 63,000-seat Olympic stadium would also be built, though its exact location and design were yet to be determined.
The change meant the $7 billion joint funding agreement between the Albanese and Palaszczuk governments in 2023 needed to be renegotiated.
Noting what she called the 'positive changes' coming out of the Crisafulli government's 100-day review, Federal Sports Minister Anika Wells said she was keen to come to a new agreement.
'The prime minister wrote to the premier saying, 'you don't have to worry about us squibbing on the deal' – we love the Games, we want to make it a success, but we need to see that detail,' she said.
Wells said there had to be value for money to justify the use of federal taxpayer funds, which was something the Albanese government had identified in the Brisbane Arena.
'One of the things we loved about the Brisbane Arena is that we could say to people from Karratha or Bendigo, this is something that you can enjoy when you come to Brisbane,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Demonstrate leadership': Labor under pressure to respond to drug summit
‘Demonstrate leadership': Labor under pressure to respond to drug summit

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Demonstrate leadership': Labor under pressure to respond to drug summit

The Minns government is being urged to move faster on overhauling drug policy in NSW, with MPs from across the political spectrum backing cannabis law reform and peak welfare groups calling for Labor to implement recommendations from the NSW 2024 Drug Summit. After last week's budget failed to include funding aimed at addressing the 56 recommendations from the summit, a coalition of peak services including NCOSS and the Wayside Chapel have urged Labor to 'demonstrate leadership' and push ahead with drug reform. 'The families and communities impacted by this issue across NSW have waited too long for change,' the joint statement, which was also signed by Uniting, the Salvation Army, Wesley Mission and the St Vincent de Paul Society read. 'We see the ongoing impact that stigma has on people who use drugs and experience drug dependency and the difficulty in accessing support.' It has been almost three months since the co-chairs of the drug summit, Carmel Tebbutt and John Brogden, handed the government its final report including 56 recommendations, among them calls for Labor to 'significantly increase' funding for drug and alcohol services. Loading While the summit stopped short of recommending decriminalisation, it called for changes ranging from the introduction of a medical defence for driving while using medically prescribed cannabis, to cutting penalties for minor drug possession. The government has yet to respond to the summit's recommendations, but in a statement, Health Minister Ryan Park said it would do so 'in the next six months as requested by the co-chairs'. Park said the government had moved to introduce a pill testing trial in the interim, and that it had announced a $235 million package for drug and alcohol services before the summit. 'The funding is focused on meeting the unique needs of priority population groups including Aboriginal people, pregnant women, people with mental health conditions, young people and people involved in the criminal justice system,' he said.

Security expert brands Anthony Albanese's handling of US strikes on Iran 'disturbing' following revelation Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of attack
Security expert brands Anthony Albanese's handling of US strikes on Iran 'disturbing' following revelation Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of attack

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Security expert brands Anthony Albanese's handling of US strikes on Iran 'disturbing' following revelation Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of attack

Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge has argued Anthony Albanese's response to United States strikes on Iran was made "even more disturbing" by revelations the Prime Minister had advanced knowledge of the attacks. Mr Albanese came under intense scrutiny over his and the government's reaction to news the US had bombed three of Iran's key nuclear facilities. The government initially put out a statement attributed only to a spokesperson which failed to explicitly support the attacks before the Prime Minister later held a press conference to give direct backing. Critics of Labor and Mr Albanese claimed the response showed the government was out of step with the Trump Administration and had been caught flat-footed by the US. However, on Sunday Sky News Australia revealed the Prime Minister did have advanced knowledge the US planned to attack Iran's nuclear sites, although not the exact timing on when the strikes would occur. According to Mr Shoebridge, the revelation is likely to prompt further questions about Mr Albanese's handling of the issue. "I think it's good that our government knew about this beforehand, but the fact that the government knew before it happened, that the US was going to bomb Iran, makes the Prime Minister's performance even more disturbing," he told Sky News. "Let's remember, the strikes happened on a Sunday. Almost every other world leader reacted that day. It wasn't until Monday that we got a stilted press conference from the Prime Minister and he still sounded clueless and flat-footed. "That made sense when we thought the whole thing had come as a surprise to him, but knowing he had pre-warning makes his performance quite bizarre." Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor last week claimed Mr Albanese had expressed "anti-US alliance' sentiments by failing to quickly back in the strikes and it is possible that criticism will be renewed following the revelation Labor had advanced warning. The back and forth over the government's response comes as the relationship between Australia and the US continues to experience increasing scrutiny after the re-election of President Donald Trump. Critics of the government have highlighted past comments from senior Labor figures about the US President to suggest there is a disconnect between the leadership of both countries. Australia has also come under pressure over its approach to defence spending, with Trump Administration officials pushing for Labor to lift its outlay. Mr Albanese and Defence Minister Richard Marles have both stuck by existing plans to increase spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP, despite pressure to reach 3.5 per cent from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. "We have increased our defence investment,' the Prime Minister said on Friday. 'What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need - that's what we're investing in.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store