I was sure Lucy Letby was guilty… then spent weeks poring over evidence & now I'm convinced NO babies were murdered
And last week it emerged Lucy Letby could be facing more charges over the deaths of babies at hospitals she worked at.
8
8
Letby, 35, is understood to have carried out two work placements at Liverpool Women's Hospital - where she trained as a student - between October and December 2012, and January and February 2015.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had received "a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary asking us to consider further allegations in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital".
It comes after three people - who were in senior leadership roles at the Countess of Chester Hospital - were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter as part of an investigation into the baby deaths.
But while evidence continues to stack up against her, there are also a growing number of people - including some prominent politicians - who have publicly expressed doubts over her guilt.
Yesterday we told how journalist Nigel Bunyan, who attended Lucy Letby's main trial and the retrial that followed it, is convinced justice was served because Letby is "a nailed-on serial killer of tiny, defenceless babies".
But The Sun's Chief Features Writer Oliver Harvey is in the opposite camp, concerned "an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history".
Here he puts forward his argument for why he's convinced Lucy Letby is not guilty of her harrowing crimes, and why a fresh appeal is needed immediately.
STARING at Lucy Letby's washed out mugshot on the day of her conviction, I believed she was a wicked baby killer.
Justice was done, I assumed, so let this monster rot in hell. Hadn't the 'Angel of Death' even admitted her own guilt in scrawled notes?
Months later, after being commissioned to write an article about Letby 'truthers' - the internet army of sleuths pleading her innocence - I did a deep dive into the evidence stacked against her.
Top doc whose work was used to nail Letby reveals why he KNOWS she's innocent
Much of it involves complex medical and statistical information. It required strong coffee, a string of late nights and expert advice.
Now, I believe an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history.
And, in my view, no babies were murdered or harmed at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
Last week prosecutors revealed they were considering fresh charges against Letby - currently rotting in prison as she serves 15 life sentences.
Cheshire Police have been investigating further 'deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies'.
8
8
So why do I believe Letby - already caged for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others - has been wrongfully convicted?
And could two jury trials and two Appeal Court hearings really have misread things so badly?
A solemn truth is that English justice - long admired across the world - sometimes gets it wrong.
After nearly 30 years working in Fleet Street, including reporting for a news agency at the Old Bailey and the High Court, I've witnessed my share of wrongful convictions firsthand.
I saw the Bridgewater Three - James Robinson and cousins Vincent and Michael Hickey - emerge blinking in the sunlight after 18 years behind bars for a crime they didn't commit.
Wrongly convicted for murdering 13-year-old paperboy Carl Bridgewater, James spoke of the 'long, lonely years that we've cried and wept' as 'people have looked at us with hate' and 'called us child-killers'.
Words delivered with such raw emotion stay with you.
Then there was Angela Cannings, wrongly convicted of murdering two of her babies.
During her 18-months incarceration I got to know her salt-of-the-earth husband Terry.
Visiting him at home in Salisbury, Wiltshire, he told me: 'The trial was horrific, I don't know how Angela coped.
"After she was jailed I just sobbed and sobbed on my sofa.'
Angela's conviction was overturned by the Appeal Court in 2003 after it emerged medical evidence against her was flawed and that her babies had actually perished from cot death.
8
It's a pertinent example of how police, prosecutors and juries can get it wrong when dealing with complex medical issues.
I believe evidence used to convict Letby was also catastrophically flawed and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
A central plank of the prosecution case - placed before the jury at the beginning of Letby's first 10-month trial - was an apparently damning shift rota.
The chart showed a cluster of 25 suspicious baby deaths and collapses matched against the shift rota of the 38 nurses who worked on the unit.
Only Letby was at the scene for every death and collapse.
Yet the jury wasn't told about six other baby deaths in the period for which she faced no charges.
Statisticians also say the chart covers far too narrow a period of time.
Professor Richard Gill, whose expertise is medical statistics, told me the spreadsheet was 'ludicrous' and that he believes Letby is innocent.
Fatal flaws
8
8
When a case has been built around what the professor says are flawed statistics, then I believe the whole evidential edifice starts to crumble.
So what about the science?
Expert witness Dr Dewi Evans said that on the majority of occasions babies were killed or harmed, Letby injected air or insulin into their bloodstreams or feeding tubes.
A string of respected neonatologists called Dr Evans's theory that Letby injected air into babies via their nasal feeding tubes as 'implausible' and 'ridiculous'.
Dr Evans had cited a 1989 academic paper which said skin discolourations occur with air bubbles in blood vessels, and he believed this was evident in several of the babies.
But the paper's co-author, Dr Shoo Lee says none of the descriptions of the babies' skin blemishes given by witnesses matched those that he had noted.
In February, Dr Lee chaired a panel of 14 leading international experts who had examined 17 cases at the heart of Letby's prosecution.
Their conclusion?
"We did not find any murders. In all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care," he revealed.
Remember Letby - who has always pleaded her innocence - was never seen injecting a baby or harming them in any way.
Police found no internet searches for her alleged murder techniques while no motive or psychological profile of a serial killer was ever presented to the court.
And Letby's so-called confessions notes - in which she'd written, 'I'm evil I did this' - were scrawls produced on the advice of counsellors to help the nurse deal with extreme stress.
The ramblings also included: 'WHY ME? I haven't done anything wrong.'
They were written as part of her therapy after she was removed from her nursing duties following a cluster of baby deaths.
Used as a 'gotcha' moment at her first trial, the 'I'm evil I did this' sentiment may simply have been her insecurity at so many babies dying on her ward.
Letby also kept 257 confidential shift handover sheets from the ward under her bed. Twenty-one of the documents related to 13 children prosecutors said she had harmed.
Campaigner and former Cabinet Minister David Davis told me: 'If you didn't know that she was accused of murder, you'd just think she was being excessively conscientious.'
Revelations that she searched bereaved families on Facebook perhaps shows she was concerned for those grieving.
It certainly doesn't amount to evidence she was a baby killer.
The Countess of Chester - which treated critically ill and very premature babies clinging to life - was plagued by staff shortages and a superbug, while a leading medic described its neonatal unit as 'out of its depth'.
With so many clustered baby deaths, I believe blame was subconsciously shifted to a convenient scapegoat - the young, female, guileless nurse Lucy Letby.
The prospect of fresh charges and a trial may actually work in her favour. A better marshalled defence could call on a wealth of expert witnesses deployed to debunk bad science and iffy statistics.
That Letby's case is likely to rumble on for years is heartbreaking for the bereaved families.
A fresh appeal is needed immediately. The threshold for criminal conviction - being beyond reasonable doubt - hasn't, in my opinion, been close to being reached.
Justice may be blind, but it is not infallible.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UK is a ‘powder keg' of tensions and could easily ignite once again, report warns
A new report warns the UK is a "powder keg" of social tensions, risking further unrest a year after widespread riots across the country. Research reveals one in three adults rarely or never interact with people from different backgrounds, and up to seven in ten have not met local asylum seekers. The report highlights immigration concerns as the primary driver of local community tensions, exacerbated by political polarisation, declining trust in institutions, and the cost of living crisis. Sir Sajid Javid and Jon Cruddas, co-chairing a new commission, state that without urgent action, the "very basis of our democracy is at risk" due to societal fragmentation. Last summer's far-right riots, which targeted asylum seeker hotels, were fuelled by widespread misinformation regarding the identity of a knife attacker.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour blames middle-class shoplifters for pushing up prices
Middle-class shoplifters are responsible for pushing up prices on the high street, the policing and crime minister has claimed. Dame Diana Johnson has vowed to punish wealthier thieves as part of her crackdown on retail crime, insisting 'there will be consequences' for shoplifters, regardless of their background. She said: 'It's a crime. If you're middle class, or whichever class you want to determine that you are, it's a crime. That is just not acceptable because we all know that people end up paying higher prices if people are stealing.' Her comments come as Britain's retailers battle a shoplifting epidemic that is costing them billions of pounds each year. In a bid to address the issue, the Government plans to invest £200m into neighbourhood policing, and has said it will make assaulting a shop worker a standalone offence. It has also scrapped previous legislation that made stealing goods worth less than £200 a 'summary-only' low-level offence. It also plans to develop a 'Fusion Cell' programme for sharing intelligence on retail crime and its perpetrators. Incidents of retail crime hit their highest level on record in the year leading up to August 2024, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC), growing by more than 50pc to hit more than 2,000 incidents a day. Graham Wynn, a director at the BRC, said: 'The cost of theft has also risen to over £2.2bn a year, pushing up prices for honest shoppers and damaging the customer experience.' Much of the crime wave has been blamed on organised crime gangs who steal high-value goods such as spirits and meat before selling them on for a profit. Middle-class crime However, retail industry bosses have increasingly raised the alarm over shoplifting among the middle classes. Archie Norman, the chairman of Marks & Spencer, first highlighted it as a problem two years ago: 'It's too easy to say it's a cost of living problem. Some of this shoplifting is by gangs. Then you get the middle class. 'With the reduction of service you get in a lot of shops, a lot of people think: 'This didn't scan properly, or it's very difficult to scan these things through, and I shop here all the time. It's not my fault, I'm owed it'.' Last month, John Nussbaum, director of retail at Kingdom Security, said some shoplifters believed they were 'cheating the system' and did not necessarily see themselves as criminals. When asked what her message to shoplifters would be, Dame Diana said: 'It's a crime. You are committing a crime. 'During the disorder last year, I remember in Hull, there were young women coming out of Lush because they'd been into Lush to loot, and they were coming out with boxes of toiletries from Lush, thinking that was perfectly fine. 'There were no consequences. We have to get back to the fact that if you steal, if you commit a crime, there will be consequences.' She also called on landlords not to allow the selling of stolen goods in their venues, amid reports that some pubs were being used by criminals to do so. She said: 'If you're a pub down the road, then selling that is not part of what you should be doing to protect and support your community.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The sexual harassment epidemic tainting British business
When Amy got her first job as a bus driver at the age of 20, she wasn't prepared for how uncomfortable it would be to work in such a male-dominated industry. 'You think everyone is going to be like your dad. You don't realise that other people's dads are like this – it's mind-blowing,' she says, reflecting on the decade of workplace sexism she's faced at multiple bus depots. 'People say 'oh, it's just banter' – that's the biggest problem. Older men think it's a compliment if they make a sexual remark.' Like many women, Amy*, says she doesn't want to 'ruffle any feathers' by complaining. After all, she knows many others who have had it far worse. But she is exhausted by the constant jeers from the men she works closely with. 'In the summer when it's hot, I don't wear tights – there's usually a sexual remark from the men in the canteen when I go upstairs. They also make comments like 'you should be on the catwalk, not driving a bus'. They don't realise that it feels uncomfortable.' An increasing number of women working at companies from City institutions to household names are coming forward with stories of harassment in the workplace. Despite believing that we live in more enlightened times compared to the 1970s or 80s – when women were effectively treated as second-class citizens in the workplace – sexual harassment remains an epidemic tainting British business. Male-dominated hierarchies Amy almost counts herself lucky – other women she has spoken to have felt so unsafe at work that they have eventually quit. Poppy*, who is in her 20s and works in the construction industry, recalls being repeatedly targeted and harassed by two senior men she used to work with. They would tell her that women belonged in the kitchen and would send inappropriate messages. 'I ended up separating from my fiancé because of the stress. It affected every part of my life,' she says. 'My hair is curly and one of the bosses didn't like curly hair, so he paid me to go and straighten it because he said I looked a mess.' Poppy, who was also told early on in her career that having a child would ruin her future job prospects, believes that sexism is ingrained across corporate Britain. While most cases go unreported, there have been several high-profile cases in recent months and no sector is immune – almost half the fashion retail employees surveyed by Drapers think sexual harassment is 'common'. More women are also coming forward to recount tales of harassment at well-known British employers. The BBC is now facing questions over its knowledge of Gregg Wallace's behaviour after 50 more people came forward with allegations against him, months after hundreds of allegations of sexual misconduct emerged against ex-Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed. Wallace has denied the sexual harassment allegations. Al Fayed died in 2023. A government survey in 2020 found that 29pc of employees experienced some form of sexual harassment in their workplace in the previous year – but the real figures are thought to be far higher. 'Most UK businesses are still structured around male-dominated hierarchies,' says Poppy. 'Despite more inclusive policies, culture often reflects outdated gender norms – there is still an old boys' club power structure.' These are not stories from generations gone by. Despite widespread efforts to crack down on sexual harassment at work and hire more senior women into top jobs, UK plc continues to have a problem. 'I don't think it's improved in the last decade – maybe more women have the confidence to report it, but the sexist comments from men aren't slowing down,' adds Amy. Rise of the 'bad apples' Internal training documents show that senior City staff are being taught the very basics when it comes to behaviour. 'Do not sexually harass a colleague,' reads a presentation for a top law firm, adding that unwanted behaviour includes 'grabbing, groping, kissing, fondling or brushing against another's body'. It also urges lawyers to avoid 'leering' at co-workers and to steer clear of 'unwelcome massaging'. Such training sessions have spiked as managers increasingly fear legal action from potential victims. Data from online learning provider iHasco shows that sign-up rates to their sexual harassment courses have shot up 862pc in just a year, in part because of a new law which forces employers to do more to prevent sexual harassment at work or at work events. In some organisations, staff now need official permission to drink alcohol at client parties. Yet attitudes aren't shifting. A poll by trade union Unite found that 34pc of women still do not believe that there is a zero-tolerance approach to bad behaviour at work, with one in four suffering work-related sexual assault. Alarmingly, over a quarter of the women polled said they have been shown porn at work by their co-workers. Some think sexism has become worse in recent years. One HR chief, who did not want to be named, thinks there has been a 're-emergence of unpalatable characters', particularly since the rollback of diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) programmes under Donald Trump, who ordered a ban on the policies. The effects are being felt in the UK, with some leaders even overheard boasting about how they can say whatever they want now, the person adds. Businesses, regulators and the government are now scrambling to do more to stamp out toxic behaviour amid rising concerns for women in the workplace. The Financial Conduct Authority, the City watchdog, has expanded rules around harassment and bullying in order to stop 'rolling bad apples' who abuse colleagues in one job from job-hopping undetected. Last year Parliament's influential Treasury select committee raised concerns that women in finance were afraid to speak out about abuses in the workplace because of perceptions that the City is a 'man's world,' with MPs accusing HR departments of protecting sexist bosses. The Government also wants to ban bosses from covering up sex scandals by outlawing the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in the workplace to silence victims. In 2018, The Telegraph was prevented from revealing allegations against Sir Philip Green, the former Topshop owner, after five ex-employees signed an NDA. The change will be provisionally written into Labour's incoming Employment Rights Bill, which will return to the House of Lords this week. Yet despite the raft of changes, recruitment bosses and victims aren't so sure that behaviour will change any time soon. Most stories of harassment at work are never discussed, so abuse goes unnoticed under the surface. 'Cultural change is a slow process. The legacy of patriarchal structures is still based on leaders who aren't primary caregivers or take parental leave, and these systems are historically not designed to address inequality,' says Amanda Rajkumar, Adidas' former global head of human resources. 'There remains a fear of speaking up because it is neither recognised nor rewarded. Whilst there is increased support and emphasis on robust and independent grievances and investigations, many cases go unreported, with women feeling undervalued and disrespected. 'There are many women with genuine instances of sexism, from pay issues to inappropriate senior management behaviour. Still, more often than not, they decide not to pursue a formal route, as they know it will damage their career. This is one of the reasons women leave companies.'
