Gardeners recruited to help save critically endangered Tumut grevillea
The Tumut grevillea has fewer than 1,000 plants left in the wild and is only found in a 6-kilometre stretch of land alongside the Goobarragandra River, in the Snowy Mountains.
As part of the NSW Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy and Water's (DCCEEW) Saving Our Species program, the organisation partnered with Riverina Local Land Services (LLS) to deliver a series of educational workshops on the native shrub.
More than 45 people attended, including adults and children from Tumut and surrounding areas, and were given cuttings and taught propagation techniques to try to grow it at home.
LLS senior officer Cherie White said she hoped the workshops inspired a new generation of people to save the plant.
"It's really important to engage with the local community and watch them be excited about the grevillea and its recovery," she said.
The native shrub is also connected to women's business in First Nations culture, as it is found around culturally significant sites to the Wiradjuri and Walgalu people.
As part of regeneration efforts, the DCCEEW and LLS enlisted the help of First Nations people from the Brungle Tumut Local Aboriginal Land Council and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service to plant 60 seedlings along the Goobarragandra River.
DCCEEW threatened species officer David Hunter, who also led the workshops, said the plant was a "spectacular shrub in bloom".
"It has these incredible purple toothbrush-shaped flowers that cover the plant," he said.
Dr Hunter said land modification after colonisation, such as land clearing, had impacted the plant's numbers.
"Undoubtedly, prior to European settlement, the Tumut grevillea would have had a much broader range," he said.
"As of the late 1990s, there were about 300 adult plants remaining in the wild but over time has declined to fewer than 60 in the wild."
Dr Hunter said grazing by introduced species, domestic stock and feral animals — particularly deer — had also caused numbers to dwindle.
Ms White said the Tumut grevillea was difficult to protect, because it was challenging to gather seeds and propagate.
To collect the seeds without them being eaten by opportunistic birds, LLS staff placed bags over the plants while the seed ripened.
"It ripens, it drops off into the bag, and it doesn't get eaten by the parrots," she said.
Dr Hunter said he hoped residents would have success propagating the plant and help restore its population.
"It's an extremely special plant," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
NZ 'ULEB' wood heaters emit a fraction of the pollution of standard models. Why aren't they in Australia?
A new generation of low-emission wood heaters that can produce a fraction of the particulate pollution of current models could save lives by improving air quality, according to researchers. But while the heaters have been on sale in New Zealand for more than a decade, and Australian clean air groups have called for their widespread adoption, they might not be widely available here for many years. Updating pollution standards that would effectively make all new heaters sold in Australia low-emission would take up to 10 years, according to Tim Cannon, chair of a Standards Australia pollution committee. Mr Cannon is also head of the lobby group the Australian Home Heating Association — but he said decisions on pollution standards were voted on by all members of the committee, which includes a range of perspectives. He told the ABC he was unconvinced by recent peer-reviewed modelling that showed long-term exposure to wood-heater smoke was responsible for more than 700 premature deaths every year around the country. But, Mr Cannon said, the committee would consider tightening pollution standards, although he was concerned that doing this too rapidly could "decimate" the industry. "You can't just roll out changes [to wood heaters] overnight," he said. However, Australian researchers studying the effectiveness of low-emission burners said the introduction of new low-emission heaters "could be done very rapidly" based on the NZ experience. So what are ultra-low emission wood heaters and what impact have they had to pollution levels in New Zealand? Ultra-low emission burners (ULEBs) cost the same and look much like traditional wood heaters, but include various technologies to improve combustion, convert more of the fuel to heat, and ultimately reduce particulate emissions. They were introduced into New Zealand following the introduction of tougher standards, and are now undergoing testing at the University of Tasmania. Testing has shown ULEBs are the only kind of heater that could meet more stringent emissions standards. John Todd, a wood-heater expert taking part in the testing, said NZ wood-heater manufacturers were forced to innovate and develop ULEB designs after parts of the country introduced tight emissions controls a decade ago. "They said they could never build heaters that could meet [ULEB emission standards] and they now have 30‒40 models that do." The heaters have made a significant difference to the air quality of Christchurch, where the local council ran a phase-out scheme for traditional wood heaters. Dr Todd said testing of ULEB designs on Australian hardwoods showed the heaters could emit just 10 per cent of the particulate matter (specifically particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, known as PM2.5) generated by wood heaters complying with current Australian standards. Fay Johnston, director of the University of Tasmania's Centre for Safe Air, said Australia could follow NZ's lead with ULEBs, along with other measures such as a phase-out of wood heaters in general in urban and high-density areas. "There's really no reason not to adopt it and drive the same innovation and have far less-polluting heaters available for Australians," Professor Johnston, who led the testing, said. The decision around how dirty wood heaters sold in Australia may be is largely governed by wood-heater pollution standards set by Standards Australia's "CS-062" technical committee, a group of 20 members made up mostly from industry and government. Over the past 30 years, the committee has tightened its pollution standards, so heaters emit much less particulate matter (at least on paper) than previous designs. Despite the change, however, air quality in areas with high wood-heater use isn't falling. There are opposing arguments for why this is happening. Mr Cannon said most wood heaters being used were old and built before the current tight standards. But others, including wood-heater emissions experts such as Dr Todd, said the laboratory protocol used to test heater emissions for compliance with the Australian standards did not reflect how Australians actually used these heaters at home. As a result, Dr Todd said, new wood heaters were up to 10 times more polluting than the standards suggested. "No-one operates heaters the way they're being tested," he said. "The standard assumes everyone is going to operate their heater in the best way possible." Professor Johnston agreed. She and others have called on the Standards Australia wood heater committee to change its compliance testing protocol, which would effectively tighten pollution standards for wood heaters. Professor Johnston said a draft real-world testing protocol would be submitted to the standards committee by the end of the year. "In my view, it's a long overdue [change]. We know we can get better and we haven't done it." Mr Cannon told the ABC he was interested in the emissions research underway at the University of Tasmania, but was reluctant to tighten standards too fast. Committee decisions are made on the basis of consensus, through voting in a formal ballot. Mr Cannon told the ABC the industry was under attack from "health groups" such as the Centre for Safe Air. He said reducing wood-heater emissions was politically necessary "to keep … those types of clean air scientists at bay. The Australian Home Heating Association campaigns against local councils and state and territory governments phasing out wood-heaters via, for instance, newspaper ads and targeted social media campaigns. "It would take five years' worth of research and then it might be five years before [ULEBs] becomes mandated in certain areas," Mr Cannon said. "So it could be, at best, 10 years away." Mr Cannon also said that while he was not convinced by the modelled health impacts of wood-heater smoke, he wanted to accommodate critics in order to avoid a "blanket ban on wood heaters". "What I think and what [I do] representing our industry are not necessarily aligned," he said. "We want to see the longevity of our industry. We could just push back [against critics], but that's going to get us nowhere. "We have to try to be friends." Health groups are calling for a general wood heater ban in urban and high-density areas. Asthma Australia CEO Kate Miranda said the non-profit wanted a "phased transition away from wood-fire heaters in favour of cleaner and healthier heating alternatives" such as reverse-cycle air conditioners. "There is no safe level of exposure [to wood smoke] and even small amounts can cause health effects and trigger asthma symptoms." Professor Johnston said wood heaters had a role in "low-density rural areas" where the smoke could not affect large populations or neighbours, but should be banned in urban areas "where you have to buy firewood". "We live in a highly fire-prone country. We need to manage our fuel loads," she said. If you do have a wood heater, here are some tips to reduce, but not eliminate, smoke:

ABC News
11 hours ago
- ABC News
Australian-made rocket crashes after attempted north Queensland launch
An Australian-designed and manufactured rocket has lifted off in the first launch attempt from home soil, though it crashed shortly after. Gilmour Space Technologies attempted to launch its orbital rocket, called Eris, from a spaceport in the north Queensland community of Bowen on Wednesday morning. The rocket was in the air for less than a minute. Spectators who gathered in Bowen reported hearing a blast and seeing large plumes of smoke at the launch and for some time after. Co-founder Adam Gilmour posted to social media that the company was happy with the launch attempt. "Got off the pad, I am happy," he wrote. "Of course I would have liked more flight time but happy with this." Gilmour Space released a statement with further information celebrating the unprecedented event. "Today, Eris became the first Australian made orbital launch vehicle to lift off from Australian soil," the statement read. "For a maiden test flight, especially after an extended 18-month wait on the pad for approvals, this is a strong result and a major step forward for Australia's sovereign space capability." The company said Eris had 23 seconds of engine burn time and 14 seconds of flight. Initial assessments of the Bowen Orbital Spaceport found launch infrastructure intact. The Gold Coast company tried to proceed with launch attemptsseveral times this year but was hampered by weather and technical issues. Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate congratulated the company. "Congratulations to Gilmour Space Technologies on having a crack. They truly exemplify the Gold Coast 'have a go' spirit," Cr Tate said. "They are literally a Gold Coast company aiming for the stars. If you ever wanted an example of how diversified our economy is now, this is it. "We look forward to following their progress in the years ahead." 'Part of history' For Mackay resident Andrew Hyland, this was his third trip to Bowen to witness the rocket take-off. "I've been up here since the first launch was programmed to go," he said. "Being Australia's first launch in 50 years and first Australian-made … it's part of history, you can't miss out on history." Bowen residents Helen and Douglas Tawse were ready to watch the rocket take off from the beach. Ms Tawse said the launch would "put Bowen on the map". Mr Tawse said the launch could generate benefits for the small north Queensland community. "I never thought I'd ever see the day," Mr Tawse said. "If they're talking about more satellites going up, it would have to help Bowen's economy in the long term." Pointed towards the sky, this Australian-first rocket is set to blast a small town into the global spotlight Photo shows A rocket on scaffolding is lifted up on a launch pad. It's taken the Gilmour brothers nearly 10 years to build and design a locally made orbital rocket. Space enthusiasts are set to flock to north Queensland to see it lift off. 'Burgeoning commercial' industry Gilmour Space Technologies has received Australian Government support for its Bowen project, including $5 million for the Eris launch vehicle announced last week. University of Southern Queensland astrobiologist and astronomer, Jonti Horner, said the launch of the Eris rocket was exciting and showed a maturation of the space industry. Professor Horner said that historically, only government-run space agencies had the capability to launch rockets. "In the last decade or so, there has been very much an explosion in our use of space, and that's been because there has been a shift to commercial capacity to put things into orbit," he said. "As soon as it becomes a commercial enterprise, that means the technology is now much more mature and the prices drop hugely, and there is now this burgeoning global industry of commercial spaceflight and the commercial use of space." Gilmour Space Technologies cut its May launch campaign short after staff reported two anomalies on different days. The first was a power supply issue, and the second was the premature opening of the spacecraft's payload fairing, or nose cone. The company hopes to eventually send satellites into orbit from Australia for commercial entities and the government.

News.com.au
11 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Dark spots': COVID jab tied to rare health symptom
New research is calling for further study on a possible link between COVID-19 jabs and long-term vision issues. While vaccines have been vital in fighting the pandemic, emerging data could mean we're not out of the woods yet. Between January 2021 and January 2023, 20 peer-reviewed studies looked into eye problems reported by 243 people aged 18 to 84 who had received COVID-19 vaccines. Almost half of these patients - 42 per cent - had the Pfizer-BioNTech jab, which was the main vaccine rolled out in Australia, the USA, the UK, and much of Europe. What jumps out is inflammation. Nearly half of the patients reported experiencing ocular inflammatory conditions like uveitis, an irritation deep inside the eye. Another 24 per cent were said to have suffered optic neuritis, a swelling of the optic nerve that can cause pain and threaten vision. Herpetic eye disease, caused by the herpes virus attacking the eye, showed up in 14 per cent of cases, triggering redness, pain, and discomfort. About 10 per cent documented retinal circulation issues - blockages in the eye's arteries or veins that can trigger sudden vision loss. And there were also a few rare cases where patients were noted to exhibit retina-related problems causing 'dark spots' or 'blind patches'. But the most notable observations come from a recent Turkish study that tracked 64 patients before and after their two mRNA vaccine doses. Using detailed eye scans, researchers found an 8 per cent drop in the cornea's endothelial cell count - the cells responsible for keeping the cornea clear. These cells don't regenerate, and losing too many can permanently impair vision. To put that into perspective, healthy adults usually have between 2000 and 3000 of these cells per square millimetre. After vaccination, the average dropped from 2597 to 2378. While these numbers are still considered safe for most, the decline could be a warning sign for people with pre-existing eye conditions or those who have had eye surgeries like LASIK, cataract removal, or corneal transplants. Researchers also noted that corneas thickened by around 2 per cent after vaccination - a sign of possible swelling. The honeycomb shape of the endothelial cells became distorted, and the size differences between individual cells increased, which are both signs of cellular stress. Though none of the study participants reported immediate vision problems, experts warn that long-term structural changes to the cornea could lead to lasting damage, especially in vulnerable patients. Dr Fatma Sümer and Sevgi SubaÅŸi, authors of the study published in Ophthalmic Epidemiology, stressed the need for careful observation: 'The endothelium should be closely monitored in those with a low endothelial count or who have had a corneal graft.' According to Healthline, eye complications after vaccination are rare and appear to be driven by an overactive immune response. Symptoms can include blurred vision, light sensitivity, redness, eye pain, shingles around the eye, or reactivated herpes infections. In even rarer cases, the immune system may reject a previously transplanted cornea, risking vision loss and graft failure. This means the transplanted cornea loses its clarity and function, leading to impaired vision and the potential need for further treatment or surgery. These findings are not conclusive, and experts do not advise people to skip their COVID vaccine shots — far from it. But they are urging doctors and patients to not ignore these subtle warning signs. Those who have had prior eye surgery, suffer from chronic eye disease, or notice persistent blurry vision after vaccination are advised to be checked, because even small changes inside your eyes can have big consequences down the road According to safety reports from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), 'vaccination is the most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from infection.' Like all medicines, the TGA notes, 'COVID-19 vaccines may cause some side effects. 'The most frequently reported include injection-site reactions (such as a sore arm) and more general symptoms, like headache, muscle pain, fever and chills.' The TGA closely monitors reports of adverse events to the COVID-19 vaccines and emphasises that 'the protective benefits of vaccination far outweigh the potential risks.'