Unpopular Opinion - TANGLED'S Mother Gothel Wasn't That Bad
Did she keep the Queen and King of the land in anguish for 18 years by stealing their only baby? Sure did. Did she keep said baby locked in a tower away from human contact and influence? Most definitely. Did she emit Mommie Dearest energy by gaslighting her to believe that the lanterns flown on her birthday every year were never for her? Yep, unfortunately.
If this were a real-world scenario, there's no doubt that Mother Gothel (Donna Murphy) would have been arrested, tried and thrown in prison for tens of years – and rightfully so. However, honestly, in the grand scheme of things, she could have done so much more damage to Rapunzel overall. Besides being a kidnapper, her worst crime as her acting mother was never empowering her – which I think we can all agree is a terrible thing for any parental figure to do to their own child.
Gothel's strategy of stifling Rapunzel's inner desire to experience life outside her tower was convincing her that the 'outside was a dangerous place, filled with horrible, selfish people.' I mean, she wasn't totally wrong. Am I right?
She raised her as her own, taught her to sing (granted, this was to keep Gothel young), nicknamed her Flower, and even when Rapunzel wanted a specific gift for her birthday that required a long trip to retrieve, Gothel agreed to take the trip with little hesitation. All I'm saying is all Gothel needed was Rapunzel's hair, she didn't have to love and care for her the way that she did.
Now, could I have a slight bias in this because newer stories of women that we've always been led to believe are villains are being told, so we now see it from their perspectives? 100% YES.
For example, ABC's Once Upon a Time told the story of one of my favorite character progression arcs, with the Evil Queen, played by Lana Parrilla. In seven seasons, the writers allowed the Evil Queen to evolve into less of an evil character and more of an upstanding, regal one. She may have had her moments of pure pettiness toward Snow White, but over time we saw how the events of her past shaped and reshaped her choices in life to become the selfless, wonderful mother she was always meant to be to Snow White and Snow White's grandson – the familial ties were DEEP in this show. Arguably, the same thing could be said for the Angelina Jolie's portrayal of Maleficent. The way that she learned to love and care for Aurora – of course this was after putting a sleeping curse on her for revenge against a jilted lover – ended up morphing into a beautiful relationship between fairy Godmother and Godchild. ONCE UPON A TIME – ABC's 'Once Upon a Time' stars Lana Parrilla as Evil Queen/Regina/Roni. (ABC/Craig Sjodin)
Ultimately, it's safe to assume that the most long-term damage Rapunzel will have is Stockholm Syndrome, and that's for her charming partner, Flynn Rider, and her birth parents, whom she's been reunited with, to handle. Rapunzel is extremely loved, and thankfully she's never not known that feeling – thanks to her other Mother, Gothel. Once she gets out of the tower, you see her interactions with other people and you see how caring she is to other people around her, so clearly Mother Gothel wasn't that bad.
This article was originally posted on 6/30/20
Geek Girl Authority's Favorite Sci-Fi Mothers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
18 minutes ago
How to watch ABC News 'What You Need to Know' on Disney+
ABC News is launching its first-ever daily news show created specifically for Disney+, bringing viewers a fresh approach to the network's award-winning coverage. The new short-form series, hosted by ABC News chief international correspondent James Longman and senior political correspondent Rachel Scott, aims to help viewers stay ahead of the day's conversations with essential news and analysis. "We are proud to launch this innovative series with Rachel and James, who meet viewers where they are with essential news, context and analysis to help them better understand the world around us," Almin Karamehmedovic, president of ABC News, said of the new show. "This new effort expands ABC News' significant footprint on Disney+, allowing us to reach and connect with new and diverse audiences on the platform." When does it premiere? "What You Need to Know" makes its debut on Monday, July 21, exclusively on Disney+. New episodes will be released every weekday morning at 6 a.m. ET, giving viewers a jump start on their day's news consumption. Each episode remains available on-demand for 24 hours. What is the show about? The short-form streaming series will deliver a fast, fresh approach to news coverage. In each episode, the show will cover everything from breaking news headlines and major world events to entertainment updates and viral videos. 'What You Need to Know' anchors Two of ABC News' correspondents will take the helm of this groundbreaking series. James Longman, ABC News' chief international correspondent, brings his extensive global reporting experience to the show. Based in London, Longman has covered major international events across more than 45 countries, including Russian President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. "I'm really excited about the fast moving and mobile nature of this show," Longman said. "Rachel and I are going to take you along with us as we report from all corners of the world for ABC News. I can't think of a better way to break down the news than bringing viewers directly to the stories." Rachel Scott, ABC News' senior political correspondent, joins Longman as co-anchor. Scott's portfolio includes covering President Donald Trump's second term, his administration and Capitol Hill. She has reported on numerous significant political events, from the attempted assassination of Trump to President Joe Biden's decision to drop out of his reelection race. "I'm excited to host this show because it was intentionally designed to bring viewers with us -- whether we're reporting from the White House, overseas, or on the road," Scott said. "We hope viewers feel closer to the stories we cover every day. I am also excited about the opportunity to bring our audience up to speed quickly. They'll get the top stories in under 10 minutes with all the context and analysis they're used to seeing on ABC News." How to stream and watch 'What You Need to Know'? Viewers can access "What You Need to Know" exclusively through Disney+. A subscription to the streaming service is required to watch the show. 'What You Need to Know' schedule on Disney+ Each new episode debuts at 6 a.m. ET on weekday mornings and remains available for streaming throughout the day. The show joins Disney+'s growing lineup of ABC News programming, which includes "Good Morning America: First Look" at 4 a.m. ET, "Prime with Linsey Davis" at 7 p.m. ET, and "World News Tonight with David Muir" at 10 p.m. ET.
WIRED
18 minutes ago
- WIRED
This Is the Commodore Comeback Fans Have Waited for—but the Odds Are Still Against It
After years of mismanagement and questionable product tie-ins, the 80s computer brand is back, now with a fan at the helm. But is the appetite for retro gaming still big enough for it to succeed? The Commodore 64U Starlight Courtesy of Commodore In 1994, Commodore crashed and burned. Once a home computing giant across the US and Europe, the company was undone by mismanagement and misfires. The carcass was picked clean and the pieces resold so many times that it was hard to keep track, but with each new owner came the inevitable—an attempt to make a fast buck by slapping the famous C= logo on any old junk. Fans watched in horror as the brand appeared on the mediocre all-in-one PC, the bizarrely named Gravel in Pocket media player, and the Commodore smartphone. There was even a Commodore-branded shredder. So when retro gaming YouTuber Christian 'Perifractic' Simpson announced he wanted to buy what remained of Commodore and give it a new life, questions were asked. Chief among them: does the world still even need Commodore? When I'm 64 Commodore as a brand initially focused on typewriters and calculators, but its glory days arrived with the rise of home micros, causing a swift rebirth as Commodore International Computing. Its biggest success was the Commodore 64, which hit the sweet spot between affordability and potential. While the CPU was sluggish, powerful graphics and a surprisingly capable sound chip (which remains revered today) spurred creativity on both sides of the Atlantic. Over 5,000 commercial games were released during the machine's heyday, and more than 15 million units were sold, making the C64 still one of the highest-selling single computer models ever. It's this legacy Simpson aims to revive. Initially, he sought a licensing deal with the Commodore brand owners, imagining 'official' boards and replacement components as part of an inclusive, community-friendly conglomerate. These plans snowballed during discussions, and Simpson found himself securing an agreement to buy Commodore outright for a 'low seven-figure' sum. He now serves as Commodore CEO and promises to revive the company in a sustainable way—one that won't repeat the failures of the past. But here's where things get tricky. Simpson doesn't actually own the original company because that company no longer exists. Commodore's 1990s dismemberment means the current iteration owns a number of trademarks, but essential parts of the ecosystem remain scattered. C64 ROMs and Amiga (Commodore's 16-bit micro) rights belong to Cloanto and Amiga Corporation. AmigaOS is controlled by Hyperion Entertainment. And aside from the odd mass-market flirtation from clone machines, like the C64DTV all-in-one joystick and the plug-and-play THEC64 Mini, major developments that mattered for the past 30 years have all come from the community, not the brand. Computers for the Masses It's for these reasons Simpson finds himself walking multiple tightropes. He must avoid alienating enthusiasts that kept the Commodore flame alive, and not imply that only his new Commodore confers legitimacy. He must collaborate closely with owners of other key puzzle pieces and license the Commodore brand fairly to interested third parties. And to recoup that seven-figure sum, the new Commodore must sell enough new hardware, which means moving beyond a dwindling core fanbase. For now, Simpson's initial play banks heavily on nostalgia—not solely for the C64, but for an entire era. The new Commodore website pitches the company as a 'digital detox brand [that's] grounded in digital minimalism.' It rails against social media, glorifies the good old days of 'techno optimism'—apparently, the 1980s through to the mid-1990s—and hints that Commodore can help users reclaim their childhoods. But the company also wants to be seen as an innovator with an eye on the future, and this results in a kind of branding whiplash. The new Commodore wants to be both reboot and original; past and future. Fittingly, this iteration's debut product, the Commodore 64 Ultimate, embodies such tensions. The $500 gold-bling Founders Edition and $350 LED-laden disco case Starlight Edition don't exactly scream digital minimalism. But the $300 BASIC Beige is the spitting image of the original hardware. All models bridge authenticity and modernity by supporting original C64 peripherals and current connectivity, including 1080p HDMI output so you needn't hunt down a CRT TV. Inside, it's all FPGAS—field programmable gate arrays—which ultimately mean simulation rather than the less-accurate emulation found in Chinese retro handhelds and cheap plug-and-play TV devices. Some critics nonetheless grumble that even this 'new' machine is past and present in another way, effectively being an amalgamation of existing products, from the keycaps to the having the Ultimate64 board at its core. However, Ultimate64 creator Gideon Zweijtzer has publicly disagreed that Simpson is merely assembling other people's hard work and slapping on a logo. He believes the Commodore 64 Ultimate was a 'joint effort between parties to create a cohesive package' and credits Simpson as someone with reach who can 'bring people together.' The $64,000 Question That reach will be essential because noble efforts, sentiment, and saying the right thing won't bring sustainability. Even pent-up demand for a new Commodore 64—at the time of writing, over 4000 units have been sold, amounting to $1.5 million in revenue—is a one-off trick that can't be repeated. History shows retro appeal can be short-lived. Outside the hardcore enthusiasts, fans tend to rapidly move beyond rose-tinted, wide-eyed nostalgia; the retro devices they've bought then gather dust. Few remain on sale for long because the market is finite and fickle. And then, there's the question of games. A large slice of the annual retro gaming market—estimated to be around $2.5 billion, though no one has a great handle on the numbers—comes from software rather than hardware. The issue for Commodore here is that it never released any notable games of its own, so it can't mimic Atari's ability to remake the Atari 2600 with modern connectivity while also reimagining 1980s classics like Pong and Missile Command . And even if Commodore were to license games, nothing in the entire C64 catalog has the cultural clout of Pac-Man , Space Invaders , Sonic the Hedgehog , or Super Mario Bros . The Commodore 64 Ultimate menu. The alternate mainstream option would be an attempt to reestablish Commodore's reputation as a brand that offers computing for the masses, not the classes, ringing in Simpson's desire for a 'simpler, distraction-free computing experience.' But what would that mean in practice? Unplugging? Educational and creative tools? Commodore 64 BASIC is notoriously bad, and it's unclear whether enough newcomers will see value in a relatively expensive beige retro box when a Raspberry Pi costs a fraction of the price and can tap into a massive existing ecosystem. But an entirely new platform would be a colossally risky endeavor. The Last Byte of a Legend What is the endgame, then? Without hit games and obvious mainstream appeal, how does Commodore survive, let alone thrive? Is it even possible for this 1980s cultural icon to move beyond people who were there at the time and break out of its bubble? It's hard to say. Perhaps it doesn't have to. Simpson envisions a 'single, joined-up family of Commodore machines,' and that could be enough. Commodore would become a community-focused brand, presiding over a modest ecosystem, acting as a benevolent curator that elevates quality projects, brings just enough polish and legitimacy to help the scene flourish, and simply refuses to let the legacy fade. Although investors who've pumped in cash might see things differently. A much worse scenario would be a repeat of the past: panic over income, leading to the brand again being stamped on unremarkable products, or the mismanagement and misfires that alienate partners and fans. There's also the very real possibility that Commodore might just discover the harsh reality of being a very niche, small player in an industry of giants. Any one of those could deal a final, fatal blow to the brand from which it would never recover, taking down swathes of the community with it. Still, this time feels different. This revival doesn't come from cynicism but from genuine passion and love for the brand. Even so, the odds of success feel slim, whether that means sparking a new wave of computing optimism or returning the brand to cultural relevance. But for a while at least, fans can remain optimistic this might finally be the play that truly brings Commodore back to life.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billie Eilish Reveals 3D Collaboration With James Cameron Is in the Works
Billie Eilish is teasing a new project with James Cameron. During her sold-out night one Manchester concert on Saturday, Eilish revealed she is working on a 3D collaboration with James Cameron (Titanic, the Avatar films, Terminator franchise). More from The Hollywood Reporter Astronomer CEO Andy Byron Resigns After Getting Caught on Coldplay Kiss-Cam Tyler, the Creator Reveals New Album Drops Monday Cash Cobain on Justin Bieber 'Swag' Collaboration: "We Were Just in There Being Free" 'So you may have noticed that there are more cameras than usual in here. Basically, I can't say much about it, but what I can say is that I'm working on something very, very special with somebody named James Cameron, and it's going to be in 3D,' the singer told the crowd. 'So, take that as you will and these four shows here in Manchester, you and me are part of a thing that I am making with him. He's in this audience somewhere, just saying. So don't mind that, and also I'll probably be wearing this exact outfit for like four days in a row.' Details for the project are currently unknown. It's also not been revealed if her brother and longtime collaborator, Finneas, will be involved. The 'Birds of a Feather' singer's past film credits include the 2021 documentary Billie Eilish: The World's a Little Blurry, directed by R.J. Cutler and Happier Than Ever: A Love Letter to Los Angeles, the 2021 concert movie. Eilish is currently touring her third album, Hit Me Hard and Soft. As for Cameron, his next film is the highly anticipated Avatar: Fire and Ash, which is slated to release on Dec. 19. The runtime for the film will apparently be longer than The Way of Water, which was more than three hours long. Best of The Hollywood Reporter From 'Party in the U.S.A.' to 'Born in the U.S.A.': 20 of America's Most Patriotic (and Un-Patriotic) Musical Offerings Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
