Key witness in Lim Guan Eng trial says he told the truth
Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli, 66, former director of Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd (CZCSB), stated that the corruption did occur, supported by the substantial evidence and documents presented by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) during investigations.
'I was compelled to tell the truth. If I were to follow my heart, I would wish for YB Lim Guan Eng to win in this case, as I owe him a debt of gratitude.
'However, upon reviewing the evidence and documents, I could not deny that the offence indeed took place,' said the 23rd prosecution witness.
He made this statement during re-examination by deputy public prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin in the RM6.3 billion corruption case involving Lim Guan Eng.
Wan Shaharuddin: You informed the court that you were instructed to issue a press statement regarding the project, and that the contents of that statement were untrue, yet you proceeded to issue it. Is that correct?
Zarul Ahmad: I did so to protect my project, to avoid escalating tensions with the then Chief Minister of Penang, Lim Guan Eng, and to safeguard his interests.
Zarul Ahmad acknowledged that in the statement, he claimed the project was obtained transparently and without any criminal wrongdoing, which he admitted was false.
Wan Shaharuddin: So you deliberately misled the people of Penang to protect Lim Guan Eng's image despite knowing your statement was untruthful?
Zarul Ahmad: I am indebted to him and followed his instructions, as he was serving as the Finance Minister at the time.
According to the amended first charge, Lim, 64, is accused, in his capacity as the then chief minister of Penang, of abusing his position to receive a bribe of RM3.3 million to assist a company owned by Zarul Ahmad in securing the Major Roads and Undersea Tunnel Construction Project in Penang, valued at RM6,341,383,702.
The offence allegedly took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister's Office in Penang.
Under the amended second charge, Lim is accused of soliciting a 10 percent bribe out of the project's future profits from Zarul Ahmad for assisting his company in securing the same project.
The solicitation allegedly took place near The Gardens Hotel, Lingkaran Syed Putra, Mid Valley City, between 12.30 am and 2.00 am in March 2011.
Additionally, Lim faces two charges of disposing of a couple of state-owned lots of land in Penang, valued at RM208.8 million, to a developer linked to the undersea tunnel project.
These offences were allegedly committed at the Penang Land and Mines Office, Komtar, on Feb 17, 2015, and March 22, 2017.
The trial before Judge Azura Alwi is scheduled to resume on June 24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Trio ordered to defend charge of robbing luxury handbag
KOTA KINABALU (July 14): A Sessions Court here today ordered three men to enter their defence on a charge of gang robbery. Judge Amir Shah Amir Hassan ruled that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against Mohd Melvin Matdi, 36, Shahrizan Sablee, 24, and Zamree Said, 35. The three were charged under Section 395 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum jail term of 20 years and whipping, upon conviction. The court fixed August 8 for the defence trial. Mohd Melvin was denied bail and remains in remand, while bail for the other two accused was extended. According to the facts of the case, the three men allegedly robbed a 39-year-old woman of a luxury handbag at a tamu in Menggatal at about 4.20am on March 7 last year. Deputy public prosecutor Bryan Francis is leading the prosecution. Counsel Sylvester Kwan is representing Mohd Melvin, while the other two accused remain unrepresented. Four prosecution witnesses are expected to be called during the trial.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Bangladeshi loses bid to reclaim RM723k seized in Immigration raid
SHAH ALAM: The High Court has dismissed a criminal revision application filed by a Bangladeshi national challenging a Sessions Court's decision to forfeit RM723,000 in cash seized during an Immigration raid earlier this year. Judicial commissioner Dr Hazlina Hussain ruled that there was no procedural error by the Sessions Court judge to justify intervention by the higher court. According to the court document, Salman Ahmad Chowdhury as applicant had pleaded guilty to breaching the conditions of his temporary employment visit pass by working at an unauthorised premises in Ampang. Salman was fined RM400 and ordered to be deported. He did not appeal the order before his deportation. During the raid on Jan 17, enforcement officers from the Immigration Department found Salman in possession of multiple foreign passports and large sums of money kept in a safe deposit box. Following Salman's guilty plea, the lower court also ordered the forfeiture of RM723,000 to the government. His former employer, Agensi Pekerjaan Insight Alliance Sdn Bhd (the agent), was also fined RM10,000 for hiring an undocumented migrant and did not appeal the conviction. However, on May 6, Salman and the agent applied to High Court to exercise its revisionary power to revise the learned lower court's decision on an order to forfeit the monies. Lawyers Mohd Haziq Razali and Nur Khairunnisa Sabirah Abdul Manan submitted that was no nexus between the cash and the immigration offence. However, the judge disagreed. "To the court, if the counsel's argument had any merit, it was quite perplexing as to who now owns the cash if the forfeiture order by the Sessions Court was wrong. "There is indeed a nexus between Salman and the disputed money, based on the police report. "Furthermore, Salman admitted to all the exhibits tendered before the trial judge. "By denying the forfeiture order, as counsel did, they were also questioning the guilty plea Salman had made before the lower court, which the court thought devoid of merit," she said in her grounds of judgment. Salman and the agent filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal.
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ex-judge loses appeal in RM100mil defamation suit against Sarawak Report editor
PUTRAJAYA: Former Sessions Court judge Mabel Sheela Muttiah has lost her appeal against a Kuala Lumpur High Court decision that dismissed her RM100 million defamation suit against Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle Brown on a technicality. The technical grounds were Mabel's failure to translate two allegedly defamatory articles into Bahasa Melayu, a mandatory requirement for all pleadings filed in court in her suit over three articles. One of the article s was a 2015 Sarawak Report piece titled "How AG's office connived to prevent a second post-mortem on Kevin Morais — Exclusive Expose". A three-judge Court of Appeal (CoA) panel led by Datuk Azizah Nawawi today (July 14) dismissed Mabel's appeal, saying they were bound by another CoA ruling that a plaintiff must provide a Bahasa Malaysia text of an impugned defamatory article. "In this case, there was no Bahasa Malaysia translation of the impugned defamatory article, and that was clearly a non-compliance with Order 92 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012. "We find there is no appealable error by the High Court. "The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs," she said. The court ordered Mabel to pay RM10,000 in costs to Rewcastle Brown. Azizah sat with judges Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin. Lawyers Guok Ngek Seong and Phyllia Lim acted for Rewcastle Brown while Mabel was represented by lawyers Datuk David Gurupatham and R. Venothani. Mabel was once a special officer to former attorney-general Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali. In May last year, then High Court Judicial Commissioner (now judge) Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan said the requirement for complete pleadings in Bahasa Melayu is attributed to the language's supremacy as a national language. He said this was enshrined in Article 152 of the Federal Constitution and Section 8 of the National Language Act 1963/67 and Order 92 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court 2012. He said Mabel made an inference about the meaning of the articles and ruled that he would have awarded RM1 million in damages as one of the three articles was defamatory and injured her reputation, but there was still no certified translation in Bahasa Melayu.
