Citizens Advice Scotland in trans rights row over bathroom change
CAS's chief executive, Derek Mitchell, reportedly said in the email, sent May 6, that the charity was bound by 'legal constraints' following the landmark ruling by the UK Supreme Court in April on how sex should be interpreted under the Equality Act 2010.
The ruling stated that, under the Equality Act 2010, the definition of 'woman' refers to 'biological sex', a decision gender critical campaigners claimed had brought 'clarity on the law'.
READ MORE: Labour MPs visit Israel on lobbying trip in middle of Gaza genocide
However, legal experts have pointed out that the ruling on the definition of 'man' and 'woman' relates to the 2010 Equality Act only, while campaign groups have also raised concerns over the interpretation of the ruling.
Mitchell said the decision to enforce male and female-only bathrooms was in response to the ruling and subsequent interim 'guidance' offered by the UK's human rights regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
CAS's chief executive reportedly clarified that a separate single-occupancy bathroom would also be available 'for any colleague'.
'As an employer, CAS is required to comply with the law, and we need to ensure our practices and policies reflect current legal standards,' Mitchell said.
'This is not an expression of any view on the High Court ruling, it is our legal obligation as an employer.'
Mitchell reportedly sent a second update two days later acknowledging the upset that had been caused due to the decision, but doubled down on claims that the charity was bound by the law to introduce changes.
The decision has left staff at CAS feeling hurt, afraid, disappointed, and concerned by Mitchell's claim that the decision had been taken out of the charity's hands by legal changes, The Ferret reported.
A spokesperson for CAS said they recognised 'this issue touches on deeply personal experiences and we will continue to monitor and review our approach should guidance change'.
Lawyers and campaigners have said that the EHRC's update was neither intended as formal guidance nor legally binding, and therefore gives employers options on how they proceed.
One staff member at CAS claimed neither the trade union nor the equality, diversity and inclusion committee were consulted ahead of the decision, according to The Ferret.
Another staff member told The Ferret how CAS had built its workplace culture around inclusion and dignity, and that this policy change was effectively a 'slap in the face'.
'It's almost like it's polluted my work,' said one staff member.
'Because obviously when we consult, we're very respectful of any kind of pronouns. So I would like to think that we would treat our colleagues the same, and that the attitude from management would be the same.'
Another said the decision to put this out 'without going through proper channels to make sure that the information that he's putting in there is correct' made them feel 'less safe within the organisation'.
The Good Law Project have raised concerns since the ruling by the UK Supreme Court over how it is interpreted and whether or not it will impact other legislation that governs access to toilets and changing rooms in the workplace.
Jen Ang, a human rights lawyer and director of legal firm Lawmanity, was shown the leaked emails by The Ferret.
She said: 'The Supreme Court decision does not require employers to provide only separate toilets for men and women – it only clarified the meaning of 'sex' for purposes of the Equality Act and in so doing, shifted our understanding of what is required if single sex, mixed sex or only sex facilities are being provided by an employer.
'Employers must consider a range of factors in deciding what toilet facilities to provide, and be prepared to justify their decisions.'
She claimed companies or charities that restricted access to some facilities on the basis of a protected characteristic like sex or gender reassignment without being able to justify the decision as a 'proportionate means to a legitimate aim', may be open to legal challenge in the future.
READ MORE: Police issue statement after Scottish men killed in Spain shooting
'This is a good reason why organisations should start early with good faith efforts to gather the information they will need to make these decisions,' Ang added.
'By engaging with staff and service users to understand their requirements – and also why clear and practical guidance and support is urgently needed from our UK equalities and human rights regulators, and from our national governments.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
LGBTQ+ figures criticise supreme court's gender ruling at London Pride
Thousands of people gathered in London for Pride on Saturday, but prominent LGBTQIA+ figures at the event voiced concern that transgender people are being 'villainised more than ever'. Singer and actor Olly Alexander and writer Shon Faye were among those to criticise a UK supreme court ruling on the definition of a woman at London's annual celebration of LGBTQI+ communities. Alexander, the Eurovision 2024 contestant, told the PA news agency: 'Trans people right now, they need our support and love more than ever, they're being villainised, demonised in the press, by a lot of the media, and trans people they're just like us … they're you, they're me. 'They deserve the same respect, the same rights, the same privileges, same opportunities, and that's why Pride is so important this year.' In April the supreme court ruled the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Before the march, Faye, author of Love in Exile and The Transgender Issue, said 'we've just seen an unprecedented attack on queer rights and trans rights across the world'. She told PA: 'For the trans community in particular here in the UK, we've seen an onslaught of misinformation, attacks in the media, and unfortunately the roll back of human rights in the courts. 'I think (Pride) is more important than ever – I think a lot of trans people have been made to feel afraid in public space and pride this year is about taking back public space, and showing what we're not going to be silenced, and we're not going to be intimidated.' US pop singer Chaka Khan is headlining a concert in Trafalgar Square after the march, at which about 500 organisations filed from Hyde Park Corner, through Piccadilly Circus and on to Whitehall Place. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: 'It was an honour and a privilege to again walk at the front of London's world-famous Pride parade as huge crowds of Londoners and visitors joined together for an incredible show of love, unity and solidarity with our LGBTQI+ communities. 'The fantastic parade and celebrations across central London have shown once again that our capital is a beacon of inclusivity and diversity. 'This year's event was also a defiant reminder that we must keep fighting for equality and take a stand against those seeking to roll back hard-won rights.' A YouGov poll released before the event found 67% of people in the UK believe the country is inclusive to LGBTQ+ people, and 60% would not welcome a shift towards more negative attitudes. Simon Blake, chief executive of charity Stonewall, which commissioned the survey, said, despite the findings, 'we know many LGBTQ+ people do not feel this in their neighbourhoods and workplaces'.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Martina Navratilova is about to win her greatest ever victory for all women
I am fairly sure that nobody's idea of a good Wimbledon weekend is settling down with a cup of coffee and tucking into a story about the latest in the world of trans rights case law. Indeed, most people would be happier if they never had to hear of this harmful, strange and rather sad issue ever again. Live and let live, with a few exceptions, pretty much covers it in the eyes of the sane. And yet on and on it goes. The trans rights movement just won't give up. They refuse to see how their agenda might be seen to trample over the peace, safety and sense of fairness – the sense of right itself – of the much bigger, embattled group known once quite simply as women. In April our Supreme Court ruled that sex, within the context of the Equality Act, should be taken as biological. This was met with an enormous breath-letting of relief by a brave cadre of pro-woman activists and the very many who privately share that view. But the trans rights corps simply continued on regardless. Many organisations in Britain have simply ignored the ruling so it is beginning to feel like it never happened. Whitehall's own advert for the job of overseeing the implementation of single-sex spaces (what a weird world we live in) includes the role of making it easier to legally change gender. I mentioned 'exceptions' to the obvious live-and-let-live policy towards trans people. Those are not about being horrible to trans people or wishing or legalising harm to them. They are about imposing some basic ethics on trans people that we would expect of any group: their rights cannot come at the cost of loads of other people's. Their rights cannot amount to a perversion of fair play, making it unfair play. That's not how societies like ours work. The biggest, clearest example of this, the one that has exercised the most people – including those who would rather stay out of politics and the culture war – is trans women and girls in girls' and women's sport. The issue has been incredibly persistent despite the blinding, widely-felt obviousness of the right answer – that no, biological boys and men should not compete in girls and women's sport because they have an unfair advantage. But apparently it's not obvious. Which is why the US Supreme Court is now getting involved. It announced last week that it would consider an attempt by West Virginia and Idaho to enforce their state laws banning biologically male trans athletes from women's sport in public (state) schools and universities. There is a tortuous legal history to this matter already. State laws banning trans girls and women competing in sport in public schools and universities have been blocked in circuit courts of appeal. Now two trans runners who wanted to be on women's track and cross-country teams, one in middle school in West Virginia and one at the Boise State University of Idaho, have sued those states for discrimination and violation of their Title IX (sex-based) rights, with lower court judges eventually siding with the states, but the litigants allowed to keep competing while the case goes on. Indeed, in April of this year, the fourth US circuit court of appeals in Richmond, Virginia, threw out the lower court judge's decision, ruling that the law's exclusion of the middle school trans girl from girls' teams violates the Title IX law. The ruling was a bizarre thing. It said, in its decision against West Virginia state law, that it treats transgender girls differently from other girls, 'which is – literally – the definition of gender identity discrimination' and that it was therefore 'discrimination on the basis of sex' (Title XI). Er, yes. How the court came to use the idea that transgender girls were the same as other girls as the bedrock of its argument is hard to understand. It's as if the word 'transgender' simply isn't there, which shows how totemic the irrational beliefs about identity have become. At any rate, now the Supreme Court is needed to step in to decide whether the state laws are unconstitutional. Hopefully it'll be clever enough to argue what the vast majority of people already know. If the Court rules in favour of the states, the implications will be huge: 23 other states have now passed laws banning trans women in women's sport. Here in Blighty, the whole thing drags on terribly too. It's painful. Wimbledon is a feast of excitement, merriment and best of British strawberries and fizz, and yet it's part of a firmament that has been overshadowed by the still-confusing guidance around trans women in tennis. While trans women have been banned from some British events, under the Women's Tennis Association's guidelines, trans players can compete in WTA tournaments if they have signed a form saying they are female or non-binary and that their testosterone levels will remain below a certain limit for two years. Which is how Martina Navratilova, the tennis champion (who has won the Wimbledon singles final nine times) ended up taking on the same aggressive, homophobic, misogynistic lunatics as JK Rowling. You can understand her passion and her position. Would she have had the career she has with the WTA guidelines? Quite possibly not. Sports women have been feeling cheated out of what is rightfully theirs. Girls and women aspiring with all they are worth to be champions feel disillusioned. And then their confidence begins to ebb. This is what happened, as was well-chronicled, after the University of Pennsylvania welcomed barely disguised man 'Lia' Thomas onto the women's swim team. It was shocking to see, and even more shocking to see the abuse female swimmers faced in describing why it was wrong. 'Male bodies need to play in male sports,' the tireless Navratilova spelt out for the umpteeth time on Amol Rajan Interview s on the BBC last month. 'They just need to compete in the proper category, which is the male category. It's that simple. But by including male bodies in the women's tournament, now somebody is not getting into the tournament. A woman is not going into the tournament because now a male has taken her place.' In many ways, Navratilova encapsulates so much about Anglo-American culture today. Despite standing up for women's sport and being a prominent, inspiring example of a lesbian in a fairly heterosexual domain, she is hounded and ostracised by LGBT groups. We have never lived in times so obnoxiously drunk on their own progressiveness, while being blind to the actual authoritarian regressiveness that is really being peddled – and by the brave, fought. I was swimming at the Ladies Pond on Hampstead Heath not long after our Supreme Court ruling and I ended up speaking to a few young women about their thoughts on the matter. They were semi-professional athletes and while they didn't much like, but were not impassioned, about trans women at the pond, they were extremely angry and activated about transwomen in sport. This, they felt, was a huge moral sin, and undermined all that sport stands for: fairness of competition, the fruits of hard work, the pleasure of the win. America's Supreme Court has the chance to set a precedent. There is much I find sinister and wrong about Trump's America, but there is a better chance now than there was before that on this issue, the Supreme Court will make the right choice, and begin to undo some of the madness of the past decade.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
LGBTQ+ figures criticise supreme court's gender ruling at London Pride
Thousands of people gathered in London for Pride on Saturday, but prominent LGBTQIA+ figures at the event voiced concern that transgender people are being 'villainised more than ever'. Singer and actor Olly Alexander and writer Shon Faye were among those to criticise a UK supreme court ruling on the definition of a woman at London's annual celebration of LGBTQI+ communities. Alexander, the Eurovision 2024 contestant, told the PA news agency: 'Trans people right now, they need our support and love more than ever, they're being villainised, demonised in the press, by a lot of the media, and trans people they're just like us … they're you, they're me. 'They deserve the same respect, the same rights, the same privileges, same opportunities, and that's why Pride is so important this year.' In April the supreme court ruled the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Before the march, Faye, author of Love in Exile and The Transgender Issue, said 'we've just seen an unprecedented attack on queer rights and trans rights across the world'. She told PA: 'For the trans community in particular here in the UK, we've seen an onslaught of misinformation, attacks in the media, and unfortunately the roll back of human rights in the courts. 'I think (Pride) is more important than ever – I think a lot of trans people have been made to feel afraid in public space and pride this year is about taking back public space, and showing what we're not going to be silenced, and we're not going to be intimidated.' US pop singer Chaka Khan is headlining a concert in Trafalgar Square after the march, at which about 500 organisations filed from Hyde Park Corner, through Piccadilly Circus and on to Whitehall Place. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: 'It was an honour and a privilege to again walk at the front of London's world-famous Pride parade as huge crowds of Londoners and visitors joined together for an incredible show of love, unity and solidarity with our LGBTQI+ communities. 'The fantastic parade and celebrations across central London have shown once again that our capital is a beacon of inclusivity and diversity. 'This year's event was also a defiant reminder that we must keep fighting for equality and take a stand against those seeking to roll back hard-won rights.' A YouGov poll released before the event found 67% of people in the UK believe the country is inclusive to LGBTQ+ people, and 60% would not welcome a shift towards more negative attitudes. Simon Blake, chief executive of charity Stonewall, which commissioned the survey, said, despite the findings, 'we know many LGBTQ+ people do not feel this in their neighbourhoods and workplaces'.
