Manhattan Community Board 8 votes against Lenox Hill Hospital expansion proposal
There's been an ongoing conversation with the community for the last six years after the hospital's 2019 revitalization plan proposed a 516-foot-tall building.
Residents are concerned about what 10 years of construction will look like in their residential neighborhood.
"They kinda can upgrade the infrastructure, and hospitals do it all the time. They're all not tearing themselves down and building these pavilions," Upper East Side resident Ann Goodbody said.
"We're all for renovation of the hospital. We'd love a nice new hospital, but the size and scale is just astronomical for this neighborhood, let alone any residential neighborhood," Upper East Side resident Stacy Krusch said.
Hospital employees say the building is over 150 years old and renovations are critical.
"We have to be thinking not just five years from now and ten years from now, but 50 to 100 years from now, generations ahead," said Jake Scheinerman, Lenox Hill chairman of cardiac and thoracic surgery.
The height of the building was later revised to 436 feet in the 2023 proposal.
"It does demonstrate a commitment to listening and a commitment to change in how we have lowered the height of the building and how we have continued to try and adapt the face and structure of the building to what we hear from you all," Lenox Hill Executive Director Dr. Daniel Baker said.
A hospital spokesperson says they are encouraged by the growing support and that they "remain committed to working with community leaders throughout the approval process."
Local 79 worker Troy Watt is hoping it will pass eventually.
"The opportunity for there to be some consistent work will be great for hundreds of New Yorkers, you know," he said.
Community Board 8 voted 23-15 against the proposal. It now goes to the borough president, city planning commission, City Council and eventually the mayor's office.
Members of the Committee to Protect Our Lenox Hill Community say 40 stories is still too high for the neighborhood and thanks the community board for standing with them. For now, the fight continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
OF COURSE New York's bungled weed legalization fueled a wave of addiction
An explosive Post exclusive revealing that legal weed is fueling a wave of addiction is fresh proof of Albany's feckless legalization. 'It's one of the stupidest things our society has done — they legalized cannabis during the opioid crisis,' grumbled Luke Nasta, president and CEO of Camelot Counseling of Staten Island. Thing is, neither the Legislature's leaders nor Gov. Andrew Cuomo (then eyeing a 2020 presidential run) cared about the risks, the clear downsides or even elementary practicality when they rammed through legalization in 2019. Advertisement They let social-justice obsessions write the new rules, then installed a clueless crew to run the new state Office of Cannabis Management. As the OCM dithered over awarding the new licenses, illegal shops popped up all over the city and state — shielded from law enforcement by the new laws' lunatic provisions. So the outlets that had proven their ability by selling under the 2014 medical-marijuana law got crushed even as qualified new potential sellers couldn't open for business. Advertisement Oh, and Albany didn't even allow for common-sense limits on smoking dope in public, so the reek of weed is everywhere. Worst of all, the politicians shut their ears to warnings about the impact of cannabis on young brains — a prime reason the Medical Society of New York opposed legalization. So the state saw an explosion of flavored weed products and edibles, plainly aimed at hooking young people susceptible to addiction. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Any legalization risked bringing an avalanche of new addicts, but New York's move might as well have been timed and designed to maximize the damage. How mad does it get? Consider the nonprofit Housing Works, which runs drug-treatment services and a cannabis-dispensary arm. It tells its pot customers they're 'helping fund lifesaving services that support thousands of New Yorkers each year' — except that its treatment centers on the addict-enabling 'harm reduction' approach. Prospering by feeding misery: That's pretty much the essence of Albany's approach to legalization.
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
NYC shooting would never have happened if mental illness were handled properly
If New York is to be the stage for mad people to commit their spectacle acts of violence, then we need to talk seriously about mental-health reform. The Nevada gunman who opened fire in midtown Manhattan last week, killing a police officer and three others, should never have made it to New York. A competent mental-health system would have stopped him years ago and 2,000 miles away. The 27-year-old shooter had been hospitalized involuntarily twice in Nevada, first in 2022, at the age when serious mental illnesses tend to manifest, and again in 2024. In between those short-term holds, he had police encounters, including an arrest for criminal trespassing and exhibited troubling behavior like driving unregistered cars. Just a month before the shooting, in June, a tip was reportedly called in that he had bought excessive amounts of ammunition at a gun show and an aftermarket trigger, a gun piece designed to give a shooter better control and accuracy. In a rambling suicide note blaming the NFL, the shooter believed he had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, though reports of his history of any concussions are mixed. The NYPD found antipsychotic medication prescribed to him in his car. His violent behavior, which antipsychotics effectively reduce, suggests he hadn't been taking them. All this suggests a young man experiencing signs of early psychosis and who had deteriorated enough to draw the attention of government systems. As is all too typical with these cases, though, there appears to have been no supervision or oversight, no mandated treatment and no long-term hospitalization. The shooter's deterioration, from his first involuntary commitment to his purchase of ammunition and firearms, all happened in Nevada. So did his release — twice — from holds that should have promoted more sustained interventions. Nevada ranks 43rd in the nation for inpatient psychiatric bed capacity. With so few beds, hospitals can only admit so many patients, which means some patients won't be committed, even when that's precisely what they and the community need. Short-term stays of 72 hours or less fix little. They don't set up a care structure around a person to facilitate stability. Upon discharge, there's no guarantee of treatment compliance, especially in a state where court-ordered outpatient care is rarely used. Some have asked how the shooter, with a mental-health history, was able to get hold of a gun. But gun laws are only as good as the mental-health records that inform them. And if a mental-health system fails to intervene forcefully enough, scant service records will ever be generated. A mass shooting requires a greater degree of organization than a subway pushing. But like the subway violence New Yorkers have become tragically accustomed to, the Midtown shooter's victims were strangers to him, and he was known to the system, which failed him and the public. Those mental-health systems failures were Nevada's, not New York's. But the shooting tragedy provides lessons relevant to the debate here. First, untreated serious mental illness, though more visible in New York City, is a national problem. If New York continues to strike the fancy of ambitious murderers looking for the largest stage on which to perpetuate their atrocities, New York has a uniquely large stake in national mental-health reform. President Donald Trump's recent executive order on homelessness called for more use of civil commitment nationwide. Progressives blanch at that, but it's what will be needed if we're to make headway in reducing mental illness-related violence. Second, in the case of most such violence, the problem isn't stigma or insufficient public empathy for the mentally disabled. It's insufficient engagement with those who are most sick and most at risk, many of whom don't believe they are sick at all. Third, while asking mental-health systems to stop all violence somehow related to untreated psychosis is unrealistic, asking them to help reduce the risk is, or should be, a core responsibility. But systems tend to go about that task in completely the wrong way. Too many taxpayer-funded mental-health programs claim to prevent mental illness but do so by conducting mass screenings of the population for general distress. Examples include Mental Health First Aid and school-based programs, which have expanded dramatically since COVID. When everyone is marked for concern, the system floods with noise, making true signals of danger harder to recognize. A more effective mental-health system would be both smaller and larger than the one we have now. It would be more ambitious and certainly involve the robust participation of the national government. But it would be more focused on the hardest cases. Stephen Eide is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal. Carolyn D. Gorman is a Paulson Policy Analyst at the Manhattan Institute.
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Get granny some AC: How using a fan when it's really hot out could actually make the elderly hotter
As New Yorkers sweat through relentless heat this summer, many are cranking up electric fans in a desperate bid for relief. But a shocking new study throws cold water on the popular cooling fix, warning it could actually backfire for older adults under certain conditions. Researchers found that in some blistering environments, sitting in front of a fan can increase body temperature in seniors — putting grandma and grandpa at greater risk of heat stroke and other serious health problems. 4 Thousands of people in the US suffer from heatstroke each year. SERHII – The study, conducted by scientists in Australia and Canada, tested how electric fans affect older adults under both dry and humid heat conditions. In the first phase, 31 adults aged 60 and older were exposed to hot, dry air — 100.4°F with just 15% humidity — simulating severe indoor heatwave conditions. Each participant completed four separate, three-hour sessions spaced at least 72 hours apart: fan only, skin wetting without a fan, skin wetting with a fan, and no intervention. Instead of cooling them down, fan use in dry heat caused participants' core body temperatures to rise by 0.5°F. They also reported feeling hotter and less comfortable. The findings suggest that, rather than cooling the body, the fan was actually pushing heat into it. Previous research from the same team found that fans used in hot, dry conditions tripled cardiac strain in older adults — a potentially deadly consequence for people with heart disease. 4 Extreme heat can exacerbate existing medical conditions and even accelerate aging. Felix Mizioznikov – 'In very hot and dry heat, fan use worsened all outcomes and should be discouraged for these conditions,' the study authors wrote. The second phase of the study focused on hot, humid conditions. This time, the researchers included 58 older adults — including 27 with a history of coronary artery disease, who had been excluded from the dry heat tests due to potential heart risks. In these tests, room temperatures again reached 100.4°F, but with 60% humidity. Unlike in dry heat, fan use in humid conditions slightly lowered participants' core temperatures by an average of 0.18°F. It also boosted sweating and made participants feel cooler and more comfortable overall. An earlier study by the same team showed that fans — with or without skin wetting — also helped reduce cardiac strain under similar humid conditions. 4 Studies suggest roughly 9 out of 10 homes in the US have some form of air conditioning. Satjawat – Together, researchers say the findings challenge CDC guidelines that advise against using fans when temperatures exceed 90°F, citing a potential increase in body temperature and related health risks. 'While air conditioning is an effective way of staying cool, it's not available to everyone, especially those most vulnerable to the heat such as the elderly and people with heart disease — so it's positive news that low-cost alternatives are effective, Dr. Daniel Gagnon, a researcher at the Montreal Heart Institute and co-author of both studies, said last year. 'Importantly, the study has shown that the weather conditions affect the type of cooling strategy that should be used — a vital piece of information that will help older people to stay safe in heatwaves,' he added. 4 Extreme heat events are becoming more frequent and intense in the US. Günter Albers – Heat waves are becoming more frequent across major US cities — and more dangerous, as sweltering overnight temperatures offer little relief from the day's heat. Each year, an estimated 60,000 Americans end up in the emergency room due to heat-related illnesses like heat exhaustion and heat stroke — and more than 13% of those cases require hospitalization, according American Medical Association. In New York City, the danger is already playing out. On June 25, a record-breaking 99°F scorcher sent 141 people to emergency rooms with heat-related issues — the highest single-day total since 2017. Extreme heat is the deadliest weather-related hazard in the US, with more than 14,000 deaths directly linked to heat since 1979. But experts warn the true toll may be far higher, as heat is often underreported or overlooked as a contributing factor. In New York alone, more than 500 people die prematurely each summer due to extreme heat — the vast majority inside their homes without air conditioning. The city operates cooling centers to help vulnerable residents, but for those relying on electric fans at home, the new research makes one thing clear: check the humidity. If it's dry, that fan could leave you even hotter than before.
