
School leaders' unions consider encouraging members to quit as Ofsted inspectors
In a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and Ofsted chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver, the unions said the proposed action 'underlines the strength of feeling' about the reforms.
This would be an unprecedented step for ASCL and NAHT and underlines the strength of feeling about the proposed reforms Letter to Education Secretary from ASCL and NAHT
This month, Ofsted said it would delay setting out its final plan for school inspections in England until September – just weeks before new report cards are due to be rolled out in November.
Under the plans, set out in February, schools in England could be graded across eight to 10 areas of a provision using a colour-coded five-point scale.
They would receive ratings, from the red 'causing concern' to orange 'attention needed', through the green shades of 'secure', 'strong' and 'exemplary' for each area of practice.
But in a letter on Tuesday, the leaders of the ASCL and the NAHT highlighted heads' concerns over the timetable for reforms and the five-point grading scale.
The unions have both warned that the intention to start inspecting under a new system in the autumn term is 'entirely unacceptable' and it will negatively affect staff's wellbeing and mental health.
It comes after four education unions called on the Government to delay the introduction of school inspection report cards to the beginning of the 2026/27 academic year earlier this week.
The latest letter – signed by the ASCL's Pepe Di'Iasio and the NAHT's Paul Whiteman – said: 'We are writing to you further to our joint letter with NASUWT and NEU to inform you ASCL Council recently determined that unless there are changes to both the timeframe of implementation and to the five-point grading scale, then ASCL will consider encouraging its members to withdraw their service from Ofsted as OIs in the autumn term.
'At its meeting of June 20 the NAHT resolved to do the same.
It feels as though we have exhausted the potential for compromise through discussion, and that we have little option other than to consider this more direct form of action Pepe Di'Iasio, Association of School and College Leaders
'This would be an unprecedented step for ASCL and NAHT and underlines the strength of feeling about the proposed reforms.'
Ofsted had planned to publish its formal response to its consultation on proposed inspection reforms in the summer term, ahead of the changes coming into effect in November this year.
But earlier this month, Sir Martyn said the watchdog now plans to publish its full response in September due to the scale of the feedback it received.
The inspectorate has said it will give it more time to analyse responses and carry out further testing of proposals to improve the final approach.
At the time, the Education Secretary called the delay of the publication of inspection materials – and Ofsted's consultation response – 'disappointing'.
Ms Phillipson added that it was 'important' that Ofsted delivers to the expected timescales to avoid additional challenges for school leaders.
Mr Di'Iasio said: 'We have voiced our concerns repeatedly over the past few months in discussions with Ofsted and the DfE (Department for Education), but the timetable for implementation has actually got worse rather than better, and there has been no indication so far of likely movement on the five-point grading scale.
It is disappointing that unions are taking legal action and using disruption tactics to frustrate our vital work Ofsted spokeswoman
'It feels as though we have exhausted the potential for compromise through discussion, and that we have little option other than to consider this more direct form of action.'
Last year, the Government announced that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped.
Previously, Ofsted awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgments: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate.
The move came after Ofsted faced criticism after the death of headteacher Ruth Perry.
Mrs Perry took her own life in January 2023 after an Ofsted report downgraded her Caversham Primary School in Reading, Berkshire, from the highest to the lowest overall effectiveness rating over safeguarding concerns.
An Ofsted spokeswoman said: 'Ofsted exists to keep children safe and raise standards.
'Our inspectors do vital work to improve children's lives, including by identifying schools, nurseries and colleges where standards are not high enough.
'It is disappointing that unions are taking legal action and using disruption tactics to frustrate our vital work.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Pupil numbers in schools expected to drop by nearly 400,000 over five years
The number of pupils in state schools in England is expected to decline by nearly 400,000 by 2030 amid falling birth rates, Government figures suggest. The population attending primary and nursery schools is expected to drop at a 'faster rate' than previously projected over the next five years, according to the Department for Education (DfE). It comes as primary schools in parts of England, including London, have been considering closing due to falling pupil numbers and funding pressures. The latest DfE projections, published on Thursday, suggest that 4,205,117 pupils will be in state nursery and primary schools by 2030 – a fall of 300,000 from the population in 2025. Meanwhile, 3,135,086 pupils are projected to be in state secondary schools in 2030 – which is 97,000 lower than the actual school population in 2025. A population bulge in England has been moving into secondary schools, but the DfE said it now expects these pupil numbers to peak in 2026/2027. Last month, a former education secretary called for school funding to no longer be judged on a per-pupil basis because of falling pupil numbers. Conservative MP Damian Hinds said the decline in the number of children in schools meant funding being measured on a per-pupil basis was no longer a good reflection of whether funding is increasing or decreasing. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Falling rolls can create a real headache for schools already struggling amid severe financial pressures because the majority of funding is calculated on a per-pupil basis. 'It will be vital that the Department for Education protects schools that are particularly affected by this as it has a disproportionate impact on budgets, particularly for small schools. 'There are always significant variations between different parts of the country, individual schools and even year groups and other recent data forecast the number of school places planned for 2026/27 will need to double to meet demand. 'Trends can also change over time. Rather than reducing funding, we would urge the Government to continue to invest in schools, allowing them to maintain existing staffing levels. 'This would help reduce the unsustainable levels of workload which are fuelling a recruitment and retention crisis, also enabling some schools to offer smaller classes and more targeted help for pupils who need it.' Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'The forecast that there will be almost 400,000 fewer pupils in schools by 2030 will understandably cause concern among parents and educators about implications for their schools. 'However, it is not a given that falling pupil numbers means widespread school closures.' He added: 'Using falling rolls to reduce class sizes would improve schools for pupils and staff, helping reduce workload and improve teacher retention, allowing more contact time with each pupil to improve educational outcomes and allowing for greater integration of pupils with Send into mainstream classrooms. 'Schools with 30 pupils per class cost the same amount to run as schools with fewer per class, but the current funding model allocates money to schools on a per-pupil basis, leaving those with smaller classes out of pocket. 'To take advantage of the slowing birthrate and improved outcomes, the Government must protect schools with falling rolls from funding shortfalls and avoid schools in this situation making cuts that harm educational provision.'


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Extraordinary data blunder led to overestimate of special needs pupils getting extra time in exams by 100%
Exam chiefs have admitted they overestimated the proportion of children getting extra time in exams for special needs by more than 100 per cent. In an extraordinary blunder, Ofqual, the exams regulator, admitted the real figure is actually less than half of what it said. The mistake was caused by including duplicate applications in its data for the last decade. The latest figures showed an incredible 30 per cent of children got extra time in their A-level and GCSE exams, up from 15 per cent in 2016. However, today, the regulator admitted the real figure is likely to be less than 14 per cent. It means Ofqual are now withdrawing ten years' worth of data, and will re-publish the latest figures in the coming months. The mistake is significant because the supposed enormous rise in children being granted extra time for special needs has become a political headache for the Government. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has been battling how to mend the country's overloaded and 'broken' special needs system. As part of this, she asked Ofqual to look into why there was a large disparity between the percentage of children who get extra time at private schools, at 42 per cent, compared with those at state schools, at 27 per cent. Today, Ofqual admitted that the real figures for private and state schools will be broadly in line with their respective special needs populations. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said: 'We are correcting the record as soon as possible. 'The access arrangements process has not changed, and students who received support did so appropriately. 'This issue is limited to our access arrangements dataset and our other statistics are not affected.' In a blog post, Mr Bramley said the error had been due to incorrect reporting at a local level. It included those who didn't sit exams in the year being recorded, and duplicate applications for the same student. 'Reporting was based on data that was not linked to individual student exam entry records, making validation difficult,' he added. He said that the proportion of students receiving special exam arrangements – including extra time – was much more closely aligned than previously reported to the proportion of students with special educational needs reported in the school population.' Pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) can apply for extra time in exams – with 25 per cent extra time being the most common. It is known as an 'access arrangement' – and others in this category include use of a reader or scribe. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.' Ofqual is due to publish revised statistics in late 2025, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards.


BBC News
4 days ago
- BBC News
Inspectors tell council to improve children's services as demand rises
A council asked to help a neighbouring authority improve its child services has been told by inspectors the effectiveness of its own found concerns in Stockport Council's children's services in areas like support for children experiencing domestic abuse and neglect, and the experiences of those in critical report comes after the council stepped in to help Tameside Council overhaul its struggling children's services last Councillor Wendy Meikle, who is cabinet member for children and families, said the authority had an improvement plan in place and was "determined to meet this challenge head-on". Management oversight was described as "weak in some key areas of front-line practice" and the council's overall effectiveness in children's services was judged to "be below par", the inspection said there had been a continued rise in the demand for children's services, including an "increase in complexity" since Stockport's last inspection in 2022 when it was given a 'good' rating overall. 'Disappointed' Inspectors found in its most recent report that the council's approach to domestic abuse was inconsistent and some social workers did not "understand the complexities relating to coercive control and fear". In some case, they said "safety planning sometimes relies on victims to protect their children from the people who have abused them". "Where the specialist domestic abuse team is co-working with vulnerable families, the response to risk and safety planning is stronger."The council was given a 'good' rating for the experiences and progress of care Council is run by the Liberal Democrats under a minority administration, after it was left under no overall control at the last local leader Mark Roberts said "we're disappointed by the overall judgement" but added the council was "fully committed to addressing the areas for improvement". Councillor Christine Carrigan, leader of the opposition Labour group, said the authority had to act with "urgency and transparency to put things right". Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.