&w=3840&q=100)
Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade
Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions.
Trump's latest claim comes days after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for ending several conflicts around the world including the one between India and Pakistan.
On Sunday, in a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed radio host and author Charlamagne Tha God, and said he (God) knows nothing about him or what he has done, like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight.
He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, Trump said.
Just a day earlier, Trump said in an interview on Newsmax that he has settled a lot of wars.
You take a look at what's happened just over the last little while. We've settled a lot of, a lot of very beautiful wars have been settled One of the wars India, Pakistan, nuclear, Trump said adding that he settled conflict between Thailand and Cambodia as well as Congo and Rwanda.
I settled that up. And I settled it up with trade. I settled a lot of them with trade. I said listen, you guys are going to fight. You can fight all you want. I mean, just fight your hearts out. But we're not doing a trade deal'.
All of a sudden they end up not doing a war. I settled a lot of wars. I think I settled averaging about a war a month. But, you know, we're saving millions of lives, he said.
Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment.
The tariff for Pakistan was 19 per cent, lower than the 29 per cent announced by Trump in April. In fact, Trump on Wednesday also announced sealing a trade deal with Pakistan and said that Washington will work with Islamabad to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's massive oil reserves.
At a White House press briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said that Trump has now ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.
She said that the president has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, she said.
Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim nearly 30 times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament this week that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor launched by India in retaliation after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by Trump.
Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said Prime Minister Modi and Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
India On Edge? Iran, Pakistan Revive Chabahar-To-Turkey Rail Link, Deepen Strategic Ties And Trade Corridors
New Delhi: Iran and Pakistan have formalised a renewed partnership that opens up new transport routes and expands trade links across the region. During his first official visit to Pakistan, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a series of bilateral agreements aimed at boosting economic, technical and strategic cooperation between the two neighbours. Officials from both countries confirmed that Pakistani goods will now have overland access to European and Russian markets through Iranian territory. Analysts view this move as a potential game changer for regional logistics. They say it will offer an alternative to traditional maritime shipping routes that can be slower and costlier. This overland trade link is expected to be integrated with the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a multimodal trade network that begins at India's Mumbai port and runs through Iran to reach Russia and Europe. India and Russia have been actively developing this corridor, and the inclusion of Pakistan raises questions about new dynamics in the region. The Iran-Pakistan alignment also touches on Beijing's broader ambitions. China is exploring ways to link its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) with the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which could allow Chinese goods to move through Iran and access the Gulf and Central Asia. It will reduce dependence on the Malacca Strait. With a strong naval presence from both India and the United States in that region, Beijing has been looking for strategic alternatives to safeguard trade routes. As part of the new partnership, Iran and Pakistan have set a target to increase bilateral trade from USD 3 billion to USD 10 billion. Both sides have framed this goal as a step toward strengthened economic cooperation and long-term regional integration. President Pezeshkian got an unusual welcome in Islamabad, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif personally receiving him at Nur Khan Airbase. The gesture was seen by many as a signal of how seriously Pakistan views its relationship with Tehran. The visit also comes at a time when Islamabad is balancing ties with the United States while seeking closer engagement with Iran. Pakistani officials have also reportedly raised the issue of Baloch separatist groups operating across the border, some of whom Islamabad claims receive support from abroad. A major highlight of the visit was the revival of the Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul rail project. Both countries agreed to restore and operationalise the 6,540-kilometer railway line that connects South Asia with Europe through Turkey. Once it resumes full operations, the journey will take around 10 days that will be a major improvement over the 21-day maritime route. The division of the railway spans 1,990 kilometres in Pakistan, 2,603 kilometres in Iran and 1,950 kilometeres in Turkey. Although the project was initially launched in 2009, it has faced repeated delays. Officials now hope to revive the corridor to full capacity. For India, the developments hold serious strategic implications. Iran and Pakistan have discussed linking the Iranian port of Chabahar, that India helped build, with Pakistan's Gwadar port, which is operated by China. Iranian leaders have expressed interest in connecting both ports via trade and logistics routes. This proposed maritime link could dilute India's strategic influence in the region and give China greater access to Gulf waters. Gwadar has already been a focal point of Chinese infrastructure investment, with reports suggesting that a future Chinese naval facility may be in the works. If Chabahar and Gwadar are connected, it could reshape the geopolitical balance of port infrastructure in the Arabian Sea and create new strategic concerns for New Delhi. The series of agreements signed during President Pezeshkian's visit marks a turning point in Iran-Pakistan relations. As the regional landscape continues to evolve, the implications of these developments are likely to resonate far beyond South Asia.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Numbers Don't Lie – But Leaders Might Not Like Them
In the U.S., something strange and worrying just happened. Former President Donald Trump fired a government official named Erika McEntarfer. Why? Because the department she worked in (which tracks how many people have jobs) updated some numbers — and the new numbers didn't look good for Trump. At first, it looked like the U.S. had added over 140,000 new jobs in May and June. That was good news for Trump, because he had put tariffs (extra taxes) on imported goods, and people were worried those would hurt the economy. But later, after a closer check, the department said only 19,000 jobs were added in May, and 14,000 in June. July looked even worse. Trump didn't like these new numbers. He said they were 'rigged' to make him and his political party look bad. But experts say that's just not true. These job numbers are made by hundreds of people using detailed methods. Sometimes they're off at first because many companies are late sending their reports. Trump could've asked for better data systems — which would actually be helpful! But instead, he fired the messenger. That sends a bad message to the world: it looks like he's trying to control or hide the truth. If leaders start changing numbers to make things look good instead of being good, that's what dictators do — not what democracies should do. A researcher once showed that countries that fake their growth often look suspiciously brighter in satellite photos at night than their official numbers suggest. India did well in that test, but we still have problems with collecting accurate data. For example, we're still waiting on the national Census, and some job reports are slow or unclear. The big lesson? If you want to fix a problem, don't shoot the messenger — fix the system. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Stat Of The Nation
Trump's sacking of a govt data official sends an awful message that all democracies must heed Convention demands that emperors don't shoot messengers, but Trump sacked Erika McEntarfer on Friday after her Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) revised US jobs data for May and June downwards. Those were the first full months to reflect the impact of Trump's 10% baseline tariff. Initially, BLS had reported 144,000 new jobs in May, and 147,000 in June, suggesting that fears about the impact of tariffs were overblown. Now, it says only 19,000 and 14,000 jobs, respectively, were added in the two months. Initial data for July looks even weaker, with only 73,000 jobs added. Post-revision, it might turn out to be a month of net job loss. Suddenly, Trump's tariff project is looking weak when high country-specific tariffs are about to take effect from Thursday. He's reacted predictably, alleging data was manipulated: 'In my opinion, today's jobs numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' But as former US treasury secretary Larry Summers says, the charge is preposterous because the data is compiled by 'hundreds of people following detailed procedures'. The job numbers are off the mark every month simply because a third of the 121,000 employers BLS surveys don't send their responses on time. Trump could have asked for better data gathering. It's a fair demand, given that investors and the Fed, with which he has a running feud, base their decisions on such indicators. But Trump's cost-cutting – remember Elon Musk's Doge? – is among the culprits here. His personal attacks on officials and sackings will only weaken global confidence in US. If he manages to 'control' data somehow, he will push US into the league of dictatorships that are known to fudge economic data all the time. In 2018, University of Chicago researcher Luis Martinez made an interesting observation using satellite images: a 10% increase in nighttime lights was correlated with a 2.4% GDP increase in democracies, but 2.9-3.4% increase in authoritarian countries. India passed Martinez's test well, but our data framework isn't strong either. The delayed Census is a blemish, and even after improvements, getting a final estimate of GDP growth takes two years. There are questions about the accuracy of PLFS data also. To improve policy formation, and to attract more investment, we must improve our data collection and reporting. And if the data is sour, spare the messenger. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
