SA's energy one-stop shop projects for IPPs faces hurdles as US funding withdraws
Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers
Banele Ginidza
The establishment of the Energy One Stop Shop (EOSS) project, an initiative aimed at revolutionising South Africa's renewable energy sector, is currently in limbo due to a significant funding shortfall.
Yunus Hoosen, head of Invest South Africa (InvestSA), disclosed to Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry on Wednesday that the project was seeking an additional R60 million to continue its rollout across all provinces.
The setback follows the withdrawal of funding from the United States under former President Donald Trump's Executive Orders.
"We have done the functional specs. We have been funded by donor agencies. We lost a little bit of funding from the US but we continue to talk to a number of other donors to see how we can get this programme going. Its is R60m and we intend to finalise and launch this in the fourth quarter of 2026," Hoosen said.
"What we plan to do is to have a one-stop shop in every province. We have them in three provinces and the one at the dtic [campus]. We are ready to roll out Eastern Cape and Limpopo. The Northern Cape is undergoing refurbishment, following that is Mpumalanga. We just need to do the work and sort out the one-stop shop in the Free State and the North West."
The EOSS was envisioned as a solution to the myriad challenges facing Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in the renewable energy landscape, working collaboratively with multiple government departments to simplify regulatory processes.
It's designed to provide guidance and support, enabling IPPs to navigate the complex authorisation landscape while effectively reporting progress and challenges to the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (the dtic) and various National Energy Crisis Committee (NECOM) structures.
Collaboration plays a key role in the EOSS's success, and the programme works closely with private sector partners and industry associations, including Business Unity South Africa (Busa), the South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA), and the South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (SAPVIA), among others.
However, the rollout has experienced delays, which Hoosen attributed to changes in executive leadership within coordinating entities, including CEOs and chief financial officers.
"We also face delays from provincial government frameworks. That has happened in the Free State. We could have rolled out a long time ago in the Free State," Hoosen said.
Despite these challenges, the EOSS has already unlocked various projects, such as a 9.8MW biogas facility supplying the BMW plant in Tshwane, and enabling the realisation of 70MW of biogas in the Free State.
Hoosen noted that as of December 2024, the overall achievements of the IPP programme included more than R239 billion in investments across 104 projects, facilitating the generation of just under 8 000MW of electricity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Two-pot pension system disburses billions, but concerns linger
The two-pot system has two components – one for savings and the other for retirement. Many concerns over the two-pot retirement payouts have not yet been addressed, even as the system forges ahead with almost R60 billion disbursed to claimants since September last year. Prof Lucien van der Walt, director of Neil Aggett Labour Studies Unit at Rhodes University, said the system is a positive development, but it allows a small amount to be accessed annually. 'Given the situation that many working-class people face, it's better than being trapped in a downward spiral of financial instability and losses,' he said. Small annual access seen as both a benefit and limitation 'Previously, many people quit their jobs so that they could access their retirement funds, often leaving them broke later, and on the small government old age pension system.' Van der Walt also highlighted as one of the negatives of the system the fact that the money would be taxed on withdrawal at the usual tax rate. 'You will lose some of the money, even though it is your money. This is not the same as withdrawing cash from an ATM,' he said. However, trade union federation Cosatu described the pension fund reform as 'among the most transformational since the democratic breakthrough of 1994'. More than R57 billion has been paid to more than 3.5 million workers since the roll-out of the two-pot pension system. 'Fund operators reported unprecedented numbers of calls and applications from workers. While some funds' systems were initially overwhelmed, most coped well, with Cosatu and its affiliates intervening where workers experienced challenges,' said Cosatu's parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks. Cosatu praises system rollout but slams employer defaults While the ANC-aligned federation praised the 'excellent progress' made in the system payouts, it objected to some employers and municipalities that had failed to pay over workers' pension contributions. ALSO READ: Two-pot retirement system: Almost 4 million withdrawals close to R57 billion Parks said some 7 700 employers had been fingered as culprits, with the largest numbers of such cases reported in the municipal, security and cleaning sector. He said Cosatu was 'deeply angered by over 7 700 employers who, through this process of providing relief to workers, have been exposed for having failed to pay over workers' pension contributions'. He said this is fraud and theft and must be dealt with by law enforcement agencies. 'Cosatu, with National Treasury and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority, continues to intervene with such delinquent employers to ensure this criminality is dealt with,' said Parks. Saftu raises alarm over lack of access before retirement But the South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu), while welcoming the system, rejected the rules surrounding the second pot – the retirement component. 'The two-pot pension reform could have been progressive if it were not for the rules for the second pot, which require workers to access it only at the retirement age,' said Saftu in a statement. 'This means a worker who is dismissed, retrenched or who resigns, will not access their pension fund in a lump sum until after they reach retirement age.' How the two-pot system works The two-pot system has two components – one for savings and the other for retirement. This meant 33% of the contributions would go into a savings pot and be accessible for withdrawal once a year, while 66% would go into the retirement pot, where it would be kept in the fund until the employee reached retirement age. ALSO READ: Poor financial literacy about retirement costing SA and consumers millions This is designed to ensure employees will be able to access their retirement savings to provide some financial relief, according to the fund operators. 'Reduced standard of living' Some regard this as a great idea in light of the ongoing economic crisis and financial strain that is burdening workers. The African Christian Democratic Party had cautioned workers that withdrawals from the savings pot should only be made for emergencies. 'It should also be noted that this withdrawal will be subject to tax and other administrative costs, resulting in one receiving less than what was applied for,' said the party. 'Additionally, a withdrawal from the savings pot will reduce the final total amount available at retirement and may result in a reduced standard of living.' Fund operators and watchdogs urge caution Last year, retirement fund operator Allan Grey told its clients that the idea behind the new two-pot retirement savings system is to promote the preservation of retirement fund investments until members retire. While Old Mutual, in one of its myth-busting explanations, said the system would be automatic for all retirement fund members. But Corruption Watch cautioned about the potential for fraud and corruption related to the two-pot retirement system, particularly regarding cybersecurity vulnerabilities and the risk of scams. The corruption buster encourages vigilance, reporting suspicious activities, and verifying communications from retirement funds. NOW READ: Dipping into retirement funds could cost more than you think
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Landlords beware: 26 per cent of rental applicants in South Africa classified as high risk in Q1 2025
Interest rates, supply and demand, popular locations, and property types drive South Africa's property market. Image: Henk Kruger/ANA/African News Agency More than a quarter of South African rental applicants were classed as high-risk in the first quarter of this year. A detailed risk analysis in the latest PayProp Rental Index highlighted that this is a significant challenge for landlords and rental agents. Based on data from the Tenant Assessment Report, PayProp's market-leading tenant screening tool, 26% of prospective tenants fell into the scoring system's highest risk bracket, up from 25% a year ago. 'Landlords are seeing improved returns from healthy rental price growth in 2025, but it's important not to get complacent,' says André van Rooyen, head of sales at PayProp. 'Tenant affordability is lower due to the cost of living in many provinces, and with one in four applicants potentially presenting a payment risk, thorough vetting is non-negotiable,' van Rooyen said. Traditional credit checks were said to offer only part of the picture when it comes to assessing tenant payment reliability, as they score the applicant based on their debt repayment history but often do not take rental payments into account. In contrast, PayProp combines credit scoring with rental payment histories captured from the platform to reveal where tenants fall on the risk spectrum. Analysis by PayProp ahead of a recent training webinar found that it was 94% better at predicting bad tenant behaviour than a traditional credit score when applied to a sample of real tenant data. In the first quarter of this year, 39.6% of lease applicants were rated minimum-risk, 20.0% were low-risk, 14.5% were medium-risk, and 26.0% were high-risk. This distribution across the risk spectrum suggests that rental applicants are becoming more concentrated at both ends of the risk scale lately, making careful tenant selection more important than ever. Income was said to be the strongest determinant of tenant risk. Among applicants earning R80 000 or more per month, 60.6% were classed as presenting minimum risk and just 12.2% as being high-risk. In the lowest income bracket (R10 000 - R20 000), only 23% qualified as minimum risk, while 37% were high-risk. 'Affordability is one of the first things any agent will check, and this helps demonstrate why,' says van Rooyen. 'It also means that careful vetting is even more essential for lower-priced properties, as applicants are more likely to fall into lower income brackets. "However, there are high-risk and low-risk tenants in every income bracket, and using smarter tools helps agents identify low-income, low-affordability tenants who nevertheless have perfect payment records.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Age was also said to play a clear role, as the 20 - 29 age group showed the lowest share of minimum-risk tenants (29.6%), likely due to thinner credit files and shorter rental histories. However, despite being unknown quantities in normal credit scoring terms, this group tends to have more disposable income after debt and rent, making them potentially better prospects than raw scores may suggest. In contrast, 61.3% of applicants over 60 were classified as presenting minimum risk, and tenant risk declined sharply for all age groups over 50, thereby indicating a pattern likely linked to more stable financial positions and mature credit profiles. According to Experian's latest Consumer Default Index (CDI) for the first quarter of this year, despite their active economic roles, young South Africans face barriers in accessing the credit market. Representing nearly 24% of the adult population, the youth segment (consumers around 30 years and younger) was said to account for only 9% of the total credit market, holding just 3% of outstanding debt. Vehicle Asset Finance (14%) and Retail Loans (10%) are the most common credit products for youth, reflecting their current financial needs and market accessibility. In contrast, youth only hold 1% of the Home Loans market, underscoring the long-term financial milestones that remain largely out of reach for many people. Interestingly, the report finds only slight gender-based differences in tenant risk, despite women earning roughly 80% of what men do, according to Stats SA. Some 40.1% of men were assessed as minimum-risk, compared to 39.1% of women. One possible explanation is that women spent 3.2% less of their income on debt repayments than men, improving their overall affordability profile. While trends by income, age and gender offer useful insights, van Rooyen reiterates that every tenant is unique. 'Each demographic contains both high and low-risk individuals,' says van Rooyen. 'That's why risk reporting based on proven payment behaviour is essential for agents managing tenant selection. It's not just about reducing risk for agents, it also ensures that good tenants who pay their rent reliably can go to the front of the line, no matter their income levels or what's left after servicing current debts,' van Rooyen said. 'With more rental applicants falling into the high-risk category than a year ago, the days of relying solely on gut feel or credit scores are behind us. The smartest agencies are combining data sources for a full-circle view of tenant reliability.' According to the South Africa Property Market Predictions for 2025 published by the Landlord Association of South Africa (LASA) in January, the South African property market is set to undergo significant changes in 2025, influenced by shifting economic dynamics, evolving consumer behaviour, and potential legislative amendments. The National Residential and Commercial Landlords Association said the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) was expected to maintain a cautious monetary policy stance in 2025. It said that while inflation may stabilise around the target range of 3% to 6%, marginal interest rate increases could be implemented to manage global economic pressures. This would impact home loan affordability and demand for residential properties, it said. LASA said that despite a challenging global economy, South Africa's GDP growth is forecasted to recover modestly in 2025, supported by mining exports and infrastructure investment. It said urban areas, particularly Gauteng and the Western Cape, were likely to see a resurgence in property development and demand. Independent Media Property
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Homeowners bring class-action lawsuit against 'big-four' SA banks
It's a class-action lawsuit the likes of which South Africa has never seen before. R60 billion and more than 100 000 former homeowners. They'll be taking on South Africa's 'big-four' banks – ABSA, FirstRand, Nedbank and Standard Bank. As such, the record-breaking class-action lawsuit is set to be heard in February 2026. And it's said to be made up of residents who fell on hard times. They couldn't meet their mortgage payments, and had their homes repossessed by the banks. Who then sold them as distressed properties on auction. Buying a distress property on auction is a great way to get a good deal. Image: File Unsurprisingly, the potentially biggest class-action lawsuit ever in South Africa, could prove a turning point for the bank industry, reports IOL . If awarded, it will dwarf the previous successful class-action lawsuit in the country. This was awarded back in 2012, for R5 billion, to miners who contracted silicosis and tuberculosis. So, what exactly are the former homeowners arguing against South Africa's banks? And what's the likelihood of this record-breaking settlement actually being awarded in court? Such unscrupulous behaviour often targeted the poorest black households a decade ago. Image: Writer's room As such, applicants in the class-action lawsuit are fighting that their homes were undervalued when sold at auction. They were often sold with no reserve price, no regard for market value and for as little as R1 000. Apparently, this was possible before 2017, when South African courts didn't require a minimum sale price. Such a practice was also only prevalent in South Africa at the time, and nowhere else. Mercifcully, the loophole has since been closed. However, more than 100 000 former homeowners did suffer, and they wish to set the record straight in court. And they've got the Lungelo Lethu Human Rights Foundation taking up the fight for them. With one advocate Dr. Douglas Shaw leading arguments. The case is expected to be heard in February 2026. Image: Pexels Talking on The Money Show, Dr. Shaw said he's pushing for criminal investigations into each sale. 'When I go to court, I go up against tens of people. It's me versus all those from the top banks in the country. It's a scary thing to do. Most lawyers would say, no, it's too difficult. But this class-action lawsuit needs to be heard,' said Shaw. If your house was repossessed and sold as 'distressed' before 2017, you can add your name to the growing class-action lawsuit here. Simply email – banksoldmyhouse@ for more information. We'll bring you more on this story as it develops into 2026 … Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
