
True Costs Of Enterprise Firewall Refreshes
Investing in technology is crucial for businesses to protect their networks, data, devices and users from external threats. Depending on which source you look at, most experts suggest a firewall refresh every five to seven years.
A five-year refresh cycle is just about right for most organizations. Wait too long, and you might fall behind on the latest cybersecurity threats or miss out on improved performance. Jump in too soon, and you could end up spending more than necessary.
The following factors may dictate the need for a refresh of firewalls:
• Increased Security Threats: To combat evolving cyber threats, it's essential to stay ahead of cybercriminals who continually find new ways to exploit vulnerabilities.
• Demand For Higher Performance: As cloud and SaaS adoption grows, older firewalls may struggle to meet increased throughput demands.
• End-Of-Support (EOS): Firewall manufacturers frequently declare EOS dates for their older appliances, indicating that they will cease providing updates, support and replacement parts.
• Staying Ahead Of Technology: Existing hardware may not be able to support advanced security functions like advanced threat protection (ATP) or innovative technologies, such as AI.
Keeping up with technology isn't cheap. For decades, firewall vendors have relied on constant refresh cycles to maintain their profit pools. Why do vendors want to push for renewals?
• Increased Revenue: Every refresh creates a revenue opportunity for a vendor to push for a "like-for-like" upgrade. But if your needs have changed, you need to look at newer architecture.
• Transition To Subscription Models: Vendors are motivated to shift to a recurring revenue model.
• Bundled Services: A firewall refresh can be used as a means to bundle (or seemingly give away) additional services such as SD-WAN, ATP, IoT security, etc.
• Renegotiate Agreements: Refresh cycles open an opportunity to renegotiate license agreements. This can lock in customers for extended periods and increase revenue.
Such strategies enable firewall vendors to capitalize on the enterprise need for updated security infrastructure in an ever-evolving security landscape. For example, in its Q1 2025 Earnings Report, Fortinet shared that a quarter of its installed base is facing EOS (end of support) by 2026. This is based on earlier generations of chips (mainly SOC3 and NP6). This will impact the customers who purchased firewalls during the 2021-2022 'super cycle' and follow the typical five-year upgrade cycle.
The same is true for other leading firewall vendors. Lately, I've seen a number of discussions from customers online who have reported significant price increases on renewals and expensive forced hardware refreshes. As a result, many enterprise customers are looking to switch vendors due to concerns about total cost of ownership with constant price hikes during refresh cycles.
A firewall refresh provides an excellent opportunity to migrate to a modern framework. Zero trust has surfaced as a way to ensure a robust, adaptive security posture.
Here are some key reasons why zero trust is important to future-proof your security infrastructure:
• Eliminates implicit trust by continuously verifying every user and device, regardless of location.
• Reduces attack surfaces by segmenting the network and controlling access strictly. Firewalls play a critical role in this.
• Prevents data breaches by ensuring only authenticated and authorized users can access sensitive data and applications.
• Simplifies compliance by consistently applying security policies across the enterprise.
• Enhances visibility and control of network traffic and user activities and detects and blocks malicious activities.
A well-planned firewall refresh goes beyond acquiring new equipment; it's about building a more secure, efficient and scalable security infrastructure. It's an opportunity to reassess the appliance sprawl at your sites and consolidate multiple functions—security, SD-WAN and, if need be, a switch into a single device. It is an opportunity to simplify your architecture and reduce costs, not just today but also for the next decade.
Consider extending this consolidation to the LANs, too. Software-driven LAN (SD-LAN) could be an excellent opportunity to combine security, routing, network services and switching to trim costs and improve agility.
Careful planning and comparative analysis of your incumbent firewalls with other firewall solutions can enhance your security to keep up with emerging threats, increase performance to support throughput demands and potentially reduce your total cost of ownership. Consider the following when evaluating enterprise firewalls:
• Security Effectiveness: How effectively the firewall protects and controls network access, applications and users while preventing threats and blocking malicious traffic.
• Threat Prevention: How effective the firewall is in protecting a trusted network from an untrusted network while allowing authorized communications to pass through.
• Rated Throughput: How the firewall performed under various adverse conditions such as maximum connections, transactions per second, concurrency, throughput and latency.
• Price & Value: How cost-effective the firewall is in relation to performance, manageability and security.
• Vendor Lock-In: When software, ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) and hardware are tightly coupled in firewalls, vendor lock-in is inevitable. To mitigate this, consider using open standards, modular architecture and multi-vendor environments.
Instead of relying on vendor-driven refresh cycles, reassess your security and performance needs. Evaluate if a new architecture or vendor can better support zero trust, cloud and SD-WAN priorities cost-effectively.
Leverage the refresh cycle as a strategic inflection point. Consolidate firewall, SD-WAN, SASE/SSE, IoT security and even LAN infrastructure. This will reduce operational complexity, lower total cost of ownership and future-proof your network.
Before committing to any refresh, review third-party evaluations, such as those from CyberRatings.org or Gartner. Use objective data on performance and price/performance ratios to evaluate comparatively, negotiate better terms and choose the best-fit solution for your enterprise.
In conclusion, to align with modern needs, reassess your security and performance requirements, consolidate security functions to simplify operations and reduce costs and demand independent validation and cost transparency before committing to any refresh.
Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
24 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Tesla's Autopilot system is in the spotlight at a Miami trial over a student killed while stargazing
NEW YORK (AP) — A rare trial against Elon Musk's car company began Monday in Miami where a jury will decide if it is partly to blame for the death of a stargazing university student after a runaway Tesla sent her flying 75 feet through the air and severely injured her boyfriend. Lawyers for the plaintiff argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature called Autopilot should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S sedan blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour in the April 2019 crash. Tesla lays the blame solely on the driver, who was reaching for a dropped cell phone. 'The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver.' The driver, George McGee, was sued separately by the plaintiffs. That case was settled. A judgement against Tesla could be especially damaging as the company works to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on U.S. roads by the end of next year. A jury trial is rare for the company, which often settles lawsuits, and this one is rarer yet because a judge recently ruled that the family of the stricken Naibel Benavides Leon can argue for punitive damages. The judge, Beth Bloom of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, issued a partial summary judgement last month, throwing out charges of defective manufacturing and negligent misrepresentation against Tesla. But she also ruled plaintiffs could argue other claims that would make the company liable and ask for punitive damages, which could prove costly. 'A reasonable jury could find that Tesla acted in reckless disregard of human life for the sake of developing their product and maximizing profit,' Bloom said in a filing. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way, including a parked Chevrolet Tahoe that Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, had gotten out of near Key West, Florida, to look up at the sky. The Tesla rammed the Tahoe at highway speeds, causing it to rotate and slam into Benavides, tossing her into a wooded area and killing her. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuit's allegations and said it expects that consumers will follow warnings in the vehicle and instructions in the owners' manual, as well as comply with driving laws. Tesla warns owners in manuals that its cars cannot drive themselves and they need to be ready to intervene at all times. —— Former AP auto writer Krisher reported from Detroit.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We Were Not Planning On This Kind Of Expenditure At This Point In Our Lives,' How These Parents Are Dealing With Their 'Boomerang Kid'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Two parents from Sherman Oaks, California, moved their 24-year-old daughter back into the family home in early 2024. In their mid-60s, the parents, who asked to remain anonymous when speaking to CNBC, expected that they'd be closing in on retirement at this point in their lives. Instead, they're canceling vacations and delaying retirement in order to accommodate their daughter's $5,000 a month living expenses. "We were not planning on this kind of expenditure at this point of our lives," the mother told CNBC. "The reason we do it is because we don't want to see her on the street." The family isn't alone in having their plans upended by the unexpected return of an adult child. The phenomenon, which experts have termed "boomerang kids," has been steadily growing over the last few years. Don't Miss: In terms of getting money back, . Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." A Thrivent study on boomerang kids released in 2025 found that 46% of parents report that their adult children, ages 18-35, have moved back home at some point. The reasons for these moves vary from economic factors like debt, stagnant wages, and rising housing costs to personal factors like divorce or illness. While many parents say they are happy to provide a safety net for their children, there's also recognition that it often has a significant and negative impact on their own finances. According to the survey, 38% of boomerang parents say that having their children move back in has impacted their ability to save for long-term goals like retirement. The Sherman Oaks parents say they are feeling that pinch, to the point that it has caused tension in their relationship with their daughter. So they've turned to parenting coach Kim Muench for help navigating their new situation. Trending: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — The move is a great first step in healing the rifts that boomerang situations can create, Muench told CNBC. "Parents sometimes hesitate to get help for themselves and invest in their health ... because they're already spending more than they would like to support their adult or emerging adult children," she says. Ultimately, though, Muench says open and honest conversations about money and timelines are the only way to ensure the familial bonds won't be permanently affected by a return home. She suggests starting with small financial boundaries, like asking your child to contribute towards a bill or put a set amount of money away in a savings account to mimic paying rent. "When their son or daughter is not taking [financial responsibility] on incrementally, [parents] actually get very worried that they will be financially providing for the rest of their lives," Muench told CNBC. "It takes consistent conversations, because it's probably not going to happen in the first conversation," she continued. "And it takes an emotional maturity level on both the parents and the emerging adult side to figure out how they can work together." Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article 'We Were Not Planning On This Kind Of Expenditure At This Point In Our Lives,' How These Parents Are Dealing With Their 'Boomerang Kid' originally appeared on


CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Z Fold 6: Slimmer Body, Bigger Screens and Slightly Higher Price
At Samsung Unpacked in July, the phonemaker introduced its most advanced foldable yet: the Galaxy Z Fold 7. It supersedes last year's Galaxy Z Fold 6 with upgrades big and small (or rather, big and thin), but how exactly do they compare? Here's the Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Galaxy Z Fold 6 specs comparison. Samsung has been releasing foldable phones for over half a decade now since the initial Galaxy Fold (no "Z" back then) launched in 2019, and the company has gotten pretty good at the newer smartphone format. Gone are the days of display and hinge durability issues; now, Samsung's foldable phones are as reliable as their flat counterparts… though at $2,000, the Z Fold series' prices are still high enough to put them out of reach of all but deep-pocketed enthusiasts. The Z Fold 7 packs the latest Samsung upgrades and some design innovations, while the Z Fold 6 is still a powerful and capable device, leaving either a great choice for those who can afford them -- just note the $100 difference in list price, as all those upgrades have led the Z Fold 7 to start at $2,000 while the Z Fold 6 starts at $1,900. Here's how both foldable phones compare. The Galaxy Z Fold 6. Lisa Eadicicco/CNET Design and display Both the Z Fold 7 and Z Fold 6 follow the same broad design: a book-style foldable that has an outer screen to function more or less like a flat smartphone when folded closed. It can be unfolded to reveal its wider, more tablet-like inner display, providing more screen real estate for tasks, games and watching media. The Z Fold 7, however, takes the Z Fold 6's design and slims down its thickness so it takes up even less space in pockets or bags. The Z Fold 7 is 8.9mm when folded up, down from 12.1mm thick in the folded-up Z Fold 6. Likewise, when unfolded, the Z Fold 7 is only 4.2mm thick, down from the 5.6mm in the Z Fold 6. That's even thinner than the Galaxy S25 Edge's 5.8mm thickness, which commands an $1,100 price because of its own deliberately thin and light design. Galaxy Z Fold 7. Numi Prasarn/CNET While users may not see how much thinner the Z Fold 7 is unless they put it side by side with another phone, there are areas where it's noticeably trimmed down -- there's hardly any bezel left around the top and bottom of the USB-C port. The new foldable comes in at 215 grams, which is about the weight of most flatphones, and lighter than the Z Fold 6's 239 grams. Both foldables are IP48 rated for dust and water resistance, meaning while they may survive being dunked in water for at least 30 minutes (the "8" in that rating), they won't protect against molecules smaller than 1mm (the "4" in that rating, lower than the "6" in most phones' IP68 rating) -- so keep either foldable away from dust and sand. Read more: I Held the Galaxy Z Fold 7. It's So Thin I Almost Forgot It's a Foldable The Z Fold 7 is overall slightly taller and wider than its predecessor, which results in bigger screens. The new foldable has a 6.5-inch AMOLED Full HD Plus (2,520x1,080 pixels) cover display, up from the 6.3-inch AMOLED Full HD Plus (2,376x968 pixels) cover display on the Z Fold 6. Both models have 1 to 120Hz variable refresh rates. Similarly, the Z Fold 7 has a larger 8-inch AMOLED tablet-like (2,184x1,968 pixels) inner display compared to the Z Fold 6's 7.6-inch AMOLED tablet-like (2,160x1,856 pixels) inner display. Both also have 1 to 120Hz variable refresh rates. The Galaxy Z Fold 6's camera block. Lisa Eadiccico/CNET Cameras The Z Fold 7's camera array is mostly unchanged from last year's model, with one glaring exception: the 200-megapixel main camera, which it inherits from the Galaxy S25 Ultra that launched in January (and also made it to the Galaxy S25 Edge that arrived in May). While we haven't had much time to try it out, the Z Fold 7's main camera should take sharper photos than the 50-megapixel one on last year's Z Fold 6. On paper, the Z Fold 7's remaining cameras seem otherwise identical to their counterparts on the Z Fold 6: a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera, 10-megapixel 3x telephoto and a 10-megapixel front-facing camera on the cover screen. The 10-megapixel camera on its internal display is now inside of a display cutout, moving away from the under-display camera that prior Fold phones used. Both foldables shoot video in 8K at 30 frames per second. Galaxy Z Fold 7. Numi Prasarn/CNET Specs and battery It's not surprising that the Z Fold 7 gets a boost in specs over last year's Z Fold 6. The most notable is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Z Fold 7, which is more powerful and efficient than the Z Fold 6's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The Z Fold 7 has the same internal storage options as its predecessor: 256GB, 512GB and 1TB. But whereas the Z Fold 6 only offered 12GB of RAM for all three of those storage options, the new foldable kicks it up a notch by offering 16GB of RAM for its largest storage (the 256GB and 512GB are again paired with 12GB of RAM). The Z Fold 7 has the same 4,400mAh battery capacity as last year's Z Fold 6. But until we test out the new foldable, we won't know whether its particular setup will result in more or less battery life -- the slightly larger displays on the Z Fold 7 would suggest it would drain its battery faster, and prior testing with Snapdragon 8 Elite phones found they drained more power. Connectivity-wise, the Z Fold 7 has the edge with its Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 support, which are newer and more advanced than the Z Fold 6's Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 support. But there's still one area where the Z Fold 7 remains painfully behind the times: charging. The foldable still has 25-watt maximum charging, which is pretty dismal and borderline embarrassing in 2025 for a phone of this price -- even the flawed OnePlus Open that launched in 2023 had faster 67-watt charging, which filled that foldable from dead to 76% in half an hour. As a point of comparison, last year's Z Fold 6 (also 25 watts) recharged just over 40% in 30 minutes. Both phones also have Qi wireless charging. Samsung is selling magnetic cases for the Fold 7 that add compatibility with Qi2 wireless chargers and other magnetic accessories. Galaxy Z Fold 6. Lisa Eadiccico/CNET Software, support and AI The Galaxy Z Fold 7 launches with Samsung's One UI 8 and Android 16 out of the box, which is an improvement over the Z Fold 6 arriving with Android 14. Yes, despite being a year apart, Samsung's biggest foldable will arrive with the newest version of Google's mobile operating system, which the software giant surprise-dropped back in June months ahead of its usual release window. While this is obviously a big win for the new foldable to not have to wait weeks or months for Android 16, it's also a longevity upgrade: Samsung is once again promising seven years of software and security updates for the Z Fold 7, which means it should get annual upgrades until 2032. But while the Z Fold 6 has the same number of upgrades, one of those was Android 15 that came out later in its launch year -- meaning it should only get upgrades until 2030. Both folding phones get the full suite of Samsung's Galaxy AI features as well as Gemini access. From Google's Circle To Search to erasing objects in photos, there's a range of little tools and tricks. But because the Z Fold 7 gets more years of Android updates (and has a newer processor), it could get more Galaxy AI features in the future. Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Galaxy Z Fold 6 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Cover display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 6.5-inch AMOLED, 2,520x1,080p, 1-120Hz refresh rate 6.3-inch AMOLED; 2,376x968 pixels; 1-120Hz variable refresh rate Internal display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate 8-inch AMOLED, 2,184x1,968p, 1-120Hz refresh rate 7.6-inch AMOLED; 2,160x1,856 pixels;1-120Hz variable refresh rate Pixel density Cover: 422 ppi; Internal display: 368ppi Cover: 410 ppi; Internal: 374 ppi Dimensions (inches) Open: 5.63 x 6.24 x 0.17 inches; Closed: 2.87 x 6.24 x 0.35 inches Open: 6.04x5.21 x0.22 in; Closed: 6.04x2.68x0.48 in Dimensions (millimeters) Open: 143.2 x 158.4 x 4.2mm; Closed: 72.8 x 158.4 x 8.9mm Open: 153.5x132.5x5.6mm; Closed: 153.5x68.1x12.1mm Weight (grams, ounces) 215g (7.58 oz.) 239g (8.43 oz) Mobile software Android 16 Android 14 Cameras 200-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide), 10-megapixel (telephoto), 10-megapixel (cover screen, selfie) 50-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide), 10-megapixel (3x telephoto) Internal screen camera 10-megapixel 4-megapixel (inner screen under-display); 10-megapixel (cover screen) Video capture 8K at 30fps 8K Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 RAM/storage 12GB + 256GB, 12GB + 512GB, 16GB + 1TB 12GB + 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Expandable storage No None Battery 4,400 mAh 4,400 mAh Fingerprint sensor Yes Side Connector USB-C USB-C Headphone jack No None Special features One UI 8, 25W wired charging speed, Qi wireless charging, 2,600-nit peak brightness, Galaxy AI, NFC, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, IP48 water resistance IP48 rating, 25W wired charging, wireless charging + powershare, 3x optical zoom (up to 10x digital and 30x Space Zoom with AI Super Resolution tech) US price starts at $2,000 (256GB) $1,900 (256GB) UK price starts at £1,799 (256GB) £1,799 (256GB) Australia price starts at AU$2,899 (256GB) AU$2,749 (256GB)