Tariffing New Zealand Timber And Lumber Products To The U.S. Would Be Troublesome
Forests thrive in New Zealand's climate and the sector supports a year-round harvest – with responsible production central to the industry. Plantation forests are sustainably managed (with large areas under global certification programmes), and are dominated by radiata pine, a productive and fast-growing softwood species. Processed outputs from our forest estates range from lumber, pulp and paper, panels, to engineered wood and remanufactured products.
The strength of New Zealand pine compares favourably with that of most traditional construction lumber species. Appropriate conversion processes ensure that the higher-strength wood fibre near the outside of the log is sawn for building and construction. Our radiata pine is versatile and is excellent for an impressive range of structural and appearance applications. It is easily kiln dried or chemically treated to produce stable and long-lasting products.
Due to limited domestic demand for our wood products, we have always taken great pride in developing relationships and exporting our timber and lumber to overseas markets, such as the United States. In 2024, we exported $US215 million of radiata pine products from New Zealand to the United States making the U.S. our third largest export market for forest products behind China and Australia. Although the $US215 million is minor when compared to the total global imports of $US2.3 billion of timber and lumber products into the United States, this trade is valued by both the New Zealand producers and the American DIY customers.
New Zealand timber and lumber exporters are known for providing high value wood products into the United States, most of which is sold into the DIY end user's market, such as Home Depot, Lowes and Menards.
Given the healthy relationship between the United States and New Zealand on the trade front, the temporary relief of tariffs on timber and lumber imported into the United States has been welcomed. Though we realise that this tariff exemption could be short lived based on the outcome of the Section 232 investigation aimed at determining the global effects imports of timber, lumber and their derivative products have on the United Sates supply chain.
As a small niche supplier of wood products that are needed by the U.S. domestic building market, there is a strong argument for keeping New Zealand timber and lumber imports tariff free to avoid any additional price hikes and further supply chain disruptions.
If tariffs are added to imported New Zealand wood products, this will have a direct impact on the American consumer through price increases and supply availability on articles like clear pine boards, moldings, solid wood sidings and primed product. As one customer in the United States commented ' a lot of what we buy from New Zealand we can't get elsewhere easily, so expect we may have to pay extra, resulting in higher prices for the consumer '. As an example, clear radiata pine boards are unable to be produced in the United States as no domestic species come from a pruned forestry resource.
There is a realisation that due to our low trade barriers and the minimal effect we have on global imports into the United States, that New Zealand is not the target of any new tariffs. However, there is a chance that we will be unintentionally caught up in the tariff effects should they be implemented. With high shipping and production costs, it is anticipated that should a tariff on New Zealand timber and lumber products be imposed then this will lead to higher prices at a time when other building material costs are also on the rise.
From a New Zealand perspective we look upon the temporary tariff exemption on timber and lumber products as a blessing, and we thank our kindred organisations in America, such as the National Association of Home Builders and the Northeastern Retail Lumber Association, for their support in making this happen. Like many, we now wait for completion of the section. 232 Investigation as to what the future holds for imported New Zealand timber and lumber products entering the United States.
Mark Ross
Chief Executive
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
20 hours ago
- NZ Herald
In an increasingly multipolar world, most countries don't want to choose sides between hegemons
It was an agreement between Chinese and Brazilian state-backed companies to begin the first steps towards building a rail line that would connect Brazil's Atlantic coast to a Chinese-built deepwater port on Peru's Pacific coast. If built, the roughly 4500km line could transform large parts of Brazil and its neighbours, speeding goods to and from Asian markets. It was a neat illustration of the contrasting approaches China and the US have taken to their growing rivalry. China offers countries help building a new rail line; Trump bullies them and meddles in their politics. The surreal first six months of Trump's second stint as president have offered up endless drama, danger and intrigue. By that standard his tussle with Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil's President, seems like small beer. But it was a revealing moment, illuminating how Trump's recklessness compounds America's central foreign policy problem of the past two decades. How should the US execute an elegant dismount from its increasingly unsustainable place atop a crumbling global order? And how can it midwife a new order that protects American interests and prestige without bearing the cost, in blood and treasure, of military and economic primacy? These are difficult, thorny questions. Yet instead of answers, Trump offers threats, tantrums and tariffs, to the profound detriment of American interests. China's astonishing economic rise, coupled with its turn toward deeper authoritarianism under President Xi Jinping, has made answering these challenges more difficult. China now seems to most of the American foreign policy establishment, and even more so to Trump, too powerful to be left unconfronted by the US. This line of thinking risks missing America's best and most easily leveraged asset in the tussle for global dominance with China: Most countries don't want to choose sides between hegemons. They prefer a world of benign and open competition in which the US plays an important, if less dominant, role. Nowhere is that truer, perhaps, than Brazil. A vast nation, bigger than the contiguous United States, it is a good stand-in for many of the world's middle powers. Contrary to the famous quip that Brazil is the country of the future and always will be, it has managed to become the world's 10th-largest economy, just a whisker smaller than Canada. It has a long tradition of hedging its relationships with a range of big powers — the US, China and the European Union — while trying to advance its ambition to be a key player in world affairs. As America's position as the sole superpower has waned and Brazilian leaders have vied to shape an increasingly multipolar landscape, those efforts have picked up. That has involved, unquestionably, a deepening of its economic and diplomatic relationship with China, its biggest trading partner. Lula travelled to Beijing in May for his third bilateral meeting with Xi since returning to the presidency in 2023, declaring that 'our relationship with China will be indestructible'. The two countries are founding members of the Brics group, a bloc of mostly developing middle-income countries that includes a number of American antagonists — Russia and, more recently, Iran. American officials have long been wary of Brics, which has sought in various, mostly marginal ways to thwart American power. But Trump has been outright antagonistic. Last week, as Lula played host to the Brics summit, Trump blasted off a social media post threatening to slap additional tariffs on any nation 'aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS.' This aggression is hard to square with the milquetoast statements that came out of Brics, which predictably condemned the bombing of Iran and its nuclear sites but pointedly avoided naming the countries that carried it out, Israel and the US. While member countries have increased trade among themselves, helping Russia elude Western sanctions, the bloc has made almost no progress on its declared intention of introducing a shared currency to counter the dollar. It is a loose and sometimes fractious group, basically a talking shop. Some countries within Brics would like the organisation to be more forthrightly antagonistic to the US, but Brazil, along with India and South Africa, has been resolutely opposed to turning it into an anti-American or anti-Western bloc. 'Brazil knows that China is indispensable, and the US is irreplaceable,' Hussein Kalout, a Brazilian political scientist who previously served as the country's special secretary for strategic affairs, told me. 'Brazil will never make a binary choice. That is not an option.' Indeed, Brazil has much to lose in alienating the US, and its growing ties with China are as much a symptom of American vinegar as Chinese honey. It does a huge amount of business with the US, running a trade surplus in America's favour of about US$7 billion last year. America is Brazil's largest source of foreign direct investment, rising steadily over the past decade in everything from green energy to manufacturing. Lula and Trump may be ideological opposites, but if they were ever to meet, they would have plenty of pragmatic reasons to get along. Instead, Trump has chosen antagonism. Part of his calculation, clearly, is political. But if Trump thought he was helping Bolsonaro's right-wing supporters win back power by undermining Lula, his letter appears to have had the opposite effect. Lula, once one of the world's most popular and celebrated leaders, won a very narrow victory in 2023. His popularity has sagged as he struggles to deliver on his election promise to bring down prices and improve the economy. Thanks to Trump's attacks, Brazilians are rallying around their president. However, the spat shows something deeper and more important. For many rising powers, China's supposedly revisionist designs on reshaping the globe pale in comparison to Trump's shocking use of tariffs, sanctions, and military firepower. 'From a Brazilian perspective, the country firmly seeking to change the underlying dynamics of the global order is the US,' Oliver Stuenkel, a Brazilian German political scientist who has written extensively about Brics, told me. America, not China, is the wrecker. This is a shock to the world, and a terrible shame for America. Trump is missing an opportunity that his two predecessors — Barack Obama and Joe Biden — let slip through their fingers: to use America's waning dominance to shape a new, more egalitarian multipolar order that preserves American influence and power while making room for others to rise. This would be no easy task, requiring painful choices about core American values and commitments. It would also demand humility, a quality few American presidents have shown, in no small part because American voters tend not to seek or reward it. Americans have now elected a president who seems to have none at all and whose words and deeds brim with an arrogance that even the crudest caricature of the ugly American would not conjure. Even as Trump pledged to avoid foreign wars and entanglements, his vision of peace seems predicated on a form of 'America first' dominance that invites the chaos he promises to avoid. This stance makes violent confrontation with China, the only real rival to American primacy, seem almost inevitable — and the return of the grim contestation that characterised the Cold War more likely, whether China desires it or not. What is certain is that many countries — rich and poor, declining and rising — definitely do not want this. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Lydia Polgreen ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Investment company Morrison's secret link to OpenAI's Project Stargate
One of New Zealand's most prominent investment firms has made a US$1 billion ($1.7b) investment linked to one of the largest technology infrastructure projects in the world – OpenAI's US$500b Project Stargate. Morrison, the firm that owns Infratil, acquired an American underground fibre cable company called FiberLight in 2022,
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Diplomatic sources say profits from $390b seized by the EU could form new war chest
He said at least eight member states had signed up to the scheme as he announced it alongside the US president in the Oval Office on Tuesday. A Nato official said: 'It is widely considered that Nato's support mission for Ukraine – Nsatu – will play the lead role in co-ordinating purchases of American weapons and their eventual delivery to Kyiv.' Ministers and officials said it would be more logical for Nato to oversee the scheme than one of its member states because of concerns over transparency. Xavier Bettel, Luxembourg's Foreign Minister, joked that the scheme would need a 'sugar daddy' to oversee it – a reference to Rutte calling the US President 'daddy' at the recent Nato summit. However, there were some reservations about using Nato to purchase weapons on behalf of Ukraine because of fears it could be seen as a provocation by Moscow. Under the most likely plan, a central, Nato-controlled cash pot will be topped up by European allies and Canada. The money will then be used to make purchases from a 'shopping list' of American weapons and ammunition created by the Ukrainian Government. Radosław Sikorski, Poland's Foreign Minister, suggested to EU colleagues the bloc's contribution from the fund could come from the profits of frozen Russian assets. 'Should it be a burden shouldered by our taxpayers or the Russians,' he told the room, according to a source familiar with the discussions. Brussels had been discussing its own war chest for weapon purchases using the seized assets. But using the cash towards the new scheme is seen as more efficient and a better way to maintain Trump's support for Ukraine. European sources have noted a significant about-turn in the President's stance on Ukraine, after previously being accused of being friendly towards Moscow. Topping up the American scheme will also come as a direct contribution to the Nato defence spending target of 3.5%, making it easier for countries to hit the goal. Details of the military aid deal are still to be finalised, according to Nato officials, although the first deliveries of Patriot air-defence batteries are expected in Ukraine within days. Sources said they would still have to hammer out particulars, such as what long-range missiles could be made available to Kyiv. Most of these decisions will be in the hands of the White House in the coming days as the scheme takes shape. Meanwhile, the EU is expected to sign off on its 18th package of sanctions against Russia at a meeting today. 'Catch-all powers' The measures are expected to hand unprecedented 'catch-all' powers to customs officials, who will be able to seize shipments out of the bloc they believe could make their way to Russia. The system being introduced by Russia is purchasing European goods to fuel its war machine through third countries, such as Kazakhstan or Turkey. Under the scheme, exporters of seized shipments will have to provide cast-iron evidence that the freight will not make its way to Russia before it is released. Brussels will also target Moscow's 'shadow fleet' of oil tankers, sanctioning a refinery in India and a bank in China suspected of supporting President Vladimir Putin's sale of fossil fuels abroad.
