Labour might be down, but it's not necessarily out - voters reflect on a year in power
It's worth knowing too, when our panel was recruited, they were not told they would be asked about politics.It could have been for any other market research exercise, for washing powder or water bills, rather than anything to do with Westminster - so it wasn't a gathering of political junkies.But our group, who all voted Labour last time, certainly had a strong sense of what has happened to the government they elected just twelve months ago, and it wasn't pretty.First of all, we asked the group about their impressions of Labour's first year back in office, overall.The overwhelming sense, and one of the words used most often was "disappointed".
"I've always been Labour, but I expected much more from them," Yvette, who's 57 and a nutritionist said. "I thought they'd be there for the people."Kelly is 35, and a stay-at-home mum. She was frustrated about what she sees as a lack of progress on immigration. "Everything they promised, nothing has come of it yet," Kelly said. "Immigration is a big thing for me."Adam, is an illustrator aged 37. He was a bit more forgiving of Sir Keir's problems: "They are patching things up, the first year is not the year to push the big ideas, let's steady the ship."But 30-year-old Sodiq, who owns his own business, reckons Labour hadn't been completely straight about what its plans were to start with."I think a lot of the things that were promised were never going to happen," Sodiq said.Kirsty, who's 35 and a teacher, even told us, "I feel lied to".
What about the chaos of Parliament this week, and Labour's many changes of direction since they've been in office? The group had definitely noticed what had gone on in the last seven days, not always the case when it comes to shenanigans in SW1.Veronica, a 64-year-old carer, had seen the chancellor's tears and had some sympathy."I think she's trying her best - there are going to be teething problems, it's only the first year." But she said, "crying at the Commons the other day and Keir Starmer didn't even notice, but everyone else did? Sometimes I think, 'Is it the pressure getting to her?'".Hayley, who is a personal assistant, was also dubious that Sir Keir didn't notice, but reckons the government deserves more time."You can't turn the country round in a year," the 40-year-old said.But it was clear the group had reservations about Labour's repeated shifts in position - whether on welfare this week, or winter fuel before.While praising Sir Keir for listening, Adam said: "What happened this week - another U-turn - was worrying, it pushes the idea that there is no direction."Yvette said "if he makes a decision he should stand by it", changes of heart were like "lastminute.com".
In the general election there were big shifts towards Reform UK, even though they didn't win either the Dartford or Gravesham seat.But Kent was one of the 10 councils Farage's party took control of in the local elections this May.Reform's progress has certainly been noticed. Kelly said: "They are picking away at figures and picking away at other things – they seem to be doing things, and proactive."Given how Reform is doing in the national polls, consistently ahead of the other political parties, it was no surprise that some of the group were thinking about giving Nigel Farage a chance next time round."If there were an election tomorrow I would vote for him," Yvette said, suggesting he should be given a chance even though "a lot of bad things are said about him".
But Sodiq said: "I'm at the other end of the scale. He's a politician, like others, who says things people want to hear, and people generally are not comfortable with the two main parties, and just want to try something else."Labour is worried by their grisly position in the polls, and there's something of a sense of bewilderment too about just how shaky things have got in the last few weeks.But at senior levels, sources believe if they keep on keeping on, eventually, many voters like those we met this weekend will return to them if hopes for improvements in the NHS and the economy come to pass.
Sign up for the Off Air with Laura K newsletter to get Laura Kuenssberg's expert insight and insider stories every week, emailed directly to you.
Watch tomorrow to hear the advice that our group would give Sir Keir Starmer in order to improve, to make that happen.Of course this is only a taste of what's on some voter's minds in just two constituencies, but the mood was certainly disappointed with what has, and has not happened since Labour moved back into power. But there was a sense, a grudging willingness among these Labour voters to give Sir Keir and the government more time.After twelve months, Labour is most certainly down, but not necessarily out.
Top image credit: Reuters
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar urged to 'come clean' on tax changes in Scotland
The SNP have written to the Scottish Labour leader over comments he made last week signalling his party would seek to bring Scotland's income tax system closer in line with the rest of the UK. In an interview with the Scottish Sun, Sarwar accused SNP ministers of "government by performance" as he suggested he would move to end the tax divergence with the rest of the UK if he becomes first minister. READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Bigger-picture switch is proving key in tackling tourism issues Currently, a majority of Scottish taxpayers pay less income tax than they would elsewhere in the UK. In Scotland, the top rate of tax (45%) comes in at earnings of £75,001, while those reaching £125,140 face a 48% levy. In the rest of the UK, the top rate of tax is 45% and only comes in when earnings reach £125,140. Figures from the Scottish Fiscal Commission suggest that Scotland's tax system generates up to an additional £1.7 billion each year compared to if it had matched the UK Government's policy. The SNP said Labour's plan would risk reversing this additional income and would mean that lower-income Scots would pay more while the wealthiest pay less, resulting in "billions of pounds worth of cuts" from public services to plug the gap. Kevin Stewart MSP (Image: PA) Kevin Stewart, an SNP MSP who sits on Holyrood's Economy Committee, has written to Sarwar to urge him to outline what services he would cut in order to "balance the books". In his letter, he asked Sarwar to clarify his position that those on "very large salaries" should pay less tax, "while also supporting disability benefits cuts". Stewart wrote: 'As you know, a majority of Scots currently pay less income tax than they would if they lived elsewhere in the UK, and Scottish income tax generates well over a billion pounds additional funding to be spent here in Scotland. 'Any changes to the Scottish income tax system puts this at risk – meaning Labour's plans could see the poorest being taxed more, or cutting up to well over a billion pounds from Scottish public services in order to fund these tax cuts. 'Is it really your position that people on very large salaries should pay less income tax in Scotland, while also supporting cuts to disability benefits? 'I am therefore writing to you to ask what spending cuts Labour plan to implement in Scotland in order to bring Scotland's income tax system more in line with the rest of the UK.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) pictured with Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Jane Barlow/PA) Sarwar previously backed the UK Government's decision to cut disability benefits, before Labour conceded to rebels and watered down such plans in a last-minute climbdown. Commenting, Stewart told The National that since Labour took office last year, "they have made it their business to balance the books on the backs of the poor, disabled and older people". 'For a Labour politician to claim there is no money to pay for disability benefits while also arguing that very rich people are being taxed too much frankly beggars belief – and shows how out of touch Mr Sarwar is with traditional Labour voters," he said. READ MORE: Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's headquarters 'Mr Sarwar needs to come clean with people in Scotland – if Labour are in power in Scotland, what services would he cut to fund tax cuts for the rich? Will it be free tuition, prescriptions, childcare, bus passes, the baby box – or will he cut ADP [Adult Disability Payment] – Scotland's equivalent of PIP [Personal Independence Payment] - just like his bosses in London wanted to?" Stewart continued: 'The SNP are proud to have introduced progressive taxation in Scotland which ensures those on lower incomes pay a bit less while people on higher incomes pay more – and everybody benefits from the extra investment in public services. 'The truth is, Scottish Labour just want to bring Scotland in line with the rest of the UK regardless of the cost to the Scottish people – only the SNP can be trusted to stand up for a fairer Scotland that the vast majority of people want to live in.' Stewart's comments came as Scottish Government Finance Secretary Shona Robison urged Starmer to look north of the Border for a more progressive tax system to protect public spending. (Image: PA) Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, they would not be in the "complete fiscal mess that they are in now". She said: 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. READ MORE: More than 20 people arrested at protest in support of Palestine Action 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now." Robison added that Labour need "a new direction – and they should look to Scotland". She continued: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's spokesperson for economy, business and fair work, Daniel Johnson MSP, said: "Unlike the SNP, Scottish Labour won't use higher taxes on workers like nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth. 'A Scottish Labour government will grow our economy, end the SNP's addiction to wasting our money and reform our public services so they are fit for the future. 'Next year Scots have the chance to kick out an SNP Government that can't be trusted with our money and take a new direction with Scottish Labour.'
The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer told not to 'punish' children by keeping two-child cap
The SNP urged the Prime Minister to end the limit amid reports it could stay as a result of Labour watering down most of its welfare reforms. KEIR Starmer has been urged not to 'punish' children by keeping the two-child cap following Labour's partial U-turn on benefit cuts. The UK Government had attempted to save around £5 billion a year by cutting welfare, mostly for those claiming disability and health benefits, but made concessions following a revolt from MPs. READ MORE: At least 42 Palestinians killed by Israel as doctors warn babies facing death The move means the Treasury may not see any savings at all as the welfare budget is still set to rapidly rise in the coming years. Media reports suggest the move could see ministers keep the cap in order to save money. The Prime Minister previously indicated the Government would only abolish the two-child cap, which prevents parents from claiming child tax credit or universal credit for more than two children, when it had the money to do so. Asked in May whether he would scrap the policy, he said: 'We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty.' The SNP, which will mitigate the limit in Scotland by 2026, has urged the UK Government to scrap the cap, which it says is pushing thousands of children into poverty. The party said analysis from the House of Commons Library found that 2.3 million families could be lifted out of poverty if the UK Government matched Scottish Government policies. These included the Scottish Child Payment, abolishing the two-child benefit cap and scrapping the so-called bedroom tax. According to the House of Commons Library, these measures would lift 96,000 families in Scotland out of poverty. The analysis also shows that over the past decade the number of children living in poverty in the UK has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24. That number is expected to rise to 4.6 million (33%) by 2029-30, according to the data. SNP deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart urged the Prime Minister to have a rethink on his welfare plans. Pete Wishart MP (Image: PA) He said: 'Keir Starmer must not punish children for his disastrous mistakes over the Labour Party's cuts to disabled people. 'It is utterly shameful that as a direct result of Labour Party austerity cuts, child poverty is rising to record levels in the UK – and the Prime Minister is failing to lift a finger to tackle it. 'Scrapping the two-child benefit cap is the absolute bare minimum – and it should have been done on the Labour Government's first day in power. READ MORE: Here's why banning Orange marches would be a bad idea 'It's pathetic that senior Labour Party figures now want to keep this punitive welfare cut just to show rebel MPs who's in charge. 'Saving Keir Starmer embarrassment is not more important than tackling child poverty.' Wishart urged Starmer not to 'drag his feet' on the two-child cap and to instead match the SNP's Scottish Child Payment with a similar policy for the entire UK. He added: 'Thanks to SNP action, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. 'Unless Keir Starmer urgently follow's Scotland's lead, his lasting legacy will be pushing millions of children into destitution.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty. We've just announced a new £1 billion package to reform crisis support, including funding to ensure the poorest children do not go hungry outside of term time. 'This comes alongside the expansion to free breakfast clubs and the move to make over half-a-million more children eligible for free school meals. 'We have also increased the national minimum wage and are supporting 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shona Robison urges Labour to tax rich to fill £5bn gap
In the 2023 Budget, the SNP created a new 'advanced' rate of 45% on incomes between £75,000 and £125,140, and increased the top rate to 48%. READ MORE The Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) forecast that the Scottish rate of income tax would raise around £1.4 billion more than if Scotland had retained the same tax policy as the rest of the UK. However, last year the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the new top rate might actually bring in less money, as some higher earners change how they work, where they live, or take measure to avoid or evade paying tax. Despite Tuesday's chaos in the Commons — when ministers offered rebel MPs last-minute concessions to pass a welfare bill originally intended to make £5bn in savings — Labour has insisted it will keep its election promises not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT. The changes put pressure on the Chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget, especially as she has committed to her fiscal rules: not to borrow to fund day-to-day public spending, and to get debt falling as a share of UK economic output by 2029/30. The prospect of those rules changing has already spooked the markets. Ms Reeves's tears saw the pound plummet When Ms Reeves was seen crying in the Commons at Prime Minister's Questions, after Sir Keir Starmer refused to back her, the pound fell against the dollar and the euro, while gilt yields soared. The Prime Minister has now very publicly backed his Chancellor. But with no prospect of more borrowing, Ms Reeves has two main options: raise taxes or cut spending. Ms Robison said the Chancellor should opt for the former. 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories — but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different,' she said. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership — frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now.' The Finance Secretary said asking people on higher incomes to 'pay a bit more in tax' meant that a majority of taxpayers in Scotland pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK. Currently, those earning less than £30,300 — around 51% of Scottish taxpayers — pay slightly less income tax in 2025–26 than if they lived elsewhere in the UK. Taxpayers earning the median income of £29,800 are £5 better off than if they lived south of the Border. However, a taxpayer with an income of £50,000 pays £1,528 more a year in Scotland than in the rest of the UK, while someone on £100,000 pays £3,332 more, and someone on £125,000 pays £5,221 more — equivalent to a 7% reduction in their after-tax income. Ms Robison said: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government — but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in — and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' READ MORE Ms Reeves's most likely option is to freeze income tax thresholds beyond 2028 — a stealth measure that could raise around £8bn a year by 2029–30, thanks to what is known as fiscal drag, where workers are pulled into higher tax brackets as wages rise with inflation, even if their real incomes do not increase. Other possibilities include targeted wealth taxes, such as cutting pension lump sum allowances, scrapping dividend tax reliefs, or reducing the inheritance tax exemptions on certain shareholdings. Labour is also under pressure from backbenchers to consider increasing levies on banks or the gambling industry, both of which have seen windfall gains in recent years. Responding to Ms Robison's comments, a Scottish Labour spokesperson said: 'The SNP have broken Scotland's NHS, overseen falling standards and rising violence in our schools, and left 10,000 children in temporary accommodation with nowhere to call home. 'Even in a cost of living crisis, SNP ministers keep using higher taxes as a substitute for economic growth. Scots pay more and more and with John Swinney, we all get less and less. 'While there's much more to do, this past year a UK Labour Government has ended Tory austerity, delivered a pay rise for 200,000 of the lowest paid Scottish workers, and ensured the largest budget settlement for Scotland in the history of devolution. 'This SNP Government has failed Scotland — and next year, we'll have the chance to get rid of them.'
