Opinion: Congressional funding for child care is crucial to supporting Utah families
As a home-based child care provider, CCDBG funds typically provide for 50-75% of my program funding. I'm in a rural area and the wages in my area are very low. As much as childcare providers love the work they do, it is work, and they still have to make a living and run their businesses. The block grant money has been foundational in providing scholarships and quality improvement funds for children at the highest risk.
Before I opened my program, I spent almost 10 years working with children who had been victims of abuse and neglect in Utah. I saw up close the repeated cycles that come with poverty and a lack of support. As a child care provider I have also seen the good that comes when we interrupt generational patterns and choose to support families, which is why I'm asking Rep. Celeste Maloy to sign Rep. Burgess Owens' appropriations letter asking for robust funding for CCDBG.
The cost of child care can be debilitating for families. I felt that as a young mom and social worker trying to figure out how to make it all work for my own family. And in the 17 years since I opened my own child care program, I've seen how hard it is for every family. But I also know how expensive it is to run a quality program and how hard it is to make the numbers work in a very broken system. This past year, for the first time in my program history, I had to raise my rates above the subsidy rate. I was conflicted about this for a long time, as I'm aware it has probably limited the number of low-income families that can choose my program. Those children especially need access to high-quality care, and their parents benefit greatly from the support they receive from a good program. But I also have my own responsibilities, and with rising costs, I did not have a choice.
CCDBG funding will help and is a vital part of the solution moving forward. As I told congressional staff, CCDBG can help me as a small-business owner keep my door open while promoting parent choice and ensuring more parents can find and afford the care they need.
Rep. Maloy has until May 16th to sign onto this important letter, which would make a world of difference for families, children and providers like me.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's what a California Democrat told a Utah crowd about the GOP's ‘big, beautiful bill'
California Rep. Sara Jacobs spoke to a crowd of about 150 at a Sandy town hall Friday evening, making the case that Democrats need to adopt a message focused on economic issues such as housing affordability and child care. Although Utah Republicans love to take swipes at liberal Californians, Jacobs, a Democrat, said concerns about cost of living cross party lines, and she said she visited the state to let Utahns know their worries are being heard in the halls of Congress. 'Showing up and answering tough questions and having conversations with our constituents is another really important part of our job,' Jacobs told before the town hall. 'Our title is literally 'representative,' and so it's our job to represent people. We need to come and make sure that we're listening to everybody.' The town hall was held at the Salt Lake Community College Miller Campus in Sandy, within the boundaries of Utah Rep. Burgess Owens' 4th Congressional District. Democrats in attendance criticized Owens for a lack of public town halls this year and said the event was meant to let constituents in the area have their voices heard. Jacobs, who represents parts of San Diego, California, in Congress, spoke out against the Republican tax and spending bill — which she called the 'Big Ugly Bill' — that was signed into law last week. She noted that nearly 200,000 Utahns could lose access to Medicaid over the next decade and warned of cuts to food stamps that could impact people in the state. 'Actually, there is a better way, and we as Democrats want to listen,' she said. 'We do care, and we are showing up everywhere.' The Democratic National Committee has held similar town halls across the 50 states in recent months. Friday's town hall was the first one attended by Jacobs, who is the youngest member of House Democratic leadership. At 36, she said she resonates with Utah as the youngest state in the U.S. and pitched her vision for an 'affirmative vision' of the Democratic Party going into elections next year and in 2028. 'To me, we need to laser focus on bringing down the cost of housing, bringing down the cost of child care, making sure that everyone can have the housing and child care that they need to be successful,' Jacobs said. 'And we can build trust by making sure that we do that and do that well and then to expand to other issues.' Like Utah, which faces a housing crunch, Jacobs said San Diegans are worried about the cost of living. 'Look, I've been here in Utah a day, but in that time, the things I've heard from folks here in Utah are that the cost of housing is too much, the cost of child care is too much, the cost of health care is too much,' Jacobs said. 'Those are the exact same three things I hear from my constituents in San Diego.' She argued that the policies Republicans have passed recently will fall hardest on many voters who supported the GOP. 'We need to welcome them in, and we need to show them actually that we understand the status quo wasn't working and that we actually have a plan to how to make their lives better,' she said. Jacobs is the granddaughter of Irwin M. Jacobs, the founder of semiconductor and software giant Qualcomm, and she leaned into her privilege when she called for higher taxes on wealthy Americans. 'We just need to actually tax the really, really, really rich people and be able to use those resources. And here I know this because I grew up in one of those families,' she said to applause. 'My grandfather founded a Fortune 500 company, so believe me when I say, there are plenty of resources to go around.' Millcreek Mayor Jeff Silvestrini spoke to what he sees as the Democratic Party's working class roots, saying the party has to 'get back to the roots of that.' 'We are the party of the working class,' he said. 'But we shouldn't be so focused on the little things like pronouns and things like that that don't matter to people or that alienate them and really show them that we care about the working people.' Utah Democrats and left-leaning groups have been active in pushing back against the Trump administration and its GOP allies through a series of protests against the Department of Government Efficiency, the 'big, beautiful bill' and deportation raids. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, filled the Huntsman Center in April, and angry constituents have confronted Utah lawmakers during town halls. New Utah Democratic Party Chairman Brian King said he would like to bring more national figures to speak in Utah in the future and is planning more town halls in the coming months, particularly in rural parts of the state thought to be more conservative. 'They should have an opportunity to come out, be invited to come out and let their elected officials — or people who are candidates for office — find out what's on their mind, and so that is a high priority of mine as chair of the party,' he told reporters before the event. Immigration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids were another focus of the town hall, and Utah Rep. Grant Amjad Miller, D-Salt Lake City, spoke of being a 'direct son of an immigrant' — his mother is Palestinian. His American roots on his paternal side go back to the American Revolutionary War, when an ancestor who immigrated from Prussia fought. 'My point being this: It does not matter if your American roots are new or if they are old,' Miller said. 'Unless you're Indigenous, those roots came from another place.' Jacobs, whose district is just north of the U.S.-Mexico border, said it's easier for politicians to 'fearmonger' about immigration the further they are from the border. 'Those of us close to the border, we know how important the border is for our community. We know how important immigration is for our communities,' she said. 'We're literally talking about people who are just trying to make a living for their families, and the more we can highlight that, I think the more that we'll get public sentiment on our side, and we'll be able to push back on this, because we're already seeing the president's poll numbers change on immigration.'
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Yahoo
Are national parks really at risk? Sen. Mike Lee pushes back on campaign against public land sales
WASHINGTON — Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. Celeste Maloy are defending a proposal to sell federally owned land after environmental groups launched a campaign against the proposal, included in the Senate version of President Donald Trump's tax bill. The groups accuse congressional Republicans of trying to siphon off millions of acres of federal land to help pay for Trump's tax cuts. But Lee and Maloy, both Utah Republicans, say maps circulated by groups like the Wilderness Society are misleading, and come from national groups that don't understand the local issues at play. The decades-long debate over whether to sell off federally controlled land was reignited last week after Lee drafted language requiring 11 Western states to sell between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres over the next five years. The proposal is tucked into a larger bill of energy-related provisions meant to offset trillions of dollars in proposed tax cuts in Trump's reconciliation package. The proposal has prompted pushback, mostly beyond the handful of states it directly affects. Public land advocates and outdoor groups have criticized the legislation — even attracting the attention of some celebrities, such as actress Sydney Sweeney who said this week that public lands 'belong to all Americans, and it is the patriotic duty of every citizen to resist this scheme.' Lee rejected that characterization, responding in a post on X: 'Great—if federal land is an unmitigated good, then every state should have an equal share of it.' The online discourse has resulted in conflicting interpretations about what the legislation would do — or wouldn't do, in some cases. Here's a breakdown of the basic components of the bill and how different groups are responding. Under the bill, 11 states would be required to sell anywhere between 0.5% and 0.75% of all Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service lands, which could total up to a maximum of 1.5% in some cases. The legislation specifically applies to Utah as well as Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. About 63% of Utah's land is owned by the federal government, the most of any state in the country aside from Nevada. The federal government owns more than 80% of the land in Nevada. By comparison, the federal government owns just 0.3% of the land in Connecticut and Iowa, the least among the states. The bill would require the land be used only for 'the development of housing or to address associated community needs,' although it does leave that interpretation up to the secretaries of Interior and Agriculture. Lee has said there will be updates to the legislation that would further restrict what lands can be sold, mandating that those being sold by the U.S. Forest Service are within two miles of a population center and those being sold by the Bureau of Land Management are within five miles. The Utah senator notes lands with existing permits for grazing, mining, mineral leases, or more would also be exempt. The bill outlines 15 categories of protected land that cannot be sold for housing purposes. These include national monuments, national historical parks, recreation areas, conservation areas, units of the National Wildlife Refuge System, units of the National Fish Hatchery System, national trails, national memorials, battlefield sites and military parks, among other things. However, conservation groups such as the Wilderness Society have circulated maps depicting lands they believe would fall under the bill's definition of public lands. The map shows popular hiking trails, ski resorts and grazing areas the group says would be at risk under Lee's proposal. Those lands stretch across the Wasatch Front to include Big Cottonwood Canyon, Little Cottonwood Canyon and Parleys Canyon. Lee has pushed back against those characterizations, with his office arguing the Wilderness Society map is not an official government document and is 'speculative and misleading.' Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, who led a similar public lands sales proposal in the House earlier this year, also rejected the Wilderness Society map, warning it's part of an agenda from a 'national group that may have no understanding of Utah.' 'People see that map and they get panicky,' Maloy told the Deseret News in an interview. 'I want people in Utah to be more thoughtful in how they respond to maps on the internet, because that map isn't part of any legislation.' 'Not every acre of public land is a national park. The vast majority of it is not,' Maloy added. 'We have a lot of sagebrush ground that is adjacent to cities and towns where we do have infrastructure needs, and we've got to be able to have serious conversations about how we handle the real needs of communities in Utah. It can't always devolve into loud rhetoric about parks and access.' Instead, the Utah lawmakers have maintained the bill does not list any lands 'for sale' but instead creates a nomination process to purchase lands currently owned by the government. The legislation excludes specific acreage as well as any maps to adhere to the strict Senate rules of reconciliation. 'When this bill puts land in the category of eligibility for sale, it doesn't mean for sale,' Lee told conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Thursday. 'It just means there's a process by which it could be transferred.' The process for selling off land would begin shortly after the bill is passed. The legislation requires the secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to solicit nominations from interested parties within 30 days of passage. The bill does not specify who qualifies as an 'interested party' nor does it have restrictions. The lands under consideration must meet certain criteria, such as being adjacent to existing developed areas, having access to existing infrastructure, is suitable for resident housing, and contains isolated tracts that are inefficient to manage. After that initial solicitation, the secretaries must publish lists of land for sale every 60 days until they meet the required acreage of lands to sell in each state. However, the provision would require the interior secretary to consult with state and local governments as well as any Indian tribes before facilitating any sort of sale, according to the bill. That way, aides noted, it created a 'public participant process.' The bill also carves out what is known as 'first right of refusal,' which would give state and local officials an early opportunity to make a first offer if they so choose. When drafting her initial amendment, Maloy proposed selling about 11,000 acres of public lands in Utah's Washington and Beaver counties, which was drafted upon request from county officials. That proposal was ultimately removed from the tax bill amid pushback from some Republicans as well as concerns it did not adhere to strict reconciliation rules. Still, Maloy says the arguments influencing the original amendment still stand: Local leaders should decide whether to sell off public lands. 'Every event I have, especially political events, somebody asks, 'What are you going to do to get us more control of our public land?'' Maloy told the Deseret News. 'I think there's a big appetite for that in Utah. People want it to be thoughtful. They want more access, they want more control. They want more of a voice.' Lee's language is separate from Maloy's, although the Utah senator did work with the congresswoman when drafting his own version, he told the Deseret News. The proposal to sell off public lands is still an uphill battle in Congress, even with Trump's support on the issue. While some conservatives are supportive of the effort to sell federally owned lands to pay for Trump's signature tax cuts, other Republicans in Western states have come out against the proposal — particularly those in Montana. Both Republican Sens. Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy of Montana told the Deseret News they oppose the sale of public lands. However, they both noted separately they were pleased to see Montana exempted from Lee's proposal, which the Utah senator did after consulting with the pair. However, Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., has gone even further to say he would outright oppose any reconciliation package that includes the sale of public lands, possibly putting the bill at risk. 'I don't yield to pressure, only higher principle,' Zinke said in a statement. 'I have said from day one I would not support a bill that sells public lands. I am still a no on the Senate reconciliation bill that sells public lands. We did our job in the House. Let's get it finished.'
Yahoo
27-06-2025
- Yahoo
Senate parliamentarian nixes tax incentives for school choice, religious college exemptions
WASHINGTON — A handful of education-related tax provisions were stripped from the Senate reconciliation bill on Friday morning after the parliamentarian ruled they did not adhere to strict budgetary rules that would relieve them from a filibuster. One of the biggest proposals Republicans sought to include in the massive tax package was a plan to promote school choice by providing scholarships to students who wish to attend private secular or religious schools. Much of the proposal was based on the Educational Choice for Children Act to implement a tax credit scholarship plan, legislation that Utah Rep. Burgess Owens co-sponsored in the House. 'Overnight, the Senate parliamentarian struck down key school choice provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill,' Owens told the Deseret News in a statement. 'Every child deserves the freedom to learn, and every parent deserves the power to choose what's best for their family. I'm grateful to our partners in the Senate for their continued leadership as we work together on next steps to ensure school choice reaches every child in every zip code.' One of the major tenets of the program is a $4 billion annual tax credit for those who donate to scholarship organizations that help pay for educational expenses such as private school tuition, books, or the cost of homeschooling supplies. The program would expand school choice, Republicans argue, by opening the door to private education for families who otherwise could not afford it. Families would be eligible for the program so long as they earned at or below 300% of the area's median gross income. For example, in Salt Lake County where the median income is $94,658, any child in a household earning less than $283,974 could qualify. The tax credit scholarship plan was estimated to cost roughly $26 billion over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. The parliamentarian also nixed language exempting religious schools from a proposed endowment tax that Republicans hope to tuck into their massive reconciliation bill, making it unclear whether the planned taxes will remain in the package. Republican lawmakers are pushing to increase endowment taxes for U.S. universities, proposing a new tiered system that could cost elite colleges hundreds of millions of dollars each year. The proposal initially included language carving out exceptions for most religious schools, exempting them from the higher taxes. But under the rulings issued on Friday, the religious exemptions do not adhere to reconciliation guidelines and would instead be subject to the 60-vote threshold. Through the budget reconciliation process, Republicans can circumvent a filibuster and Democratic opposition to expedite the passage of certain legislation by a simple majority vote. There are certain rules that dictate how often reconciliation can be used, and the procedure can only be used to advance budget-related legislation such as taxes, spending and the debt limit. However, if provisions run afoul of those rules, it will instead be subject to the typical 60-vote threshold. Once a budget reconciliation blueprint is finalized, it then only requires a simple majority in the House and Senate to pass. The parliamentarian removed several proposals on Medicaid and other tax-related measures throughout this week, sending Republicans into a scramble to adjust the bill language and finalize the full package before their self-imposed deadline next week.
