logo
Balanced advantage vs. Multi Asset Allocation Mutual Funds: Which should investors choose?

Balanced advantage vs. Multi Asset Allocation Mutual Funds: Which should investors choose?

Time of India31-05-2025
Balanced Advantage / Dynamic Asset Allocation Funds
Live Events
Multi Asset Allocation Funds
Key differences
Which fund type should one choose?
Way forward for these categories
In the diverse universe of mutual funds , understanding the distinction between various hybrid categories is crucial to making informed decisions. Two popular choices for investors seeking a balanced risk-return approach are Balanced Advantage Funds (BAFs), also known as Dynamic Asset Allocation Funds (DAAFs), and Multi Asset Allocation Funds While both aim to manage market volatility and deliver consistent returns, they differ significantly in structure, asset composition, and investment philosophy. Here's a breakdown of how they work and how investors can choose between them.Balanced advantage funds or dynamic asset allocation funds are designed to dynamically shift between equity and debt based on changing market conditions. Fund managers use internal models that assess valuation metrics, momentum, and macroeconomic indicators to decide how much exposure should be allocated to equity or debt at any given time. The equity allocation in these funds can vary widely, typically ranging from around 30% to over 80%, depending on the fund house's model. The debt portion acts as a buffer, helping reduce volatility during market downturns.A unique advantage of BAFs is that many of them maintain an average equity exposure above 65%, often through arbitrage positions. This allows them to qualify for equity taxation, which is more favourable than debt taxation over the long term. The goal of these funds is to provide stable, equity-like returns while limiting downside risks through timely asset rebalancing. Investors who want market participation without full equity volatility often find BAFs an attractive core holding.Multi asset allocation funds, as per SEBI guidelines, are required to invest in at least three asset classes — usually equity, debt, and commodities like gold — with a minimum of 10% in each. This structure inherently provides broader diversification compared to BAFs, as the inclusion of non-correlated assets such as gold helps reduce overall portfolio risk.These funds typically maintain a mix where equity forms the core, supported by fixed income instruments and gold or other commodities. Unlike BAFs that dynamically change their equity-debt allocation based on models, Multi Asset Funds often rebalance periodically rather than tactically. The objective here is to deliver stable returns across different market cycles, relying on the varying performance of asset classes rather than frequent tactical shifts. For investors who believe in the long-term benefits of diversification across asset classes, multi asset funds offer a one-stop solution.The most fundamental difference lies in the asset mix. While BAFs primarily toggle between equity and debt based on valuation models, Multi Asset Allocation Funds include at least three asset classes and maintain a minimum allocation to each.BAFs are typically more dynamic, with frequent shifts between asset classes to respond to short-term market movements. In contrast, multi asset funds may follow a more stable rebalancing strategy, providing smoother returns but potentially lower agility during sharp market moves.In terms of taxation, most BAFs enjoy equity taxation because they maintain the required equity exposure through direct holdings or derivatives. Multi Asset Funds, however, may not always qualify for equity taxation depending on the actual breakdown of the portfolio, which could affect post-tax returns.All balanced advantage funds enjoy equity taxation which means investors who hold for more than a year pay 12.5% tax. In the case of multi-asset funds, some schemes that allocate more than 65% to equity enjoy equity taxation. However, there are some conservative schemes that have 35-65% allocated to equity, where investors who hold for more than 2 years pay tax at 12.5%, while those that sell before 2 years pay slab-based tax.Another distinction is that while BAFs usually exclude commodities, Multi Asset Funds mandate exposure to gold or other non-equity, non-debt assets, offering better diversification in times of inflation or global uncertainty.Balanced Advantage or Dynamic Asset Allocation Funds are ideal for investors who want active equity participation but with an in-built cushion during market downturns. These funds are particularly useful for conservative investors looking for equity exposure without fully bearing the volatility of the stock market. They are also suitable for long-term investors who prefer tax-efficient options and want the fund manager to adjust allocations based on market conditions.On the other hand, Multi Asset Allocation Funds are a good fit for investors who value broad diversification and want exposure to different asset classes like gold, which can act as a hedge during economic instability or inflation. These funds tend to be more conservative in their allocation and are appropriate for moderate-risk investors who believe in riding different market cycles through asset diversification rather than timing or tactical allocation.Both Balanced Advantage and Multi Asset Allocation Funds serve the purpose of managing portfolio risk, but through different mechanisms. While BAFs rely on dynamic shifts between equity and debt based on market signals, Multi Asset Funds take a more structured diversification route involving a broader set of asset classes.Your choice should ultimately depend on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and belief in either tactical allocation or strategic diversification. In many cases, combining both types within a portfolio can create a well-rounded investment strategy suited for various market conditions.If the investor has a medium- to long-term horizon, partial deployment in balanced advantage or multi-asset funds can serve as a middle ground, offering market participation with downside buffers,' Sagar Shinde, VP Research, Fisdom shared with ETMutualFunds.While sharing the way forward for multi asset allocation funds, Vishal Dhawan, CEO, Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors, a wealth management firm in Mumbai told ETMutualFunds that one can hold multi asset allocation funds in the portfolio especially in volatile markets as they can help preserve capital and deliver more stable returns over time compared to pure equity funds.'Gold, for instance, has emerged as one of the strongest-performing asset classes in recent years, especially during times of global uncertainty. Its presence in the portfolio can act as a natural hedge, offering protection when equities are under pressure. However, it is important for investors to understand the fund's asset allocation model and strategy as this will influence how the fund performs across different market cycles,' Dhawan adds.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jane Street hires Khaitan in index manipulation case
Jane Street hires Khaitan in index manipulation case

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

Jane Street hires Khaitan in index manipulation case

US high-frequency trader (HFT) Jane Street has hired top law firm Khaitan & Co. to defend itself in the case of alleged index manipulation, two people aware of the matter said. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) alleged in an Interim order last week that Jane Street had manipulated the Bank Nifty and Nifty indices over two years by taking outsized trading positions, relative to other market participants, in their cash and derivatives constituents. According to the regulator, this enabled Jane Street to make unlawful profits of ₹4,844 crore from trades in weekly Bank Nifty and Nifty options. Also Read: Jane Street's woes may have only just begun. Sebi is now checking Sensex options 'The HFT is very close to closing the loop and is expected to pay the amount as asked by Sebi," said a senior executive aware of the development. Khaitan & Co and Jane Street did not respond to Mint's late night queries sent on Sunday. "The two options before Jane Street are to challenge Sebi's interim order or to respond to it," said Sandeep Parekh, founder of Finsec Law Advisors. "A challenge would mean it goes before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), and from thereon to the Supreme Court, depending on which way the tribunal rules. A response means they pay the amount and continue to trade in the market, reserving a right to seek legal redress as the Sebi investigation is ongoing." Sebi flags expiry-day strategy in January A key episode cited in the Sebi order occurred on 17 January 2024, the weekly expiry day for Bank Nifty options. The index opened 3.2% lower at 46,574 after HDFC Bank reported disappointing quarterly results. Sebi alleges Jane Street responded by purchasing Bank Nifty index futures and constituent stocks worth ₹4,370 crore, helping the index recover to a high of 47,212.75 and giving 'an impression of recovery" in the index. Also Read: Sebi's Jane Street crackdown sparks debate over arbitrage and manipulation As the index recovered, call option prices surged while put options slumped. Sebi claims Jane Street proceeded to then sell the costlier call options to and buy the cheaper put options from other participants in this phase, taking total bearish exposure in Bank Nifty options worth ₹32,114.96 crore. In the second leg, Jane Street allegedly unwound its positions, pushing down the index and its constituent stocks, which boosted the value of the purchased puts manifold while eroding the value of the sold calls, enabling them to rake in ₹735 crore in options that day as the Bank Nifty plunged 4.28% to close at 46,064.45. Firm denies wrongdoing Sebi alleges that through such strategies, Jane Street profited illegally to the tune of ₹4,844 crore over 21 days between August 2023 and May 2025. The regulator has ordered seizure of the alleged gains and barred Jane Street from the capital market until the money is deposited in an escrow account. Sebi also said Jane Street entities made a total profit of ₹36,502.12 crore between January 2023 and March 2025 through its trading strategies. Also Read: Buch slams 'false narrative' of delay in Jane Street probe In an internal staff communication after the Sebi order, Jane Street said it was 'deeply upsetting" to see the firm " mischaracterised." The note added, 'We are working on a formal response to Sebi." Addressing the specific allegation regarding 17 January 2024, Jane Street said, 'The strategy termed manipulation by Sebi was in fact a commonplace practice to align the large divergence in prices between the Bank Nifty index options and the price levels implied by its constituent stocks on that day. Priyanka Gawande contributed to this report

F&O Market: The real issues and the socioeconomic benefits questioned
F&O Market: The real issues and the socioeconomic benefits questioned

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

F&O Market: The real issues and the socioeconomic benefits questioned

Foreign and domestic traders should be treated equitably in tax matters Debashis Basu Mumbai Listen to This Article The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) last week issued a damning preliminary order against Jane Street, a New York-based trading firm, accusing it of orchestrating large, synchronised trades across the cash, futures, and options markets to manipulate equity-index levels. The trades allegedly profited Jane Street handsomely while inflicting losses on India's ever hopeful retail investors. In righteous indignation, Sebi declared that 'the integrity of the market and the faith of millions of small investors ... can no longer be held hostage to the machinations of such an untrustworthy actor'. Sebi has banned Jane Street from India's securities markets

IPO boom: 162 companies eye Rs 2.4 lakh crore in record fundraising drive
IPO boom: 162 companies eye Rs 2.4 lakh crore in record fundraising drive

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

IPO boom: 162 companies eye Rs 2.4 lakh crore in record fundraising drive

Driven by strong economic fundamentals and rising interest from retail investors, India's IPO market is heading for a busy second half of 2025. Nearly 162 companies—including big names like LG Electronics and Tata Capital Ltd—are preparing to hit the markets, collectively aiming to raise a record Rs 2.4 lakh crore through public offerings. Experts say this fundraising spree is unlike anything the capital market has seen before and comes at a time when stock markets have stabilised and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have eased. As of the end of June 2025, 71 companies had secured approval from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to launch their IPOs, with plans to collectively raise around Rs 1.14 lakh crore, according to data from Prime Database. Among them, LG Electronics India — a fully owned subsidiary of South Korea's LG Electronics and a key player in home appliances and consumer electronics — is eyeing a Rs 15,000 crore offering. Several companies are lining up for IPOs as India's primary market continues its strong momentum. Among them, Dorf Ketal Chemicals India and Credila Financial Services Ltd are each planning to raise Rs 5,000 crore. Other major IPOs in the pipeline include JSW Cement and SMPP Ltd, targeting Rs 4,000 crore each. Hero Fincorp is looking to raise Rs 3,668 crore, while National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) and Continuum Green Energy Ltd aim to raise Rs 3,400 crore and Rs 3,650 crore, respectively. Anthem Biosciences Ltd is set to open its Rs 3,395 crore IPO for public subscription on Monday, July 14. The IPO market remains active with 90 companies having filed their Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with SEBI in the current calendar year, up to July 2, 2025. These companies are awaiting regulatory approval to go public. Together, they aim to raise a total of Rs 1.17 lakh crore, according to data from Prime Database. Tata Capital Ltd has the largest proposed issue, seeking to raise Rs 17,200 crore through a primary market share sale. Other significant IPOs include Meesho Ltd at Rs 4,250 crore, PhysicsWallah Ltd and Orkla India Pvt Ltd with Rs 4,000 crore and Rs 3,200 crore respectively, while Juniper Green Energy and Tenneco Clean Air India Ltd are looking to raise Rs 3,000 crore each. Just last week, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company, India's second-largest asset manager, filed draft papers with SEBI for a massive Rs 10,000 crore IPO. 'The IPO pipeline is the largest it has ever been in the Indian market. Unless there is major negative news flow, I expect a very strong second half of the year,' said Pranav Haldea, Managing Director at Prime Database Group. Out of the 71 companies that have already received SEBI's approval to launch their IPOs, 18 were cleared in 2024 but have still not gone public, leading to questions about their plans. According to a market source, these companies may have received lukewarm feedback about the potential success of their IPOs. 'It's also possible they explored the grey market response and decided it wasn't strong enough to move forward,' the source said. Haldea attributes this delay to potential valuation mismatches, investor feedback, or strategic shifts within the companies. VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Investments, pointed out that after markets hit an all-time high in September 2024, a correction of nearly 20 per cent followed. 'When there's a 20 per cent correction from peak levels, companies with IPO approvals become cautious and prefer to wait for more favourable conditions. That's why, despite approvals, many are holding back,' he said. Despite geopolitical uncertainties, India's IPO market remained resilient in the first half of 2025. Up to July 2, a total of 25 companies raised over Rs 46,000 crore. Among the major issuances was HDB Financial Services, which raised Rs 12,500 crore in June, marking the largest IPO by a non-banking finance company and the biggest since Hyundai Motor India's Rs 27,870 crore IPO in 2024. The surge in IPO activity during January–June 2025 has been supported by strong macroeconomic fundamentals, a stable stock market, low inflation, favourable monetary and fiscal policies, IPO-friendly reforms, and growing retail investor participation. 'Primary markets tend to mirror the mood in secondary markets. With buoyancy returning since April, we've seen a noticeable uptick in IPO activity in recent months,' Haldea added. SimranJeet Singh Bhatia, Senior Equity Research Analyst at Almondz Global Securities Ltd, said India's macroeconomic indicators remain solid, with GDP growth at 6.5 per cent in FY25 and expected to stay above 6 per cent in FY26, despite global headwinds and uncertainty over U.S. President Donald Trump's new tariffs. In May, domestic retail inflation eased to 2.82 per cent, the lowest in over six years. GST collections in June grew by 6.5 per cent year-on-year, crossing Rs 1.80 lakh crore for the second consecutive month. Bhatia noted that this easing inflation prompted the RBI to cut the repo rate by 50 basis points to 5.5 per cent, which has restored foreign investor confidence and boosted both equity and IPO markets. Looking ahead, experts believe the IPO market in 2025 could reach record levels, fuelled by renewed investor confidence, a healthy economic outlook, and the expected listing of several high-quality companies. 'We anticipate continued momentum in the IPO space, driven by companies with strong financials and attractive valuations. Some of the major upcoming listings include NSDL, Tata Capital, Canara Robeco AMC (by Canara Bank), Hero Fincorp, LG Electronics, and Prestige Hospitality (by Prestige Estates),' Bhatia said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store