'Uber driving is the worst job I've ever had'
Taxi drivers in the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) trade union working for Uber, Bolt, and Addison Lee started a 24-hour strike at 7am on Thursday (May 1). They hit out at the amount of commission companies take from drivers, which Uber admitted can be up to 40pc for some journeys, but added it averages '20-30pc' weekly.
Striking drivers held a peaceful protest on Great Ancoats Street on Thursday afternoon, attended by roughly 30 people. They told the Local Democracy Reporting Service why they took industrial action.
READ MORE: Masked figures drop from helicopters and storm building near Manchester Tesco
READ MORE: M62 moor fire LIVE as 18 crews tackle devastating blaze with road shut - latest updates
In response, Uber outlined the benefits it says they provide for drivers including holiday pay and national insurance. Bosses say they are working with the GMB union and listening to their drivers to try and improve their experience in work.
But Tesfit Kidane, from Blackley, who started with Uber in December 2023, said: 'It's the worst job I've ever had.
"I was working in a warehouse before. I am thinking of going back to the warehouse.'
He added: 'The payment is not enough… We have to pay insurance and road tax. We have a family to feed from that.'
Another driver, Nesar Hamidy, said his pay is so low in Manchester that he often 'drives 40 miles' to earn more in Liverpool, Chester, or Preston — where he said 'prices are good'.
And driver Vahid, a cabbie of seven years who has worked with various firms in the city, said he was considering quitting Uber.
'The price is already half compared to other fares in Manchester,' he said. 'I used to work with other companies, like StreetCars, the wages with Uber are half.
'If they carry on what's the point working with them? With my family and the cost of living, it's not worth it.'
However, the 44-year-old admitted Uber 'has some advantages' like 'holiday pay, national insurance, and you can cash out five times per day'.
Other benefits include pension contributions, childcare vouchers, and sickness cover, Uber told the LDRS.
A spokesperson added in a statement: 'We regularly engage with drivers, especially through our industry-leading agreement with GMB Union, who are not taking part in this action.
'Uber is currently meeting with hundreds of drivers across the country to hear directly from them about how we can improve their experience on the platform.'
Morgan Powell, one of the protest organisers, said they have such benefits because 'drivers are willing to fight back'.
It's thought top Uber bosses and union chiefs are meeting next week, where pay will be the subject of discussion.
The strike action comes at a time when Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham is calling for reforms of the taxi trade.
Earlier this month, he launched his 'backing our taxis campaign', calling on the government to introduce a new law to tackle out-of-area working.
The first step in making the plans a reality is the launch of a 12-week-long 'engagement exercise', said Sara Todd, the chief executive of Trafford council, who is working with Mr Burnham on the plans.
Bolt and Addison Lee were contacted for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Uber Technologies (UBER) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
Wall Street expects a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when Uber Technologies (UBER) reports results for the quarter ended June 2025. While this widely-known consensus outlook is important in gauging the company's earnings picture, a powerful factor that could impact its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on August 6. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call will mostly determine the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations, it's worth having a handicapping insight into the odds of a positive EPS surprise. Zacks Consensus Estimate This ride-hailing company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.62 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +31.9%. Revenues are expected to be $12.46 billion, up 16.4% from the year-ago quarter. Estimate Revisions Trend The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Earnings Whisper Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. Our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction) -- has this insight at its core. The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only. A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP. Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell). How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for Uber? For Uber, the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +0.20%. On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3. So, this combination indicates that Uber will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate. Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue? Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number. For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Uber would post earnings of $0.51 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.83, delivering a surprise of +62.75%. Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates four times. Bottom Line An earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss. That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported. Uber appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release. Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stifel and Piper Sandler Raise PT on Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) is included in our list of the . A close up view of a hand holding a smartphone, using a ride sharing app. Ahead of its upcoming Q2 earnings release, Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) received multiple bullish updates in the past week. On July 24, 2025, Piper Sandler raised its price target on Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) from $95 to $103. The investment firm cited UBER's 31% six-month return, improving foreign exchange trends, and confidence in the company's affordability initiatives to retain customers. Piper Sandler expects $46.5 billion in Gross Bookings and $2.1 billion in EBITDA, aligning with Q2 consensus estimates. Meanwhile, on July 29, 2025, Stifel increased its price target on Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) to $117 from $110, maintaining a 'Buy' rating. The analyst anticipates strong Q2 results across consumer platforms, expressing growing confidence in the company's sustained growth and operational strength. Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER), headquartered in San Francisco, offers ride-hailing, food delivery, and freight services with its global platform. It is included in our list of the unstoppable stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of UBER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Cheap Value Stocks to Buy Now According to Warren Buffett and 7 Best Potash Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Why 5.3% Of Workers Now Hold Multiple Jobs: The Full Story
The president brags about how many jobs he has created, goes an old joke. Someone in the audience says, 'I have three of them.' The implication, obviously, is that the economy is so poor that people have to find multiple part-time jobs to support themselves. The actual data show good news: a declining trend in multiple job holding over decades, with a recent upturn. And that upturn may reflect opportunity rather than need. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics begin in 1994. The chart shows a general downward trend from 1995 through 2014, with a slight increase in the years leading up to the pandemic. After the worst of the pandemic, the percentage of employed people with multiple jobs rose from 4.4% to 5.3%, the steepest increase in 30 years. (The data are not adjusted for seasonal fluctuations, so the chart begins in 1995 to show 12-month moving averages.) Multiple job holding is usually associated—as the old joke reflects—with difficult times. But we see no increase at the time of the 2001 recession and only a small uptick in the 2008-2009 recession. (Recessions are shaded in gray on the chart.) Perhaps the hard-times story must be combined with a good-opportunity story. Economist Daniel Culbertson of the Indeed Hiring Lab observed that the rise of the gig economy (as embodied by Uber, DoorDash and other contract work) may have provided opportunities that people found appealing. Years ago, a job almost always involved a schedule and a location where the worker would report. The gig economy provides opportunities for people to work their preferred hours—even if that means different hours one week than the next. And the employee may not have to go into a fixed location but rather can start working from wherever he or she happens to be at the moment. (The conversation occurred during Talivity's Talent Market Index briefing.) There is probably truth in both the need story and opportunity story (which is my interpretation of Culbertson's remarks). And there may be middle ground where a person in need looks at different options, such as work full time in one job or part-time at two jobs with different characteristics. A variety of ride-share (Uber and Lyft) conversations I have had point to both ends of the spectrum. Two former taxi drivers shifted to ride-share driver because their preferred job—taxi driver—was no longer paying good money. They both shared bad feelings about the change. (A propensity to tell customers about their bad feelings may have led to disappointment with a system in which riders rate their drivers.) Several ride-share drivers, however, enjoyed the opportunity. One worked remotely as a tech writer, but wanted or needed some extra income. He kept his ride-share app open while he worked at home. One day it started raining and surge pricing kicked in. His app alerted him, so he shut his laptop and got in his car. He only drove customers when he would be well-rewarded. Similarly, another work-at-home person would only accept long drives on the ride-share apps. He would take someone from the distant suburb where he lived to the airport, then take someone else from the airport to the driver's suburb, and then he resumed work from home. He didn't care to do short trips, and he didn't have to. Several female drivers told me they didn't feel comfortable picking up late-night bar hoppers. Their ride-share contract did not require them to work hours or locations they disliked. And some drivers don't speak English, but can do the job thanks to the rideshare app and map app working in their native language. Thinking over economic questions often leads to stereotypes. 'A typical job seeker is looking for ….' Or, 'A typical employer is looking for ….' A deeper insight, though, is that the world is populated with widely varying people and businesses. Yes, a majority may prefer regular hours, but some want to vary their hours, and others are willing to be on call as the need arises. Many organizations need their workers to show up on time every scheduled workday (think stores and fire departments) but others just need the work done in some reasonable time range. We also have some companies that experience wide fluctuations in demand while others have very predictable needs. With great diversity of employers and businesses, no single work model will be good in all instances. Business leaders may be able to take advantage of some opportunities to get better employees at lower cost. Most people would prefer to have some flexibility in their work hours to accommodate commuting delays or family obligations. A company that does not really need employees to show up on a fixed schedule can get some good workers by offering flexibility. Another example: Companies that have varying needs might be better off paying high wages for people who agree to show up on short notice, working only as needed. That could be cheaper than paying people a moderate wage to stand around just in case they are needed. There are many retirees who would like to do something outside the home but don't want to commit to a daily job. Their flexible schedules might fit well with on-call work. The business analysis begins by looking at specific jobs and determining what the company really needs, plus what would be nice to have but not absolutely necessary, and what is not needed at all. Then look for employees whose particular interests aligns with the company's need. And as companies such as Uber, DoorDash and Upwork have learned, there might even be a business in serving that narrow need. People interested in public policy should consider that some multiple job holders are happy with their situation.