Maramadi, an agrarian sport fading into oblivion
However, the harvest race that once drew thousands to the muddy fields near Anandapally in Adoor during the Malayalam month of Chingam is nearly extinct today.
The race was a sight to behold. A pair of bulls yoked to a wooden plank charged down a 100-m waterlogged track, with a rider clinging to the log and two runners guiding them. For viewers, it was rhythm, tradition and unwavering spirit – 'agriculture in motion', as many dubbed it.
Started in the 1950s in Adoor Puthuveettil Padi Ela, Anandapally Maramadi was held annually after paddy harvest until 2008, following a Supreme Court directive that banned events involving the use of animals, including Tamil Nadu's Jallikattu.
'While states like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra subsequently passed legislation allowing traditional bull-related sports to resume following a 2017 amendment by the Centre, Kerala has yet to follow suit,' said Varghese Daniel, president of the Anandapally Karshaka Samithi (AKS), the organisers of the Maramadi.
Despite promises from successive state governments, neither a Bill has been passed nor an ordinance promulgated to permit Maramadi.
'We were told an ordinance would be brought. Even the CM publicly assured it. But nothing has moved forward,' said AKS secretary V K Stanley.
The organisers said Maramadi attracted over 60 bull pairs from eight districts as well as large crowds, including foreign tourists. The event traditionally took place on August 15 during Independence Day celebrations. Bulls, often brought from Tamil Nadu, were specially trained and maintained by local farmers for a considerable cost.
Cultural significance
Beyond entertainment, Maramadi carried cultural and agricultural significance, serving as a platform to showcase indigenous farming practices and tools, encouraging youth participation in agriculture and promoting rural tourism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Over 95 lakh domestic tourist visits to Jammu & Kashmir during Jan-June in 2025: Government data
The figures for domestic tourist visits to Jammu and Kashmir during January-June this year stood at more than 95 lakh, according to data shared by the government. Union Tourism Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat shared the data in a written response on Monday to a query on whether the Centre is aware of the decline in tourist footfall and business losses in Jammu and Kashmir during the peak tourist season following the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam. AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi also asked if any assessment was made by the government on its economic impact on local tourism-dependent stakeholders. "No such assessment has been made by the Ministry of Tourism on economic impact on local tourism-dependent stakeholders in Jammu and Kashmir," Shekhawat said. The Pahalgam terror strike took place on April 22 in which 26 civilians, mostly tourists were brutally killed. India avenged the killings with Operation Sindoor under which the armed forces early May 7 decimated multiple terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir (PoK). A special discussion in the Lok Sabha on "India's strong, successful and decisive Operation Sindoor" began on Monday as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said the military action against Pakistan had sent a clear message to supporters of terrorism that India was committed to defend its motherland. In his response, Shekhawat also shared year-wise tabulated data for domestic tourist visits (DTVs) and foreign tourist visits (FTVs) from 2020 to 2025. This data is provided by the state tourism department. Based on the latest information received from the Jammu and Kashmir tourism department, the number of DTVs and FTVs stood at 95,92,664 and 19,570 respectively for the period January-June of 2025. DTVs for preceding four years were -- 2,35,24,629 (for year 2024); 2,06,79,336 (2023); 1,84,99,332 (2022); 1,13,14,920 (2021) and 25,19,524 (2020). FTVs for preceding four years were -- 65,452 (for year 2024); 55,337 (2023); 19,985 (2022); 1,650 (2021) and 5,317 (2020, and for January-June period of 2025 it stood at 19,570. Shekhawat said the Ministry of Tourism has taken several steps or initiatives to promote tourism sector in the country, including in Jammu and Kashmir. On April 23, the Union tourism minister had told reporters in Delhi that some people with nefarious intentions had tried to again "incite separatism and terrorism" in the Valley and asserted that his ministry would do the best to "minimise the dent" on tourism in Jammu and Kashmir in the wake of the Pahalgam attack.
United News of India
15 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC declines to stay draft electoral roll publication in Bihar, emphasises ‘En Masse Inclusion' over Exclusion
New Delhi, July 28 (UNI) The Supreme Court today declined to stay the publication of the draft electoral rolls for Bihar scheduled for August 1 under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India (ECI), despite concerns raised by opposition leaders and civil society groups over mass disenfranchisement. A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi refrained from granting interim relief, noting the time constraints as Justice Kant had to attend an administrative meeting later in the day. However, the Bench assured the petitioners that the matter would be heard expeditiously and asked counsels to indicate the time required for detailed arguments on Tuesday. Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), pleaded with the court to restrain the ECI from issuing the draft list, arguing that the ongoing process could inconvenience nearly 4.5 crore voters. He said those excluded from the draft would be forced to undertake the cumbersome process of filing objections and proving their eligibility anew. Justice Surya Kant, however, remarked that since the list was only a draft, the Court retains the power to review and nullify the process later if legal infirmities are found. 'We can always strike down the process if we find any illegality,' he observed, declining to pass an order making the process subject to the outcome of the case, stating that such a presumption was already implicit. The petitioners also flagged the alleged non-compliance by ECI officials with the Supreme Court's earlier direction (July 10 order) to accept Aadhaar cards, Voter ID (EPIC), and Ration cards as proof of eligibility. Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the ECI, responded that Aadhaar and EPIC were being reviewed, but raised concerns over the authenticity of ration cards, citing widespread instances of forged documents. Justice Kant, however, reiterated the presumption of validity attached to official documents and directed the ECI to ensure that Aadhaar and EPIC are accepted. 'You will proceed with Aadhaar and Voter ID... Forgery can happen with any document; that cannot be the basis to reject an entire category,' the Court observed, adding that the ECI should work towards 'en masse inclusion' rather than en masse exclusion. The controversy stems from a June 24, 2025, directive by the ECI launching a Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar under Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The petitions, filed by a broad coalition of political leaders, activists, and civil rights groups, claim that the process is opaque, hasty, and disproportionately affects Muslims, Dalits, poor migrants, and illiterate citizens. The petitioners—including leaders from the INC, CPI, CPI-M, DMK, Shiv Sena (UBT), RJD, AIMIM, JMM, and others argue that this is the first time voters who have cast their ballots in multiple elections are being asked to reconfirm their citizenship, failing which their names may be deleted from the electoral roll. They further contend that the documents demanded by the ECI such as passports, birth certificates, and school certificates are not easily available to large sections of Bihar's population. By excluding widely used documents like Aadhaar and Ration cards, the petitioners claim the ECI is violating Section 22 of the Representation of the People Act and Rule 21-A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, both of which mandate adequate safeguards against arbitrary exclusion. In its counter-affidavit, the ECI has defended the exercise as necessary to ensure that only Indian citizens are included in the electoral rolls. It has maintained that Aadhaar and Ration cards are not reliable proof of citizenship and insisted that its eleven-document list was merely illustrative. The ADR, in its rejoinder, alleged large-scale procedural violations, including unauthorized mass-uploading of enumeration forms without voter consent, submission of forms for deceased individuals, and attempts to meet 'unrealistic' deadlines set by the Commission. These claims were supported by field reports from journalists and election observers. Previously, a vacation Bench led by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Joymalya Bagchi had also cautioned that determination of citizenship is not within the ECI's mandate, urging it to consider Aadhaar, Voter ID, and Ration cards as part of the process. Although the Supreme Court has not yet passed any definitive orders, the matter is now scheduled for detailed hearing, where the legality and fairness of the ongoing SIR exercise will be rigorously scrutinized. For now, the Court has allowed the ECI to proceed with the publication of the draft electoral rolls, leaving the door open for judicial intervention if procedural violations are established. UNI SNG RN
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Supreme Court quashes FIR against Lakshya Sen in birth certificate forgery case
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed an FIR against badminton player Lakshya Sen, his family members and coach in the birth certificate forgery case. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar said the continuation of criminal proceedings against Sen was an abuse of the process of court. The top court observed the very allegations that were examined and debunked by competent authorities were now being sought to be revived as it ruled out any fresh evidence meriting reopening of the appellants, particularly appellant 1 and 3, are sportspersons of national standing, having represented India in international badminton tournaments and having earned multiple accolades, including medals at the Commonwealth Games and BWF international events," the court said. The top court went on, "To compel such individuals who have maintained an unblemished record and brought distinction to the country through sustained excellence,to undergo the ordeal of a criminal trial in the absence of prima facie material would not subserve the ends of justice."The invocation of criminal law in such circumstances, the bench held, would amount to an abuse of process, which this court cannot countenance. The top court observed the Sports Authority of India (SAI), upon receiving complaints, initiated a verification process in 2016, which included medical testing and factual players were stated to have undergone bone ossification and dental tests at government-run hospitals including AIIMS, Delhi."The findings of these tests supported the birth years as recorded in official documents. On that basis, the SAI closed the matter. The CVC, an independent oversight body, was also seized of the issue and recommended no disciplinary proceedings against D K Sen. These findings were accepted by the relevant authorities and have not been set aside or reopened," the bench M G Nagaraj alleged birth certificates of Sen and his brother Chirag Sen were top court was hearing a plea against a February 19 Karnataka High Court order rejecting the petitions filed by Sen, his family members, and his coach U Vimal high court found prima facie evidence, warranting an investigation into the alleged Sen's parents Dhirendra and Nirmala Sen, along with his brother, coach, and an employee of the Karnataka Badminton Association were involved in falsifying the birth to the complaint, the accused allegedly manipulated the birth certificates of the Sen brothers, reducing their age by approximately two-and-a-half alleged forgery was intended to allow them to participate in age-restricted badminton tournaments and avail government supported his claims with documents obtained under RTI Act and requested the court to summon original records from SAI and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports in New on the evidence, the court directed the High Grounds police station to conduct an police subsequently lodged an FIR under Sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery), and 471 (using forged documents as genuine) of petitioners moved the Karnataka High Court in 2022, securing an interim order, which stalled the argued the complaint and subsequent FIR were baseless, motivated, and intended to harass was alleged to have acted out of personal vendetta, after his daughter applied to join the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in 2020 but was not selected after the evaluation a coach at the academy, was named in the high court, while dismissing the petitions, observed the petitioners' counsel did not present arguments despite being given sufficient opportunities.- EndsTune InMust Watch
