
Lebanese president calls for Hezbollah to disarm as US pressure rises
Aoun's comments Thursday during a speech marking Army Day in Lebanon came as pressure increases from Washington to disarm Hezbollah.
The U.S. presented Lebanon with 'draft ideas to which we have made fundamental amendments that will be presented to the Cabinet early next week," Aoun said.
Under the Lebanese proposal, there would be an 'immediate cessation of Israeli hostilities' in Lebanon, including airstrikes and targeted killing, a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon and the release of Lebanese prisoners held in Israel, Aoun said.
Lebanon, for its part, would implement the 'withdrawal of the weapons of all armed forces, including Hezbollah, and their surrender to the Lebanese Army,' he said.
The comments came after a speech Wednesday by Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem that called the group's weapons 'part of Lebanon's strength' and said 'anyone who demands the delivery of weapons is demanding the delivery of weapons to Israel.'
Hezbollah officials have said they will not discuss giving up the group's remaining arsenal until Israel withdraws from all of Lebanon and stops its strikes.
Aoun said Lebanon's proposal also calls for international donors to contribute $1 billion annually for 10 years to beef up the Lebanese army's capabilities and for an international donor conference to raise funds in the fall for reconstruction of Lebanese areas damaged and destroyed during last year's war between Israel and Hezbollah.
The war nominally ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire in November calling for Hezbollah and Israeli forces to withdraw from the area south of the Litani River in Lebanon, which would be patrolled by a beefed-up Lebanese army, along with U.N. peacekeepers.
The agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani River should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorized facilities starting with the area south of the river.
Hezbollah maintains the deal only covers the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the U.S. say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon.
Since the the ceasefire took effect, Israel has continued to occupy five border points in Lebanon and carry out almost daily airstrikes that Israel says are aimed at preventing Hezbollah from rebuilding its capabilities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Trump administration to formally axe Elon Musk's 'five things' email
WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - The Trump administration plans as soon as Tuesday to formally axe a program launched by billionaire former Trump adviser Elon Musk requiring federal employees to summarize their five workplace achievements from the prior week, two people familiar with the matter said. The Office of Personnel Management, the federal human resources agency that implemented Musk's push to slash the federal workforce, plans to announce the end of the "five things" email to HR representatives across the federal government later on Tuesday, the two people said, declining to be named because the matter was not public. While many federal agencies had already phased out compliance with the weekly email, the move, not previously reported, signals the Trump administration is turning the page on one of Musk's most unpopular initiatives following a dramatic row between the two men in early June. The White House and OPM did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk, who spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help Trump win November's presidential election, led the Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce until his departure in May to refocus on his tech empire. Musk initially received a warm White House sendoff from Trump, but then incurred the president's wrath by describing Trump's tax cut and spending bill as an abomination. Trump pulled the nomination of Musk ally and tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman to lead NASA and later threatened to cancel billions of dollars worth of federal contracts with Musk's companies after the blowup between the two men. The "five things" email, launched by Musk in February to boost accountability, sparked tensions with department chiefs who were blindsided by the weekend email mandating the move. It also fueled confusion among government workers who received mixed messages about whether and how to comply. Reuters reported in March that the White House installed two Trump loyalists at OPM to ensure better policy coordination between the White House and the agency. Scott Kupor, a venture capitalist who took the helm at OPM in July, foreshadowed the end of the initiative last month, describing processing of the weekly response emails as "very manual" and "not efficient." It is "something that we should look at and see, like, are we getting the value out of it that at least the people who put it in place thought they were," he said.


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
AOC hit with ethics violation after saying fiancé both is and isn't her ‘spouse' in government filings
Republicans on the House Ethics Committee have reprimanded New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after she reportedly said in government filings that her fiancé, Riley Roberts, both is and isn't her 'spouse.' In its July 2025 report, the ethics committee criticized Ocasio-Cortez for listing Roberts as her 'spouse' on federal documents that she filed before attending the 2021 Met Gala. Roberts and Ocasio-Cortez are not yet legally married. 'The Committee also found evidence that Representative Ocasio-Cortez listed Mr. Roberts as her 'spouse' on paperwork filed with the House relating to privately sponsored travel, although the two were not legally married at the time of the gifted travel,' the report states. Similarly, the ethics panel stated that Roberts was listed as a spouse on the documents to attend the gala, but that he wasn't listed as a spouse in Ocasio-Cortez's financial filings, The Daily Mail noted. If he had been listed as a spouse, he would have been forced to disclose stock and other financial holdings. 'The Committee further notes that at the same time Representative Ocasio-Cortez was seeking to take advantage of exceptions to the Gift Rule only applicable to spouses and/or certain relatives, she was not disclosing Mr. Roberts's financial interests as is required of Members who are legally married,' the report adds. Last month, Ocasio-Cortez was ordered to pay back thousands of dollars after the ethics panel determined that she had not been paying market rates in connection with her appearance at the Met Gala in 2021. The panel found that the 35-year-old had underpaid for her dress, which said 'tax the rich' across the back, as well as for jewelry and accessories. In the July 2025 report, the committee states the investigation will be closed after Ocasio-Cortez has paid another $2,700 to vendors for clothing and accessories. The panel said the congresswoman has been cooperating with the investigation. The committee also criticized that Met Gala organizer and Vogue editor Anna Wintour personally invited Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts to the event. Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts met while they were both studying at Boston University and have been engaged since April 2022, The Mail noted. A lawyer for Ocasio-Cortez, David Mitrani, argued in the filings that Roberts is not subject to the financial disclosure rules as he's 'not considered a spouse.' The committee states that Roberts still enjoyed some of the benefits of being a spouse, such as receiving a spouse's congressional pin, which allowed him to access certain restricted parts of the congressional complex. 'Mr. Roberts and the Congresswoman have been together since 2014, and have lived together since 2016,' the committee states. 'Mr. Roberts has had a spouse pin since the Congresswoman entered Congress in 2019.' 'It is clear that the term 'spouse' – as utilized in this former rule and as seemingly accepted by the Committee by expanding 'spouse or dependent' to any guest – was intended to allow a Member of Congress to bring the individual that they've decided to share their lives with to a charity event, regardless of whether they had taken steps to bring the law or religion into their relationship,' it adds.


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Famous Democrats' blistering response to Kamala Harris' claim that 'the system is broken'
Prominent media personalities Charlamagne tha God and Stephen A. Smith slammed Kamala Harris for saying that the system is 'broken' after she spent decades working in politics. The pair of Democrats took aim at Harris' comments last week on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, where the former vice president responded to the host's questions about a potential future for office. 'I don't want to go back in the system, I think it's broken,' she said. Charlamagne and Smith seized on the remarks on Monday's episode of the Stephen A. Smith Show, accusing Harris of hypocrisy. 'When they asked her the other day about her stepping away and she was like, "I want to step back from it, the system is broken" - you're a career politician, you've been there practically all your life,' Smith said. 'You've been an attorney, a state attorney general. You've been a prosecutor. You've been a senator. You've been a vice president. My God, you've been a part of it. And now you're saying it's broken?' 'That means you couldn't do but so much to fix it when you was in it.' Charlamagne agreed. 'The system was broken long before Donald Trump, you know, got into office,' the radio host added. 'Kamala is a friend, man. I've been supporting Kamala for a long time,' he continued. 'But I can't sit here and say I disagree with you. I think that she should do whatever it is that she wants to do, but when I heard her say that, you know, "The system is broken" and she wants to take a step back from the system - her whole career has been the system.' Smith also claimed 'there's no way in hell she's going to win the presidency in 2028.' 'I don't think that she's going to be the candidate,' he said. 'I think her time - she had a chance at that. It didn't get done and that's where I'm at with it.' The conversation came just days after President Donald Trump attacked Charlamagne, calling the host a 'racist sleazebag' after he openly criticized the president in front of his daughter-in-law. The Breakfast Club host sat down with Lara Trump, who is married to the president's son Eric Trump, on Saturday night and asked him to rate her father-in-law's performance in office over the past six months. 'I wouldn't give it a good rating - simply because the least of us are still being impacted the worst,' Charlamagne, whose real name is Lenard Larry McKelvey, replied. 'Like when you look at something like the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' That's something that I'm going to benefit from because of the tax bracket that I'm in. But there's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill,' he added. In February, Smith threatened to run for president himself, saying the USA's 'joke' of a two-party system could motivate him. Smith, who spoke exclusively to the Daily Mail at the time about his potential entry into politics, has flip-flopped when it comes to a career in public office, previously saying he has 'no desire' to run for president. However, he has also said he would consider running if he had a 'legitimate, bonafide shot to win,' and outlined on his eponymous show what he'd want to change if given the chance. 'Let me tell you why [I would consider running]. Because I think our system sucks,' he said, via Awful Announcing. 'I think the binary system where we have to choose between the Democrats and the Republicans is a joke.