A pilot made sharp turn to avoid a B-52 bomber over North Dakota, then took to the mic to explain
The Friday incident is detailed in a video taken by a passenger and posted to social media as Delta Flight 3788 approached the Minot International Airport for landing. In the video, the SkyWest pilot can be heard over the plane's intercom system explaining that he made the sharp turn after spotting a B-52 bomber in his flight path.
'Sorry about the aggressive maneuver. It caught me by surprise,' the pilot can be heard saying on the video. 'This is not normal at all. I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up.'
Passengers can be heard applauding as the pilot wrapped up his explanation.
SkyWest, a regional carrier for Delta and other large airlines, said the flight had departed from the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and landed safely in Minot after performing a 'go-around' maneuver when another aircraft became visible in the SkyWest plane's flight path. Minot is 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of Bismarck, North Dakota's capital city, and about 50 miles (80 kilometers) from the Canadian border.
The Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement that it's investigating the incident. SkyWest said it is also investigating.
In the video, the pilot noted that Minot's small airport does not operate radar and directs flights visually. When the airport tower instructed the SkyWest flight to make a right turn upon approach, the pilot said he looked in that direction and saw the bomber in his flight path. He informed the tower and made a hard turn to avoid the bomber, he said.
'I don't know how fast they were going, but they were a lot faster than us,' the pilot said of the bomber.
The North Dakota incident comes nearly six months after a midair collision between an Army helicopter and a jetliner over Washington, D.C., that killed all 67 people aboard the two aircraft.
Minot Air Force Base is about 10 miles (16 kilometers) north of Minot, North Dakota's fourth-largest city. The base is home to 26 B-52 bombers, intercontinental ballistic missile operations and more than 5,400 military personnel.
An Air Force spokesperson confirmed Monday that a B-52 bomber assigned to the base conducted a flyover of the North Dakota State Fair on Friday and that the Air Force is 'looking into' the report of a bomber and a commercial airliner operating in the same airspace around the Minot airport.
Some small airports like Minot's don't have their own radar systems on site. In fact, the vast majority of the nation's airports don't even have towers . But regional FAA radar facilities do oversee traffic all across the country and help direct planes in and out of airports like Minot. The Minot airport typically handles between 18 and 24 fligts a day.
The pilot's frustration is evident in the video.
'The Air Force base does have radar, and nobody said, 'Hey, there's a B-52 in the pattern,'' the pilot told passengers.
——-
This story has been corrected to show the dateline is Bismarck, N.D., not Bismarck, Neb., and that the pilot turned the plane to avoid the bomber's path.
——-
Beck reported from Omaha, Nebraska.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pilot Wanted to Fly Solo Around World Again. She Shared One Last Message Before Fatal Flight
Anh-Thu Nguyen hoped to inspire other Asian female aviators through her travelsNEED TO KNOW A 44-year-old female pilot is dead after her small plane crashed in Indiana on July 30 In 2024, she became the 10th woman to fly solo around the globe, and was recreating that journey before the accident "I'm super excited today," the pilot told her followers on social media that same morningA 44-year-old female pilot died after her small plane crashed in Indiana as she was beginning another solo flight around the world. On Wednesday, July 30, at around 10:45 a.m. local time, a Lancair IVP crashed in Greenwood, killing the one person on board, according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 'Preliminary information indicates the airplane crashed shortly after departure from Indy South Greenwood Airport,' the lead investigating agency, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), confirms to PEOPLE in a statement on Thursday, July 31. An NTSB investigator is on the scene. The Johnson County Coroner's Office confirmed that the pilot who died was Anh-Thu Nguyen from Miami, according to a statement shared on Facebook on Wednesday. PEOPLE has contacted both the Greenwood Fire Department and Greenwood Police Department. In a now haunting Facebook reel, Nguyen posted a status of her journey on the morning of the fatal crash. 'I'm super excited today. I just completed the first leg of my solo flight around the world a few days ago from Oshkosh to Indiana,' said Nguyen, who became the 10th woman to fly solo around the globe in 2024, according to her alma mater Purdue University, where she earned her Master of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics in 2015. 'This is more than just a flight, okay?' she continued from the cockpit. 'It's a mission to inspire the next generation of Asian female pilots, aerospace engineers and STEM professionals.' For the second leg of her trip, Nguyen planned on flying from Indiana to Pennsylvania, she told her followers. 'Wish me luck, thank you and I will see you in Pennsylvania,' she said. 'Let's keep flying forward, together.' While an investigation into the crash is ongoing, witnesses shared what they saw that morning. 'The plane was kind of going like this and banking, and then it started to lower,' Amanda Landwerlen, who saw the crash, told FOX affiliate WSVN. 'The nose dove, she went into a spin and just came straight down,' another witness, Frank Williams, told the outlet. Nguyen's last public statement wasn't just words – it was a mission. She grew up in Vietnam, and was fascinated by the airplanes that would fly over her village, she told Purdue's School of Aeronautics and Astronautics publication, Aerogram. The aspiring aviator moved to the United States when she was 12. After earning her degrees, Nguyen founded the nonprofit Asian Women in Aerospace & Aviation (AWAA) in 2018. The pilot wanted to inspire other Asian women and young girls to join the field she loved so much. In a statement, the organization mourned their passionate leader. 'Anh-Thu was an inspiring pilot, instructor, and advocate for girls and women in aerospace, engineering, and aviation,' AWAA said. 'She lived with boldness, curiosity, and drive. She came from humble beginnings in Vietnam to becoming a beacon of hope to many.' In her home state of Florida, Nguyen also made an impact with the Dragon Flight Training Academym which she opened in Pembroke Pines five years ago. 'I love being a flight instructor because I'm able to share my knowledge while at the same time learning more about aviation myself,' she told Aerogram. According to the academy, Nguyen was an award-winning instructor with over 5,000 hours of experience. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In a GoFundMe created to fund Nguyen's flight around the world, the organizer spoke about how Nguyen had impacted her own life and dreams of flying. 'Her life stories are inspirational and have taught me and other women around her to dare to dream the impossible even when things are difficult,' the organizer wrote. 'She is truly my heroine and quite simply a living legend in my eyes.' Read the original article on People
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy?
Hey Mr! I hope you are doing well (if those thick thighs are a reflection of how well you are doing, you are doing well indeed). You're one of the only sensible voices in kink I know. What do you think about online dom/sub relations? I'm currently getting into one. I'm married, but he isn't into kink, so I have an agreed outlet online where there is a lot of fantasy but no touching. I guess my question is, do you think that's healthy? It gives me an outlet for my dominant tendencies. But at the same time, it makes me a bit uncomfortable to let this (my predilection for domination) out. I know you are not Dear Abby, but if you could offer me some advice, I would be grateful. If you can't, that's cool. Best! Hi mister, I am kinda like Dear Abby. Thanks for the 'thick thighs' compliment—you've seen my Instagram. (If anyone reading this would rather submit a question there than via email, it's @badalexcheves). Reading your question, I'm not sure what advice you need. Advice on being dominant? Or doing it online? What's the issue? I think it's great to let your dominant side out. But your question is not clear: Are you uncomfortable letting your dominant side out on the internet because it's the internet? Or does your discomfort lie in letting your dominant side out in any capacity? Related: I'm older & heavy. Will a muscular escort still be into me? I sense it's the latter. If so, is your hesitation rooted in ethics? Propriety? Social mores? Faith? These are real things you should ask yourself. You ask me specifically if I think it's 'healthy' to let your dominant side out, which could mean many things, but at its simplest, it suggests you believe doing so might be unhealthy in some way. I'd say that if you have any inclination to be sexually dominant, it's healthier to let that out with someone who willingly consents to it than to repress it or, worse, unleash it on someone who does not desire or consent to it, like your current partner. Many gay men, when they talk about 'unhealthy' sex, are talking about the in-person kind that involves the risk of sexually transmitted infections. But that risk is nonexistent in an online relationship. So, the 'unhealthy' aspect of it you're worried about must fall somewhere in moral or mental territory. 'Unhealthy' here, then, means something akin to 'wicked' or 'wrong.' To me, that's scratching at a moral feeling, a belief. I have a rule about those: It is not my job to change anyone's beliefs about sex. Let me explain that. Beliefs—religious and otherwise—dictate human sexuality. Across the world, beliefs shape and define what we do and don't allow ourselves to explore and experience. I think a sex writer should only offer encouragement (or, when necessary, discouragement) for things people already want to do, or have entertained the idea of doing, or are currently doing. Related: He gave me a 'pass' for sex with others. Should I take it? The ethical line, then, is drawn at encouraging something a reader does not want to do—something they do desire or do not believe is right. To me, that's wrong. Regardless of what I think, suggesting a reader change their beliefs or do something they don't honestly desire feels like a breach of the unspoken, unofficial contract between those who ask for help and those who provide it. I can give facts, tips, and advice, but I can't make you believe something you don't, because beliefs aren't rooted in facts—they're inner things, soul things. I once had little respect for those things, but that's changed. You must do what you believe is right. There is only so far a digital role-play, dom/sub thing can go. You can have video calls and tell him what to do. You can watch each other, wank to each other, talk to each other, perform on camera, and much else. You can connect deeply, confess, share things you've never shared with anyone else, and develop real, deep feelings. Findom (financial domination) setups are common online. You can consensually humiliate and degrade someone on Twitter by posting (mutually agreed-upon) photos of them from an anonymous account. I know subs who love that sort of thing. You can also get scammed, conned, abused, hacked, have your pictures uploaded to some site you're not aware of, and all sorts of sinister things. That's the internet, babe. So, if you choose to do it, remember common-sense safety measures regarding the internet and taking naked pictures that include your face (don't take or send them), showing recognizable tattoos or places in your photos (don't), and so on. If you're chatting on a site, don't create a username that's your real name. Don't send passwords. Be wary of suspicious links. Ultimately, interacting with strangers online is always a risk. Image sharing online can be a matter of mutual vulnerability: you can screenshot anything he sends you, and vice versa, so it behooves you both to respect the other's privacy. Even so, there are millions of bad actors online, and the potential that he is one is higher if you've never met him in person and never plan to. Regardless of where your hesitation is coming from, you at least seem aware that sexual self-expression is necessary in a long-term relationship, and you seem comfortable with the idea of pursuing it within the parameters set by you and your partner. That's a good start. I'd give it a shot. I hope it feeds your dominant urge. If not, I hope you at least entertain my belief that purely online dom/sub interactions are a poor substitute for the real thing. If there's any 'danger' here, it's that of liking it too much and wanting more. I don't think that's unhealthy at all, but it might pose a risk to your relationship. You might, at some point, need to ask yourself if the no-touching rule works for you—and what that means if it doesn't. I don't want to speed anyone's journey along, but if you wish to fast-forward things a bit, consider discussing with your partner the possibility of opening up your relationship to include real, physical intimacy with others. You can agree on the terms of it—on when, where, and with whom it's allowed. You might not think you want that now, but that is something you should prepare for. Because getting bitched out as a quivering sub is better in real life, and being a brutal dom is too. I've done both. Trust me: You will want to take it offline and into the bedroom. Hey there! I'm Alexander Cheves. I'm a sex writer and former sex worker—I worked in the business for over 12 years. You can read my sex-and-culture column Last Call in Out and my book My Love Is a Beast: Confessions, from Unbound Edition Press. But be warned: Kirkus Reviews says the book is "not for squeamish readers.' In the past, I directed (ahem) adult videos and sold adult products. I have spoken about subjects like cruising, sexual health, and HIV at the International AIDS Conference, SXSW, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and elsewhere, and appeared on dozens of podcasts. Here, I'm offering sex and relationship advice to Out's readers. Send your question to askbeastly@ — it may get answered in a future post. This article originally appeared on Out: Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy? Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Military chopper traffic over Washington was a worry leading up to fatal midair crash, NTSB hears
Military helicopter traffic over Washington was a longtime worry among aviators operating around the airport where an Army helicopter and commercial airliner collided this year, killing 67 people, federal investigators heard during testimony on Thursday. It is the second of three days of witness testimony and public inquiry by the National Transportation Safety Board into the January midair crash over the Potomac River. The board focused on air traffic control and heard Thursday that it was common for pilots to ask to use visual separation — basically relying on their eyesight — just as the Army Black Hawk's pilot agreed to do the night of the crash. FAA officials also said controllers relied heavily on pilots using visual separation as a way to manage the complex airspace with so many helicopters flying around Washington D.C. But Rick Dressler, an official with medevac operator Metro Aviation, told the board it is difficult to identify other aircraft in the night sky around Ronald Reagan National Airport, especially if an onboard locator system was switched off, as Army choppers routine did. Dressler said that he and other civilian helicopter pilots in the area have long been concerned about the Army and Air Force helicopters flying around Reagan airport. 'I don't like saying this. I'll say it again on the record," Dressler, a former Army aviator and retired Air Force officer, said. 'I'm speaking for my group there. We we are all very uncomfortable when those two units are operating.' Clark Allen, an FAA training manager in the Washington area who worked in the tower at Reagan National Airport, said it was common for visual separation to be used daily between helicopter pilots and commercial traffic. The American Airlines jet arrived from Wichita, Kansas, carrying, among others, a group of elite young figure skaters, their parents and coaches, and four union steamfitters from the Washington area. The collision was the nation's deadliest plane crash since November 2001 and was the first in a string of crashes and near misses this year that have alarmed officials and the traveling public, despite statistics that still show flying remains the safest form of transportation. It's too early for the board to identify what exactly caused the crash. The board's final report won't be released until sometime next year. 'Fix it' On the first day of hearings Wednesday, investigators highlighted a number of factors that may have contributed to the crash and the warnings about helicopter traffic that the Federal Aviation Administration received years before the tragedy over the Potomac River. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy urged the FAA to 'Fix it. Do better' at the end of a fiery exchange when she highlighted the warnings the agency ignored years earlier. She also suggested the Army adopt a formal policy making it clear that helicopter pilots should never fly under landing planes because pilots told investigators they were doing that routinely. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk and the tower was telling you that,' Homendy said. But there were 21 bureaucratic steps the tower had to follow to get a change made and after the accident the FAA transferred managers out of the tower instead of acknowledging that they had been warned. 'What you did is you transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem,' Homendy said. 'But you guys are pointing out, 'Welp, our bureaucratic process. Somebody should have brought it up at some other symposium.' Are you kidding me? 67 people are dead. How do you explain that?' FAA didn't add warning to helicopter charts, official says Homendy said an FAA working group raised concerns about all the helicopter traffic around Ronald Reagan National Airport and the risk of a collision in 2022, but the FAA refused to add a warning to helicopter charts urging pilots to use caution when this runway was in use. 'This is the very event that this would have been the cautionary note for,' she said. Video and animation presented during the proceeding's first day showed the helicopter flying above the 200 feet (61 meters) altitude limit before colliding with the plane. Investigators said Wednesday the flight data recorder showed the helicopter was actually 80 feet to 100 feet (24 to 30 meters) higher than the barometric altimeter the pilots relied upon showed they were flying. So the NTSB conducted tests on three other helicopters from the same unit in a flight over the same area and found similar discrepancies in their altimeters. Dan Cooper with Sikorsky helicopters said that when the Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash was designed in the 1970s, it used a style of altimeter that was common at the time. Newer helicopters have air data computers that didn't exist back then that help provide more accurate altitude readings. Army officials said a discrepancy of 70 to 100 feet (21 to 30 meters) between the Black Hawk's altimeters is within the acceptable range because pilots are expected to maintain their altitude plus or minus 100 feet. Concern about distances between planes and helicopters The greater concern is that the FAA approved routes around Reagan airport that included such small separation distances between helicopters and planes when planes are landing. 'The fact that we have less than 500 foot separation is a concern for me,' said Scott Rosengren, who is chief engineer in the office that manages the Army's utility helicopters. During the two minutes before the crash, one air traffic controller was directing airport traffic and helicopters in the area, a task that involved speaking to or receiving communications from several different aircraft, according to the NTSB's History of Flight Performance Study. Chief Warrant Officer Kylene Lewis told the board that she wouldn't find an 80 to 100 foot discrepancy between the different altimeters on a helicopter alarming because at lower altitudes she would be relying more on the radar altimeter than the barometric altimeter. Below 500 feet (152 meters), Lewis said she would be checking both instruments and cross referencing them. The air traffic controller had spoken to or received communications from the Black Hawk helicopter, an airplane that was taking off, an Air Force helicopter, an airplane on the ground, a medical helicopter and an inbound flight that was not the American Airlines plane that would crash.
