logo
100m Americans infected with parasite that 'silently' eats away at the brain... the subtle signs YOU have it

100m Americans infected with parasite that 'silently' eats away at the brain... the subtle signs YOU have it

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Alarming findings show that potentially more than 100 million Americans have been infected with a parasite that silently eats away at the brain.
A new study by scientists at the University of California, Riverside, estimates that 10 to 30 percent of people in the US are infected with Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), often without knowing it.
Previous studies have linked it to mind-altering behavior, such as risk-taking, depression and even schizophrenia.
The parasite, which can lie dormant in the brain for decades, is typically contracted through undercooked meat or exposure to cat feces.
Most people infected with Toxoplasma gondii experience no symptoms. When symptoms do occur, they often resemble those of the flu, such as fever, swollen lymph nodes, muscle aches, and fatigue, as well as confusion, poor coordination and muscle weakness.
Because it typically mimics more benign conditions, the infection is often overlooked, but can be diagnosed via blood tests that look for antibodies.
The milder symptoms usually subside within a few weeks with the help of anti-parasitic medicines or antibiotics, but in individuals with weakened immune systems, pregnant women, and infants, toxoplasmosis can cause more severe complications such as seizures and difficulty breathing.
Now, based on their research, the scientists believe they have potentially found a way to detect T. gondii and treat it.
The team discovered infected neurons in the brain release fewer extracellular vesicles (EVs) — particles that play a role in communication between cells.
Lead researcher Emma Wilson, professor of biomedical sciences, said: 'Our research opens the door to using EVs as biomarkers, which can be isolated from blood.'
Current diagnostic tools can only confirm if someone has been exposed to T. gondii by identifying antibodies, proteins produced by the body's immune system to fight foreign invaders like bacteria and viruses.
However, tests cannot detect if the parasite is still active in the brain or how it might be impacting brain function.
Wilson and her team are now conducting further research to better understand how the parasite operates in a bid to develop new therapies to clear the parasite or even vaccines in the future to protect against it.
In humans, T. gondii can lead to toxoplasmosis, which causes flu-like symptoms that can go largely unrecognized.
Pregnant women who ingest the parasite in early pregnancy can suffer a miscarriage or stillbirth, according to studies.
Most infections go away without treatment but medication is available for those who are more at risk of serious complications.
The researchers behind the most recent study say that there is 'no need to avoid someone who is infected [and] most people live their entire lives without symptoms'.
But there are signs it could be linked to brain damage.
Studies suggest patients infected with T. gondii were almost 50 percent more likely to have been diagnosed with schizophrenia than those without, for example.
Offering advice in terms of avoiding infection, researchers behind the new paper added: 'The most effective prevention is proper food handling and hygiene.
'Cook meat thoroughly, wash vegetables, and always wash your hands after handling cat litter, especially from young cats, which are more likely to shed the parasite.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the healthiest breakfast cereal?
What is the healthiest breakfast cereal?

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

What is the healthiest breakfast cereal?

I s this the beginning of the end for breakfast cereal? The morning staple took off in the 1950s as a convenient alternative to porridge or eggs. Quick, tasty and 'fortified with vitamins and minerals', it has been filling our bowls ever since — but recently the total sale of branded cereals has dipped by 6.5 per cent, with only oats and granola bucking the trend. Why have we fallen out of love with cornflakes and co? Mostly it's due to an increase in health-conscious consumers avoiding ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and added sugars — many cereals can be packed full of them, regardless of the benefits trumpeted on the front of the box. However, experts say it can be a healthy choice, with some caveats. 'Cereal isn't inherently good or bad — it depends on the type and how you serve it,' says Rob Hobson, a nutritionist and the author of Unprocess Your Life. This is your guide to navigating the cereal aisle.

US supreme court ruling sets stage for more politicized science under RFK Jr
US supreme court ruling sets stage for more politicized science under RFK Jr

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

US supreme court ruling sets stage for more politicized science under RFK Jr

A US supreme court decision affirming the constitutionality of Obamacare sets the stage for more politicized science in the future, health law experts said about the court's decision. The court's majority opinion in Kennedy v Braidwood Management found that an expert panel – the preventive services taskforce – convened under the Affordable Care Act is under the direct oversight of the health secretary. 'This is your classic good news, bad news,' said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown Law. 'In a sane world, with a secretary of health that believes in science and doesn't bring in conspiracy theories and agendas, you would applaud this decision.' With health policy now in the hands of the Trump administration, 'it gives Secretary [Robert F Kennedy Jr] complete power about what to recommend and what not to recommend,' Gostin said. The court issued the opinion only hours after an expert vaccine advisory panel (ACIP) handpicked by Kennedy subverted the scientific consensus by recommending against vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative overwhelmingly considered safe. Thimerosal has been a subject of misinformation and anti-vaccine advocacy for decades. Much like the expert panel in question in the Braidwood case, the recommendations of the vaccine advisory committee are a key link in the treatment distribution pipeline. Recommendations from both panels are typically affirmed by the leadership of the health department, and then become the basis on which insurers base coverage decisions. In the case of the ACIP, those recommendations typically concern vaccines. In the preventive taskforce context, they include a wide range of treatments – from statins to cancer screenings to HIV prevention. It was widely recognized that Kennedy had the authority to hire and fire people for the vaccine panel – but legal controversy existed about whether health secretaries have the same power over the preventive services taskforce. 'The president and the Senate are accountable 'for both the making of a bad appointment and the rejection of a good one',' wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh for the six-vote majority. In other words, the court said, if you don't like it, go to the ballot box. MaryBeth Musumeci, an associate professor of health law management at the George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, told the Guardian: 'We have that structure in place – and that is a really great structure if the folks in charge are actually deferring to the experts and the science and what the evidence says.' She added: 'To the extent that we are going to make decisions based on bad science – that has really serious public health implications.' The panel at the center of the vaccine decision is the ACIP vaccine panel. Until June, the advisory panel was made up of 17 experts vetted by CDC career scientists. Their recommendations, while not binding, were almost always approved by CDC leadership. Kennedy fired all 17 members unilaterally in June and stocked the panel with eight ideological allies – including vaccine skeptics and medical professionals with little experience in vaccines. One panelist withdrew after a government financial review, and after it was widely publicized that the secretary's claims about the panelist's affiliation with two universities was false. Wayne Turner, a senior attorney for the National Health Law Program, which advocates for the medically underserved, said that he and others were 'certainly breathing a sigh of relief with the court's decision today' because a key provision of Obamacare was found to be constitutional. 'But that sigh of relief is really short-lived,' Turner said. 'We have long anticipated with the appointment of RFK Jr, and certainly with his actions with the ACIP, that we can fully expect the preventive services taskforce to be the next battleground in the ideological war this administration seems to be waging. And the war is against science.' The subject of the Braidwood case provides a salient example. Plaintiffs were suing the government to claim that the taskforce was wrongly appointed. Although their legal argument was thorny, one treatment they specifically cited as wrong was insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an HIV prevention drug. Although the plaintiffs' claim that the taskforce was unconstitutional was swatted down, it provides activists with a roadmap to get what they want – if they can convince Kennedy to appoint more ideological allies to the taskforce. The preventive services taskforce may have one protective mechanism: a requirement that they be guided by evidence written into Obamacare, the legislation that impaneled them. Gearing up for another fight, Turner said: 'That's going to be an important thing for us to point to in the weeks and months ahead, and years, quite frankly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store