logo
Tech industry experts warn AI will make us worse humans

Tech industry experts warn AI will make us worse humans

CNN02-04-2025
While the top minds in artificial intelligence are racing to make the technology think more like humans, researchers at Elon University have asked the opposite question: How will AI change the way humans think?
The answer comes with a grim warning: Many tech experts worry that AI will make people worse at skills core to being human, such as empathy and deep thinking.
'I fear — for the time being — that while there will be a growing minority benefitting ever more significantly with these tools, most people will continue to give up agency, creativity, decision-making and other vital skills to these still-primitive AIs,' futurist John Smart wrote in an essay submitted for the university's nearly 300-page report, titled 'The Future of Being Human,' which was provided exclusively to CNN ahead of its publication Wednesday.
The concerns come amid an ongoing race to accelerate AI development and adoption that has attracted billions of dollars in investment, along with both skepticism and support from governments around the world. Tech giants are staking their businesses on the belief that AI will change how we do everything — working, communicating, searching for information — and companies like Google, Microsoft and Meta are racing to build 'AI agents' that can perform tasks on a person's behalf. But experts warn in the report that such advancements could make people too reliant on AI in the future.
Already, the proliferation of AI has raised big questions about how humans will adapt to this latest technology wave, including whether it could lead to job losses or generate dangerous misinformation. The Elon University report further calls into question promises from tech giants that the value of AI will be in automating rote, menial tasks so that humans can spend more time on complex, creative pursuits.
Wednesday's report also follows research published this year by Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University that suggested using generative AI tools could negatively impact critical thinking skills.
Elon University researchers surveyed 301 tech leaders, analysts and academics, including Vint Cerf, one of the 'fathers of the internet' and now a Google vice president; Jonathan Grudin, University of Washington Information School professor and former longtime Microsoft researcher and project manager; former Aspen Institute executive vice president Charlie Firestone; and tech futurist and Futuremade CEO Tracey Follows. Nearly 200 of the respondents wrote full-length essay responses for the report.
More than 60% of the respondents said they expect AI will change human capabilities in a 'deep and meaningful' or 'fundamental, revolutionary' way over the next 10 years. Half said they expect AI will create changes to humanity for the better and the worse in equal measure, while 23% said the changes will be mostly for the worse. Just 16% said changes will be mostly for the better (the remainder said they didn't know or expected little change overall).
The respondents also predicted that AI will cause 'mostly negative' changes to 12 human traits by 2035, including social and emotional intelligence, capacity and willingness to think deeply, empathy, and application of moral judgment and mental well-being.
Human capacity in those areas could worsen if people increasingly turn to AI for help with tasks such as research and relationship-building for convenience's sake, the report claims. And a decline in those and other key skills could have troubling implications for human society, such as 'widening polarization, broadening inequities and diminishing human agency,' the researchers wrote.
The report's contributors expect just three areas to experience mostly positive change: curiosity and capacity to learn, decision-making, and problem-solving and innovative thinking and creativity. Even in tools available today, programs that can generate artwork and solve coding problems are among the most popular. And many experts believe that while AI could replace some human jobs, it could also create new categories of work that don't yet exist.
Many of the concerns detailed in the report relate to how tech leaders predict people will incorporate AI into their daily lives by 2035.
Cerf said he expects humans will soon rely on AI agents, which are digital helpers that could independently do everything from taking notes during a meeting to making dinner reservations, negotiating complex business contracts or writing code. Tech companies are already rolling out early AI agent offerings — Amazon says its revamped Alexa voice assistant can order your groceries, and Meta is letting businesses create AI customer service agents to answer questions on its social media platforms.
Such tools could save people time and energy in everyday tasks while aiding with fields like medical research. But Cerf also worries about humans becoming 'increasingly technologically dependent' on systems that can fail or get things wrong.
...Apple Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
TuneIn
iHeart Radio
Radio.com
Amazon
RSS
'You can also anticipate some fragility in all of this. For example, none of this stuff works without electricity, right?' Cerf said in an interview with CNN. 'These heavy dependencies are wonderful when they work, and when they don't work, they can be potentially quite hazardous.'
Cerf stressed the importance of tools that help differentiate humans versus AI bots online, and transparency around the effectiveness of highly autonomous AI tools. He urged companies that build AI models to keep 'audit trails' that would let them interrogate when and why their tools get things wrong.
Futuremade's Follows told CNN that she expects humans' interactions with AI to move beyond the screens where people generally talk to AI chatbots today. Instead, AI technology will be integrated into various devices, such as wearables, as well as buildings and homes where humans can just ask questions out loud.
But with that ease of access, humans may begin outsourcing empathy to AI agents.
'AI may take over acts of kindness, emotional support, caregiving and charity fundraising,' Follows wrote in her essay. She added that 'humans may form emotional attachments to AI personas and influencers,' raising 'concerns about whether authentic, reciprocal relationships will be sidelined in favor of more predictable, controllable digital connection.'
Humans have already begun to form relationships with AI chatbots, to mixed effect. Some people have, for example, created AI replicas of deceased loved ones to seek closure, but parents of young people have also taken legal action after they say their children were harmed by relationships with AI chatbots.
Still, experts say people have time to curb some of the worst potential outcomes of AI through regulation, digital literacy training and simply prioritizing human relationships.
Richard Reisman, nonresident senior fellow at the Foundation for American Innovation, said in the report that the next decade marks a tipping point in whether AI 'augments humanity or de-augments it.'
'We are now being driven in the wrong direction by the dominating power of the 'tech-industrial complex,' but we still have a chance to right that,' Reisman wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Microsoft is killing its failed ChromeOS competitor, Windows 11 SE
Microsoft is killing its failed ChromeOS competitor, Windows 11 SE

Engadget

time22 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Microsoft is killing its failed ChromeOS competitor, Windows 11 SE

Microsoft is ending support for its ChromeOS competitor Windows 11 SE. The company will officially stop providing "software updates, technical assistance and security fixes" in October 2026, according to an updated support document spotted by NeoWin . When it was announced in 2021, Windows 11 SE was pitched as a simplified, lightweight version of Microsoft's operating system for the classroom. Chromebooks and ChromeOS devices are widely used in schools around the world, so it made sense that Microsoft would want to offer something competitive. Windows 11 SE, and the Surface Laptop SE that launched alongside it, were the company's latest attempt to do just that. Clearly the plan didn't work, as evidenced by Microsoft's decision to shutdown Windows 11 SE just five years later. The operating system was available on other low-cost devices, but it doesn't appear that it acquired nearly the same-sized audience as ChromeOS. If it had, Microsoft likely wouldn't be dumping it so unceremoniously. Windows 11 SE isn't the first time Microsoft has tried to spin-off a more efficient version of Windows, though it did seem like the most thought out. For example, the company has also tried Windows 10 S (which lives on as "S Mode" in Windows 11) and the never-launched Windows 10X, a streamlined version of Windows for dual-screen devices. While Windows 11 SE devices will work after Microsoft's October 2026 cut-off, the company recommends "transitioning to a device that supports another edition of Windows 11 to ensure continued support and security."

Your chats with Meta's AI might end up on Google — just like ChatGPT until it turned them off
Your chats with Meta's AI might end up on Google — just like ChatGPT until it turned them off

Business Insider

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Your chats with Meta's AI might end up on Google — just like ChatGPT until it turned them off

OpenAI's ChatGPT raised some eyebrows this week when people realized that certain chats were able to be found by Google search. Although people had checked a box to share the chats publicly, it seemed likely that not everyone understood what they were doing. On Thursday, OpenAI said that it would stop having shared chats be indexed by Google. Meanwhile, Meta's stand-alone MetaAI app also allows users to share their chats — and it will continue to allow Google to index them, meaning that they can show up in a search. I did a bunch of Google searches and found lots of MetaAI conversations in the results. The Meta AI app, launched this spring, lets people share chats to a "Discover" feed. Google crawlers can "index" that feed and then serve up the results when people use Google search. So, for instance, if you do a site-specific search on Google for " and the keyword "balloons," you might come up with a chat someone had with the MetaAI bot about where to get the best birthday balloons — if that person tapped the button to allow the chat to be shared. As Business Insider reported in June, the Meta AI Discover feed had been full of examples of chats that seemed personal in nature — medical questions, specific career advice, relationship matters. Some contained identifying information like phone numbers, email addresses, or full names. Although all of these people did click to share, based on the personal nature of some of the chats, I could only guess that people might have misunderstood what it meant to share the conversation. After Business Insider wrote about this a few weeks ago, the Meta AI app made some tweaks to warn users more clearly about how the Discover feed works. Now, when you choose to share a conversation, you get a pop-up with the warning: "Conversations on feed are public so anyone can see them and engage." The additional warning seems to be working. Scrolling through the Discover feed, I now see mainly instances of people using it for image creation and far fewer accidental private text conversations (although there seemed to still be at least a few of those). Meanwhile, Daniel Roberts, a representative for Meta, confirmed that Meta AI chats that were shared to its Discover feed would continue to be indexed by Google. He reiterated the multi-step process I just described. For now, Meta AI can only be used via its mobile app, not the web. This might lead people to think that even the Discover feed exists as a sort of walled garden, separate from "the internet" and existing only within the Meta AI app. But posts from the Discover feed (and only those public posts) can be shared as links around the web — and that's where the Google indexing comes in. If this sounds slightly confusing, it is. That may also be confusing to users. Now, it's possible that some people really do want to share their AI chats with the general public, and are happy to have those chats show up on Google searches along with their Instagram or Facebook handles. But I'm still not sure I'd understand why anyone would want to share their interactions — or why anyone else would want to read them.

Android Circuit: Galaxy Z Fold 7 Reviews, Nothing Phone (3) Controversy, Epic's Google Play Victory
Android Circuit: Galaxy Z Fold 7 Reviews, Nothing Phone (3) Controversy, Epic's Google Play Victory

Forbes

time23 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Android Circuit: Galaxy Z Fold 7 Reviews, Nothing Phone (3) Controversy, Epic's Google Play Victory

Taking a look back at this week's news and headlines across the Android world, including Pixel 10 Pro pricing, Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, iPhone Fold's market impact, Nothing Phone (3)'s controversial redesign, Epic's Google Play victory, and Microsoft updates Windows 11's Android connectivity. Android Circuit is here to remind you of a few of the many discussions around Android in the last seven days. You can also read my weekly digest of Apple news here on Forbes. Pixel 10 And Pixel 10 Pro US Pricing Google will launch the Pixel 10 family later this month. The evolutionary handsets look to have small tweaks to the design, but there's one area that's going to remain unchanged. Google is keeping to the same prices as the Pixel 9 family, albeit with one option missing from the line-up: "As suspected, Google is dropping the 128 GB model for the Pixel 10 Pro XL. While it was not listed in European pricing, there was a question whether this was a regional quirk, but with European, US, and Canadian pricing all missing the 128 GB option, the higher starting price on the Pixel 10 Pro XL is because there's no 128 GB to 128 GB comparison possible. However, note that the 256 GB to 256 GB price is matched from the Pixel 9 Pro XL." (Forbes). Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review Samsung's latest foldable brings several changes from last year's model, including upgraded hardware and software in the camera, a new OLED screen, a lower profile and weight reduction. And they all add up to something significant. For many reviewers, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is now a practical if expensive option for consumers: "For the first time, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 feels like a viable alternative to a flat phone, at least in terms of hardware. The new design is as thin and light as many flat phones, and the cover display is large enough to do anything you'd do on non-foldable devices. Plus, you have a tablet-sized display on the inside with serious multitasking chops. We lament the loss of S Pen support, but it was probably necessary to address the chunkiness of past foldables." (Ars Technica). The iPhone Fold And The Galaxy Z Samsung has another advantage in the current crop of foldables… Apple's iPhone Fold. Tim Cook's move into the origami world, but the potential of this iPhone os going to boost the market this year: "While the Galaxy handsets go on sale today, Apple's iPhone Fold is not expected until September 2026 at the earliest. If there's one thing that many who buy at the top end of the technology portfolios are known for, it's a magpie-like fascination with anything shiny and new. If it's there, they want it right now. There's no iPhone Fold right now, but there is the Galaxy Z Fold 7 that's ready for purchase." (Forbes). Nothing Phone (3)'s Controversial Changes Nothing Tech's CEO Carl Pei is pushing back against the reviews of the Nothing Phone 3. Many are picking out the lower specification chipset and the stripping away of the unique design elements all taking price against a rising price and the perception of 'gimmick' additions to the interface: "That encapsulates the Phone 3 as a whole. It's a fine Android phone, and one whose design stands out from the crowd. But flagship phones need to be great on all fronts. The Phone 3 is good enough at most things, but lacks a special trick that might set it apart from better-known smartphone competitors. The Glyph Matrix, at least in its current form, isn't that." (Bloomberg). Epic Wins Google Play Store Appeal Google has lost an appeal in its ongoing legal battles with Epic Games and must change how it approaches partnerships between manufacturers and the Google Play Store ecosystem: "The ruling by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday means the Google Play store will need to lift restrictions that prevent app developers from setting up rival marketplaces and billing systems. The injunction against Google has been on hold since last year during the appeal. (Bloomberg). And Finally... Microsoft has updated its Windows 11 desktop app that links to your Android smartphone with more features and utility added to both sides of the connection: We've reimagined the Link to Windows app as a connected PC experience hub — a central place where you can access, share, and control content between your Android phone and Windows PC. [Including] Recent activity, PC at a glance and Remote actions." (Microsoft). Android Circuit rounds up the news from the Android world every weekend here on Forbes. Don't forget to follow me so you don't miss any coverage in the future, and of course, read the sister column in Apple Loop! Last week's Android Circuit can be found here, and if you have any news and links you'd like to see featured in Android Circuit, get in touch!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store