
Democrats self-own bragging about inflation shows the left has learned NOTHING
Last week, the geniuses in charge of maintaining the Democratic Party's social media picked at a fresh wound — and showed, again, exactly why it lost the 2024 election.
The blue team's official X account shared a line chart showing the change in the price of various groceries — meat, dairy, produce, etc. — over time, and asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.'
'Trump's America,' read the caption.
The problem? The last part of the line barely went up.
The blue team's official X account, with the caption 'Trump's America,' shared a chart showing the change in the price of various groceries, asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.'
Eric Daugherty, /X
And what it actually showed was a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024.
In other words: over the course of former President Joe Biden's White House tenure.
'I would just advise Democrats not to post about inflation given their track record,' suggested conservative influencer A.G. Hamilton. 'Might save them the embarrassment of having to delete their posts after getting dunked on' — which is exactly what they did.
'This is the gang that couldn't shoot straight!' marveled Fox Business host Stuart Varney.
And of course Team Trump got in on the action.
The problem with the chart was that it actually showed a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024 – when Biden was president.
RapidResponse47/X
What's notable about the braindead blunder, though, is not the blunder itself.
It was that it represented yet another admission, eight and a half months after they surrendered the presidency to Donald Trump for the second time in three election cycles, that the Democrats still haven't made a sincere effort at diagnosing the reasons for their unpopularity — much less addressing them.
A new Wall Street Journal poll found that their party continues to suffer as a result — to the point that just 33% of Americans hold a favorable view of it, and 63% view it unfavorably.
Both Donald Trump (-7) and the GOP (-11) are also underwater, but may as well be polling as well as ice cream compared to the Democrats.
The same holds true of the public's view of various issues; voters still trust the GOP more than the alternative when it comes to the economy, inflation, immigration and foreign policy.
If that doesn't wake Democrats up to the provenance of all their political pain, nothing will.
The Left has long relied on comforting fallacies to numb the discomfort that accompanies defeat.
After 2016, elected Democrats and their media allies insisted that Trump's shocking victory was only possible thanks to Russian meddling.
And now, they're laboring under the misimpression that return to power can be attributed to Republicans' superior, but decepting messaging — an almost supernatural ability to compel Americans to believe that which isn't so.
If only they could convince the public of the truth, they'd surely prevail.
But the cold, hard truth is that it's always been about the substance, stupid — as the unflattering data they so proudly shared last week demonstrates.
Kamala Harris was deposited into the dustbin of history because she was the top lieutenant in an administration that had proven a miserable failure long before her boss's implosion last summer.
Americans spent the entirety of the Biden years telling pollsters that their lives were demonstrably, palpably worse as a result of historic price hikes.
Biden & Co. responded to these pleas for relief by denying the existence of inflation until they couldn't any longer.
Then, when they finally did implicitly admit to the effects of the nearly $2 trillion boondoggle they passed in 2021, they slapped the name 'Inflation Reduction Act' on yet another profligate spending bill that every layman in America knew would only compound the problem.
There are similar stories to be told about Americans' dissatisfaction with Biden's approach to foreign policy, his abdication of his duty to secure the border, and his championing of a radical social agenda that maintains up is down, left is right, and black is white.
Their stubborn refusal to grapple with this incontrovertible truth is also reportedly set to be reflected in an upcoming 2024 autopsy conducted by the DNC.
The New York Times reports that it will 'steer clear of the decisions made by the Biden-turned-Harris campaign,' and instead 'focus more on outside groups and super PACs that spent hundreds of millions of dollars aiding the Biden and Harris campaigns through advertising, voter registration drives and turnout efforts.'
It's like watching a restaurant serving inedible food invest in new plateware.
The gripe has never been with the Democrats' presentation or voters' tastes.
It's with the product itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
5 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Carney, Trump Likely to Speak in ‘Next Number of Days': Trade Minister
Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump will likely talk 'over the next number of days' following the U.S. decision to impose a 35 percent tariff on Canadian goods not covered under the free-trade agreement between Canada, the United States, and Mexico, the federal minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade says. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' that he was 'encouraged' by recent discussions with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.


New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Smithsonian denies Trump admin pushed to get rid of exhibit's impeachment placard
The Smithsonian on Saturday denied it was pressured into removing a placard detailing the two impeachments against President Trump at an exhibit in the National Museum of American History. The federal arts and history institution, while confirming it removed the placard from the impeachment section of its 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit last month, said it did so only because of aesthetic concerns. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 4 The exhibit spotlights US presidents who were impeached — or in the case of Richard Nixon, nearly. REUTERS It explained that the move was made because 'the placard … did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the Smithsonian said. 'The section in question, Impeachment, will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' it added. 4 The impeachment display is part of a broader exhibit on the American presidency. REUTERS Last week, the Washington Post reported that references to Trump's two impeachments had been scrubbed from the exhibit and claimed that it was the result of a content review the museum chain initiated under pressure from the administration. Some lefty critics quickly jumped on the notion, ripping the administration. But the Smithsonian explained that the placard in question was intended only to be a 'temporary' add-on to the exhibit, which is about 25 years old. 4 Donald Trump is the first US president to have been impeached twice and survived. AP Trump is one of three US presidents to have been impeached, or had charges brought against him, by the House, alongside Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. All three were eventually acquitted by the Senate. Former President Richard Nixon is also mentioned in the Smithsonian display, although he resigned right before he could be impeached over Watergate. The first impeachment against Trump in 2019 was over his alleged pressure campaign to leverage aid for Ukraine to entice the US ally to dig up dirt on the Biden family. His second impeachment took place over the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump is also the first former or sitting US president to be criminally indicted — something he also survived. The charges involved falsifying business records. Trump's White House team has been leaning on the Smithsonian to root out wokeness in its policies and exhibits. In March, the president signed an executive order seeking to eliminate any alleged divisive narratives and to champion 'American' values. 4 Smithsonian officials denied that political interference led to the removal of a placard detailing Trump's impeachments. REUTERS 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit opened to the public in 2000 and features a photo from Johnson's impeachment, copies of a report that sparked Clinton's impeachment and a battered filing cabinet from the Watergate controversy. Trump is briefly mentioned in a web-page companion to the exhibit.


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House officials defend Trump's firing of BLS chief
White House officials on Sunday defended President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following a weak jobs report, a move that has sparked broad criticism. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Kevin Hassett, chair of the National Economic Council, said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Hassett said in another interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the BLS commissioner has a responsibility to explain major revisions such as the one seen in Friday's jobs report, which showed 258,000 fewer jobs for prior months than initially reported. 'The big downward revision is something of a puzzle. I don't think it was explained very well. And I think that markets might be as much unsettled by the fact that the data are so noisy,' Hassett said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, said in an interview that aired on CBS's 'Face the Nation' Sunday that the president has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers reported by the Labor Department. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the president has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's, but everything we saw last year,' Greer said in the interview taped on Friday. 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he added. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Trump on Friday directed his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the latest jobs report showed the country only adding 73,000 jobs in July, and major revisions for jobs added in May and June. The move prompted immediate outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, with some calling for an investigation. McEntarfer was nominated by former President Biden and overwhelmingly confirmed by the GOP-led Senate early last year in an 86-8 vote. Trump's advisers underscored the president's concerns about revisions to the labor data while defending McEntarfer's firing. Hassett noted that jobs data reported by the government has seen major swings since the COVID-19 pandemic. 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers. In fact, they were extremely reliable, the kind of numbers that you want to guide policy decisions and markets, through COVID. And then when COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed. So the typical monthly revision often was bigger than the number itself,' Hassett said on NBC. Trump, in axing the BLS chief, claimed without evidence that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The president accused her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad, writing on Truth Social on Friday, 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' McEntarfer reacted to Trump's firing of her in a social media post over the weekend, saying it was the 'honor of my life' to serve in the role and hailing the 'vital and important work' carried out by civil servants at the agency.