Live updates: Education savings accounts on the Texas House floor
READ MORE: Texas leaders share unfiltered thoughts on future of education
An ESA program would allow families to use tax dollars to help pay for private education, while the public school finance bill would increase current funding to Texas's public schools by $7.7 billion.
Before the meeting, some lawmakers started calling to turn SB 2 into a referendum — allowing Texas voters to have the final say on their ballots in November.
'The Governor keeps saying this is what Texans want,' Rep. Vikki Goodwin, D-Austin, posted on X. 'But that's not what we're hearing. We should be putting this to a vote of all Texans.'
Gov. Greg Abbott, who declared ESA legislation an emergency item for two consecutive sessions, said the voters already decided.
'This is just another desperate distraction from out-of-touch Texas Democrats,' Abbott's Press Secretary Andrew Mahaleris said in a statement. 'School choice was on the ballot last November, and Texans elected a school choice majority in the Texas Legislature. When it comes to education, parents matter, and families deserve the ability to choose the best education opportunities for their children.'
As the day develops, we'll keep you updated right here on the latest from the Texas House floor.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem Senator Elissa Slotkin complains party is too worried about ‘p—ing off' the Internet
Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., says that Democrats are too worried about making people angry and that they 'constrain' themselves too much. During an interview last week on PBS's 'Firing Line with Margaret Hoover,' Hoover asked Slotkin about President Barack Obama's recent criticism of Democrats, where he said that his party should 'toughen up.' 'President Obama chided Democrats, saying they need to 'toughen up' against Donald Trump. You have said we need more 'alpha energy' in the Democratic Party,' Hoover told Slotkin. Slotkin agreed, and Hoover asked if she and Obama are 'saying the same thing.' 'I don't know if we're saying the exact same thing, but it sort of smells the same, right,' Slotkin said. 'And I think this idea that Democrats are so careful, and they're so caveated, and they're so worried about offending each other, offending other people, they're so worried about pissing off people on the Internet. They live often in a world where they constrain themselves.' Hoover then asked if Democrats are 'too sensitive.' 'I think some of them, sure, are too sensitive,' Slotkin said. 'And this is, to me, the central point, especially with Donald Trump in the White House, this is just not a moment to be careful and polite. We need a plan. We need to be on the same page. We need to play as a team. We need to call out when someone isn't helping the team. And we need to hug someone when they do something great.' 3 'They're so worried about pissing off people on the Internet,' Senator Slotkin said about Democrats. 'They live often in a world where they constrain themselves.' PBS 3 Slotkin agreed with Barack Obama's statement that the party should 'toughen up.' 'It sort of smells the same, right,' Slotkin said. Getty Images The PBS host asked Slotkin if she was saying that Republicans are afraid of Trump, and if Democrats 'fear each other's factions.' Slotkin responded by saying that some 'fear' backlash on X, still often referred to as its former name Twitter. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 'You know, I've been shocked — you know, I'm new to the Senate, six months in — how many of my peers said, 'Well, Elissa, I'd love to be with you on that issue, but, you know, Twitter will be mad. You know, the Internet people will be mad at me,'' Slotkin said. 'They literally say that,' Hoover asked. 3 'Especially with Donald Trump in the White House, this is just not a moment to be careful and polite,' the sentor said. 'We need a plan.' AP 'Yeah. There'll be a bad online response,' Slotkin admitted. Obama's 'toughen up' comments referenced by Hoover were made at a fundraiser in July where he said Democrats should complain less.
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Rand Paul stalls Mike Waltz nomination for UN ambassador
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is standing in the way of Mike Waltz's nomination as ambassador to the United Nations, dealing a serious setback to Trump's former national security adviser, sources familiar with the matter tell Axios. Why it matters: Paul's resistance to Waltz forced the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to delay an expected Wednesday vote on the nomination. The committee is now in recess. Some Republicans are still hopeful that Paul can be convinced to support Waltz or that one or more Democrats will decide to back him in committee, according to people familiar with the matter. A key Waltz adviser expressed strong confidence that Waltz would garner bipartisan support in committee. What he's saying: When asked if he plans to support Waltz, Paul told Axios: "They pulled it for now, we're going to see what happens over the next week." "If you want to report my opinion," he continued, "I had an exchange in the committee last week — that's probably the best thing to report." Zoom out: Paul grilled Waltz in his confirmation hearing last week, demanding to know why he tried, as a House member, to force Trump to keep 8,000 troops in Afghanistan. "The idea that Congress should be involved with declaring war is sort of passé. It's old-fashioned. But when it comes to ending a war, you voted with Liz Cheney and the others to say that the president couldn't end the war," Paul said in a heated exchange. The intrigue: Some Democrats are privately concerned about who Trump might nominate if Waltz goes down, citing their deep misgivings about other rumored candidates, like Richard Grenell, Trump's ambassador to Germany in his first term. The bottom line: Waltz still might be reported out of committee in the coming days.
Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Supreme Court allows Trump to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission
The commission helps protect consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls, suing errant companies and more. Trump fired the three Democrats on the five-member commission in May. They were serving seven-year terms after being nominated by President Joe Biden. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Baltimore ruled in June that the dismissals were unlawful. Maddox sought to distinguish the commission's role from those of other agencies where the Supreme Court has allowed firings to go forward. Advertisement A month earlier, the high court's conservative majority declined to reinstate members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, finding that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members 'without cause.' The three liberal justices dissented. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The administration has argued that all the agencies are under Trump's control as the head of the executive branch. Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted that it can be difficult to characterize the product safety commission's functions as purely executive. The fight over the president's power to fire could prompt the court to consider overturning a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. Advertisement The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president's party. They serve staggered terms. That structure ensures that each president has 'the opportunity to influence, but not control,' the commission, attorneys for the fired commissioners wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission's independence.
