logo
Russia's new ‘Frankenstein' missile terrorising Ukraine

Russia's new ‘Frankenstein' missile terrorising Ukraine

Yahoo13-05-2025
For weeks, a new Russian missile has been tormenting Ukraine.
It is fast, lethal and was unrecognisable until Ukraine's military intelligence (HUR) unmasked it as the S8000 'Banderol'.
Translated as 'small parcel' in English, it is a lightweight, low-cost, small cruise missile that reaches speeds of 400mph and can hit targets more than 300 miles away.
It is also, specialists have found, a Frankenstein-like creation of foreign-sourced components which flies in the face of international sanctions.
Kyiv says the precision-guided weapon, which carries a high-explosive 115kg warhead, has been used in deadly strikes on southern Ukraine, with unofficial reports saying it has been targeting Odesa and Mykolaiv since February.
Uniquely, it is launched by Russia's large Orion drones, meaning Russia does not have to risk tactical aircraft, while its considerable range allows it to strike targets well behind enemy lines. In the future, reports say it will be launched by Mi-28 attack helicopters.
Russia appeared to have produced 'a formidable weapon system' that could give its forces a 'significant advantage on the battlefield', said Vijainder K Thakur, a military analyst and former Indian fighter pilot.
It also represents a significant milestone for Russia – the ability to produce a low-cost missile for mass production.
For example, its SW800Pro jet engine, built by Chinese company Swiwin, is sold through online marketplaces, including China's AliExpress and Alibaba, for £12,000.
But Chinese parts are just the beginning.
By pulling apart downed Banderols, HUR discovered more than 20 key components coming from 30 companies, including from the US, Switzerland, Japan, Australia and South Korea.
The discovery exposes the extent to which foreign technologies, often sourced from Kyiv's backers, have slipped through cracks in sanctions and ended up being fired at Ukraine.
There has been no official Russian confirmation of the Banderol's specifications or operational status, and its development was kept secret until recently.
In February, Moscow reported the first 'successful test flight of a new unmanned aerial vehicle' but offered no technical details.
Ukrainian defence sources suspected it was the Banderol and soon after, reports of an unknown weapon striking Ukraine began to circulate.
In late April, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy of Russia's security council, went to inspect the mystery weapon deep in southern Russia. He nodded his head, appearing impressed, as officials pointed to various design elements.
Credit: X/@OSINTWarfare
The S8000 is developed by the sanctioned Kronstadt Group, a Russian defence enterprise best known for producing the Orion UAVs.
It appears to closely resemble America's joint air-to-surface standoff missile, a cornerstone of US long-range strike capabilities, designed to strike heavily defended targets without having to be launched inside hostile airspace.
Russia's new missile also can make tighter turns than the country's traditional missiles and, according to Ukraine's HUR, has radar-evading technology and onboard anti-jamming systems.
If the Banderol is capable of what Ukraine claims, it could mark the arrival of a new generation of precision-guided, low-cost munitions that pose a significant risk to Ukraine.
But Russia's dependence on foreign components highlights the gaping so-called 'sanctions hole' that allows Russia to circumvent Western sanctions using convoluted supply chains via a third country, including China, Turkey, the UAE and neighbouring former Soviet states.
Russian weapons 'depend on foreign components', HUR wrote alongside its Banderol report. 'Without them, they cannot continue to fight, occupy, and kill.'
A Banderol reportedly contains a US-made motion tracking device, a microcontroller from Switzerland, an Australian-built information exchange model, a battery pack from Japan and a South Korean servo drive.
HUR identified the 'Chip and DIP' network, one of Russia's largest electronics distributors, as a key supplier of many of the foreign components. It is sanctioned by the US and Ukraine, but not by the EU, UK, Japan and Australia.
One of the great advantages of the Banderol missile is its low cost, according to John Hardie, a weapons expert and deputy director of the Russia programme at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
'The name of the game here is increasing Russia's strike depth and capacity to fire missiles in larger numbers,' he told The Telegraph. 'Ukraine is pretty successful at downing Russian missiles, but the more Russia can launch, the more likely they are to get through and the more Ukraine has to expend its limited supply of interceptor missiles.'
According to a 2022 report by the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank, more than 450 foreign-made components were discovered in Russian weapons found in Ukraine, with 318 of them made in the US.
'We see the same picture today, often the same culprits,' said Maria Shagina, a senior sanctions researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Russia is both breaking sanctions and exploiting the loopholes. 'It all boils down to diversion, through intermediaries and third countries,' Ms Shagina said, adding that technologies were much harder to track than financial transactions.
The key issue, she said, 'is that Western enforcement of sanctions is poor and the manufacturers must do better due diligence to who they supply. They do not ask the questions they should'.
And when it comes to commercially available, off-the-shelf parts, it was near-impossible to prevent them from being procured by Russia. 'No one can crack down on all procurement networks and all circumvention schemes,' Ms Shagina added.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles
Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles

In picking fights and waging wars on multiple fronts, President Trump should heed the advice of Britain's greatest sailor and naval hero Lord Horatio Nelson: Only a fool or a stupid ship's captain would ever fight a fort. While immobile, unlike ships, forts were better defended and protected. And forts were more easily reinforced, rearmed and resupplied by land than ships at sea, which then had to find suitable ports. Trump is not at sea except in the minds of his many critics, yet he has joined several simultaneous battles against forts. He has given Russia no more time beyond Monday's 10-day deadline to end the war in Ukraine. Former Russian President and Prime Minister Dimitri Medvedev has threatened nuclear war if Trump is not careful. In that regard, Russia is a formidable fort armed with nuclear weapons equal to America's. Trump started a global trade war with his announcement Friday of new tariffs, having struck a deal with the European Union while still negotiating with China. He seems to have picked a fight with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over relieving extreme starvation in Gaza, after having turned a Nelsonian blind eye toward an estimated 61,000 Palestinian deaths. And he surely is at war at home against so-called woke law firms and universities and, remarkably, a more than significant part of his MAGA base over refusing to come clean about his relationship with the deceased sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein. Whether Trump will prevail or fail in all, some or none of these battles will largely determine his administration's future and will almost certainly impact congressional elections in 2026 and the presidential vote in 2028, for which he is legally prevented from running. For most mere mortals, bookies would set the odds of failing or losing at least one of these battles as very low. Running the deck, however, would recoup a fortune in bets. Yet Trump's history has reversed all the odds against him. This makes any seemingly rational bet to the contrary exceedingly dumb. In this ability to overcome setbacks that would crush most people, Trump made Bill Clinton's reign as the ' The Comeback Kid ' seem both short and trivial. Will that luck hold out? War with Russia will not happen. Putin, however, will not be impressed or moved by the threat to force negotiations by imposing new sanctions or deploying two American nuclear submarines that somehow will annoy or worry Russia sufficiently to abandon its efforts. At the moment, while the war in Ukraine will not be fought to the last Russian, there are no compelling facts or arguments to convince Putin he is losing or needs to withdraw his forces. Quite the contrary. Similarly, in Gaza, Netanyahu's actions will determine America's. The relationship with Israel has grown so close over the decades since the 1956 and 1967 Arab-Israeli wars that the U.S. no longer tries or considers not giving Israel basically what it needs or demands. What could happen in these conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, as with the Houthis, is that the U.S. withdraws and the situation reverts back to the pre-war days. The global trade war is different. The administration asserts that tariffs will not raise inflation and will generate greater economic growth. This argument is the equivalent of the ship commanded by Nelson's dim witted captain. Other states will react. The World Trade Organization and its agreed upon principles will become cannon fodder. Even though imports comprise only about 11 percent of U.S. total GDP, the effects of tariffs will be much greater. Unlike Gaza and Ukraine, of which Trump can wash his hands, the economy is not something that can be discarded like a used tissue. Trump will have to do something to explain or cover up any misjudgments. The only way for that to happen comes from the Trump playbook: Call the bad data 'fake news,' dissemble and stall — or cling to the belief that tariffs are working, despite all the contradictory evidence. Ironically, Epstein may be the problem that simply will not disappear — the fort that ultimately wins. Trump is trapped by his promise to release all the Epstein files. Suppose there are none and nothing more to release? Or suppose the files contain truly damaging revelations about Trump or his circle? There may be no way out. One conclusion is clear: The fewer fights picked, the better. And the chances of winning many are not odds most people would accept. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.

Kremlin Warns Against ‘Nuclear Rhetoric' In Trump-Medvedev Feud
Kremlin Warns Against ‘Nuclear Rhetoric' In Trump-Medvedev Feud

Time​ Magazine

time25 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Kremlin Warns Against ‘Nuclear Rhetoric' In Trump-Medvedev Feud

Russia warned against 'nuclear rhetoric' on Monday after an online feud between President Donald Trump and Russian former President Dmitry Medvedev led to the U.S. deploying two nuclear submarines last week. 'Russia is very cautious about nuclear nonproliferation matters, and we believe everyone should be very careful about nuclear rhetoric,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in a call with reporters. 'On the whole, certainly, we absolutely wouldn't like to engage in such polemics, nor would we like to comment on that in any way,' Peskov said in response to a question about the deployment of the submarines. What began as an online war of words between Trump and Medvedev escalated into nuclear brinkmanship on Friday when Trump said he had ordered the two nuclear submarines into 'appropriate regions.' Tensions have been growing between the U.S. and Russia as Trump has grown frustrated with Moscow's unwillingness to agree to his terms to bring an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump issued a 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate a peace deal with Ukraine in early July, to which Medvedev responded that Russia 'didn't care' in a July 15 post on X. Trump picked up the feud in a Truth Social on July 31: 'Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Medvedev then made a veiled threat to use a Cold War-era Soviet nuclear capability known as 'The Dead Hand,' which allows Moscow to launch nuclear strikes even if humans who would usually issue the orders to do so had been killed in a first strike. Trump reacted to the 'highly provocative' statement with an order to deploy the submarines. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Friday. The President later told the press that the deployment was to "protect our people." The Kremlin appeared to seek to calm the mood on Monday, however. 'There can be no winner in a nuclear war,' Peskov said. 'This is probably the key premise we rely on. We do not think there is talk of any escalation.' Together, the U.S. and Russia own more than 10,000 nuclear warheads, harboring nearly 90% of nuclear weapons across the globe. A single nuclear weapon in New York City could kill more than 580,000 people, according to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. Trump has said that he would levy tariffs against Russia should they not broker a peace deal by the new Aug. 8 deadline.

AI Kills SEO As The Whole World Watches
AI Kills SEO As The Whole World Watches

Forbes

time37 minutes ago

  • Forbes

AI Kills SEO As The Whole World Watches

Google is trying to be more like Netflix, not Blockbuster. But is this simple pivoting destroying the web? Or perhaps more accurately, putting traditional publishers in an untenable position? This week, we're seeing fairly robust coverage of additional declines in conventional Google search – you know, the kind where you enter a string of keywords, and look through resulting SERP pages to find what you want. We've been getting notified about this for some time now – how in the mad rush to build AI tools, Google is threatening its own dominant business, the business of keyword search. But now, it seems like the phrase 'Google apocalypse' has been freshly introduced, indicating a critical mass that will change the game for millions of users and businesses. 'Now that AI-generated summaries are being integrated into search results, anyone looking for information has less reason to click through to the websites where that information originates,' wrote Klaudia Jazwinska at the Columbia Journalism Review July 31, including estimates from Pew and other parties. 'For media publishers whose business models rely on referral traffic to bring them advertising revenue, this shift feels nothing short of catastrophic.' Other outlets have picked this up, too. There's even a story from NPR, an institution that is, in its own way, in the hot seat too. All of it is screaming the message that we will not be able to rely on time-tested methods in the new AI age. The Big Picture There are two ways to understand this sea change: you can look at the numbers, famously released by Pew and other parties, or you can try it for yourself. Go to Google, and put in a search phrase. You'll see the AI overview come up at the top, in plain English. If you asked a question, that question gets answered 'above the fold,' to use journalistic parlance. So why would you click into SERPs? Not too long ago, I wrote about another aspect of this – the billion-dollar business of Search Engine Optimization or SEO, and how it is giving way to Generative Engine Optimization or GEO. Basically, since the genAI tools are killing keyword search, they're also making that SEO work less relevant, which is devastating to businesses that have invested in things like keyword research. That brings us to where this change is felt most deeply: the news media. The Last Nail in the Coffin As for newspapers, magazines and community publications, these outlets have been under pressure ever since the days of the early Internet. It started with the mandate to move to a digital payment model, which nobody liked. A newspaper was made to be in print. News offices had trouble figuring out how to maintain revenue with digital subscriptions. Eventually, some of the top publications figured out SEO and related methods. They build the best digital payment systems they could. But blogging and alternative news sources made things tough. Now, AI is writing stories, and newsrooms are cutting staff. Fewer consumers are choosing to invest in local news. And without even the ability to garner click-throughs, it's anybody's guess what kind of skeletal news system will remain. I covered a Ted talk by a fellow named John Chesto who laid out all of this in a revealing way. Combine the existing death of news media with a dramatic change in Internet search architecture, and you have an apocalypse, indeed. The headline I used, AI Lacks Full Capacity to Replace Journalism, doesn't mean that new changes won't kill the institutions. It just means AI isn't quite there yet. Businesses are supposed to be able to pivot, to some extent. But they can't pivot at the speed of light. And no one should expect them too. We're having profound growing pains integrating powerful new technologies. It's not just newsrooms – from your local furniture store, to your neighbor's landscaping business, to a mid-level retailer: over 20-some years, everyone has learned to create an online footprint, one way or another, with Google search. It was already too monopolistic. But this rug pull could have drastic consequences. Stay tuned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store