SAFE: Proposed Welfare Code Betrays Animals And The Law
The animal rights organisation says the code legitimises inherently harmful practices – including mud farming, feedlots, and painful procedures like castration and tail docking without pain relief – while continuing to allow animals to suffer without …
SAFE is demanding that the Ministry for Primary Industries' proposed Code of Welfare for Sheep and Beef Cattle be scrapped, calling it a legal shield for cruelty that fails to meet even the most basic obligations under the Animal Welfare Act 1999.
The animal rights organisation says the code legitimises inherently harmful practices – including mud farming, feedlots, and painful procedures like castration and tail docking without pain relief – while continuing to allow animals to suffer without access to shelter.
'If this code is accepted in its current form, it would effectively become a manual for animal cruelty,' says SAFE CEO Debra Ashton.
SAFE warns that the code is not an isolated failure, but a symptom of a broken regulatory system that routinely favours industry convenience over animals' needs, experiences, and rights.
'We've engaged in good faith for years, but this draft proves the system can't be trusted. It's time to draw a line,' says Ashton.
The organisation has written to NAWAC Chair Dr Matthew Stone, MPI Director of Animal Health and Welfare Carolyn Guy, Minister for Agriculture Todd McClay, and Associate Agriculture Minister Andrew Hoggard, urging them to abandon the draft and take urgent action to address these systemic failures.
'It's a betrayal of our welfare law and the animals it's meant to protect.'
SAFE's full statement reads:
Proposed Code of Welfare Entrenches Cruelty and Undermines Animal Welfare Law
The proposed Code of Welfare for Sheep and Beef Cattle, currently open for public consultation, represents a profound failure of New Zealand's animal welfare system. Rather than lifting standards or upholding the Animal Welfare Act 1999, this code would entrench practices that cause widespread suffering – including painful procedures without pain relief, intensive confinement in mud farms and feedlots, and a diluted shelter standard that puts animals' lives at risk in extreme weather.
SAFE rejects the premise that this code provides meaningful guidance for compliance with the Animal Welfare Act. It does not. Instead, it offers legal cover to inherently harmful farming systems and practices that cause serious and avoidable suffering.
For that reason, SAFE will not be participating in the consultation process for a code that attempts to sanitise cruelty.
When animals are confined on mud farms, concrete, or barren feedlots, they are stripped of their most basic expressions of life – grazing, playing, resting comfortably, ruminating, and relating to one another. These are not abstract ideals, but the everyday needs of sheep and cattle.
Codes of welfare are intended to support our animal welfare legislation — not undermine it. If this code is adopted, it will set a dangerous precedent: where cruelty is legitimised, public expectations are ignored, and the intent of the Animal Welfare Act is effectively nullified.
This failure is not isolated. In 2023, the Regulations Review Committee recommended a prompt and substantive review of how secondary legislation under the Animal Welfare Act is developed – and whether existing instruments, particularly codes of welfare, are consistent with the purpose and intent of the Act. Almost two years have passed without action. It must now be prioritised to ensure that regulation genuinely reflects the law and protects the animals it exists to serve.
SAFE is calling for the proposed Code of Welfare for Sheep and Beef Cattle to be scrapped. The code must be rewritten in full alignment with the Animal Welfare Act — not shaped to prioritise profit, productivity, or convenience over animals' wellbeing and legal rights.
We urge the Government and the public to reject this code and demand a future where animal welfare law is not just symbolic but lived. It's time to build a system that reflects what the Animal Welfare Act already affirms: that animals are not merely commodities to be managed, but sentient beings with needs, feelings, experiences, and intrinsic worth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
13-06-2025
- Scoop
ECan Backtracks On Te Waihora Leadership, Fish & Game Doubles Down On Harm
Press Release – Animal Justice Party At a public forum presentation to ECan on 26 March 2025, AJP raised urgent questions about both environmental and animal welfare impacts of duck shooting. The Animal Justice Party (AJP) is calling written responses from ECan and Fish & Game New Zealand on recreational duck shooting at Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere) a clear failure of leadership. 'Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere), is recognised as one of Aotearoa's most ecologically significant wetlands,' says Danette Wereta, General Secretary of AJP, 'It is governed by a national Water Conservation Order, which overlays all other management.' The Order identifies Te Waihora's habitat for wildlife as an outstanding amenity or intrinsic value warranting protection. Regional Councils are responsible for implementation of National Orders. At a public forum presentation to ECan on 26 March 2025, AJP raised urgent questions about both environmental and animal welfare impacts of duck shooting. 'On the day, the majority of Councillors showed genuine engagement and concern for the contradiction between ECan's wildlife habitat responsibilities to Te Waihora and the ongoing disturbance and killing of wildlife for recreation,' says Wereta. However, a letter to AJP from ECan Chair Craig Pauling after the meeting deflects responsibility to other agencies, specifically Fish & Game and the Department of Conservation (DOC). ECan's written response claims ECan holds no jurisdiction over protecting biodiversity, passing the issue to Fish & Game and DOC. Fish & Game's Game Bird Specialist, Matthew Garrick, says, 'Game bird hunting is specifically listed as an integral part of the future and is listed as an important aspect to connect the community to Te Waihora.' But is shooting really the kind of connection Te Waihora needs? Just because it used to happen doesn't mean it still should. With such strong bird life at the lake, shouldn't protection and care come before outdated bloodsport? 'Fish and Game's response highlights their primary interest in promoting hunting and fishing. That organisation's interest in protecting habitat is focused through the lens of protecting habitat for game species alone, when the Lake is home to more than 150 bird species' says Wereta, 'alongside the National Order, the Lake is covered by international conservation agreements like the Convention on Migratory Species.' Fish and Game cite the Animal Welfare Act's hunting exemption to justify harm, and claim a contribution to biodiversity protection while simultaneously enabling activities that traumatise and kill wildlife. 'The idea that gunfire, wounded birds, and habitat disruption can coexist with meaningful conservation is absurd,' says Wereta. Wereta considers Fish & Game's response also reveals a dangerous contradiction at the heart of Te Waihora's governance. 'The site is identified as both a biodiversity hotspot and a recreational killing ground, yet the organisations responsible are refusing to reconcile this conflict, each pointing to the other, while the damage continues.' ECan is a member of the Te Waihora Co-Governance Group, 'it has the primary role to protect the lake as a habitat for all wildlife. We are calling for an immediate reassessment of the lake's use, and a clear prohibition on recreational duck shooting,' says Wereta, 'this is a moment to lead, not retreat.' About the Animal Justice Party Aotearoa NZ: AJP was registered in August 2023. AJP is a political party dedicated to advocating for the rights, welfare, and protection of animals. Their mission is to create a society where animals are treated with respect, compassion, and consideration. Through active participation in the political landscape, they aim to drive policy changes that reflect their commitment to a more ethical and sustainable future.
Scoop
13-06-2025
- Scoop
ECan Backtracks On Te Waihora Leadership, Fish & Game Doubles Down On Harm
The Animal Justice Party (AJP) is calling written responses from ECan and Fish & Game New Zealand on recreational duck shooting at Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere) a clear failure of leadership. 'Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere), is recognised as one of Aotearoa's most ecologically significant wetlands,' says Danette Wereta, General Secretary of AJP, 'It is governed by a national Water Conservation Order, which overlays all other management.' The Order identifies Te Waihora's habitat for wildlife as an outstanding amenity or intrinsic value warranting protection. Regional Councils are responsible for implementation of National Orders. At a public forum presentation to ECan on 26 March 2025, AJP raised urgent questions about both environmental and animal welfare impacts of duck shooting. 'On the day, the majority of Councillors showed genuine engagement and concern for the contradiction between ECan's wildlife habitat responsibilities to Te Waihora and the ongoing disturbance and killing of wildlife for recreation,' says Wereta. However, a letter to AJP from ECan Chair Craig Pauling after the meeting deflects responsibility to other agencies, specifically Fish & Game and the Department of Conservation (DOC). ECan's written response claims ECan holds no jurisdiction over protecting biodiversity, passing the issue to Fish & Game and DOC. Fish & Game's Game Bird Specialist, Matthew Garrick, says, 'Game bird hunting is specifically listed as an integral part of the future and is listed as an important aspect to connect the community to Te Waihora.' But is shooting really the kind of connection Te Waihora needs? Just because it used to happen doesn't mean it still should. With such strong bird life at the lake, shouldn't protection and care come before outdated bloodsport? 'Fish and Game's response highlights their primary interest in promoting hunting and fishing. That organisation's interest in protecting habitat is focused through the lens of protecting habitat for game species alone, when the Lake is home to more than 150 bird species' says Wereta, 'alongside the National Order, the Lake is covered by international conservation agreements like the Convention on Migratory Species.' Fish and Game cite the Animal Welfare Act's hunting exemption to justify harm, and claim a contribution to biodiversity protection while simultaneously enabling activities that traumatise and kill wildlife. 'The idea that gunfire, wounded birds, and habitat disruption can coexist with meaningful conservation is absurd,' says Wereta. Wereta considers Fish & Game's response also reveals a dangerous contradiction at the heart of Te Waihora's governance. 'The site is identified as both a biodiversity hotspot and a recreational killing ground, yet the organisations responsible are refusing to reconcile this conflict, each pointing to the other, while the damage continues.' ECan is a member of the Te Waihora Co-Governance Group, 'it has the primary role to protect the lake as a habitat for all wildlife. We are calling for an immediate reassessment of the lake's use, and a clear prohibition on recreational duck shooting,' says Wereta, 'this is a moment to lead, not retreat.' About the Animal Justice Party Aotearoa NZ: AJP was registered in August 2023. AJP is a political party dedicated to advocating for the rights, welfare, and protection of animals. Their mission is to create a society where animals are treated with respect, compassion, and consideration. Through active participation in the political landscape, they aim to drive policy changes that reflect their commitment to a more ethical and sustainable future.
RNZ News
05-06-2025
- RNZ News
Ministry for Primary Industries to review controls for tomato virus
Tomato brown rugose fruit virus. Photo: Tomatoes NZ Ministry for Primary Industries says it will review its current controls after Australia changed its strategy to deal with a highly contagious virus affecting tomatoes, capsicums and chillies. Across the Tasman , biosecurity experts and industry representatives have declared tomato brown rugose virus not technically feasible to eradicate and moved to a management strategy. 'Tomato virus' was first detected in South Australia last August and has also been found on a farm in Victoria. It is not harmful to humans but infected fruit can ripen irregularly or be deformed. It can also reduce crop yields by 70 percent. Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson said MPI had controls in place that were "working well for New Zealand and prevented any issues for our tomato growers after the discovery of tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) at sites in South Australia last August". He said a ban on all Australian tomato imports remained in place, even though only Australian tomatoes from Queensland, an area free from the virus, were imported here. "We made the decision to suspend imports from all Australian states out of an abundance of caution. As part of the actions we took, tomato and capsicum seeds from Australia require testing for the virus prior to arrival in New Zealand, a requirement already in place for other countries where the virus is present. That requirement remains. "Although Australia has announced they will no longer be pursuing eradication, all of the controls that have been in place to limit spread of the virus remain." There was nothing to suggest the virus was here but MPI's chief biosecurity officer would conduct a review of what Australia has in place to manage the risk, and New Zealand's import rules "to ensure that our settings remain reasonable", he said. "New Zealand imports Australian capsicums from Queensland. ToBRFV has not been reported in any parts of Australia in capsicums and has not been detected in Queensland. We are closely monitoring the situation in Australia and if there is any significant change in distribution, or which crops it is affecting, we will review the current import rules. "We continue to work closely with New Zealand's tomato sector. We have asked New Zealand industry representatives to assist by sharing any information they have that may inform our decision-making. We also meet regularly with Australian officials to maintain a continued understanding of the situation." MPI said growers should continue to check their biosecurity practices. "As always... be vigilant and contact us on our pests and diseases hotline (0800 80 99 66) if [you] notice problems with [your] tomatoes". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
