UN agency slams Israel over ‘inhumane' plan
The scheme was unveiled by Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Monday. It envisions establishing a walled-off camp in southern Gaza on the ruins of Rafah. Katz has said the site would initially hold 600,000 Palestinians displaced by the war and would eventually house the entire population of the enclave – more than 2 million people.
According to Katz, residents would be screened to prevent Hamas operatives from entering and would not be permitted to leave. At some point, the inhabitants would be allowed to 'voluntarily emigrate' to other countries. He has described the plan as a way to give the Israeli military more 'freedom' to fight Hamas in other parts of Gaza.
Katz has claimed that while the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would initially control the zone, it could eventually be operated by international organizations, though he has not specified which bodies would participate.
A source cited by Haaretz has claimed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has supported the plan. Commenting on the idea of providing comforts to the confined Gazans, Netanyahu allegedly said, 'Give them Ben & Jerry's, for all I care.'
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, UNRWA communications director Tamara Alrifai said: 'There is nothing humanitarian about confining hundreds of thousands of people behind fences and checkpoints under military surveillance.'
'Labeling it a 'humanitarian city' is an insult to the very notion of humanity,' she added.
Alrifai warned that the project would transform Gaza, already described as an 'open-air prison' by humanitarian groups, into the most crowded and tightly controlled camp on Earth.
UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini has called the idea a 'massive overcrowded camp' and said the only viable solution is a lasting ceasefire, the release of hostages, unimpeded humanitarian access, and a renewed commitment to a two-state solution.
The plan has also sparked outcry from rights experts and observers, some of whom have compared the sealed zone to a concentration camp and have accused Israel of engineering a mass expulsion of Palestinians.
Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza in October 2023 following a deadly Hamas incursion. Since then, the IDF has reportedly killed nearly 57,800 Palestinians, most of them women and children, leading to accusations of genocide against the Israeli leadership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's summer of losing ground: Here's how Russia is cracking the front line
Over the past month, Russia's summer campaign has maintained the methodical pace set in May and June – deliberate, grinding, but steadily effective. In total, Russian forces have seized roughly 500 square kilometers of territory – three times more than during the same period last year. While the advances may appear modest on the map, they reflect a consistent application of pressure along multiple axes and a broader shift in battlefield momentum. Active fighting has unfolded across four key sectors, stretching from the northern borderlands near Sumy to the southern reaches of the Zaporozhye front. Each offers a distinct tactical picture, yet together they form a coherent narrative of Russia's evolving strategy. Below, we examine the month's developments, front by front – from north to south. Russian forces continue to push forward along the Sumy axis, working to establish a buffer zone on the Ukrainian side of the border with Russia's Kursk Region – directly across from last year's staging area near Sudzha. Faced with a potential threat to the regional capital of Sumy, Ukrainian command was forced to redeploy units from other sectors and pull reserves into the area. In late June, the Ukrainian army launched a series of counterattacks near Alekseevka and Kondratovka, aiming to squeeze the Russian bridgehead from the flanks or potentially sever it altogether. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian army has retained a presence in Tetkino – the only settlement on Russian territory, in Kursk Region, where Ukrainian forces still hold positions. As of early July, Ukraine's counteroffensives appear to have ground to a halt. Russian troops succeeded in dislodging the Ukrainian troops from one of their two remaining footholds in Tetkino. The coming weeks will determine whether the Russian advance into Ukrainian territory will continue – or if the focus will shift to consolidating gains and expanding the border buffer zone. Last autumn, Russian forces secured a foothold on the western bank of the Oskol River north of Kupiansk, while simultaneously advancing toward the river from the south. By late June and early July, reports surfaced suggesting that Russian units had captured Moskovka – a key stronghold along the strategic Kupiansk-Volchansk railway. Encircling Kupiansk effectively would require cutting off two major arteries: The main supply route running west through Blagodatovka, and another road leading south through Osinovо. What's the situation now? Despite earlier claims, there is still no confirmed Russian presence in Moskovka, suggesting the village remains contested or under Ukrainian control. Overall, the Kupiansk axis is viewed as a secondary theater. Operations in this area appear designed primarily to pin down Ukrainian forces, preventing them from reinforcing more critical sectors of the front. After a successful push in May, Russian advances in the Konstantinovka sector have slowed somewhat. Russian forces are now pressing up against the city's primary defensive lines, advancing along the Stepanovka, Aleksandro-Kalinovo, and Plescheyevka axes. What's unfolding follows a now-familiar Russian approach to urban warfare. First, the city is flanked and key lines of communication are brought under fire control. Then begins the grinding phase: Sustained artillery bombardment wears down the defending garrison as Russian troops close in from three directions. Over time, this pressure begins to erode the city's defenses. At that point, Ukrainian forces face two choices – either retreat in an orderly fashion, as seen in Kurakhovo, or, if ordered to hold at all costs, risk a defensive collapse with potentially serious consequences for adjacent sectors, as happened in Avdeevka and Ugledar. Meanwhile Russian forces are currently focused on wearing down the Ukrainian garrison. The main roads into Konstantinovka are under Russian fire control, and pressure on the flanks is steadily increasing. On the northern approach from Chasov Yar, however, progress remains limited due to difficult terrain – an issue we addressed in a previous report. The situation around Pokrovsk mirrors that of Konstantinovka – and together, these battles may mark some of the most consequential developments of the summer campaign. On the eastern outskirts of Pokrovsk, Russian forces have advanced up to 8km toward Rodinskoe, bringing two of the three main supply routes into Pokrovsk and neighboring Mirnograd under fire control. Further south, between Pokrovsk and Velikaya Novoselka, Russian troops achieved their most significant gains this month – pushing up to 15km across a 30-kilometer-wide front. Their advance reached the administrative boundary of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), with the village of Komar – an important Ukrainian defensive position – reportedly cleared and brought under Russian control. On July 7, the Russian Defense Ministry announced the capture of Dachnoye, a village located on the DPR's border and the first settlement in Ukraine's Dnepropetrovsk Region to fall under Russian control. As part of Ukraine's fortified defense line, securing Dachnoye marks both a tactical and symbolic milestone for the Russian advance. After nearly a year and a half of relative calm, the southern front near the Dnepr River has erupted with renewed activity. Russian forces are now advancing along three axes in the region. Notably, they have captured Kamenskoye – a strategically significant settlement on the riverbank. On July 11, Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov visited the forward command post of the Dnepr Group of Forces, signaling high-level attention to the area. In the coming weeks, it should become clearer whether this uptick in operations is intended to stretch Ukrainian reserves and apply pressure – or if it marks the opening phase of a broader Russian offensive in the south.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian kamikaze drone destroys Ukrainian radar (VIDEO)
The Russian military has taken out a Ukrainian radar with a drone strike in the country's northern Chernigov Region, the Defense Ministry in Moscow has reported. In a statement on Monday, the ministry said a UAV unit operating Geran-2 drones had conducted the strike near the settlement of Borzna. A short video clip accompanying the statement depicts what appears to be several military vehicles moments before being hit by the drone. A powerful explosion follows, with plumes of black smoke billowing from the site. Earlier this month, the Russian Defense Ministry said similar explosives-laden UAVs had obliterated a Ukrainian marines' position in Russia's Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). In a separate attack around the same time, Russian Geran-2 drones hit a Ukrainian UAV workshop in Sumy Region, according to military officials in Moscow. Several days earlier, the ministry released footage of a purported strike on a Ukrainian ammunition depot in the DPR. The Geran-2 employs a 'flying wing' aerodynamic configuration and carries a 40kg+ warhead, with an operational range of up to 2,000km (1,250 miles). While the UAV typically travels at relatively moderate speeds (around 150-170kph or 93-105mph), its low radar signature and the ability to fly intricate trajectories has enabled the kamikaze drone to effectively penetrate Ukrainian air defenses. Russian forces usually launch Gerans in large numbers, which further increases the likelihood of at least some of the UAVs reaching their targets. Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022, the Russian military has deployed long-range drones to strike dual-purpose infrastructure, military installations, and Ukrainian weapon storage sites. The rapid production rate of the Geran-2 – dozens or even hundreds monthly – has enabled Moscow's forces to launch UAV swarms on an almost daily basis.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO turning Moldova into ‘battering ram' against Russia
NATO is molding Moldova into a military 'battering ram' against Russia while intending to use the former Soviet nation as 'cannon fodder' in a potential conflict, the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has said. In a statement on Monday, the SVR accused the US-led military bloc of grooming Moldova for an armed conflict with Russia. 'A decision has been made in Brussels to accelerate the transformation of the country into a forward base on the eastern flank given the advance of Russian forces in Ukraine.' The agency said NATO is rapidly converting Moldova into a 'military testing ground' by upgrading the country's rail lines to European standards, improving bridges to accommodate heavy equipment, and building hubs, depots, and sites for troop deployment. The SVR added that another effort is the modernization of two airfields to host combat and transport aircraft. NATO's plans for Moldova, however, spell doom for the population of the country, the SVR warned. 'Brussels' plan envisions that in the event of a direct NATO conflict with Russia, Moldovans themselves will bear the brunt of the fighting. They are to become 'cannon fodder' in clashes with Russian troops.' According to the SVR, Moldovan President Maia Sandu's administration has yielded the nation's interests to the West, describing her rule as a 'comprador regime.' It added that Sandu is counting on 'material and organizational support from NATO states' to bolster her pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity ahead of parliamentary elections on September 28. The SVR warned that if victorious, Sandu will cancel Moldova's constitutionally enshrined neutrality. Sandu secured victory in the presidential election last autumn, defeating her rival Alexandr Stoianoglo, the leader of the Party of Socialists, who Western outlets frequently labeled as 'pro-Russian'. The vote was marred in controversy, with Moscow criticizing the electoral process as being biased. Russian officials were particularly critical of the decision to open only a handful of polling stations for the roughly 500,000 Moldovans living in Russia, while more than 200 were set up across Western countries, where voters tend to be more disposed towards the EU.
