then faced Australia's 'trial of the century': The making of mushroom murders
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Erin Patterson was found guilty on Monday of murdering three members of her husband's family by serving them a seemingly sumptuous beef Wellington lunch laced with deadly death cap mushrooms.
The mushroom murders
On July 29, 2023, Erin Patterson, a 50-year-old mother of two, served up what appeared to be a sumptuous beef Wellington at her Leongatha home. The dish, tender eye fillet steak, golden flaky pastry, and a duxelles of finely minced mushrooms, hid a deadly secret: it was laced with death cap mushrooms, one of the most lethal fungi on earth.
Her guests that day were her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle, Heather and Ian Wilkinson, a local pastor. Hours later, the guests fell violently ill as the deadly amatoxin from the mushrooms attacked their organs. Heather died on August 4, followed by Gail later that day, and Don the next. Only Ian survived — a lone witness to a meal that would become the centerpiece of a murder investigation.
'Trial of the century'
When Patterson was charged on November 2, 2023, with three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, a community was left reeling. And when her trial opened in April 2025, the courtroom in quiet Morwell became a magnet for journalists, podcasters, and true crime obsessives.
According to AFP, the courtroom spectacle has been dubbed Australia's "trial of the century".
After weeks of forensic testimony, expert analysis, and chilling details, a jury took just seven days to deliver its verdict: guilty on all counts.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The mystery of why Patterson served death in pastry remains, but its place in Australian criminal history is sealed.
The exact motive behind Patterson's act of murder was never definitively proven in court, and even the surviving victim, Ian Wilkinson, admitted he couldn't understand what drove her to kill. However, prosecutors pointed to several factors that suggested intent.
'Sick of this sh**'
Patterson had a strained and bitter relationship with her estranged husband Simon, fueled by disputes over child support.
She was reportedly frustrated that her in-laws refused to side with her during these conflicts, at one point writing to a friend that she was 'sick of this sh**' and wanted 'nothing to do with them.'
Patterson went to considerable lengths that indicated premeditation: she lured the victims to lunch by lying about having cancer, used a food dehydrator (later found dumped at a rubbish tip with traces of deadly mushrooms), and may have gathered the toxic fungi herself, according to phone records and local death cap sightings. While she claimed in court that she loved the victims and had no intent to harm, the jury concluded that her actions were deliberate and planned, though the deeper personal reasons behind her fatal choice remain largely a mystery.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Australian Cop, Who Shot Dead An Indigenous Teen In 2019, Was A Racist
An Australian police officer who fatally shot an Indigenous teenager during an attempted arrest in 2019 was racist and worked in an environment "with hallmarks of institutional racism", a coroner has found. The killing of 19-year-old Kumanjayi Walker by then-Police Constable Zachary Rolfe in the remote Northern Territory community of Yuendumu sparked protests and renewed scrutiny of Australia's treatment of its First Nations people. Rolfe, who had been stabbed by Walker in the shoulder with a pair of scissors during the confrontation, argued his actions were in self defence and was cleared of murder and manslaughter charges by a jury in March 2022. A mandatory coronial inquest into Walker's death in custody began six months later and stretched for more than three years. In findings handed down on Monday, Northern Territory Coroner Elisabeth Armitage said: "I am satisfied that Mr Rolfe was racist and that he worked in and was the beneficiary of an organisation with hallmarks of institutional racism." "This was not a case of one bad apple," she said. She said she could not exclude the possibility that Rolfe's racist attitudes "were operative" during the confrontation and a "contributing cause of Kumanjayi's death". It comes despite an investigation into the Northern Territory Police Force last year finding that while there had been historical racism, there was no evidence of racist behaviour since 2015. Armitage said Rolfe also had an interest in "adrenaline-style policing" with a tendency to use excessive force and "dehumanise" suspects. She said this "may have led him to error" when arresting Walker. Rolfe was dismissed as an officer in 2023, after criticising the Northern Territory Police Force and the coronial process. Rolfe's lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Northern Territory Police Force said it had started anti-racism strategies during the inquest and would examine the coroner's recommendations in consultation with Indigenous leaders. Indigenous Australians are one of the most incarcerated groups in the world. Over 500 Indigenous Australians have died in custody since a royal commission in 1991 made 339 recommendations to prevent such deaths.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Erin Patterson found guilty in ‘Mushroom Murders' case: Timeline of what transpired after a fateful lunch killed 3 in 2023
Australian cook Erin Patterson has been found guilty of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in the 'Mushroom Murders' that took place in 2023. The verdict comes after a nearly two-month trial that involved 50 witnesses, a 12-member jury, and a week of deliberation. Erin Patterson found guilty in 'Mushroom Murders' case: A complete timeline On July 29, 2023, Erin Patterson hosted a lunch for some of her relatives. Her guests were her in-laws Don and Gail. They were joined by Ian and Heather, her estranged husband Simon's uncle and aunt. Simon, too, was invited to the lunch but declined the invitation on July 28. During lunch, Erin served Beef Wellington to her guests. The very next day, all four of them were admitted to hospital after experiencing vomiting and suffering from diarrhea . Gail and Heather died a few days later on August 4. Don died the next day despite receiving a liver transplant. Ian, however, recovered and eventually returned home on September 21 after spending some time in hospital. In November, Erin was formally charged in connection with the incident. This eventually led to a trial in which she was accused of deliberately contaminating the food with death cap mushrooms, highly toxic fungi that she picked based on their location posted on a public website. Her defence countered by claiming that this was a 'terrible accident' that occurred when Erin tried to enhance the dish's taste. Death cap mushrooms contain amanita toxins, which interfere with protein synthesis in liver cells and potentially cause liver failure approximately two days after being eaten. Originally from Europe, Death cap mushrooms have been spotted in multiple Australian states. Around the time of the 'Mushroom Murders' , they were said to be growing not far from Patterson's residence in rural Victoria. The verdict suggests that the jury agreed with the prosecution's claims about Erin travelling to two sites to deliberately pick Death cap mushrooms for the meal. Interestingly, Erin had fed the leftover Beef Wellington to her children after scraping off the mushrooms and pastry. What's next for Erin Patterson? Now that Erin Patterson has been found guilty, she will be taken into custody. This will be followed by a plea hearing on a later date, which is when the defence and prosecution will make submissions about what they think the sentence should be. The actual sentencing will take place later with Erin facing a maximum of a life sentence. Under Australian law, Erin will have 28 days from the date of sentencing to start filling an appeal against the verdict. The legal team may verdict itself, the term handed down, or even target both
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Erin Patterson? Australian woman found guilty of all counts in mushroom murders case
A woman from Australia was found guilty on Monday of killing three of her estranged husband's elderly relatives by serving them a meal with poisonous mushrooms. The case drew major attention across the country. 50-year-old Erin Patterson was convicted of murdering her mother-in-law, Gail Patterson, her father-in-law, Donald Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson.(via REUTERS) The trial lasted ten weeks and gained a lot of attention from both local and international media. Who is Erin Patterson? 50-year-old Erin Patterson was convicted of murdering her mother-in-law, Gail Patterson, her father-in-law, Donald Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson. She was also found guilty of trying to kill Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson. The four victims visited Erin Patterson's house in Leongatha, a small town about 84 miles southeast of Melbourne, where she served them beef Wellington, mashed potatoes, and green beans. Later the investigors found that the meals contained deadly death cap mushrooms. A jury in Morwell, a town around two hours from Melbourne, found her guilty of all charges. During weeks of testimony, Patterson was accused of deliberately tainting the lunch with death cap mushrooms, highly toxic fungi that she picked after seeing their location posted on a public website. In the days after, her former parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, died along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. Heather's husband Ian, their local pastor, survived after a weekslong stay in hospital. Also Read: Woman accused of killing in-laws with poisoned mushrooms; jury to decide fate Her defense lawyers had argued the deaths were a 'terrible accident' that occurred when Patterson tried to improve the taste of the meal, and that she repeatedly lied to police out of panic when she realized she may have added foraged mushrooms to the mix. Patterson sat in court, listening as prosecutors called witness after witness, whose testimony, they alleged, told a compelling story of a triple murder that the jury ultimately found satisfied the legal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. Under Australian law, none of the jurors can be publicly identified, and they're prohibited from disclosing jury room deliberations even after the trial ends. It will never be known which pieces of evidence influenced each juror's decision, but all 12 were required to agree on the verdict.
