logo
'Glaswegians are sick and tired of paying more to get less in return'

'Glaswegians are sick and tired of paying more to get less in return'

Glasgow Times19 hours ago

Perhaps Mr Franklin could also see into the future where left-wing Scottish and UK governments under the SNP and Labour have gone out of their way to ensure that more and more of our hard-earned money ends up in their pockets and not our own.
In Scotland, we are taxed at a UK level but also let's not forget that the devolved parliament at Holyrood has chosen to exercise its tax powers many times.
Unsurprisingly, this has led to a situation in which ordinary hard-working Scots are taxed at a higher level than others in the UK.
I'm not talking about millionaires.
This income tax gap between Scots and their counterparts south of the border is hitting people like retail managers, tradespeople, police officers, nurses and teachers; all of whom, and more, are taxed more than their colleagues in England.
It is for the Scottish people to decide at next year's Holyrood elections if they are happy with this situation, though, in as far as I see, this extra taxation hasn't resulted in any improvement in public services such as education or health.
Glaswegians are sick and tired of paying more to get less in return.
I mention this as a segue into the explanation for my vote in favour of a visitor levy tax in Glasgow at last week's City Administration Committee.
As a Conservative, I don't like to vote for increases in taxes or, just as bad, the introduction of new ones.
However, we have a situation in Scotland where the woeful SNP administration, now nearly two decades old nationally and almost a decade in power here in Glasgow, has taxed hard-working Glaswegians to pip squeaking proportions, while at the same time delivering sub-par services and a city that looks dirty and unloved.
Only in February did the same SNP in cahoots with their far-left Green colleagues increase council tax by an eye-watering 7.5%.
The SNP government, in an attempt to mitigate their own raiding of local authority funding to pay for giveaways, has allowed such council tax increases but also has given councils powers to raise more funding of their own in order to pay for services.
The Visitor Levy is one such scheme, allowing accommodation providers to charge a 5% tax on rooms to those choosing Glasgow as a destination, with the added bonus (for local authorities at least) that the provider will be responsible for the collection and administration of this levy.
My concern has always been that already hard-pressed residents would not find themselves burdened by further taxation.
The LEZ (Low Emission Zone) is proving to be a bit of a pot of gold for this administration, with the promise of a congestion charge to come.
So, it seemed not unreasonable that visitors to Glasgow should pay a contribution to the amenities they enjoy while here.
I received assurances that small businesses would be helped with administration difficulties, and the promise that they would be able to hold on to 1.5% of the take to help cover costs (something the anti-business Greens wanted to remove after a period).
This satisfied me that the "hit" to local businesses, particularly those running small B&Bs as well as Airbnb providers, would not be significant enough to cause harm to their long-term futures with the policy being constantly reviewed.
Opportunists like Reform UK will promise Glaswegians the world but they do not have a plan about how to pay for it.
To Glasgow Conservatives like me, who live in the real world, the lesser of two evils was to vote for a levy on visitors, following the path of cities around the UK and the world.
That way I hope we can minimise some of the damage the SNP have done to our local services and protect the wallets of already way overtaxed Glaswegians.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ayrshire road maintenance jobs at risk as Amey plan cuts
Ayrshire road maintenance jobs at risk as Amey plan cuts

Daily Record

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Ayrshire road maintenance jobs at risk as Amey plan cuts

Up to 100 road maintenance workers could be made redundant after trunk road operator Amey announced job cuts. Road maintenance workers in Ayrshire could be facing redundancy after trunk road operator Amey announced job cuts. The firm has began a 45-day consultation period with "a very small proportion of employees" after an operation review of their business. ‌ Up to 100 workers could be made redundant across Southwest Scotland including many in Ayrshire as a result of the plans. ‌ Unite the Union have said that they will "do all we can" to support the people affected and have called on Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop to take action. Transport Scotland have said they are aware of the situation but are awaiting further details from Amey. South Scotland MSP Carol Mochan raised the issue at First Minister's Questions last week and highlighted the A77, one of the trunk roads maintained by Amey, as "one of the most dangerous roads in Scotland". Ms Mochan has also said she will fight to ensure no one employed by Amey in Southwest Scotland loses their job. Speaking in the Scottish Parliament, she said: 'The First Minister might be aware that Amey plans to make up to 100 road maintenance workers in Ayrshire and Dumfries and Galloway redundant. 'Those workers are funded by a Scottish Government contract. The A77 is one of the most dangerous roads in Scotland and causes constant disruption to the economy of the southwest due to its poor state of repair. ‌ 'My constituents have frequent lengthy waits at road works and often face miles of diversions. 'Will the First Minister travel that road with me and explain to my constituents why 100 workers who should be helping to maintain that important road are losing their jobs?' In response, First Minister John Swinney said: 'I understand that those issues are the subject of consultation between Amey and the relevant trade unions. ‌ 'I want to make sure that that consultation is done properly and in accordance with the Government's fair work principles. I understand the importance of Carol Mochan's point, but there is a process to go through on those issues, and the outcome that will be achieved through that might not be the one that Carol Mochan fears. 'I will ask the Cabinet Secretary for Transport to consider the issues that have been raised and to reply to Carol Mochan about how those points can be properly and fully addressed.' ‌ David McGurk, Unite industrial officer, said: "Unite has been informed by Amey that up to 100 jobs are at immediate risk. The workers are currently employed on a road maintenance contract funded by Transport Scotland and directly supported by the Scottish Government across Dumfries and Galloway, Glasgow and Ayrshire. "Unite will do all we can to support these highly skilled workers who are ensuring that our nation's infrastructure is safe, reliable and up to the highest possible standard. "We have asked Fiona Hyslop, the Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure, for action from government to ascertain what can be done to save these jobs including an immediate review of the contracts awarded to Amey." ‌ A spokesperson for Amey said: 'Due to the changing needs in the delivery of the service we have reviewed the operational structure of the business. As a result, Amey has entered a 45-day consultation process with a number of employees on our South-West Scotland Network Management contract. 'A very small proportion of employees will be impacted with most of these achieved through the offer of voluntary redundancy. 'We will continue to deliver value for money services and will work closely with all affected employees and trade union representatives to ensure the consultation is fair, transparent, and supportive.' ‌ A Transport Scotland spokesperson said: 'We have been made aware of the situation at Amey and are awaiting further details of the confidential process they are currently undertaking. 'It is essential that a robust level of service is maintained as part of our maintenance contract in the South West trunk road unit.'

Celebrities call for UK Government not to ban Palestine Action
Celebrities call for UK Government not to ban Palestine Action

The National

time30 minutes ago

  • The National

Celebrities call for UK Government not to ban Palestine Action

On Sunday, from Glastonbury's Other Stage, singer-songwriter Nadine Shah read out a statement against the UK Government's decision to ban campaign group Palestine Action. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has published a draft order which would the group as terrorist organisations in the UK, meaning supporting or joining them could lead to up to 14 years in jail. READ MORE: Labour accused of 'breath-taking hypocrisy' over English oil refinery rescue In an open letter, leading artists including musicians Paul Weller, Massive Attack's Robert del Naja, Brian Eno and US artist Reggie Watts have joined Shah Actors Steve Coogan and Billy Howle are among those signing the statement which states: 'Palestine Action is intervening to stop a genocide. It is acting to save life.' Writers including Kamila Shamsie, Laline Paull and Pankaj Mishra have also signed, and said: 'Labelling non-violent direct action as 'terrorism' is an abuse of language and an attack on democracy.' They are joined by visual artists Jeremy Deller and Florence Peake, comedians Boyle, Francesca Martinez and Tez Ilyas. The open letter concludes: 'The real threat to the life of the nation comes not from Palestine Action but from Home Secretary Yvonne Cooper's efforts to ban it'. READ MORE: Protesters target Wimbledon over Barclays sponsorship links to Israeli arms firms In addition to the joint statement, Brian Eno said: 'On the one hand, 60,000 dead. On the other, a splash of paint on a plane. Which one are you most troubled by?' Poet Alice Oswald commented: 'Thank goodness for those who break minor laws in an attempt to uphold law itself". A spokesperson for Artists for Palestine UK said: 'Never before has a decision like this been challenged so immediately by artists and so widely across the country. If the Government persists with this ban, it will face anger and opposition on a massive scale.' The artists' statement in full "Palestine Action is intervening to stop a genocide. It is acting to save life. We deplore the government's decision to proscribe it. Labelling non-violent direct action as 'terrorism' is an abuse of language and an attack on democracy. "The real threat to the life of the nation comes not from Palestine Action but from the home secretary's efforts to ban it. We call on the government to withdraw its proscription of Palestine Action and to stop arming Israel."

Cabinet minister urges MPs to back welfare Bill as rebellion looms
Cabinet minister urges MPs to back welfare Bill as rebellion looms

Powys County Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Cabinet minister urges MPs to back welfare Bill as rebellion looms

A Cabinet minister has urged Labour MPs to back the Government's welfare Bill in a crunch vote as Sir Keir Starmer continues to face a major rebellion despite making concessions to disgruntled backbenchers. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds warned that retreating entirely from the reforms would mean losing the chance to 'make any changes for the better whatsoever' and undermining 'public support'. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, are enough to win over Labour rebels. But ahead of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill's second reading in the Commons on Tuesday evening, some 39 backbenchers signed an amendment rejecting the legislation. That number is far lower than the 83 needed to overturn the Prime Minister's majority, but leading rebel Rachel Maskell has warned 'many more' have told her they still plan to vote against the Government's plans. 'I'd ask (colleagues) to support the Government on that basis, because clearly what we've got here is something which is better than the existing system,' Mr Reynolds told Sky News on Tuesday morning. Asked whether MPs would lose the whip for voting against the Government, he said he was 'not aware of anything like that' but 'those issues are for the chief whip'. To see off the threat of far greater rebellion, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. It also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher UC rate for those already claiming the health-related element. But critics have argued the concessions risk creating a 'three-tier' system of disparity between existing and new claimants, as well as any future changes that emerge as a result of the Timms review. Facing questions from broadcasters on Tuesday morning, Mr Reynolds insisted it was 'entirely normal' for existing entitlements to be 'grandfathered' during major changes to the welfare system. 'There are people in the UK getting severe disablement allowance. That closed to new entrants in 2001. So this is quite common,' he said. He added: 'If people think Governments will dodge difficult issues, spend a lot of money even on outcomes they don't think are very good, and the public don't support, and if that chance to reform the system is seen to have been lost entirely, that undermines public support.' Speaking to BBC Breakfast, the minister warned: 'If we were to completely retreat from this, I think we would lose the chance to make any changes for the better whatsoever.' Some 126 Labour MPs had previously signed a 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier that would have stopped the legislation if approved. The Government looks set to have averted a revolt on that scale after watering down its reforms following a series of crisis talks with leading rebels last week, but backbench anger continues to simmer. York Central MP Rachel Maskell said that many more backbenchers than the 39 who put their names to her amendment had told her they plan to reject the Government's package of reforms. She said she had no fear in voting down the Bill and felt a 'moral duty' to 'speak up for' disabled people. 'Yes, I support getting disabled people into work where they've been discriminated and dismissed, of course that's important, but when those people can't work or need longer to prepare for work, it is vital we don't remove their lifeline,' she said. 'Or else they'll disappear further and further into the margins.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store