India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats
On top of a new 25 per cent tariff on India's exports to the US, Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia.
But the sources said there would be no immediate changes.
"These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight."
Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector.
Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said.
The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy.
Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions.
However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia.
"On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
India's top supplier
Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks.
He has threatened 100 per cent tariffs on US imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine.
Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35 per cent of its overall supplies.
India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources.
But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand.
Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp , Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters.
Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU.
Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump goes off the rails over Epstein, again blames Barack Obama in explosive new meltdown
Donald Trump is again blaming Barack Obama. He claims Obama plotted against his presidency. This comes as Trump faces scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump accuses Obama of a 'coup'. He says Obama tried to undermine his win. Tulsi Gabbard supports Trump's claims. She alleges Obama created false evidence. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is Trump reviving the 'coup' narrative now? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does Tulsi Gabbard allege about Barack Obama? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How is Donald Trump responding to renewed Epstein scrutiny? FAQs US President Donald Trump is lashing out again, this time deflecting questions about Jeffrey Epstein by reviving old allegations against Barack Obama. In a flurry of Truth Social posts, Trump accused Obama of planning a "coup" to undermine his 2016 election win. His allies support him, but critics call it a distraction. Now, a tragic twist involving a known Epstein victim has emerged in Trump's pressure mounts, Trump resurrects debunked claims, promotes conspiracy theories, and accuses Obama-era intelligence officials of treason in a fiery Trump is reiterating the discredited conspiracy theory that former President Barack Obama orchestrated a "coup" following the 2016 election, vehemently asserting that those implicated "must pay," as quoted in a report by The Daily to a report, in a series of Truth Social posts, Trump has reverted to his previous strategy, diverting his MAGA supporters from the intensifying Epstein files controversy by reiterating unfounded allegations against Obama and senior U.S. intelligence officials who determined that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.'The Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX is now TOTALLY UNDISPUTED! THE FACTS ARE ALL THERE, IN BLACK AND WHITE,' Trump asserted on Truth Social Friday morning. 'It is the biggest scandal in American History. The perpetrators of this CRIME must pay a big price. This can never be allowed to happen in our Country again!'Trump went one step further and posted a video from The Daily Signal in which right-wing pundit Victor Davis Hanson claimed that Obama-era intelligence officers were planning to "destroy" him following his victory over Hillary Clinton. "The crime of the century must be paid for by them," Trump continued, as per a Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, made accusations earlier this month that are the source of the most recent attacks. Using recently declassified documents as support, she asserted that Barack Obama and top national security officials engaged in a "treasonous conspiracy" to create false proof of Russian election meddling in order to sabotage the validity of the 2016 election order to undermine Trump's triumph, Gabbard claimed that Obama and senior intelligence officials purposefully produced phony evidence of Russian intervention. This was a concerted attempt, she claimed, to undermine the legitimacy of the new government right away, as quoted in a report by The Daily also charged Obama's team with creating the framework for what she called a "years-long coup" against Trump by spreading false material to support attacks on his accusations are based on a purported inconsistency in January 2017 U.S. intelligence reports. Although the studies determined that Russia conducted an influence effort to support Trump's campaign, she says there are unverified reports that Moscow manipulated vote counts to Trump's Obama administration has maintained that Russia did not alter any vote totals or compromise American voting machines in spite of these allegations.A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report from 2020 verified that Russia did try to use influence operations to support Trump's 2016 Obama's team and independent agencies have repeatedly confirmed that no vote totals were recent flurry of posts that target Barack Obama arrived as his relationship with convicted offender Jeffrey Epstein, who passed away in August 2019, comes under increasing has long claimed he cut ties with Epstein over a 'business dispute,' but now suggests the fallout stemmed from Epstein 'stealing' young staff members from Mar-a-Lago.'He took people. I said, 'Don't do it anymore,' because they work for me,' Trump said, referring to his former resort Trump's supporters, including Dan Scavino, applaud his online offensive, others see it as a calculated effort to divert attention away from the Epstein FBI's previous investigation into Hillary Clinton's alleged efforts to link Trump to Putin resurfaced in his posts, though analysts note that much of that claim could be attributed to Russian is claiming that Obama orchestrated a plot to delegitimize his presidency without providing any Trump's comments have resurfaced as public attention returns to his past ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Ukraine is betting big on its interceptor drones in war against Russia
Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level recently. Russia in July alone launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. read more The Ukraine war in a new phase. Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level. Russia in July launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. That's the most in any month since the beginning of the war in 2022. On July 9 alone Russia launched over 700 strikes against Ukraine using its Iranian-made Shahed drones. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine is now attempting to combat Russia's attacks via interceptor drones. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. 'I met with representatives of this production and with other manufacturers. Our request is 1,000 interceptors per day,' Zelenskyy said. But what do we know about interceptor drones? How do they work? Why are they so important to Ukraine? Let's take a closer look Interceptor drones and how they work First, let's take a closer look at interceptor drones. While drones are Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAVs), interceptor drones are UAVs built to find, follow and destroy other drones and airborne threats. These drones are built to actively engage with threats. They work autonomously or semi-autonomously. They come with features such as advanced sensing, autonomous navigation capabilities in order to maneuver at high speeds, recognising targets automatically and precision hovering. They are also equipped with net launchers, electronic jammers, and kamikaze-style impactors. They use advanced navigation tech like AI-powered inertial navigation systems. They work by using their radar, spotters or sensors to spot incoming threats. Some are synced up with a country's air defence network. This allows them to respond to threats in real time – at a fraction of the cost of missile systems or ground-based radar systems. Once they intercept enemy UAVs, they can either ram into them – known as the Kamikaze method – use nets and even explosives to down the enemy's object. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These interceptor drones are smaller than other UAVs and faster – which allows them to intercept – as well as highly manouverable. For example, experts say the Shahed drones Russia is using can fly between 200 and 300 kilometres per hour. They are also more effective when they are autonomous. As Lyuba Shipovich, CEO of Dignitas, which helps train Ukrainian soldiers on interceptors, told The Interpreter, 'You can't expect to have 700 operators for 700 drones during a mass strike like the ones we're seeing now. AI allows us to launch swarms of interceptor drones without that limitation.' Though they are more expensive than regular drones, they do not cost nearly as much as other defensive systems. Anti-aircraft missiles, for example, can cost as much as $1 million (Rs 8.5 crore), while surface-to-air missiles can cost between $40,000 (Rs 34.98 lakh) and $100,000 ( Rs 87.44 lakh) A single interceptor drone can cost as little as $5,000 (Rs 4.39 lakh). Kamikaze interceptor drones are even cheaper, costing as little as $200 (Rs 20,000) to $2000 (Rs 2.20 lakh). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Ukraine's armed forces that's a downright bargain. Why are they important to Ukraine Because interceptor drones can combat Russia's Shahed drones, which have become a menace in Ukraine. The Russian strategy has been to overwhelm Ukraine and demoralise its defenders through sheer numbers. In July, Russia sent 6,297 long-range drones into Ukraine. That figure is 14 times what it was in July 2024, when Russia sent around 400 drones. From June 1 to June 20, Russia hit Ukraine with 3,681 Shahed drones and fake UAVs. This completely disrupted the rhythm of Ukraine's defenders. A year ago, the monthly average was at around 600 UAVs per month. Experts say these are estimates and that real numbers may even be higher. Worse, Russia is ramping up its production of Shahed drones to nearly 100 UAVs per day. They now fly two to four kilometres above the ground – putting them out of reach of ground fire. Kyiv predicts Moscow will be looking to manufacture 30,000 long-range drones and two million FPV (first-person-view) drones this entire year. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. AP Which is why Ukraine is betting big on interceptor drones. Indeed, Zelenskyy even said the same at the G7 in Canada in June. 'In particular, we are working on interceptor drones to enhance protection against Shaheds', Zelenskyy said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Many Ukrainian companies are already working on this task. Wild Hornets, a non-profit group making UAVs for Ukraine, has had great success with its Sting interceptor drone against the Shahed drones. 'You can make a drone, for example, at a firm like us, fast, cheap, and en masse,' a company representative told the Kyiv Independent. 'While missiles for an S-300 are unique technologies, that maybe, seems to me, a few companies in the world can make, and more than half of those are in Russia.' Even though Ukraine has been the world's largest importer of weapons from 2020 to 2024 and is buying millions of drones, experts say it isn't doing enough. They say it needs to ramp up production even further to counter Russia. 'Russia is going to bomb our entire country with Shahed drones. They have significantly increased production and will continue to do so. If we don't act immediately, our infrastructure, our production and our defence systems will be destroyed', military and communications expert Serhiy Beskrestnov wrote on social media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, it is important to note that these interceptor drones are no silver bullet. 'We're already using them, and we are expanding their use. But they can't replace everything. We have to understand that anti-drone air defence is a complex system,' Yuriy Ignat, a spokesman for the Ukrainian air force, told The Telegraph. 'First, they don't have a very long range – only a few dozen kilometres. Secondly, you need to scale up the depth of territory they cover. They only work locally. And they can't always fly, in bad weather, fog, and so on.' Simply put, they are an important piece of Ukraine's defence puzzle.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump praises ‘registered' Republican Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad, bashes ‘woke' Taylor Swift
US President Donald Trump criticised carmaker Jaguar and pop star Taylor Swift in a new post on his social media platform Truth Social, while praising actress Sydney Sweeney for her recent advertisement with American Eagle. In the post, President Trump said Sydney Sweeney, who is a registered Republican, has 'the hottest ad out there' and that the American Eagle jeans she promoted are 'flying off the shelves.' He encouraged people to support her by saying, 'Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump then criticised Jaguar for what he described as a 'woke' advertisement, which he said had damaged the brand. He claimed the company is now in 'absolute turmoil' and noted that the CEO had resigned. 'Who wants to buy a Jaguar after looking that disgraceful ad?' he wrote. He compared Jaguar's situation to that of Bud Light, saying the beer brand was hurt financially after launching a campaign that he viewed as too progressive. 'The market cap destruction has been unprecedented, with billions of dollars lost,' Trump said, according to AP. The President also claimed he destroyed Swift's popularity when he posted to Truth Social in May that the megastar was 'no longer hot.' 'Or just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift. Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can't stand her,' he wrote. The post reflects President Trump's ongoing criticism of brands and public figures he sees as aligning with liberal causes, AP noted.
