Japan warns of China's military moves as biggest strategic challenge
China's growing joint operations with Russia also pose serious security concerns to Japan, along with increasing tension around Taiwan and threats coming from North Korea, the Defense Ministry said in an annual military report submitted to Cabinet on Tuesday.
'The international society is in a new crisis era as it faces the biggest challenges since the end of World War II,' the report said, citing significant changes to the global power balance while raising concern about an escalation of the China-U.S. rivalry.
The security threats are concentrated in the Indo-Pacific, where Japan is located, and could get worse in the future, report says.
Japan has accelerated its military buildup on southwestern islands in recent years, preparing to deploy long-distance cruise missiles, as it worries about a conflict in Taiwan, which China claims as its territory to be annexed by force if necessary. Taiwan launched 10-day annual live-fire military exercises last week intended to guard against Chinese threats to invade. Japan tested a short-range, surface-to-ship missile at home earlier last month.
Chinese warships' advance into the Pacific has steadily increased, with the frequency of their passage off southwestern Japan tripling in the past three years, including in waters between Taiwan and its neighboring Japanese island of Yonaguni, the 534-page report said.
The report comes days after Japan demanded China stop flying its fighter jets abnormally close to Japanese intelligence-gathering aircraft, which it said was happening repeatedly and could cause a collision. Beijing, in return, accused Japan of flying near Chinese airspace for spying purposes.
Two earlier close encounters in June occurred over the Pacific Ocean, where Japan spotted two Chinese aircraft carriers operating together for the first time.
China's increasing dispatch of aircraft carriers in the Pacific underscores the country's attempt to advance its sea power in distant waters, the report said. It said China's frequent dispatch of bombers for long distance flights in the Pacific by more sophisticated flight routes and fleet organization is seen as Beijing's attempt to show off its presence around Japan and to further advance its operational capability.
The Defense Ministry noted two cases last year — a Chinese warplane's brief violation of Japanese airspace over waters off islands near Nagasaki and an aircraft carrier's entry into a zone just outside of Japan's territorial waters further southwest in the Nansei island chain.
With U.S. President Donald Trump focusing on the strengthening of the U.S. economy and security, Japan and other U.S. allies face expectations to play a greater role for peace and stability in the region, the report said.
North Korea poses 'an increasingly serious and imminent threat' for Japan's security, the report said, noting the North's development of missiles carrying nuclear warheads into the Japanese territory and solid-fuel ICBM that can reach the U.S. mainland.
Russia maintains active military operations around Japan and violated the country's airspace in September, the report added, saying its increasing strategic cooperation with China has posed 'strong concern' for Japan's security.
___
Reeno Hashimoto in Tokyo contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
34 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
U.S.-Canada trade talks back underway as Trump's wish list, from oil to DEI, keeps growing
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. U.S. President Donald Trump arriving before speaking at a ceremony to sign the "Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act," in the East Room of the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Washington. Photo by Evan Vucci / AP Trade talks are reportedly continuing between Canada and the U.S., with formal meetings having taken place since U.S. President Donald Trump revealed more threats and demands last week, a source close to the White House said. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday that he expected U.S. tariffs would likely be part of any future deal. 'There is not much evidence at the moment — from the deals, agreements and negotiations with the Americans, for any country or any jurisdiction — to get a deal without tariffs,' Carney said. He also said he expected trade talks to 'intensify' in the next few weeks. Washington and Ottawa have been engaged in tempestuous trade talks for months. Carney's team is desperate to end tariffs imposed by Trump on Canadian steel and aluminum exports and keep tariff exemptions for goods covered by the U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade deal (USMCA). Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alberta for a G7 meeting, June 16, 2025. Photo by Gavin Young/Postmedia Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again After Carney's election in April, things appeared to be going well for awhile: Carney visited the White House, he seemingly got Trump to drop his talk of making Canada a '51st state,' and the prime minister quickly gave in when the president threatened to end talks if Canada didn't scrap its digital services tax (DST) on U.S. tech firms. Carney also pledged last month to increase defence expenditures dramatically to meet a higher NATO spending target by 2035, a priority of Trump's. It looked like negotiations could lead to a new U.S.-Canada deal before the July 21 deadline the two of them had set for themselves. Trump wrote an open letter to the prime minister last week, threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods starting Aug. 1, vaguely citing as reasons Ottawa's trade deficit, counter tariffs, dairy trade restrictions, and failure to halt fentanyl from crossing the border. What Trump didn't do — as he had done with the DST — was outline exactly what Carney needed to do to get things back on track. National Post looks at the reasons Trump might have wanted to derail the negotiations — and what other surprises the White House might have in store. Trump 'likes to keep us in suspense,' says Andrew Hale, a senior policy analyst at Heritage Foundation. But there is a timing issue at play here that goes beyond the negotiations. 'Basically, they have a window of time to use these 'Liberation Day' tariffs,' he says, referring to Trump's sweeping new international tariff regime unveiled in April. Hale said there is significant legal pushback facing the administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) that ostensibly gives the president power to circumvent Congress to impose tariffs in urgent situations. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. So far, there have been a few court rulings against Trump's use of IEEPA tariffs. Oral arguments in the U.S. Court of Appeals are scheduled to begin for one of those rulings on July 31, with another court set to hear two other tariff-related cases in September. To use IEEPA, a genuine emergency needs to be declared. What Trump did was declare emergencies based on trade deficits, drug trafficking, and immigration. Well, 'we've been running trade deficits for decades,' says Hale. U.S. j udges have ruled that there is no direct connection between the national emergency declared over fentanyl and illegal migration. The court rulings could still go either way. '(Trump's team is) concerned that they will no longer be able to weaponize these (tariffs) in trade negotiations,' Hale adds. 'By simply heaping on the pressure and saying, 'Bam, you get these tariffs, you're getting increased tariffs and the rest of it,' they're trying to get as many concessions as possible whilst they can still use them.' If Trump's emergency tariffs lose in court, he'd be left with the less-powerful weapon to restrict imports deemed a national security threat, under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. 'I do know that Plan B is to use the 232 tariffs as an alternative more aggressively,' Hale said. But he notes that they are product-specific and do not allow for across-the-board tariffs. Tori Smith, a senior vice president at Forbes Tate Partners, a government-relations consultancy in Washington, points out that Trump's Aug. 1 deadline doesn't seem random given the appeal hearing against emergency tariffs set to start on July 31. She also notes that the review scheduled of the USMCA, as part of its original terms, begins in October. Trump's letter, Smith said, was probably meant to 'create leverage for the United States in advance of the USMCA review.' Smith said the 'long-game strategy' for the White House is to put it in the 'strongest position for (the USMCA) negotiations.' There may also be something more personal going on, according to a source close to the administration, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The NAFTA negotiations in Trump's first term that led to the USMCA were headed by United States Trade Representative (USTR) Ambassador Robert Lighthizer, who had a cordial relationship with Canada's then-foreign affairs minister Chrystia Freeland. In the process, Lighthizer reportedly neutralized Peter Navarro, then director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy , a fierce protectionist and Trump loyalist, who is now a senior adviser to the president on trade. 'He's never really forgiven Lighthizer for that,' the source said. (Lighthizer has since returned to private life.) Robert Lighthizer speaks during a town-hall style meeting, Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2024, in Braselton. Photo by Mike Stewart While the USMCA was once touted by U.S. officials as the 'gold standard' of trade deals, possibly the reason the administration has talked of ripping it up 'was because Navarro sees that as Lighthizer's golden legacy, and he has reasons … personal bitterness, to rip it up.' David Boling, a former deputy assistant USTR for Japan, said he never witnessed the two men in meetings together and couldn't comment on their working relationship. But they had very different styles, he recalled. 'Lighthizer skillfully renegotiated NAFTA by building up trust with Capitol Hill Democrats. Coalition-building, however, is not Navarro's strong suit,' said Boling, who now works at the political-risk consultancy Eurasia Group. Navarro recently said he didn't like negotiating with Canada, while Mexico's negotiators were a 'pure joy to deal with.' 'You know, they (Mexicans) were tough negotiators, but they were reasonable, fair negotiators. The Canadians were very, very difficult, and they've always been very difficult,' he said in a television interview last week. Little downside for Trump It seems that the more Trump has pushed for concessions from Canada — on defence, on digital taxes, on fentanyl crackdowns — the more he's been able to get. Sources say his senior economic team feels they have to sell the president on deal structures, but that Trump often feels he can press for more. 'I think that this can be demonstrated pretty obviously by the Vietnam announcement,' says Smith, noting how Vietnam's team thought they would be getting a lower tariff rate than 20 per cent, but then Trump 'put out a different rate than had been negotiated or talked about by his team.' Trump mentioned Canada's highly restricted market for dairy in his open letter to Carney. But he might also start pushing for Canada to commit to more things beyond trade, as he has with fentanyl and defence. 'The Trump administration has also leveraged tariffs in matters that go well beyond trade policy with a number of countries,' said Hale. In March, the president warned countries buying Venezuelan oil they would be punished with tariffs on all U.S. exports; in the last two weeks, he's threatened 'severe tariffs' on Russia if it didn't make peace with Ukraine, and tariffs on BRICS-aligned countries (meaning Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa as well as Iran and Indonesia) because he said they wanted to undermine the U.S. dollar. Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during a press conference at the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 7, 2025. Photo by PABLO PORCIUNCULA / AFP So he may want to wield economic pressure to try getting Carney to commit to helping restart a new Canada-U.S. oil pipeline after Keystone XL was killed by the last American president, the source close to the White House said. 'They want the Keystone XL pipeline big time,' the source said. Trump has never stopped wanting that pipeline since he approved it in his first term, and has raised it repeatedly since his re-election, noted Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of the Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment at the Heritage Foundation. 'Everybody knows that Prime Minister Carney has a focus on the environment, rather than fossil fuel production, so I imagine that it might be a sticking point,' she added. So would the fact that, right now, there is no company proposing that project, since the former proponent, TC Energy, abandoned it. Apparently, the White House also wants Carney to loosen up on Liberal social objectives, like ESG (environment, social and governance) and DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion), that have in recent years complicated regulation in Canada, including for American companies that do business here. Trump has been aggressive about deregulating away from social and climate rules in the U.S. since he took office. But Carney is 'religious' about ESG, said the Washington source, which could be a 'real barrier to these things getting forward.' Yet, if Carney got rid of net-zero targets and environmental impediments, 'I think there'd be a massive love-in,' the source added. How many of these new lines of negotiation — dairy, defence, oil, DEI, ESG or others — the president opens is anyone's guess, but what is almost certain is that current trade wrangling will bleed into October's USMCA review and well into 2026, said Smith. 'The next year is going to continue to be very uncertain and rocky for Canada,' she said. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
The Latest: Senate passes $9 billion in spending cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid
Just after 2 a.m. ET, the Senate passed about $9 billion in federal spending cuts requested by President Donald Trump, including deep reductions to public broadcasting and foreign aid, moving forward on his top priorities despite concerns from several Republican senators. The legislation, which now moves to the House, would have a tiny impact on the nation's rising debt but could have major ramifications for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and U.S. food aid internationally. It also could complicate efforts to pass additional spending bills this year, as Democrats and even some Republicans voice objections to broadly ceding congressional spending power with little idea of how the White House Office of Management and Budget would apply the cuts.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Myanmar's military government recaptures strategic town from rebels
BANGKOK (AP) — Myanmar 's military has recaptured a strategic gateway town from rebel forces after nearly a year, state-media reported Thursday, marking a rare turnaround in the country's northeast, where an alliance of ethnic militias seized a large swath of territory in an offensive that began in late 2023. Nawnghkio, which sits on a major highway trading route linking central Myanmar to China, had been under the control of the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, or TNLA, a group in the Three Brotherhood Alliance, since July last year. Its recapture by the army comes after a long period where the military government had been seen as being on the defensive against an array of rebel forces in the civil war that is being fought over much of the country. Nawnghkio, which also stands on the highway leading to the major military garrison town of Pyin Oo Lwin, was completely captured by the army at noon on Wednesday after nearly 11 months of operations to retake the town, according to a state-run Myanma Alinn newspaper report on Thursday. After more than 500 armed engagements, including 20 major clashes, the bodies of 171 members of the TNLA and its allies were recovered and their ammunition supplies were captured, the report said, adding that the military was working to restore the town's administrative mechanisms, remove land mines and ensure the safe return of residents who had fled to avoid fighting. The newspaper also published photos of the soldiers who had recaptured the town in front of the government offices, hospitals, and markets. The Ta'ang National Liberation Army did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Restrictions on reporting make independent confirmation of the town's recapture virtually impossible, though the army's claim has not been challenged. However, in a statement posted Wednesday on the Telegram messaging app, the TNLA said it had moved the group's civil administration and service offices in Nawnghkio to safe locations as the military's intensive offensive operations in the past few months made it difficult to carry out work. The groups in the Three Brotherhood Alliance, which also include the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army and the Arakan Army, have been fighting for decades for greater autonomy from Myanmar's central government and are loosely allied with the People's Defense Force, the pro-democracy resistance that emerged to fight military rule after the army seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021. Since October 2023, the alliance members captured and controlled significant swaths of territory in in northeastern Myanmar near the Chinese border and in western Myanmar. Their victories were seen as forcing the army to go on the defensive over most of the country, while boosting the morale and strategic position of resistance forces. The recapture of Nawnghkio comes more than two months after the TNLA rejected the military's demands to withdraw from five towns controlled by the group, including Nawnghkio, during talks brokered by China in the Chinese city of Kunming in late April. China tries to maintain good relations with both the military government and the groups making up the Three Brotherhood Alliance, but fears that the aggressive posture of the rebel groups destabilizes Myanmar, which is a key Southeast Asian ally of Beijing with large strategic Chinese investments in minerals, energy and infrastructure. Nawnghkio's recapture also comes just more than a week after the military claimed to take back the strategic town of Mobye in southern Shan state, which had been seized since late 2023 by another alliance of ethnic armed organizations in the eastern state of Kayah, also known as Karenni. Myanmar has been in turmoil since the army's 2021 takeover, which led to nationwide peaceful protests that escalated into armed resistance and what now amounts to civil war. Nay Phone Latt, a spokesperson for the opposition's National Unity Government, which coordinates resistance to army rule, told The Associated Press last Friday that the military regime has been trying to retake areas controlled by the resistance ahead of a general election planned for later this year. The poll is widely seen as an attempt to normalize the military's seizure of power through the ballot box and to deliver a result that ensures the generals retain control.
