Erik Menendez needed surgery following complications from kidney stones, daughter says
His daughter, Talia, posted to social media Wednesday night that he had a second surgery "due to complications with both kidneys having multiple large kidney stones." She wrote in the Instagram story that he needs a third surgery.
"Because Erik is in prison, there are often complications and delays with medical care, so this continues to be a very stressful time for us as you all can imagine," she wrote. "He is currently in pain and feeling nauseous, but is recovering."
Attorney Mark Geragos said on Tuesday that Menendez had been diagnosed with a "serious medical condition" but did not provide additional details.
Erik Menendez, 54, and his older brother, Lyle Menendez, 57, were originally sentenced to life in prison for the murder of their parents. But the men were resentenced to 50 years to life after a judge determined they did not pose an 'unreasonable risk' if they were released.
This made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole.
Supporters have pushed for the men to be released, saying the boys experienced abuse at the hands of Kitty and José Menendez. The brothers contended the shotgun killings were done in self-defense, with Lyle saying he confronted their father over the abuse of his younger brother.
Prosecutors accused the brothers of being motivated by financial gain and said the murders were committed in cold blood.
Erik Menendez expressed remorse during a May 13 resentencing hearing, where he described his crimes as 'cruel and vicious' and said he was 'directly responsible for it all.'
"My actions were criminal, selfish, cruel and cowardly," he said.
His older brother similarly took accountability for his past and said at the hearing that he was "deeply ashamed."
Their parole suitability hearing is scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers say they weren't allowed inside Baltimore ICE holding facility
Federal lawmakers tried to visit a Baltimore Immigration and Customs Enforcement holding facility on Tuesday, but were barred from entering, Rep. Kweisi Mfume said. CBS News' Shanelle Kaul has the latest details. Solve the daily Crossword


The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
The UK is slogging through an online age-gate apocalypse
People across the United Kingdom have been faced with a censored and partially inaccessible online landscape since the country introduced its latest digital safety rules on Friday. The Online Safety Act mandates that web service operators must use 'highly effective' age verification measures to stop kids from accessing a wide range of material, on penalty of heavy fines and criminal action against senior managers. It's primarily focused on pornography and content that promotes suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders, but the scope of 'priority content' also includes materials related to bullying, abusive or hateful content, and dangerous stunts or challenges. Effectively, web platforms must either set up an age verification system that poses potential privacy risks, default to blocking huge swaths of potentially questionable content, or entirely pull out of the UK. Residents are finding themselves locked out of anything from period-related subreddits to hobbyist forums — it's little wonder that they're turning to VPNs. Over the past several days, several large social media platforms have started requiring age verification in the UK to access certain features and types of content, in partnership with third-party software providers. Users typically have a choice between uploading bank card information, an image of government-issued ID, or a facial scan that estimates the user's age. Meta users likely won't have seen a huge difference over the weekend, as Facebook and Instagram rolled out age verification requirements a few years ago. Bluesky users in the UK, however, now can't access direct messaging capabilities until they complete the platform's new age verification process. Reddit has also blocked access to specific subreddits for UK-based users who don't complete its age verification process, some of which — r/periods, r/stopsmoking, r/stopdrinking, and r/sexualassault, for example — provide valued community support and resources for adults and minors alike. People are already finding loopholes for these systems. The face scanning systems for Persona and k-ID — the third-party verification software used by Reddit and Discord, respectively — can both be easily tricked using Death Stranding's photo mode. (Facebook and Instagram use a similar service called Yoti, which so far does not appear to have been fooled the same way.) X doesn't yet have a direct verification system, and is instead currently estimating age based on factors like account creation date, social connections, email addresses, and legacy verification. Accounts that don't have any of these signals in place are locked out of accessing certain content until X rolls out the ID and facial scanner-based checkers it's planning to release 'in the following weeks.' That includes protest footage and video game clips that depict violence — and users who aren't even based in the UK are reporting content restrictions as well. Outside the biggest platforms, some sites are entirely inaccessible. Cybersecurity company McAfee reports that more than 6,000 websites that host adult content have already implemented age assurance methods, but others have opted to geoblock their services in the UK. A wide variety of unrelated, innocuous websites have followed suit. That includes forums for owners of EV Renault vehicles, electronic music production, beaded jewelry patterns, and tech-focused blogs. Many smaller forums simply don't have the resources to support third-party verification systems or risk millions of dollars in fines. Wikipedia has voiced similar concerns over other Online Safety Act rules that could require it to verify its adult contributors, which the Wikimedia Foundation behind Wikipedia says could leave volunteers vulnerable to 'data breaches, stalking, lawsuits, or even imprisonment by authoritarian regimes.' As such, while it's still available for now, the platform is also considering blocking UK users to avoid compliance entirely. The UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, declined to offer an attributed on-the-record comment about the new age checks to The Verge. In unattributed statements to other outlets, it said it was 'now assessing compliance to make sure platforms have them in place, and companies that fall short should expect to face enforcement action.' UK residents have launched a parliamentary petition in response to the sweeping age verification requirements, urging the UK government to repeal the Online Safety Act, and describing it as 'far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society.' The petition has attracted more than 350,000 signatures at the time of writing, surpassing the 100,000 signatures needed to force the government to consider holding a debate over the demands. Meanwhile, some users have been finding ways to avoid undergoing verification entirely, expressing distrust over handing their personal information over to private overseas companies. Many restrictions can be evaded by using a VPN, which masks the user's true location by making it seem like they're in another country — one without the UK's rigid online safety rules. VPN apps currently occupy five out of the top 10 most popular free apps on Apple's iOS store in the UK. The top spot is currently held by Swiss-based VPN provider Proton VPN, which surpassed ChatGPT over the weekend. Proton VPN's general manager, David Peterson, told The Verge that it had seen a more than 1,800 percent increase in daily sign-ups from UK-based users since Friday. The UK is now one of the countries generating the highest usage for Proton VPN, according to Peterson, with the vast majority of new users signing up for free accounts. 'This clearly shows that adults are concerned about the impact universal age verification laws will have on their privacy,' said Peterson. 'The sign-up spike in the UK follows a similar pattern as when other governments put in place restrictions on communication or social media platforms, and shouldn't be surprising since services like Wikipedia, Reddit, and X are reportedly being asked to comply with age verification requirements.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jess Weatherbed Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Regulation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Security Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Web
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Unraveling claim Louisiana voted to force 9-year-old rape victim to carry pregnancy
Claim: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers voted "to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." Rating: What's True: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban, specifically allowing young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. What's False: The proposed bill did not reference or target any specific case of a pregnant 9-year-old. What's Undetermined: The claim originated from Louisiana state Rep. Patricia Moore's mention of a pregnant 9-year-old girl in her district. However, we were unable to independently confirm the existence or circumstances of the case. In July 2025, social media posts claimed that a nine-year-old girl in Louisiana was being forced to carry a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault. One Threads post (archived) with the claim reached over 85,000 reactions and 10,000 shares, as of this writing. It read: There is a nine year old CHILD in Louisiana being forced to carry a pregnancy that was the result of SA. A nine year old CHILD. Who cannot give birth naturally because she is a CHILD and will have to undergo a C Section if she or the fetus even survive. This should enrage you. This is not pro life. I will not argue (Threads user @savabigailbeluee) The claim first surfaced on social media in June 2025, when an X post (archived) claimed, "Louisiana votes to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." It also quoted Democratic state Rep. Patricia Moore allegedly saying, "I'm constantly hearing that God would take a bad situation and turn it into good," additionally claiming that Moore spoke out against a bill allowing abortions for child victims of rape "even after being made aware of the pregnant 9-year-old girl living in her district." Similar claims spread over the months on social media platforms including Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived) and Reddit (archived). In short, the claim was a mixture of true, false and undetermined information. In early June 2025, for the third year in a row, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban. Namely, the bill would have allowed young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. However, the proposed legislation did not reference any specific case of a pregnant 9-year-old. The claim stemmed from a statement by Moore, who said she was aware of a 9-year-old girl in her district who had become pregnant. In response to our request for clarification, Moore said she was informed of the case sometime in the last year by someone who did not disclose the child's name but said the girl was from Morehouse Parish. However, we were unable to independently verify the existence or circumstances of the child mentioned. Abortion law and recent bill on exceptions Louisiana's abortion ban took effect in 2022 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision eliminated federal protections for abortion and allowed individual states to set their own laws. Under the state's law, abortion is banned except in limited cases, such as when the pregnant woman's life is at serious risk, the fetus is "medically futile" or in cases of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage. There is currently no exception for rape or incest. The in-question legislation was Democratic state Rep. Delisha Boyd's third attempt to create exceptions to Louisiana's abortion law. The proposed bill aimed to allow abortions for victims under 17 who became pregnant as a result of specific offenses such as rape or sexual battery that, if committed against a minor, would make an abortion legal in those cases. The bill said the victim wouldn't need to provide a police report, forensic evidence or proof that someone was being prosecuted for the crime in order to get the abortion. Legislators discussed the bill during a House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice hearing on June 3, 2025. As shown in the image below, the bill that "provides for exceptions to the abortion laws of this state relative to rape and certain sex offenses" received three votes in favor and nine votes against. Therefore, the measure did not proceed to the House floor for further consideration. (Louisiana House of Representatives) You can access the full text of the bill here. A video circulating alongside the claims on Louisiana "denying abortion to 9-year-old rape victim" originated from an April 11, 2025, KLFY News 10 segment that aired before legislators voted on the bill. Moore mentioned pregnant 9-year-old Moore made the statement about the pregnant 9-year-old during the hearing at 38:57 of the video recording available via the Louisiana House of Representatives' official website. Moore stated that she was "aware of a nine year old, in [her] area, pregnant" and that she was struggling to reconcile her feelings about the case with her religious beliefs. Moore also added that her mother was raped at the age of 13 and had her at 14. "So I do struggle with it. I know we got to protect our children, but this point right now, I cannot vote yes," she said. Boyd, who authored the bill, also mentioned she was aware of a "Louisiana girl who was raped and gave birth at 13 years old and a 9-year-old girl who became pregnant after being sexually assaulted." All in all, while it's true that Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have allowed abortion in cases of child rape, there was no confirmed evidence that the decision directly affected a specific 9-year-old. Moore mentioned being aware of such a case during the hearing, but we were unable to independently verify the claim. As of this writing, Louisiana abortion law does not include an exception for rape or incest. - YouTube. Accessed 11 June 2025. Agenda - Administration of Criminal Justice. Accessed 11 June 2025. HB215. Accessed 11 June 2025. ---. Accessed 11 June 2025. LA House On-Demand Video. Accessed 11 June 2025. Louisiana House of Representatives 24-28. Accessed 11 June 2025. "Louisiana Lawmakers Reject Adding Exceptions for Some Rape Cases to Abortion Ban." AP News, 3 June 2025, Louisiana Laws - Louisiana State Legislature. Accessed 11 June 2025.