Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Jury says it has reached a verdict on 4 of 5 counts; deliberations to resume tomorrow
After nearly 12 hours of deliberations over two days, the 12-member panel sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian Tuesday afternoon saying it had reached a verdict on counts two, three, four and five — two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution — but was unable to reach a verdict on count one: racketeering conspiracy.
'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," the note read. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.'
After conferring with lawyers from both sides, Subramanian told the jury to continue deliberating the case. The panel will resume its deliberations on Wednesday morning.
Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in drug-fueled marathon sexual encounters called 'freak offs' and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to control his victims.
'The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik said during last week's closing arguments. 'It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. And it's time to find him guilty.'
Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lead defense attorney, argued that Combs is a 'swinger' and a drug abuser guilty of past domestic violence, but not the 'leader of a criminal enterprise' as prosecutors have portrayed him.
'He did not do the things he's charged with,' Agnifilo told jurors. 'He did what he did. But he's going to fight to the death to defend himself from what he didn't do.'
Follow the live blog below for the latest updates culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including ABC News, CNN, NBC News and the USA Today.
The jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian saying that it will finish deliberations for today and will continue tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. ET.
The group said it had reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs but will continue to deliberate the racketeering conspiracy charge.
After Judge Arun Subramanian, the prosecution and the defense team discussed the jury's last note about not reaching a verdict on the first count against Combs, Subramanian said he was going to tell the jury to keep deliberating.
Subramanian also said he is going to tell the group that if they're done deliberating for the day and want to pick up tomorrow instead, they can send another note to him.
When the jury entered the courtroom, Subramanin said, 'I received your note that you have reached verdicts on count 2-5 but not on count 1. I ask at this time that you keep deliberating."
The jury says it has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs.
'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," its note to the judge reads. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.'
Here is a review of all the criminal counts the hip-hop mogul is facing, and the possible sentences for each:
Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy
If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Count 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 1, who is Cassie Ventura
If convicted, Combs faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 1 and commercial sex workers
If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 2, who is "Jane"
If convicted, Combs faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 2 and commercial sex workers
If convicted, Combs faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
The jury has informed Judge Arun Subramanian that it has reached a verdict on four of the five counts against Combs.
'We have reached a verdict on counts 2, 3, 4 and 5," the note reads. "We are unable to reach a verdict on count 1 as we have jurors with unpersuadable opinions on both sides.'
Count 1 is the racketeering conspiracy charge.
Counts 2-5 are sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion and transportation to engage in prostitution.
Lawyers for both the prosecution and defense told Subramanian that they want him to tell the jury to continue deliberations.
The jury has sent another note to Judge Arun Subramanian. The panel has now sent the judge six notes since deliberations began on Monday.
Combs and attorneys from both sides have gathered inside the courtroom.
As deliberations began Monday in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, he was accused in a new civil lawsuit of drugging and raping a man, USA Today reports:
In 2021, the man, then in his 20s, alleges in the suit that he met a security guard for one of Combs's parties while stopped at a gas station in Los Angeles. The guard invited him to a party that evening, where he says he drank a glass of champagne on arrival that he later suspected had been drugged. [...]In the suit, lawyers for the man also claim that during the party, while he searched for a place to lie down, he passed out and was awoken by someone unbuttoning his pants. When he asked what was going on, a voice, which the lawsuit claims belonged to Combs, responded, "You're about to get that Diddy love."When the man protested, saying he had a wife and children, Combs allegedly told him he was going to receive a great massage, before he felt himself being undressed, covered in some form of liquid and penetrated anally, per the suit.
It's one of dozens of lawsuits that have been filed against Combs since Cassie Ventura's explosive 2023 suit accusing him of sexual assault.
In a statement to the paper, Combs's legal team said, "No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won't change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone — man or woman, adult or minor."
"We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason," Combs's legal team continued. "Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth, and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail in court."
Read more from USA Today: As Diddy jury deliberates, new civil suit against music mogul alleges drugging and rape
There is once again a large media presence outside the courthouse as the jury continues its deliberations.
Combs's family members, including his mother and several children, were seen coming and going, as well as a supporter who displayed a T-shirt that reads "A freako is not a R.I.C.O," a reference to the racketeering charges the hip-hop mogul is facing.
The jury requested to review Cassie Ventura's testimony about three incidents, including the 2016 assault at a Los Angeles hotel, and the events during and after her 2013 trip to the Cannes Film Festival.
Hotel assault: Ventura told the court that Combs erupted when she tried to leave a "freak off" at the InterContinental Hotel in L.A. on March 5, 2016, a violent assault that was caught on surveillance video and left her with bruises and a black eye. Combs later paid a hotel security guard $100,000 in cash for the surveillance footage. After it leaked, Combs publicly apologized for the assault. The defense did not deny it occurred, arguing that it was evidence of domestic violence and not the criminal behavior alleged by federal prosecutors.
Cannes incident: Ventura told the court that during a 2013 trip to the Cannes Film Festival in France, Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off their yacht. Then, on a commercial flight back to the U.S., she said he pulled up explicit videos of her having sex and threatened to release them unless she agreed to another "freak off." Ventura said she felt trapped and arranged one for him upon their landing.
The jury also asked to review testimony from Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort who testified that he was paid to have sex with Ventura numerous times and witnessed Combs physically abuse her at a New York City hotel years before the InterContinental assault.
Judge Arun Subramanian ordered that transcripts of testimony from Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort, be sent to the jury.
After a lengthy discussion with lawyers from both sides, Subramanian also said the jury will get the transcripts for Ventura's testimony about the days before and after the March 5, 2016, assault at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, as well as a transcript of Ventura's testimony regarding her 2024 Instagram post in response to the release of the surveillance video. (In the post, she described the assault as "domestic violence.")
Prosecutors objected to the inclusion of her testimony about the Instagram post, but Subramanian sided with the defense, which wanted it sent to the jury.
In its latest note to the judge, the jury is asking for transcripts of testimony from Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Daniel Phillip, a male escort.
Specifically, the jury wants to review Ventura's testimony about the 2016 assault at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, which was caught on surveillance video; her flight back from the Cannes Film Festival with Combs, during which she said he played "freak off" videos and threatened to release them; and what she told the court, if anything, about the "freak offs" she took part in with Phillip.
The panel also wants to review Phillip's testimony about a "freak off" he and Ventura had at the Essex Hotel in New York. (Phillip told the court that he witnessed Ventura "slumped over.")
Lawyers for both sides are now reviewing the transcripts to identify the corresponding excerpts so Judge Arun Subramanian can provide them to the jury.
The jury has sent another note to the judge, asking for transcripts of testimony from two witnesses: Cassie Ventura, Comb's ex-girlfriend, and Daniel Phillip, a male escort who testified he was paid to have sex with Ventura.
It is the fifth note sent to the judge by the jury since deliberations began Monday.
Such a request for transcripts is not unusual. The prosecution called 34 witnesses to testify over the course of six weeks.
Janice Combs, Sean "Diddy" Combs's mother, has been a constant presence at her son's trial. She arrived at the courthouse early Tuesday for the second day of deliberations.
Inside the courtroom, the defendant spoke briefly to his mom, who was seated in the gallery, before returning to his holding cell.
'Just relax, it's gonna be all right,' he said, according to a CNN report, adding that he loved her outfit.
Judge Arun Subramanian discussed with the prosecution and defense attorneys how to answer the jury's question about whether giving drugs to someone who asked for them qualifies as distributing controlled substances.
Subramanian sent a note to the jury saying, "In response to the jury's question, the Court refers the jury to page 37, lines 1 through 3 of its jury charge," or jury instructions.
Subramanian quoted the lines he's referencing in the jury charge in his response letter:
'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.'
Judge Arun Subramanian is now on the bench.
One of the notes the jury sent to Subramanian yesterday included a question about what qualifies as the distribution of controlled substances. Subramanian said he would answer the jury's question this morning.
The jury is expected to return at 9 a.m. ET to resume its deliberations.
Late Monday, the 12-member panel sent a note asking Judge Arun Subramanian to clarify what constitutes the distribution of controlled substances.
Subramanian asked prosecutors and defense attorneys to meet and confer about how to respond to the jury's question.
The judge told the jury he would respond this morning.
There is no timetable for a decision. Subramanian told jurors that they can choose how long to deliberate each day. Yesterday, the jury stayed until 5 p.m. ET.
Jury deliberations began late Monday morning after Judge Arun Subramanian gave the 12-member panel instructions on how to apply the law in deciding its verdict.
Just an hour into its deliberations, the jury sent a note to Subramanian saying it was concerned that one juror can't follow his instructions. Subramanian sent a note back reminding jurors of "their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law."
The jury sent another note asking the judge to clarify what constitutes the distribution of controlled substances. Subramanian said he would address the issue this morning.
It concluded deliberations after more than five hours without coming to a verdict.
The jury will resume deliberations on Tuesday at 9 a.m. ET.
The 12-person group began deliberations around 11:30 a.m. ET this morning, and concluded for the day after just over five hours.
The jury sent two more notes to Judge Arun Subramanian while deliberating Monday afternoon.
Subramanian, who returned to the bench to read the notes, said that the first was a question, which he said he would answer tomorrow. The second was a note informing the court that the jury plans to end deliberations today at 5 p.m. ET.
Earlier this afternoon, the jury sent the judge a note expressing concern that one of the jurors wasn't able to follow the judge's instructions on deliberations.
After receiving a note from the jury saying it is concerned that one member of the panel can't follow his instructions, Judge Arun Subramanian sent the following reply:
'I received your note. I remind every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law. With that instruction in mind, please continue deliberating.'
Subramanian also instructed jurors not to reveal any specifics about their deliberations in any future notes they send to the court.
Just an hour into its deliberations, the jury sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian saying it's concerned that one member of the panel can't follow his instructions.
"We have a juror, No. 25, who we are concerned cannot follow your honor's instructions," read the note signed by the foreperson, who asked Subramanian to address the situation.
The judge told lawyers for both sides to confer until 2 p.m. ET, when he will return to the bench to determine a response.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marcus Morris Taken Into Custody, Markieff Reacts To Arrest
Marcus Morris Taken Into Custody, Markieff Reacts To Arrest originally appeared on Fadeaway World. Former Los Angeles Clippers forward Marcus Morris was reportedly arrested in Florida and is being held without bond on a fraud charge. As reported by TMZ first, the statement read: "Marcus Morris Sr. has been arrested on a fraud charge in Florida ... TMZ has learned. The 13-year NBA veteran was taken into custody Sunday in Broward County, Florida, according to online booking records." The veteran forward was reportedly arrested on an out-of-state warrant for writing a bad check, implying that he bounced a check and is currently being held in custody for it. Morris has had run-ins with the authorities in the past as well. In 2012, the 35-year-old was charged with battery, leading him to enter a diversion program for rehabilitation purposes. In 2015, he was also charged with assault in an alleged brawl, but he was acquitted of these charges. The incident drew a direct response from his twin brother, Markieff. The former Lakers forward reacted to the news of his brother's arrest and tweeted: "The wording is crazy. Damn for that amount of money they'll embarrass you in the airport with your family. They got y'all really thinking bro did some fraud shit. They could have came to the crib for all that. When y'all hear the real story on this shit man. All I can say is Lesson learned. Bro will tell y'all tomorrow. This weird shit gave me a headache. Can't stop nothin!" The response from Markieff appears to present a positive outlook for the future as the matter seems to have been resolved. With implications that Marcus will be released soon to reveal the "real story," more information is expected to come to light. Update: The arrest was due to Morris' outstanding casino debt of over $1200, as per his agent. The Morris twins have been in the limelight as of late. Since Markieff's altercation with Nikola Jokic, the twins recently shared more on their beef with Jokic and his brothers. The back-and-forth has been an exciting sight for the fans. Marcus Morris Sr. was drafted by the Houston Rockets in 2011 with the 11th overall pick. After his rookie season, the forward was traded to the Phoenix Suns, where he was reunited with his brother. Morris has played on several teams throughout his career, including the Detroit Pistons, the Boston Celtics, and the Philadelphia 76ers. However, his brief stint with the Knicks and his time with the Clippers can be considered some of his most productive years in the league. With a career average of 12.0 points and 4.4 rebounds per game, Morris proved to be a solid role player on most teams he played for. Since playing with the 76ers and the Cavaliers in the 2023-24 season, Morris has remained a free story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iconic ‘60s Singer and Satirist Dies at 97
Iconic '60s Singer and Satirist Dies at 97 originally appeared on Parade. The year is 1967. The black-and-white TV screen reveals an impeccably dressed, bespectacled academic in his late 30s. His fingers fly over the ivory keys of a baby grand piano. The first words out of his mouth are 'when you attend a funeral.' What follows is a familiar narrative about loss making you think of your own relatives weeping for you at your funeral, sung with appropriate pomp and circumstance. Then… something shifts. 'Don't you worry,' the singer knowingly smiles at his audience. 'For if the bomb that drops on you/ gets your friends and neighbors too,/ there'll be nobody left behind to grieve.' The song, 'We Will All Go Together When We Go,' picks up as he merrily continues to sing of the likelihood of impending nuclear destruction. The audience is unabashed with their delight, for the man on the screen is not your average run-of-the-mill entertainer. He is, instead, the legendary satirist Tom Lehrer, 97, who passed away in his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts on Saturday, according to Variety. Born in Manhattan in 1928 to a Jewish family, math prodigy Lehrer started his higher education at Harvard when he was 15. Known for his razor-sharp wit and darkly funny, politically savvy songs, the Harvard-educated mathematics professor had a surprising entry into entertainment, and an even more unexpectedly short tenure there. In a 1997 interview with Elijah Wald, Lehrer described what led him to write satirical songs in the first place. He had no yearn for fame or even any real love of performance, despite his natural stage presence. Instead, 'I would listen to the radio and think, 'I can write a song as good as that,' and the problem is, they already have people who can write songs 'as good as that' so what do they need one more for? What is necessary is somebody that can write something different.'' Lehrer was certainly different from anyone who came before him, and his unique blend of musical wit would inspire generations of entertainers to come. In the wake of his death, his fans – including the famous ones – flocked to social media to pay their respects. 'My last living musical hero is still my hero but unfortunately no longer living,' Alfred 'Weird Al' Yankovic, 65, posted to Instagram. 'RIP to the great, great Mr. Tom Lehrer.' Fans filled the comments section with 'RIP's and condolences aplenty. 'I'll miss him forever,' wrote one distraught fan. In the early '50s, Lehrer self-released a few albums while still a professor by trade, with teaching posts including Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of California, according to The BBC. 'I don't like people to get the idea that I have to do this for a living,' Lehrer deadpanned to one live audience in discussing his academic roots. 'I could be making, oh, $3,000 a year just teaching.' After the release of his first album, 'the word spread like herpes,' Lehrer quipped to Wald, describing how his self-released record went old school viral, selling a shocking 10,000 copies according to Variety. Before long Lehrer was performing in nightclubs, concert halls, and recording live concerts for television, his next record rising to number 18 on the American charts. In his songs, Lehrer explored socially taboo subjects with his signature light tunes and unabashedly frank lyrics. Along with exploring nuclear conflicts in the aforementioned 'We Will All Go Together When We Go,' Lehrer took on sexuality in 'The Masochism Tango' and 'Smut,' racism in 'National Brotherhood Week,' and addiction in 'The Old Dope Peddler.' He also made time for some lighter subjects, like mocking classic spring ballads in his own ode to the season, 'Poisoning Pigeons in the Park.' He was in the height of his career in the '60s and '70s when, abruptly, Lehrer left the entertainment industry, eschewing fame in favor of a quiet life as a math teacher one quarter of the year, and a 'cheerful layabout' for the rest of the time. "I learned 25 years ago that you didn't have to shovel snow,'' he told Wald in the 1997 interview. "You didn't even have to see snow, and that was a great revelation to me.'' After his retreat from the public eye, Lehrer's popular satire returned to the press in 1980 when they were put together in the musical revue 'Tomfoolery.' Now, despite his passing, Lehrer's songs and his signature wit will live on forever, if the overflowing comments section of Weird Al's Instagram post is any indication. One fan perfectly mimicked Lehrer's signature sense of humor with a reference to his song 'Poisoning Pigeons in the Park' in the comment, 'The pigeons are safe, BUT AT WHAT COST.' Another fan commented with a reference to Lehrer's aforementioned song about bereavement, 'We Will All Go Together When We Go.' 'I thought we'd all go together,' the fan wrote along with a crying emoji. Iconic '60s Singer and Satirist Dies at 97 first appeared on Parade on Jul 28, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Morris Twins Finally Speak About The Beef With Jokic Brothers
The Morris Twins Finally Speak About The Beef With Jokic Brothers originally appeared on Fadeaway World. After nearly four years of silence, the Morris twins have finally opened up about their infamous altercation with Nikola Jokic and his brothers, an incident that sparked one of the NBA's most intense off-court storylines in recent memory. Appearing on a recent podcast, Marcus and Markieff Morris provided their unfiltered perspective on the 2021 scuffle that left Markieff sidelined for months and fueled a long-standing beef with the notoriously protective Jokic brothers. For the first time, the twins now break it all down, and they aren't holding back. Markieff Morris explained: "It was social media. It never went anywhere... It's a cheap shot. I did a basketball play. If you see the angle, I put my hand up, like I let it know I'm coming towards you. I fouled you. It's like a hard foul in the game." "If you hit me from behind, I think it's a cheap shot. I turn my back... If you asked me, I would have never ran. Like I'm physically walking. I'm walking away. So I'm not even in the mode of knowing you're about to hit me." "Like it's like a car crash. I'm just sitting regularly in the car, just hit you in the back. You're like, woo. So my thing was, I shoved the, I was going to do it. I don't take nothing back from it." "Like, I gave it out a ton of times. So when you get hit, it ain't like I feel sorry for myself..." The incident, which took place during a regular-season game between the Miami Heat and the Denver Nuggets, began with Markieff delivering what he described as a hard, intentional foul on Nikola Jokic. The three-time MVP retaliated by shoving Markieff from behind, a move many fans and players deemed a "cheap shot." The altercation left Markieff with whiplash and a neck injury that kept him out for 58 games. In the aftermath, the Jokic brothers, known for their intense loyalty to Nikola, took to social media, threatening the Morris twins and fueling a dramatic narrative that spilled out well beyond the court. For months, the situation remained quiet, with both sides avoiding escalation. But the threat of something more physical always lingered. Now, the Morris twins make it clear: if things had ever gone further, they liked their odds. Despite the bravado, the twins' tone wasn't overly aggressive, more defensive than instigative. The interview seemed to serve as a chance to finally clear the air and assert that they never feared the Jokic brothers, nor did they regret their actions. Time may have cooled tensions, but the scars, both literal and emotional, from that chaotic moment still story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jul 24, 2025, where it first appeared.