Oil prices - what will happen if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz?
It is the clearest signal yet that instability in the Middle East will spill over, after Israel's bombardments on Iran – bolstered by US airstrikes on three nuclear sites – entered a second week.
A third of the world's oil is derived from the region, with Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar being the biggest fossil fuel suppliers, so any disruption will, of course, shake up the market.
Fears are also rising that the Islamic Regime could follow through on their promise to close the Strait of Hormuz – the most strategic oil chokepoint in the world.
And if things get uglier, security experts have told Metro that the oil could jump from the current price of $78.96 per barrel to as much as $120 in a 'worst-case scenario'.
What is striking – and somewhat ironic – is that just 24 hours after the US hit Iran's nuclear assets, Washington is now urging China to pressure Iran to keep the 103-mile stretch of ocean open…
Oil prices surged to a five-month high as investors wait to see if Iran would retaliate against the US attacks on its nuclear sites.
A barrel of Brent crude oil – the benchmark price – jumped by around 1.53% to $78.19 a barrel as of around 7.15 CEST, while WTI rose 1.48% to $74.93 a barrel.
It is worth remembering that this is around the average price for 2024, but with Israel's war only escalating, this may not be the end of it.
No oil sites have actually been struck in Iran, so the market is calmer than expected.
That said, if the Islamic Regime's Supreme National Security Council does approve of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the oil price will jump even higher.
Yet for now, there is 'no hint of disruption', said Javier Blas, Bloomberg's energy and commodities columnist.
He said: 'Multiple oil tankers crossing the Strait of Hormuz this morning, both in and outbound. Not even a hint of disruption.
'Oil loading across multiple ports in the Persian Gulf appears normal. If anything, export rates over the last week are higher than earlier in June.'
Closing the Strait of Hormuz would have 'the most profound impact' on the global oil price and the stock market since the Iraq War.
Jason Pack, fellow at Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and host of the Disorder Podcast, told Metro that it would be 'such a committal step' for Iran that it would indicate which way the war is going.
He said: 'There are many reasons why the Iranians would not want to close it. For one, they would not be able to make any money from their oil.
'Their allies, particularly China, would not want that. China is dependent on Iranian oil and their economy is already suffering.'
Closing the Strait of Hormuz also does not happen automatically – there is no barrier or another contraption to physically stop the passing of ships. More Trending
Instead, Pack explained that Iran would plant underwater mines or attack a tanker, for example, to signal it.
This would also force insurance premiums for vessels to 'go through the roof.'
He added: 'This would then cause oil to have to be taken on pipelines and trucks to the Mediterranean, and that would cause tremendous delays, and a lot of oil will not be produced as there are not enough storage facilities.
'So there would be a huge price hit and the markets would go crazy.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Is it safe to travel to Qatar? Latest after cancelled Doha flights from UK
MORE: Is it safe to travel to Turkey? Latest Foreign Office tourist advice after US strikes on Iran
MORE: El Al airline announces rescue flights from Israel to London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Donald Trump baby balloon could take to the skies again when President visits UK
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Activists are plotting to relaunch the Donald Trump baby balloon when the President jets to the UK for his historic second official visit in September, Metro can reveal. The blimp, a giant, six-metre-long inflatable depicting Trump as a baby in a nappy grasping a mobile phone, became a symbol of protests against the controversial leader on his first state visit as President in July 2018. It was flown in the skies above Parliament as tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets. During the parade, it was flanked by a group of campaigners in red flying suits who were dubbed 'Trump babysitters'. The balloon later spawned copycat versions of London Mayor Sadiq Khan and former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, which were flown in 2018 and 2019, as well as counterfeit merchandise, including t-shirts and bobblehead figures. Leo Murray, who came up with the idea of the blimp to mock the President, has now revealed he is considering re-launching the inflatable or commissioning another for the visit later this year. Leo, from north London, told Metro: 'We will consider getting the blimp up again. It was very effective last time. The way it made fun of him worked. It certainly was eye-catching and gave everyone a smile. But the danger of Trump is worse than ever now. 'The original one is now in the Museum of London so we would have to speak to them. We crowdfunded the first one so maybe we could do that again and get a new one. It's too early to say but we will have plans. 'It's more vital than ever to protest. He should not be coming for a second visit the way Britain's sucking up to him is not what people here want to see, it's very poor. 'His first presidency was bad enough but in the end he didn't get to do much. This time round he is much more dangerous- we have to oppose this visit and make ourselves heard.' To create the blimp, Leo worked with designer Matt Bonner. It was then built by Leicestershire-based company, Imagine Inflatables. While the majority of people praised the inflatable, it faced some criticism, including from the President himself. Trump said at the time the blimp made him feel unwanted, adding: 'I guess when they put out blimps to make me feel unwelcome, no reason for me to go to London. 'I used to love London as a city. I haven't been there in a long time. But when they make you feel unwelcome, why would I stay there?' Nigel Farage also described it at the time as 'the biggest insult to a sitting US President ever.' In response to the criticism, the office of London Mayor Sadiq Khan said the balloon was recognised as a legitimate form of demonstration, which is why it was allowed to fly. It was later flown in Ireland during protests in 2019 but plans to launch it over Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland that year were halted after the authorities refused permission. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Museum of London has since bought the original blimp and has it on display in its protest collection. It described the blimp as an 'extraordinary and imaginative idea' and a 'response from Londoners'. The Museum's director, Sharon Ament, said the blimp was an example of the British love of satire. She said: 'We use humour a lot. And we poke fun at politicians. This is a big – literally – example of that.' Leo added: 'Last time the blimp was very effective and could be again. 'The world is a much more dangerous place because of Trump winning the presidency again. We need to make our voices heard.' In February, Trump was invited to visit the UK for a second unprecedented state visit by King Charles. More Trending Buckingham Palace confirmed on Tuesday that Trump and his wife, First Lady Melania Trump, will be in the UK from 17 to 19 September and will be hosted at Windsor Castle. A full schedule for the visit is yet to be released. The House of Commons breaks up the day before so he will not be making an address to Parliament as is the usual protocol for a state visit. Trump said ahead of his visit: 'I think I want to have a good time and respect King Charles because he's a great gentleman.' He added that the UK was a 'great place'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Five key questions answered about the Trump administration's Epstein files chaos MORE: Kevin Spacey begs for release of Epstein files and insists he 'has nothing to fear' MORE: 'I shared a prison dorm with Ghislaine Maxwell – she isn't suicidal in the least'
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Brit parents jailed in Iran fell into a common trap, there's only one way out'
Former Iranian hostage Anoosheh Ashoori believes that British couple Lindsay and Craig Foreman were detained in Iran on espionage charges after falling victim to a common 'trap' Former Iranian hostage, Anoosheh Ashoori has sent an urgent message about the power of hope to a "courageous" British couple jailed in Iran. Lindsay and Craig Foreman, a British couple, have spent over six months detained in Iran after they were arrested during a motorcycle trip across the world. But it wasn't just the adventure of a lifetime for the couple. They were also undertaking a project as they went, hoping to discover what makes up a good life, forge connections, and learn about strong communities. They had been travelling through Iran, and posting on social media about the wonderful interactions they had with people they met - when suddenly their family lost contact with the couple. They were arrested in early January by Iranian authorities on charges of espionage - something their family categorically denies. Anoosheh Ashoori, a British-Iranian businessman, was imprisoned in Tehran's infamous Evin Prison from 2017 until 2022. He was arrested when visiting his elderly mother in Iran, blindfolded and abducted in the back of a car before being convicted as being a spy for Israel, though he had never even been to the country. He was released alongside Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe in 2022, and he told the Mirror he "deeply admired" Lindsay and Craig's project. "Lindsay and Craig's project, I deeply admire their vision. Their commitment to human connection and building hope - even in uncertain or dangerous places - shows a kind of courage that is increasingly rare today." The 71 year old added that he wasn't surprised that the couple had posted so positively about their time in Iran before their arrest, but he called visiting Iran under the current regime "a trap". "Iran is home to a deeply hospitable people and an ancient, rich culture. But it is vital not to confuse the Iranian people with the Islamic regime. "For the past 47 years, Iran has been under the control of a corrupt theocracy. It is, in many ways, a nation under internal occupation - not by a foreign force, but by an ideology. "Lindsay and Craig's posts about the kindness of Iranians are understandable. Our people are generous, curious, and welcoming, which is why many travellers feel compelled to visit, despite the risks. The desire to connect with such a rich culture, which is over 7000 years old, is strong. However, the current regime can quickly turn that goodwill into a trap." Since his release from Evin, Anoosheh has worked with charities like Hostage International - for which he recently ran the London Marathon - and Amnesty International. With the latter, he produced an incredibly moving exhibition, entitled 'Surviving Evin' that featured a dried Morning Glory flower he managed to grow during his time in prison. Anoosheh had been given a packet of seeds by a fellow inmate, Jamal, after moving into a new ward of Evin Prison and initially feeling "adrift". With time and careful attention, he managed to grow beautiful pink flowers, that to him, and the other prisoners who visited him in what became known as 'Ashoori's Corner' became a powerful symbol of hope and positivity. The former hostage explained through his profound artwork that even in the "unbearable" living conditions, hope could still be found - and must be clung onto. "Without hope, I would not have survived even a single day in Evin. Hope is what keeps the human spirit from collapsing under unbearable conditions. It's the knowledge that you are not forgotten, that people outside are speaking up and doing all they can to save you. That alone can be life-saving," he explained. "There was a point when I lost hope completely - I attempted suicide three times. Fortunately, I survived. So when I read about [Lindsay and Craig's] weight loss, I understand it deeply. Even in brief calls, their loved ones must use every second to remind them: 'You are not forgotten. We are fighting for you.' That message is crucial." When asked what advice he would give to the Foreman's family - who have launched a campaign to secure the couple's release - Anoosheh told the Mirror, "My advice is clear: apply as much pressure as possible. "History has shown us that the UK government only responds to pressure from families and from the public. Speak out, and speak loudly. Keep pushing until results are achieved. Silence helps no one."
Metro
21 hours ago
- Metro
How to save 'broken' Britain? Readers discuss patriotic millionaires and propose
Further to the divided nation described in the Shattered Britain survey by More In Common (Metro, Mon). It is ironic that so many people in this country use words such as 'broken' and 'shattered' about Britain when thousands of migrants risk life and limb to get here. Maybe some of them will see this report – in which the most common words used to describe the country were 'broken', 'mess', 'struggling', 'divided' and 'expensive' – and decide not to come! And yet, I do not think the country is as bad as they say it is. All the people I see are quite friendly. When I go shopping, I can always find the things I want. In the odd case of not finding something, there is always another store to find it in. I am sure there are many people in many lands that would like that. But there is a problem with politicians. Labour is not the party it used to be. Instead of helping the underprivileged, it seems to be attacking them. The really galling thing is there seems to be no idea about trying to get any money from the very rich. There was an article in Metro about a group of wealthy individuals who call themselves Patriotic Millionaires who are willing to be taxed more. Has Labour even considered this? Larry, Salford
